Two assumptions, firstly. The Deep State and its minions are not going to abort their totalitarian schedule. Programmable CBDCs, digital passports and social credit scores rooted in the climate change scam are coming down the pike whether we like it or not, as is the Pandemic Treaty and assorted amendments to the WHO constitution, which will result in a surrender of national sovereignty by every country by every country that is a signatory. All the major players will sign it, regardless of what we say.
The fact that the Covid narrative is falling apart (and despite regulatory bodies declaring that Omicron was 'Nature's vaccine'), Biden has repeatedly renewed the United States' declaration of an emergency; he did it again the other day and it seems as though May is the earliest that it will be rescinded. Regimes have been forced into tactical withdrawal following tactical withdrawal and are now holding the line with the mantra that, while the 'vaccines' may not prevent infection and transmission of the disease, they do prevent serious disease. Despite this, they will not acknowledge the manifest idiocy of still insisting on a 'vaccine' passport.
Further, their climate change narrative is still intact, as they have not yet been credibly challenged by any entity with the courage to carpet bomb their arrant nonsense and, even if there were such a body willing to expose the scam, the poodles in the press would memory hole the story instantly.
The second assumption is a logical extension of the first. Any cracks in the facade, any seemingly backwards step is not happening because they feel genuine remorse for their actions. Nor are they the result of a Damascene conversion. They mean to continue doing us harm – they simply have no interest in our well-being. Instead, they are actively trying to harm us. Mea culpes are not their currency. Plus there is no indication that the bought and paid for media are about to grow a collective spine.
Any criticism of the status quo from that quarter is much more likely to be a self serving deflection, as they sense that their credibility is already in the toilet and yet still sinking rapidly – effectively, a limited hangout that serves to recapture our attention so that they can gaslight us some more. Either that, or a preemptive strike to establish a defense if the brown sticky stuff really does hit the rotating arm and they find themselves caked in it at some point in the near future. There does seem to be some dissension in the enemy's ranks and probable infighting (witness the Biden document scandal, for one), but that doesn't mean that they are going to be deflected from the main task at hand.
In any event, it's not the opposition that should be our primary target – it's the undecided normies in the soft center and should always have been; the reeds that sway in the prevailing wind. That's not to say that we don't need to fight the enemy – we do. But the battle lines between the resistance and the Deep State have been drawn for decades; they've simply become more visible in the past three years. However, the object of that fight isn't to target the tyrants, because we won't be able to beat them on own own. They have too many hands on too many levers. The primary goal is to enlist the normies, because without them, we cannot triumph.
It's unfortunate, but those same people who were insufferable during the 'pandemic' – because of a combination of their over-developed sense of collectivism and their innate unpleasantness – need to be recruited. Their trust in the institutions that should have been looking out for them, which have instead done the opposite, needs to be thoroughly undermined. And it's very difficult for normies to give up their world view; partly because they don't want to admit that they've been wrong and partly because clinging to the comfort blanket is less frightening than facing up to the fact that the establishment really is out to get them.
But gauging whether we are succeeding or not has always been difficult to quantify. Normies being the personality types that they are tend to hide their lights under bushels. It's one of the reasons that pollsters have crashed and burned lately – that and their innate Leftist bias. Normies are frequently reluctant to run the gauntlet of opprobrium when they know that their response will not be the approved one. This is especially so when efforts to police dissent are as extreme as they are currently. So, we are obliged to search for other indicators as to the state of play. This article is an attempt to identify what they are and, further, what they are telling us because, come the revolution, it would useful to know if the previously undecided (or the downright hostile) have come to a decision that favors us over the enemy.
First, some caveats. Deciding what sources we can trust can be extremely tricky. For instance, believing the statistics provided by the enemy is clearly problematic. Understanding the misdirection that is present at every turn is also important. There are, of course, levels of lying – there are the soft lies, like preferential emphasis, or a deliberate omission of facts which leads people to come to false conclusions, or the simple act of ignoring a story altogether. Most regime apologists will be comfortable with this type of behavior if they believe that their cause is just. And they always think that their cause is just.
