While we are obliged to somehow steer a course through a world gone mad, we also need to remind ourselves of just how interesting, as Confucius might say, these times truly are. Touching base with reality is a necessity if we are not to slip our moorings and slowly drift away from the truth, because the art of survival necessitates at least some normalization of the abnormal. Otherwise, we would be unable to function; instead of merely shouting at the TV or the laptop, we'd be cussing out all and sundry and howling at the moon and, while this may be the most authentic response to the blob and its enablers, it's not guaranteed to put food on the table nor make for a life that's bearable.
And so, I return to a subject that is about as verboten as can be and, along with climate change and every single item on the woke agenda, a symbol of our schizophrenic society; the 'vaccines'. The enemy, as well as insisting on The Great Pretending, is also confident that the passage of time will blunt our outrage and fog our memories. But while the lock-downs and mask mandates may have been vanquished (for now), the jab is still a pervasive presence. Not necessarily in terms of uptake any more, as even the terminally gullible seem to have finally gotten the message - even if it took them four or five shots before the penny dropped. I refer instead to the ongoing effects of the clot shot and the slow reveal of who knew what and did what, when.
There are still any number of misconceptions about the 'vaccine' itself and how it came to be foisted upon us and it may not surprise you to learn that vast swathes of what we have either been told or encouraged to believe are completely false. So, let's revisit Operation Warp Speed and its subsequent implementation, utilizing information that has been in the public domain for some considerable time – but which has received little in the way of attention – supplemented with the very latest revelations; specifically, official foreknowledge of the mechanisms of harm, the foregone conclusion that was the clinical trials, the nature of the injures themselves and the smoke and mirrors surrounding the authorizations.
First, some basic facts that ought to be more widely known. mRNA technology goes back to the 1980s. The material itself instructs the host body to produce a foreign substance, in this case a pathogenic spike protein. As such, it hijacks our genetic structure. However, the Federal Drug Agency and the UK and EU equivalents are not allowed to authorize experimental gene therapies, so they call them vaccines instead. But, they are not vaccines – that's the first big lie.
Gene therapy technology has always been problematic. Nobody could find a way to use it without inducing serious, short term side effects, which increased in line with the number of shots required. It was believed that the polyethylene glycol (PEG) element of the vaccine, the coating on the nano particles, was mainly responsible. As a report from an executive at Moderna itself stated,
“Currently, no mRNA therapeutic is approved for use in humans, and a beneficial safety profile in patients still has to be demonstrated. A first clinical application will likely not be a prophylactic vaccine, because the tolerance for side effects is very low for a drug that is injected into healthy individuals.”(1)
And yet the first clinical application has been precisely that. Additionally, it was found that a majority of people have anti PEG antibodies in their immune systems and that approximately 10% of vaccinated people may have an adverse effect. For that reason, it was recommended that all patients should be screened prior to the administration of a PEGylated drug;(2) a process that was conspicuously absent come the roll-outs.
There was at least one other reason that mRNA had yet to prove 'safe and effective' - a process known as codon optimisation:
“Trying to tell your body to generate proteins is hard for many reasons. One of them is the fact that when you try to run the protein information via ribosomes which process that code and generate the protein, it can be very slow or can get stuck during the process.
Luckily, scientists found a way to overcome this problem, by doing code substitution: instead of using the original genetic code to generate the protein, they changed the letters in the code so the code would be optimized. This is known as Codon Optimization.”(3)
Once again, it transpires that messing about with natural processes has consequences beyond what was intended - if, of course, we hold that any of the downsides of the 'vaccines' are indeed unintended which, as we shall see, is a position that only those suffering from a severe shortage of grey matter could seriously contemplate. In any event, it turns out that this method of speeding up the production of spike protein engendered by the mRNA 'vaccines' is deeply flawed, and was known to be so prior to the development of the Covid 'vaccines'.
This is because the optimization process is prone to producing misfolded proteins and misfolded proteins are known to produce completely unforeseen consequences. When I say unforeseen, what I really mean is that the specific consequence is unforeseen, not the range of possible outcomes. They are largely known and none of them are good; Alzheimers, Parkinsons and heart disease as well as a number of other possible conditions. This was known as long ago as 2011.(4)
Pfizer has admitted that the optimization process results in elevated levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which in turn is an early marker for heart failure. So, why optimise codons? Because unless they do, the 'vaccines' won't produce enough protein to be 'effective'. Can you sense the circular logic? They have to make the jab dangerous or it won't be able to protect against something that's dangerous.
So, we have a technology that has had billions invested in it, yet it still doesn't work and doesn't look like it ever truly will. In fact, no product using mRNA gene therapy had even made it as far as clinical trials in humans, because their safety profiles were not robust enough:
“Researchers explored this technique in every way. In 2019, the final meta-analysis was published, i.e., a summary of all studies with mRNA vaccines. Regulatory authorities rejected the use of such vaccines in humans and animals....