But making up lies out of whole cloth is a practice that only a few used to be able to stomach, because there is really no defense if caught out. But that was when there was actually a downside to lying in this fashion. In our current morass, the downside has all but evaporated if one is on the correct team, and the willingness to make shit up has therefore grown exponentially. Witness 'safe and effective', which is an outright lie; 'runaway global warming', likewise.
The other threat comes from those who purport to be fellow travelers, but really aren't. It's not just the enemy who engages in limited hangouts – it's supposed allies, too. So many of them are compromised and unable (or unwilling) to confront the real issues. Business models need to be followed, content has to be inoffensive to sponsors. The more I research, the narrower the spectrum of authentic voices is. Nonetheless, navigating a course through friendly territory is still possible. Picking up on clues as to the normies' true disposition is, therefore, achievable even if the net must be cast far and wide.
So, to exhibit A. Novak Djokovic. You may recall that the Australian government treated him very shabbily last year and deported him just prior to the Australian Open, ostensibly because he wasn't 'vaccinated'. At the time, the narrative was that the Australian people were in favor of the decision, as they didn't see why The Joker should get special treatment when they themselves were under enormous pressure to get the jab. The press were consistently pushing the line that his was a selfish act for which he was being justly punished. He wasn't just banned for one year, either – they told him not to come back for three.
A change of government (although not of overbearing policies) and the ban was lifted. Djokovic, a nine time winner of the Australian Open, returned last month.... and received huge ovations wherever he went; at Adelaide, in a warm-up tournament (1) and at the Open itself.(2) It seems that, whatever the authorities think – and the organisers had warned fans that they would be ejected if they booed Djokovic too loudly – the people themselves think the world of the Serb. Whether that is a genuine sea change in attitudes, or whether the people ever harbored a grudge is largely immaterial; it's what's happening now that's important.
Exhibit B is the phenomenon of the people showing the politicians what they want, forcefully. Albeit for different reasons (or, rather, due to the same root cause manifested in different ways), the people are revolting. In Brazil, it was the obviously bogus Presidential election. Millions took to the streets; the Presidential palace was overrun, but critical mass was never quite achieved. The outgoing President (and victim of the fraud) failed to do his constitutional duty and trigger a clause that would have activated the military to effectively redo the election. The head of the Supreme Court is now the de facto ruler. However, it would be foolhardy to believe that the anger has dissipated and that brute force has triumphed. I suspect that, so far, only the United States' overt support of the new regime (led by a Communist, inevitably) has kept a lid on things.
Sri Lankans know how to do it properly, of course. They also overran the Presidential palace, but the protest rumbled on for months after that event.(3) Attempts by the authorities to suppress protests were only partially responsible. The difference between the two uprisings is that only one was truly existential – in Sri Lanka, the fight was for survival, after the government had crucified the economy with ruinous 'green' policies advocated by the EU among others.
This resulted in food shortages and massive inflation. The people didn't have much of a choice but to mount an insurrection if they wanted to survive. Although that sad state of affairs is almost guaranteed to be replicated in Brazil once those same policies are imposed, there isn't quite the same urgency at present. A stolen election, while irksome in the extreme, is less likely to inspire the people to go all in.
There are encouraging signs from Canada, also - although we've been here before of course with the truckers. Nonetheless, the sight of Trudeau being heckled and insulted is always gratifying.(4) As is the news that the new Premier of Alberta has cut all ties with the WEF stating:
“I find it distasteful when billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders. That is offensive … the people who should be directing government are the people who vote for them.”(5)
Talking of the truckers, they are still agitating. They have partnered with the YANA (You Are Not Alone) campaign in Canada, which is spreading awareness of the dangers of the 'vaccines'. I wouldn't imagine that Justin is overly supportive of their efforts.
Figure 1
In Britain, the BBC has come under some richly deserved fire. The organisation has been in the vanguard of the gaslighting about all things Covid, climate change and racial 'equity' – indeed, nothing is too woke for their palate. And so, the windows of at least six of their buildings got plastered with stickers, posters and pictures of loved ones injured or killed by the 'vaccines'. There were demonstrations by numerous different groups outside Broadcasting House in London.(5) Two posts on Telegram sum up protester sentiment:
“The BBC are traitors to our country. All mockingbird media are traitors to everyone’s country and have been for a very long time.”
“Enough is enough….the media is complicit in the biggest crimes against humanity and need to be held accountable for the deaths and harms caused to our friends and families.”(6)
There are other green shoots of recovery in some seemingly unlikely places. In Austria, ground zero for authoritarianism during the 'pandemic', the right wing Freedom Party (FPÖ) – known for its strong stance on immigration and opposition to sanctions on Russia – is ahead in the polls.(7) The press, predictably, think this is bombshell news, despite the fact that the population is highly sceptical of mass immigration already and the further revelation that asylum applications nearly tripled in a single year. The people don't seem all that fond of climate activists blocking roads, either. Only 19% favored no punishment; 73% would fine or imprison them.(8) The FPÖ is simply being rewarded for speaking truth to power. Another sacred cow (sanctions) is also in their cross-hairs:
“It’s finally time to appear in the EU and say: These sanctions harm us much more than Putin. Our people have to foot the bill for them.”(10)
Across the pond, in Illinois, the Democrat Governor signed a bill banning 'assault weapons' and requiring law enforcement to maintain a register. This is in clear violation of the right to bear arms and, further, recent case law affirming that very right. The legislation is merely the latest attempt to pass an unconstitutional law in the expectation that it will still be enforced until it's inevitably overturned.(11) On this occasion, however, things didn't go according to plan. This time, dozens of sheriffs told the Governor that they would not enforce the law (due to its apparent illegitimacy), but would instead hold fast until it was challenged in court.(12) The Madison County sheriffs, in particular, hit the nail on the head:
“... the citizens of Madison County can remain confident that their local law enforcement will not turn the criminal justice system against those acting within their clearly-defined constitutional rights.”(13)
The Dutch are also growing increasingly fractious. They are not a nation given to backing down and accepting BS as fact, instead. And the farmers are the tip of the spear. The government – yet another of those using 'climate change' as the excuse for an authoritarian power grab – has decreed that Dutch farming needs to be gutted, in order that the country can meet an arbitrary, unscientific emissions goal imposed by the EU. The farmers (with the support of a large proportion of the population) have decided that this isn't going to happen, which has resulted in a face-off that's been ongoing for months.(14)(15)(16)
The denouement will come, perhaps, in April. This is when the state says that it will start seizing farms by force, if necessary. And it will be necessary. In the mean time, we have the spectacle of bad faith negotiations being conducted by the government; I say this because, as long as the emissions target remains unchanged, there is absolutely no point in negotiating as no ground will be conceded by the regime. It could get messy; the Dutch police can rely on no repository of goodwill from their fellow citizens, due to the way they conducted themselves during the 'pandemic' protests, when they were unnecessarily heavy-handed.(17)(18) This isn't the only grievance aired by the public; they are also in open revolt against their largest news agency with regards to its campaign of fake news about the epidemic.(19)
It's important to note that, with the exception of the Sri Lankans, none of the other insurgencies have so far been successful. But they are evidence that not every citizen is an invertebrate and, further, that they are nor universally condemned (by the people, not the establishment) for taking on the state. It may just be that matters need to become extreme before sufficient impetus is achieved. It's not the prospect of starvation that energizes people; it's the reality of it. The normies can still manage to gaslight themselves until that point, but when disaster gets up close and personal, it tends to have a galvanizing effect. As Lenin remarked:
“Every society is three meals away from chaos.”(20)
There are other uprisings ongoing, particularly in South America, but it's not always clear whether these are genuine outpourings of dissent or Leftist attempts at a color revolution; Peru and Chile are two such states. However, the shift in public sentiment is most discernible in the changes to the Covid narrative, which has had to contort itself into impossible shapes to accommodate them.