The respiratory viruses are seasonal, and they return each year after mutating. Vaccination against such viruses (for now) is fiction. For example, vaccines against the influenza virus are effective in only about 2.8 percent of healthy young people and the elderly – zero.”(5)
The standard path to FDA approval could not even be commenced; well, not without an emergency, anyway. And not without the playing field being cleared of existing competition, a course of action subsequently adopted by the FDA (and the European Medicines Agency, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency in the UK and others) when they prohibited the use of off-label antivirals such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and bound other products up in regulatory red tape, rather than a swift approval (fluvoxamine).(6)
It was also necessary to change the definition of the words 'vaccine' and 'vaccination', although this was a delayed-reaction response. Authorities didn't deem it wise to come clean about the true nature of the technology, but were forced into damage-limitation mode when it became apparent that the jab didn't do what it said on the tin. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) previously used these forms of words, which would echo public understanding of the terms' meanings:
“Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”(7)
The new wording, which the CDC maintained hadn't changed “the overall definition”,(8) did, in fact, completely change the overall definition:
“Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.”(9)
So, instead of a vaccine that worked, we now had an experimental gene therapy that didn't. And, in short order, a pandemic that wasn't a pandemic, but which could be made to resemble an emergency if all the working parts of the 'system' could be brought to heel and given their marching orders. An emergency was required because it was the only way that clinical trials could be short-circuited; properly conducted trials would have been the Achilles heel of any mRNA product, as had been concluded by 2019.
But, if the regulatory authorities (all captured agencies, in any event) could be provided with the merest morsel of justification, they could authorize experimental products using emergency powers. In this way, dangerous products – characterized as vaccines - would find their way to market. But first, there needed to be some sort of trial, if only for the sake of appearances. And in reality (in the US), the trials performed precisely that function:
“The reality is that the Covid vaccines, as a result of successive federal legislative actions which evolved over decades, was legally categorized as a “countermeasure” under a “public health emergency.” Such “countermeasures” require no specific regulatory approval process prior to dissemination. All a countermeasure needs is the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that “it may be effective.” (10)
Warp Speed was run by a general in the Department of Defense, not by Fauci or any of his minions; so that was the legal position in the States. Quite how the UK and Europe convinced themselves that they could do likewise, I know not - perhaps they simply preferred to take the clinical trial data, such as it was, at face value. But Pfizer and Moderna were merely obliged to go through the motions, so that the pre-determined outcome could be arrived at decorously. The trials themselves were incomplete, gerrymandered and fraudulent.
Officially, the clinical trials were a couple of months into Phase III before they were abandoned; apparently, the various regulatory agencies had seen enough to persuade them that the 'vaccines' were 'safe and effective'. Suddenly, their stance of the previous year was reversed. Now it appeared that vaccination against a respiratory disease, far from being “fictional”, was essential. And to hell with testing.
However, this is what is supposed to happen with clinical trials. After laboratory testing in cell lines, animal testing is next, followed by a number of phases where the product is to be refined and then refined further. You would ordinarily get to the end of animal testing in 3-6 years. This is because there are a variety of treatments being tested – various amounts of the 'vaccine', possibly different fillers (adjuvants), various treatment protocols (including the number and timing of them) and so forth. It is a process of discovery, all designed to establish which combination (if any) is safe and effective, not just in the short term, but in the long term too. The bar is set high, in theory at least; the vaccine has to be safe, necessary and more effective than anything else in nature or in a pharmacy.
In order for these trials to be completed, there are also control groups; those participants that get a placebo, rather than the treatment itself. To obviate both the well documented mental side of disease treatment – the placebo effect - and the tendency of scientists to give the game away to participants, the best studies are double blind; neither the human guinea pigs in the trial nor the front line researchers know who is getting what. Over time, the optimal version of the vaccine will be identified and, as that happens, more and more people are enrolled in the trials in order to test the product rigorously. It's not unusual for the whole process to take ten years, although a large number of products never even make it as far as human trials.
But the Pfizer and Moderna trials were a farce. Whilst animal trials were conducted, they were seriously curtailed and run at the same time as early human trials - and they were not a resounding success. Details are sketchy, but we know that they were abandoned in the autumn of 2020; we just don't know why. Senate hearings in Texas have heard evidence that some of the animals died.(11) I need hardly point out that, whether successful or catastrophic, running these trials concurrently with human trials is unethical and pointless. The entire purpose of properly conducted animal trials is to eliminate as much danger as possible before moving onto human trials. In contrast, the entire purpose of Pfizer's animal trials was to fudge the data. That tendency was replicated in the human trials, too.
“And there's the appearance that there was manipulation of safety data analysis and reporting in the Phase 1, 2, 3 clinical trials for some of these products by focusing on patients who had completed the study per protocol, as opposed to those that entered the study as intended to treat.
That's a subtle distinction, but what it means is that if you've only accepted one dose of vaccine under those clinical trial protocols and you have an adverse event, and you decide to drop it out, or they gently suggest that you shouldn't take the second dose, that information about the adverse events that you received — which would have made you at even higher risk for the second dose — is lost. It's not included in the safety analysis.
This is a classic way to manipulate safety data in clinical research, and it's strictly forbidden.”(12)
If we simply cast our minds back to the summer/autumn of 2020; do you remember there being any real doubt about the outcome of the clinical trials? Were we all on tenterhooks? That's not what I recall. Operation Warp Speed was predestined to succeed, no matter what. Governments pretended that all their eggs were in one basket, ignored the fact that they had banned treatments that worked and gaslit the media and the permanently timorous into believing that the 'vaccines' were our only chance to avert disaster. The gene therapies were always going to be approved.
And, sure enough, the Covid ‘vaccines’ emergency authorization (in the UK, the US, Europe and elsewhere) was granted after just ten months. At which point we were assured that everything had been done to ensure they were 'safe and effective', the two buzzwords that are repeated, ad nauseum. However, there seems to be a cognitive issue here; if the 'vaccines' are safe and effective, and that state was accomplished in ten months, why does it normally take 6-10 years?
If they'd conducted proper clinical trials, they would have tested for genotoxicity – whether the 'vaccine' messed with our DNA. Had they done so, they would have discovered that genes from the 'vaccine' can permanently integrate into the DNA of some of the 'vaccinated'.(13) They would also have found that the rogue plasmid DNA found in the 'vaccines' in therapeutic amounts – “the lab-based circular DNA particles that is replicated in big vats of poo and then used to create the mRNA that goes into your “short-lived” vaccine -(14) is also capable of entering the nucleus of human cells in at least five different ways.(15) This is not good:
“...in general, if you want to have an effect on an organism (e.g., a person) using genetic methods, you can do this temporarily with RNA – which will then produce protein and should then degrade so it doesn’t produce any more. But if you want to make it more permanent you would use DNA and integrate it into the genome. Then when called on it will produce RNA which will produce protein. That process could happen for ever under the right circumstances.”(16)
If foreign DNA gets into the human genome, matters can go seriously pear-shaped, swiftly. Cancer is the biggest risk, as any interference with cell growth and replication is problematic. If it results in uncontrollable cell growth, cancer is a likely outcome. All that is required is for a fragment of DNA to attach itself to the human DNA in a problematic spot and insertional oncogenesis is the result – and there are billions of such fragments in the 'vaccine'.(17) Indeed, one of the first gene therapy attempts was halted for this very reason.
If Pfizer had even done the animal trials properly (instead of four months, three to six years) they would have discovered that their 'vaccine' caused autism in new-born rats, when the mother rat had been injected during pregnancy.(18) These rats didn't socialise well and exhibited “abnormal, repetitive patterns of behavior”,(19) with the males being particularly affected. One would think that this would have caused some alarm, in normal circumstances. One might also think that, in nearly forty years of experimentation, this outcome could well have been previously observed, at some juncture; just not reported.
Clinical trials – along with the truthful disclosure of ingredients – would have revealed that the Pfizer 'vaccine' is also laced with SV40, an infamous monkey virus that functions as a gene enhancer. It somehow contaminated the polio vaccine back in the 1950s,(20) and it is so dangerous that regulators still check for it. SV40 generally turns a gene on, forever. And it seems that, far from being a result of incompetence, its inclusion was required:
“...not only did the people that made this product not seem to care whether there was a cancer-causing SV40 enhancer sequence injected into recipients, but that sequence was coincidentally the only one that could have been chosen that had a specific property of facilitating the transport of any foreign DNA that happened to be present into the nucleus.”(21)
The problems set out above are but a selection; there are many other shortcomings associated with the mRNA gene shots. Despite the protestations to the contrary of the wholly corrupted medical profession, at least some of these issues became readily apparent in short order. While doctors and nurses were promoting the inoculation, they were also bearing witness to a tsunami of immediate post-jab emergencies requiring an ambulance response.
In Israel, there was a more than 25% increase in ambulance calls to treat cardiac arrests in the young (16-39 year olds) when the 'vaccination' roll-out kicked into gear between January and May 2021.(22) All over the US, the UK, New Zealand and elsewhere the demand for ambulances exploded. As early as February 2021, 'vaccine' clinics were calling emergency services prior to administering the shots, putting them on standby.(23) Yet, still the carnage was allowed to continue. The Scottish ambulance service was reporting excess calls in the summer of 2021 of around 10,000 a month.
By the spring/summer of 2022, by which time multiple 'booster' shots had been authorized (simply the original Wuhan shot once more), the England NHS ambulance service was in crisis (again), with a 77% rise in serious safety incidents over the previous year.(24) Locations as disparate as Canada, Shanghai and Australia were all melting down.(25) The NHS still hasn't recovered and doesn't look like it's ever going to. In 2022/23, nearly 400,000 patients waited at least 24 hours in A&E departments across England. Apparently, there simply aren't enough hospital beds any more.(26)
'Experts' are universally befuddled. They don't, for instance, seem able to decode whistle-blower information that sets out the answer in unambiguous terms, such as this evidence from New Zealand.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Front-line workers knew immediately; but the credentialed class are still performing backflips. By November 2021, FIFA had recorded a 500% increase in player deaths – 183 professional athletes and coaches had collapsed and 108 of them had died.(27) That trend has continued. Since the advent of the 'vaccine', at least 2,081 cardiac arrests or similarly similar issues have been noted, with 1,457 deaths, all amongst high-level athletes. It is likely that the true figure is considerably higher – Good Sciencing records that :
“There are many countries or states with large populations, that have almost no reports in our list. That probably means events are not being reported to us.”(28)
This is atypical. Much of it is being hidden by the likes of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter/X (the latter of which is still far from being what one would expect from a self-professed 'free speech absolutist') and players' 'vaccine' status is now a closely guarded secret, in stark contrast to days past when professionals were more than happy to virtue signal:
“Now, none of the clubs want to reveal this information. None of their sponsors want to reveal it. The government doesn’t want it. Insurance companies aren’t asking for it. The players have been told not to reveal it. Most of the players’ relatives will not mention it. None of the media are asking this question.”(29)
Pre the 'vaccine' era, the average was 66 deaths per year, the primary cause being congenital abnormalities. None of the excess deaths are the result of such conditions; they are all 'unexplained', although health officials are now trying to tell us that yet another variant, the JN.1 strain, will cause a “heart failure pandemic”, in what is transparently one more attempt to pin the tail on the wrong donkey.(30)
Figure 3
Athletes are not alone. This is the UK data on non-respiratory mortality and it's perfectly clear that the spring of 2021 was a turning point. 2023 was 9.5% above the pre-Covid 2015-2019 average.