Whereas a year ago, dissidents were 'deniers', the 'unvaccinated' were selfish, irresponsible merchants of death and any criticism of the likes of Lord Fauci was verboten, there has been something of a volte face in the public perception of many of the elements that were previously articles of faith for the Branch Covidians. Some of this can be inferred from actions taken on the quiet, some from the way that the Overton Window on the 'pandemic' has clearly shifted.
Booster take-up has dwindled to a trickle in the United States; six weeks after the introduction of the updated bivalent version, only 6.5% of the eligible population had stampeded their way to the nearest amateur with a needle.(21) Even the Australians, some of the most put upon (and, to be fair, gullible) people during the 'pandemic', were only volunteering at the rate of 30%, after 40% took the third.(22) One suspects that news that their country experienced a 17% rise in heart attacks in 2022 has not gone unnoticed.(23) Nor the fact that the danger represented by the disease was not entirely as advertised.
Figure 2
In the UK and the US (and, I suspect, elsewhere), skepticism of official sources may have been fueled by another factor. Rather than anti-'vaccine' sentiment being driven primarily by buyer's remorse in an almost completely 'vaccinated' population, it's likely that a significant amount of it is driven by people who never submitted to the jab and whose numbers are far more plentiful than we have been told. The evidence here is established by contrasting what the official figures are telling us with reputable polling conducted in random sampling. According to the CDC in America (at the beginning of December 2022), 91.6% of the population had received a single dose, at minimum. At around the same time, a Rasmussen poll found that 32% of the respondents were actually 'unvaccinated'.
The story is similar in the UK; the government claimed, in May of last year, that only 8% of the eligible population was still holding out. By the end of August, that number had reduced to 6.4%, with 88.2% receiving two jabs and 70.2%, three. However, an ICM poll conducted in late April/early May instead found that 26% of those questioned were entirely free of the 'vaccine'.(24) This is further corroborated by the government's own figures, from July 2022.
Figure 3
That governments are lying to the people is no longer a surprise; that the ranks of the critical thinkers are almost certainly larger than we supposed is, possibly, a surprise, but a pleasant one and may be part of the reason that dissent has become magnified.
There are other clues. It appears as if the American public aren't falling for other Covid canards any more, either; for example, 72% of those polled in November believed that the 'pandemic' originated in a laboratory in Wuhan.(25) In a separate poll, 57% of them want Congress to investigate the CDC's handling of 'vaccine' safety. Predictably, only 48% of Democrats were of this opinion, compared to 54% of Independents and 70% of Republicans.(26) Fauci has also had his sainthood revoked – I think that's a fair description of a group of demonstrators who recently shouted “Fuck you, Fauci” and accused him of murder.(27)
It isn't just the public that are venting. The increasing stridency of the criticism of the 'vaccines' has caused some doctors and academics to break cover, also. A peer reviewed journal calculated that 278,000 Americans died of a 'vaccine' injury in 2021 alone.(28) The fact that it was published, let alone reviewed by peers who were willing to acknowledge doing so, would have been unthinkable even six months ago. More and more doctors, scientists and advocacy groups are calling for a suspension of the 'vaccination' campaign; in Africa,(29) in the US (30)(31) and in the UK.(32) Newsweek ran an op-ed which contained the following words:
“I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and boosters. I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.”(32)
There was much more verbiage in a similar vein. Importantly, the piece did not acknowledge that the 'vaccines' are killers; – the 'pandemic', yes but not the jab. I mention this because it is an indication that the Deep State feels the need to try and stop the rot, to regain control of the narrative (unsuccessfully, I would imagine) and, in doing so, provides further confirmation of what they never want to admit.