Figure 4
“Total excess deaths for the four years (compared to 2015-2019) have now reached around 225,000, which should under normal circumstances lead to a fall of around 9% (i.e., 20,000) in annual deaths in subsequent years due to mortality displacement as deaths of the old and vulnerable are brought forward by some unusual event. Instead, what we see is excess mortality in 2023 reaching a new peak of 10.6% with currently no signs of slowing up. Once you take into account that instead of 9% fewer deaths we have 10.6% more, this adds up to a huge nearly 20% rise above expected levels.”(31)
What's more, it's the younger age groups taking the brunt. Infant deaths are up 24%, 1-14 year old deaths are up 22%, and the 15-44 category is up 20%.(32) The 'experts' are required to plumb new depths of ignorance and ignore what is staring them in the face. Cancer in American under-fifties is up nearly 13% since 2000 and Western Europe and Australia are also under the cosh;(33) these are some of the most heavily 'vaccinated' populations in the world.(34) In Switzerland, the number of patients receiving cancer treatment jumped 73% between 2020 and 2021.
Figure 5
Death and disability are stalking the highly 'vaccinated' countries. In the US, yearly excess mortality (from 2020 to 2023) was most pronounced in the younger age groups, with 2021 being the annus horriblis; the 0-24 age group showed a 21% rise – followed by two years of 20% and 17% - and the 25-44 year olds died at a rate that was 38% above the average, followed by a 22% increase in 2022, as well. Every age group up to 75-84 had at least one year in which excess mortality topped 15%.(35)
European countries also had some catastrophic results. Austrian 15-24 year olds are being decimated; 47% excess deaths in 2021, followed by 70% and 109% in the succeeding years.(36) Portugal, possibly the most jabbed country in Europe, is having a torrid time, with some values in the 50% plus range. Italy, Spain, Finland and the Netherlands – some of the true believers – have also seen large increases in excess mortality in the young. In Australia, it's the over 75s who are being weeded out at a rate that is 20% in excess of previous years.(37) There has also been a massive increase in disabilities, approximately 10- 20 for each death. This is the picture in America.
Figure 6
Fortunately for us, three years on doctors are still selflessly;
“...racing to figure out what is making them sick, and how to identify young people who are at high risk. They suspect that changes in the way we live—less physical activity, more ultra-processed foods, new toxins—have raised the risk for younger generations.”(38)
That's probably it. There's also a worldwide increase in childhood pneumonia – apparently, it's a veritable “global wave”, from China to Denmark, the UK to Argentina.(39) In the Netherlands, cases among 5-14 year olds are double last year's. Strep A epidemics have broken out in multiple countries, with infections more severe in nature than previously.(40) I am no scientist, but I can't help but notice that Cambridge University recently published a study which noted that a quarter of the 'vaccinated' now have Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).(41) The media coverage of the study inferred that no adverse effects result which, as a conclusion, is breathtakingly dumb and seems designed to simply close off an avenue of debate. The scientists themselves were somewhat less faint-hearted:
“Our findings suggest SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination could alter the immune response to other pathogens, which cause both vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable diseases. This is particularly relevant in children as they: have extensive exposure to microbes at daycare, school, and social occasions; are often encountering these microbes for the first time; and receive multiple vaccines as part of routine childhood vaccination schedules.”(42)
That the 'vaccines' damage the immune system is no longer news in the real world; only in the carefully curated pretend world of the mainstream. A 2018 paper by last year's Nobel Prize winner highlighted the fact that mRNA treatments caused a form of AIDS-like immunodeficiency.(43) There are now nine studies confirming that HIV tests turn positive after 'vaccination'.(44) These are false positive tests which are, instead, detecting immunodeficiency.
The Cleveland Clinic data put the final nail in that particular coffin. The management did not mandate the shots, so there was a cross-section of compliance with Sleepy Joe's 'mandate'. The results showed that the more doses of the original 'vaccine' one took, the worse the resistance to Covid (I would prefer to say 'respiratory disease', due to the near impossibility of isolating 'Covid' with a PCR test, or even confirming its existence).
Figure 7
It seems that each extra jab causes progressively more damage. The CDC All-Cause Mortality data shows that the 'vaccinated' have an extra 7% probability of dying per jab per year. For a 30 year old man, that translates to this.
Figure 8
Which will ruin your day if you're vaxxed. Prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, are also on the rise, the result of those misfolded proteins that accumulate in the cells. The culpability of the spike protein in the 'vaccine' was already being called out by January 2021, not that our latter-day 'experts' have felt the need to address this particular aspect of 'vaccine' toxicity yet. To say nothing of the surge in cases of heart damage and myocarditis, which over 3,400 academic papers are laying squarely at the door of the 'vaccine'.(45)
The reduction of existing populations via the mechanism of the Covid jab is, therefore, not a wild conspiracy theory; it's a racing certainty, given the known science. That alone would be devastating enough. But, there's more – much more. The 'vaccine' also prevents life from flowering in the first place.
Pfizer knew that, despite what the public were being told, the mRNA did not stay at the injection site in the deltoid but, within 48 hours, was transported (via the bloodstream) to the spleen, liver, adrenals, lymph nodes, testes and ovaries.(46)(47) They weren't the only ones in the know; the FDA were informed on November 11th 2020, which is to say before the EGT were rolled out.(48) There shouldn't have been any confusion on this point. There is a paper from 2018 which shows that mRNA passes into the testes and wreaks reproductive havoc.(49)
Both also knew that the lipid nanoparticles which contain mRNA cross the amniotic membrane and that the assurances that the EGTs are safe and effective for pregnant women was based on the observation of 44 pregnant rats for six weeks.(50) That was it – no human trials, just some French rats. They didn't even bother to dose the male rats, only the female rats that mated with them.(51)
But even this excuse for a trial was compromised by the fact that all the newborn rats were euthanized before any study could be made of their reproductive capabilities, thus rendering it invalid. In addition, a clear indication that Pfizer knew of the risks can be found in the trial structures themselves, as they explicitly excluded pregnant women. Not only that, but the men in the trials were required to
“Abstain from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle. They must be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing age on a long-term and persistent basis and they must agree to remain abstinent.
OR the men in the Pfizer trial:
Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person.”(52)
But despite these stringent requirements (in trials that commenced as long ago as summer 2020), around 270 women still got pregnant after they had received at least one injection but, in yet another breach of acceptable practice, around 230 of them disappeared from the data set with no explanation provided. We may perhaps infer one, nonetheless, as of the 36 women that remained under observation, a staggering 28 lost their babies.(53)
Men weren't spared either. Once again, the structure of the trial is clearly indicative of foreknowledge. Obvious tests were not performed, the better to conceal the existence of inconvenient truths. No tests were carried out on men's semen (54) or on the development of offspring,(55) even though it was already known that the mRNA reached the testes.(56) Men were not allowed to donate sperm, either.(57)
The aforementioned 2018 study did the work that the clinical trials avoided and detailed the damage that is inflicted on men. The epididymis, which transports sperm from the testes, is compromised. The Sertoli cells, vital to the development of the testes, are also damaged as are the Leydig cells, which are responsible for the production of testosterone. This compromises masculinity and is especially problematic when the EGT is injected into pre-pubescent boys. To add to the devastation of the male productive system, anti-sperm antibodies were also found in male sperm, as early as February 2021. Not before then, of course, because Pfizer had avoided doing the requisite testing. These antibodies prevent the sperm from reaching the egg and fertilising it.(58)
Despite all this evidence, at no point (even now) has anybody in medical officialdom acknowledged the existence of any reproductive problems. In February 2022, Fauci's NIH stated that “Covid 19 vaccination does not reduce the chances of reproduction.”(59) There is, in fact, a 22% drop in male fertility after the first two injections and the motility, concentration and total count of semen all decrease over a period of six months.(60) Additionally, the female reproductive system is replete with the type of receptors that the spike protein is attracted to and, wherever that spikes lands, inflammation results:
“...Inflammation in the ovary can number one, kill off eggs and number two, inhibit the ability for that egg to be robust in terms of implantation, in terms of getting to full ovulation and or release.”(61)
The EMA were finally forced to admit the obvious when Pfizer's court-mandated document dump landed in the first half of 2023. Prior to that, the usual incessant gaslighting was in full swing. A study, conducted in part by the CDC and reported in the New England Medical Journal, purported to show that the rate of miscarriage among 'vaccinated' mothers-to-be was in line with what would be expected of the unvaccinated; around 12% (104 out of 827).
As is now depressingly familiar, upon closer examination, the finding was deliberately and inexcusably misleading. By their definition, a miscarriage occurs prior to 20 weeks of pregnancy. However, 700 of the 827 were ‘vaccinated’ in their third trimester, between weeks 27 and 40 and were therefore unable to miscarry as per the terms of the study. It follows that the true finding was that 104 out of 127 women ‘vaccinated’ prior to 20 weeks lost their baby, a catastrophic rate of 82%;(62) an almost identical rate of miscarriage as that found in the clinical trial data (78%). There can be little doubt that the attack on the reproductive system is comprehensive and deliberate.
We can see that many of the problems with mRNA shots were already known to those who worked with them – if not all the problems, given the length of time they'd been studied. Further proof of that assertion can be gleaned from the design of the trials. All Covid 'vaccine' trials excluded immune-compromised people and only two include children under 18 participated; elderly people were also under-represented.(63) Were these 'vaccines' designed to aid those who are frail, elderly, with co-morbidities? Emphatically not. Instead, these are 'vaccines' that were tested on those least at risk, presumably to minimize fatalities, and then authorized for those most at risk.