Nonetheless, it does seem that there might be the odd glitch in the matrix. The official account is allergic to any suggestion that the 'vaccines' are in any way dangerous; less effectively than they'd hoped? Yes, unfortunately – but they couldn't have known that ahead of time, obviously. The only concessions that they are prepared to make follow the Newsweek parabola; we're sorry that our high-handedness has caused you to distrust us (even though we are still worthy of that trust), which has resulted in many lives being lost because you didn't believe us when we said that the 'vaccines' worked, which is kind of your fault too. Never mind the fact that publishing the paper in early 2023 when, prior to the roll-out in December 2020, it was already known that the mRNA technology was dangerous and that the 'pandemic' was being extended artificially while the so-called clinical trials were rushed through. The data from them appeared to be fabricated,too – a fact that has now been confirmed by the disclosure of documents from the FDA.
Next in the ever expanding pantheon of ass-covering exercises is the time-honored 'investigation'; second only to an 'inquiry' in popularity. This time, the British Heart Foundation (BHF) finds itself in the firing line with over 100 UK medical professionals co-signing an open letter to its CEO, in the light of what an MP (Andrew Bridgen) said in parliament recently. Bridgen alleged that the Oxford University Cardiology Research department, part funded by the BHF, had withheld important data about the harms caused by the Covid injections.(33) Now the UK Medical Freedom Alliance are incensed; presumably, because they want us to believe that nothing like that has ever happened before and they couldn't have worked it out for themselves by reading data that the government itself provides.
It seems that the BHF is being cast as the sacrificial lamb, the entity that has been chosen to be the recipient of yet another tardy attempt at justifying doctors' actions during the 'pandemic'. This seems a little unfair – the 'vaccine' companies and the government are upstream of the BHF and would have had the data, too. Pfizer themselves are also in some tepid water, as the UK watchdog has just found Bourla guilty of talking up his company's jab for children between the ages of 5 and 11 before it had been authorized.(34) Not the most resounding of victories, given that we know that the inoculations don't do anybody any good, but somewhat ironic as it confirms that Big Pharma themselves have been spreading misinformation. As have the BBC, as Bourla's claim was broadcast by them.
I mention these developments not as evidence that we're winning (with the exception of the peer reviewed study) – all three are likely to be mere distractions, as none of them address root causes but, instead, seek to steer us away from them. I mention them because they are examples of the establishment feeling the heat and maneuvering to escape it.
There are some notable dissenters in the climate change sphere, too. For example, renewable power projects are encountering resistance from communities,(35) who would presumably be in favor of them if they believed that it was the only way to avert a man-made disaster. After all, nimbyism (not-in-my-back-yard ism) tends to fall away in the the face of a possible apocalypse. Further, in Wyoming, lawmakers feel sufficiently emboldened to introduce a ban on the sale of electric vehicles; not a course of action they would be contemplating if they felt that they would subsequently be punished at the ballot box.(36)
Sweden has also broken ranks and ditched the entire ministry responsible for the environment – the first time in 35 years that the country doesn't have a specific climate ministry.(37) This has displeased all the usual suspects, who must also come to terms with the prospect of a vast expansion of the country's nuclear power capacity as well. Tragically, it seems that Sweden won't now meet its Agenda 2030 goals on biodiversity.
NASA themselves are also contributing to the general air of skepticism. They have recently published data which shows that there has been no global warming for the past eight years (although it's likely to be longer than that, in reality).(38) This is, of course, impossible because in that same time-frame, there have been over 450 billion tons of CO2 emissions.... unless, of course, CO2 doesn't contribute to global warming and never has. Which would be true. The fact checkers were out in force, naturally, but none of them can explain how a lengthy pause in global warming is possible if the scam's core premise is viable. People seem to be noticing, too; the tweet containing the pronouncement has been retweeted over 8,500 times.
Figure 4
There's more. Woke institutions are suffering in the face of either public indifference or outright hostility. CNN, the epicenter of fake news in the US, is a much diminished force and has plummeted to its lowest ratings for nine years.(39) NBC and MSNBC, two willing fellow travelers, are laying off staff,(40) Twitter laid off half its staff in November alone (41) and other tech companies (including Google and Meta (Facebook, as was)) have made nearly 60,000 people redundant in just the past month.(41) Fake meat sales have also collapsed.(42) It seems that attempting to force-feed the people a tsunami of lies and powdered crickets is increasingly causing indigestion.