The guidance material for the trials was also revealing in another respect; shedding. Shedding is not an unknown phenomenon, despite the ridicule it currently attracts. After all, traditional vaccines that inject a live, attenuated virus in order to stimulate the production of antibodies are giving the patient a weakened virus. Imagining that, every now and again, things don't go entirely to plan, is not beyond the wit of man. It's not unusual to see signs at hospitals requesting that people recently inoculated with certain vaccines refrain from entering the wards. Polio was an early problematic example, whereby the vaccine actually produced a live virus, even though the disease had been almost eradicated in the wild.(64) And even today, vaccine case numbers are three times that of natural case numbers.(65)
In addition, there has been copious anecdotal evidence that this is an issue with the Covid 'vaccines'. It may seem far fetched, were it not for the fact that Pfizer have accepted that environmental exposure to the 'vaccine' happens. In the document setting out the clinical protocols for the trial, they are clear on the subject. Seemingly, not only is it possible for transmission to occur through bodily contact or through breathing the same air as a recently 'vaccinated' individual, it can also happen via breast milk.(66)
There can be very little doubt that shedding occurs; the FDA also acknowledges that gene therapy products do just that. They define the action as:
“The release of viral or bacterial gene therapy products from the patient by any or all of the following routes: feces (feces); secretions (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.); or through the skin (pustules, lesions, sores).”(67)
Exhaled breath can be added to that list. The “products” to which they refer are the spike protein, mRNA and even the lipid nanoparticles themselves (with the mRNA inside). Plus, one would assume, the plasmid DNA that is 'contaminating' the 'vaccine'. However, with the exception of a Pfizer document (which revealed shedding in the urine and feces of rats and was referenced in one paper before it was scrubbed from the internet),(68) there have been no clinical shedding studies completed, even after the 'vaccines' were rolled out.
But the anecdotal evidence is overwhelming. Some people are so sensitive that, if they share a room with the recently jabbed, they are obliged to retire to bed for several days. ‘Unvaccinated’ women suffer acute menstrual abnormalities, even those who are post-menopausal. Atrial fibrillation, vertigo (sometimes for months on end), headaches, flu-like symptoms, chronic chest pain, internal bleeding, seizures and many more symptoms besides have all been reported.
These are not random health scares that are unrelated to the shedding phenomenon; they are sudden onset conditions that have come from being around the recently (and not-so recently) 'vaccinated'.(69)(70)(71) How long this shedding lasts is unknown, but if human DNA can be altered, it must be at least possible that some of the jabbed will be spike protein factories until the end of their natural span. But, when health authorities have addressed the issue at all (and I could find no evidence that the EMA in Europe nor the MHRA in the UK had ever done so), the party line is that shedding is a myth.(72)
This does not compute. It's clear that the 'vaccine' companies were aware of the issue prior to the trials. It is also now apparent that new airborne mRNA 'vaccines' exist and that the mRNA can be delivered right into the lungs. Animal experiments have already been completed and human trials are expected to commence soon.(73) Or so they say, but the medical community has been mulling covert compulsory vaccination for years already,(74) and we have no reason to unconditionally believe their pronouncements on any subject any more. It's possible that the current, ongoing research is simply a refinement of what's gone before. And to hell with informed consent.
The consent issue itself has been continually fudged since the onset of the 'pandemic', but never more so than with the 'vaccines'. It may surprise you to learn, for instance, that no single shot has ever been formally approved. All of them, the originals, the boosters, the bivalent boosters – every single one was authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization (in the US) or a Conditional Marketing Authorization in the UK and Europe. The only possible exception to this state of affairs might be some elements of the US military, who may or may not have received Pfizer's Cominarty.(75)(76)(77) But everybody else has been getting an unapproved product; not that governments have ever been at pains to point this out.
In fact, they've done their best to convince us otherwise. Back in August 2021, they told us that BioNTech's Cominarty had been approved for use in the United States.(78) Quite how that was justified has never been explained, given the fact that it had only been on the market for eight months and there was no indication that stage 3 clinical trials had ever been completed. Then, in a development no-one could see coming, Pfizer, BioNTech's partner, was given emergency authorization to continue producing the existing 'vaccine' – supposedly until all the product in storage was used up, at which point the switch to Cominarty would take place. The FDA pulled a similar stunt with Moderna in January 2022, approving Spikevax, but allowing existing stock to continue to be utilized under the existing EUA.(79)
Inevitably, questions proliferated. According to the FDA, the two Pfizer 'vaccines' were so similar as to be interchangeable. Except, of course, 'similar' isn't 'identical'. So why was it that the version that was approved hadn't actually been used on anybody yet? Because it clearly hadn't. There had been no trials of COMIRNATY at that time, which is why the FDA instructed them to conduct eleven different types of trials on specific age ranges and at-risk groups – after approval had been granted.
The cover story concerning existing supplies and the half-truths about ingredients allowed Pfizer to claim that the ‘vaccine’ was approved when it explicitly wasn't. It also allowed the Establishment to ramp up its coercion to extreme levels, with more mandates than you could shake a stick at, while Pfizer still benefited from the liability exemption that comes with a ‘vaccine’ used under an EUA, which otherwise disappears once a vaccine is approved. In this way, Pfizer could continue to evade responsibility for all the injuries caused by their ‘vaccine’. A sweet deal.
But the ingredients of the different products aren't the same and the FDA and Pfizer were playing even faster and looser than usual. In December 2021, ingredients were replaced in the formulation of both Pfizer-BioNTech's EUA product and the ghost 'vaccine' that is Cominarty; stage 3 clinical trials for the EUA product are allegedly ongoing for 12-15 year olds,(80) but the new formulation was also made available to 5-11 year olds, sans evidence. It has become increasingly difficult to understand what data are being utilized by the FDA in their approval decisions, but it is readily apparent that new ingredients have been added inappropriately and that Cominarty is no longer definitively identical to the existing jab.(81)
By March 2022, our lords and masters were trying to get us to surrender to the sixth shot of a two shot series, all of the jabs having allegedly been concocted to counter the original Wuhan strain:
“The 2019 shot has never been updated, despite claims of an update being as easy as a computer-generated “copy and paste” procedure. Pfizer and Moderna both claimed that they were working on an Omicron vaccine — projecting that it would be ready in March of 2022 — but seem to have scrapped the plan, for reasons unknown to the public.”(82)
It's worth noting that at no point in any trial scenario had any participant been given six shots of the same 'vaccine'; however, ethical standards had by now been completely compromised and the authorizations were coming thick and fast. In June, both Pfizer and Moderna were given permission to poison another age group, this time children between 6 months and five years.(83)
By August/September 2022, both the FDA and the EMA were touting the new bivalent jab, which allegedly targeted some Omicron sub-variants, despite the fact that Pfizer had only tested the jab on mice and, further, the certainty that Omicron was soon to be in the rear view mirror. They also abruptly removed the original Wuhan jab from circulation.(84) But the pièce de résistance was still to come and duly arrived in October; the FDA advisory board recommended that the Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines', the original that had been discontinued for everyone else, should be placed on the Childhood Vaccination Schedule (CVS), along with the bivalent booster (the one that's never been tested on humans).(85)
The recommendation was adopted in February 2023,(86) before Biden declared the emergency over in May, a full year after most other nations – that was the excuse that was offered, when the FDA was asked why an experimental product was placed on the schedule; apparently, small children who had never been at risk were still deemed to be living under an emergency three years after the show first hit the road.
It will be remembered that none of the shots have been formally approved; all of them are still emergency authorized, wherever they are deployed. Neither Cominarty nor Spikevax have ever been manufactured, nor are they ever likely to be; Pfizer have admitted as much.(87) The never-tested new Cominarty version, from December 2021, may well be made at some point, but not the original. Even now, however, the likelihood of this latter version being produced is vanishingly small, unless and until it is added to the CVS, in the place of (or in addition to) the EUA version. That's the point at which any liability for adverse events is removed from Pfizer and placed on the government that approved the product. And evading liability has been the aim all along, as any responsibility for defects with EUA products also falls on the government; or, more accurately, the tax-payer.
It doesn't appear as though the UK and the EMA have yet followed the FDA's lead. The vaccination regimes are, perhaps, not quite as vigorously pursued with marginal jabs, even if health services have been recommending the Covid shot to anyone five or older. But, in the US, the noose is considerably tighter. The FDA might be an 'advisory' board, but the CVS is the basis for recommendations by most physicians and there are other ways of enforcing the orthodoxy at state or local levels, where health officials set the rules as to which 'vaccines' are required in order to attend public schools.
It isn't difficult to see how that will go, especially in blue states. Parents were already checking out of publicly provided education, thanks to be abominable behavior of the teacher's union during the 'pandemic' and their obsession with wokeness, and thousands of schools across the US are at risk of closure, with enrollment down 20% on 2018 numbers.(88) Given that only 2% of schoolchildren had taken the latest shot by end October 2023,(89) any state stupid enough to mandate the 'vaccine' as a prerequisite for schooling will see further steep declines. But, then again, perhaps that's the idea, although one would imagine that the Leftists that dominate academia would like to retain their monopoly on propaganda.
One final point about regulatory approval; it's simply a move in the blame game that Big Pharma is being allowed to play, so that they might (at all times) avoid it. It has very little to do with safety and efficacy and should not be treated with an iota of reverence. Thalidomide was approved, but that didn't prevent around 10,000 children in over 46 countries being born with severe birth defects when the drug was prescribed to their pregnant mothers.(90) Merck's Vioxx was supposed to be a safe painkiller, was approved and then caused thousands of heart attacks and strokes; the company had to pay out $4.85 billion in damages.(91)
The same company got the Gardasil vaccine approved, to supposedly vaccinate against cervical cancers – as an aside, how illogical does that sound? - and are currently embroiled in multiple lawsuits which allege that physical and cognitive impairments followed in the wake of the injection.(92) Oxycotin, an allegedly non-addictive painkiller was approved and then devastated hundreds of thousands of lives when it was shown to be otherwise.(93)
This is merely a selection; there are plenty of other examples and other links to conditions that have yet to be established (perhaps 'accepted' might be more accurate), such as the relationship between childhood vaccination and autism. The US is the most jab-happy country in the world. By the age of 15 months, a typical child will have received a minimum of 28 injections of eleven different vaccines. By age 6, the total is around 44 injections of 14 vaccines, full of adjuvants as well as biological product.(94) In news that is completely coincidental in nature, the US incidence of autism spectrum disorder will likely reach a whopping 6% in 2024, or one in seventeen births.(95) All fine and dandy according to the FDA. And in no way connected.
This is the current state of play. It may be argued that this analysis contains an inordinate amount of correlation, without the necessary causation. However, as noted, foreknowledge was extensive, but the blob pressed on regardless. And correlation without causation, as a concept, is all well and good, but it's often quoted by people who have absolutely no intention of investigating further anyway. At some point, doesn't clinging to the mantra become more of a hindrance than a help?
There is no official interest in acknowledging that there is any likelihood that the 'vaccines' cause widespread serious damage, but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. There will be no mea culpe from the blob, there will be no attempt to establish the truth. They already know the truth, because they had access to the studies that we can now examine. So, waiting for officially sanctioned evidence is a mug's game. We know that there are epidemics of heart attacks and turbo cancers and we know that they started at the end of 2020/beginning of 2021.
Vast increases in prion diseases, excess deaths (of all age groups), an explosion in disabilities all came to pass in the same time frame; a quarter of Americans say they know someone who has died from the shot.(96) That's because the authorities covered all the bases comprehensively. First in line were the infirm and immune-compromised (of all ages), those less able to withstand a toxic compound that further degraded their immunity. This, despite openly excluding these groups from the trials, which ought to provoke outrage, but doesn't. They then gradually worked their way down through the ages groups, regardless of whatever relative danger each category allegedly faced (which even officialdom couldn't massage into a figure that wasn't somewhere in the 0.1% or less ballpark), killing and maiming as they went.
Pregnant women were encouraged to take the jab, even though it hadn't been tested on them because it was known to cause miscarriages and severe reproductive damage. And, once again, the blob weren't made to pay a price for their openly malevolent conduct. Eventually, they went all the way down to babies of six months – all without providing any publicly available evidence that demonstrated safety and efficacy and without any justification as to necessity or provision of informed consent.
Even the refuseniks weren't safe. If the relentless campaigns to demonize them and force them into compliance didn't accomplish the necessary, there was always the back-up plan - shedding, yet another feature of the jab that we weren't made aware of. As time passed and challenges to their regimen failed to materialize, largely due to the utter corruption of the Fourth Estate, they increasingly dispensed with even the pretense that their decisions were driven by empirical data. The result was a blizzard of authorizations for boosters, bivalents, different ages groups and so forth, over the course of three years. The effect of all this deviant activity has been to kill, injure and undermine fertility. Who'd have thunk it? From a cabal of Malthusians, no less?
We know about the lies that we were told, about how the 'vaccines' aren't vaccines and prevent neither infection nor transmission of respiratory diseases. We know about the trial data, the misfolded proteins, the reverse-transcription into human DNA, the SV-40 enhancer, the bio-distribution of the spike protein into the reproductive systems of both men and women and the consequent disastrous effect on fertility. And, now we know that the elites want to decimate the health of our youngest children, too. It's a reminder of the reality of what we are confronting.
Citations
(2) The Post Millennial @TPostMillennial
(4)
(5)
(6) https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1211-1536
(7)
(8) https://web.archive.org/web/20210826113846/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
(9) https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html
(10)
(11) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
(12) https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/05/18/doctor-says-mrna-covid-shot-animal-trials-were-halted-because-animals-were-dying/
(14) https://expose-news.com/2023/12/06/plasmid-dna-in-pfizer-c19vaccine-enters-nucleus-of-cells/
(15) Ditto
(16) Ditto
(17) Ditto
(18) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-023-04089-2
(19) Ditto
(20) https://www.tga.gov.au/polio-vaccine-sv40-contamination
(21) https://expose-news.com/2023/12/06/plasmid-dna-in-pfizer-c19vaccine-enters-nucleus-of-cells/
(22) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z
(24)
(25) Ditto
(26) https://www.itv.com/news/2023-09-25/matter-of-national-shame-400000-wait-more-than-a-day-in-a-and-e
(27)
(28) https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
(29) Ditto
(36) https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000049#DC1
(37) https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
(38) https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/cancer-young-people-doctors-baffled-49c766ed
(39) https://brownstone.org/articles/the-global-wave-of-childhood-pneumonia/
(40) Ditto
(42) Ditto
(43) https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89998
(44) Peter Doshi, Will Covid vaccine s save lives? Current trials aren't designed to tell us, BMJ 21/10/20.
(45) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
(47) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf 47
(48) Ditto
(49) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30587973/
(50) https://dailyclout.io/covid-19-vaccines-pregnancy-risky-business/
(52)https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_24_nonclinical-overview.pdf
(53) https://dailyclout.io/covid-19-vaccines-pregnancy-risky-business/
(55) https://www.schc.org/assets/docs/ghs_info_sheets/schc_osha_reproductive_toxicity_4-4-16.pdf
(56) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf
(57) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_24_nonclinical-overview.pdf
(58) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
(59) Ditto
(60) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209
(62)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/#r15
(63)
(64) https://slaynews.com/news/covid-vaxxed-testing-positive-hiv-multiple-studies-warn/
(65) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255127/
(66) https://www.tmrjournals.com/article.html?J_num=4&a_id=2402
(67) https://www.fda.gov/media/89036/download
(68) https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences/comments
(69)
(70)
(71) Ditto
(72) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html
(73) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.abq0603
(74) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
(75) https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1056/rr-2
(76) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00085-4/fulltext
(78) https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
(79)
(82)
(84) Ditto
(86) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-covid-mrna-vaccine-childhood-schedule/
(87)
(88) https://www.foxnews.com/media/thousands-schools-risk-closure-due-enrollment-loss-new-report
(89) https://apnews.com/article/covid-vaccines-cdc-a478c45025a2d403b022bd05c07dd85e
(91) https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL09297266/
(92) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ashley-dalton-merck-gardasil-hpv-vaccine-injuries/
(93) https://www.statnews.com/2019/01/15/massachusetts-purdue-lawsuit-new-details/
(94) https://www.verywellhealth.com/immunization-schedules-and-statistics-2633742
(95) https://slaynews.com/news/america-suffering-autism-tsunami-top-study-warns/
Figure 2 Ditto
Figure 3 https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
Figure 4 Ditto
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7 https://expose-news.com/2023/10/30/24-year-lifespan-reduction-c19-vaccination/
Figure 8 Ditto