Then there is evidence of what people say when they feel that they are in a safe space online. I recently came across two articles, both of which canvassed readers as to a) the toxicity of their 'pandemic' experiences and b) the reasons that they refused the jab – if, in fact, they did.(43)(44) The responses are very revealing, as they point to a widespread red-pilling of normies – people who previously had faith in government and public institutions (and, in nearly all cases, friends and families) – but who have now discovered that things are not as they seem. A smattering will serve to illustrate the phenomenon; firstly, some responses in reply to the question of which factors took the greatest personal toll:
“The willingness of so many to comply with all of it, no questions asked - even when things made no logical sense. The unwillingness of the same individuals, especially colleagues, to listen to any reason. I never imagined society could be so influenced and so horribly misled.”
“Watching the last remnants of my belief in democracy get peeled away. Seeing the collusion across the globe roll out in lockstep made me realize just how powerful and comprehensively in control those that orchestrate the darkness are.”
“The realization that nearly everyone I knew would give up literally all their individual rights for the illusion of safety.”
And then the rationale behind refusing the 'vaccine':
“Early on before all the censorship I researched some of the development of these mRna type therapies. When it came out that the test animals almost always died that sealed it.”
“I felt like it was rushed through – not tested enough. I heard several things about people having adverse effects and some even died. All of the information about how it could be dangerous or harmful was suddenly suppressed, I really felt like the public was being lied to.”
“The numbers made no sense. Available information showed that someone in my age group in good health had a +99.9% survival rate were I to contract the virus.... Basically, common sense prevailed when those around me were losing their minds!”
This is precisely the effect that is required. It's not enough that the soft center simply stays out of our lane when the crunch comes – we are going to need active support as all the indications are that change is going to have to come from below. Establishment politicians, with very few exceptions are not going to lead the charge – they are going to stay on board the ship until it's clear that it's going to take on too much water. The slew of recent articles is evidence of that – it's all sharp elbows and jostling for position. Only when it appears that their options have been reduced to two – going down or swimming – will they be of any utility, even if their primary motivation (even then) will be the saving of their own skin.
Finally, in my estimation, there are two much maligned figures who, wittingly or not, have nonetheless managed to reveal the corruption and malfeasance of those who rule over us. As such, it wasn't the achievement that either of them was aiming for, but rather the corollary effect of them simply being them. Trump is one and Boris is the other. The visceral hatred they inspired in the Deep State and the lengths to which it then went to ruin them are the two leaders' biggest gift.
Boris is far more of a weak-kneed chameleon than Trump, but the knives were out for him as soon as he had the temerity to put personal ambition ahead of the globalist agenda and become the face of the Brexit Leave movement; although I strongly suspect that the Remainers got their revenge with the deal that was negotiated (which, in all likelihood has changed very little) - but that's a big subject for another day. However, the zeal with which even members of his own party pursued Partygate - when the public had long since lost all interest in the subject – was indicative of a campaign to rid themselves of the turbulent priest, no matter the cost.
Boris' response, in a doomed attempt to curry favor with the voting public (who had no say in what became, effectively, a palace coup – followed by another one against Truss) was to initiate the collapse of the mandate mantra across all of the developed world, which can't have been part of the Deep State plan. For further evidence of that, look at the increasingly desperate attempts to keep the 'pandemic' alive in the United States.
The Biden regime still requires visitors to be 'vaccinated' (unless they're part of the invasion at the southern border, of course) and keeps extending the state of emergency, even though the next most strident Covidians in Canada, New Zealand and Australia have all been forced into climbdowns. Boris' panic (or possible peevishness, which manifested itself in a desire to throw sand in the gears) may prove crucial in the fight to retain a measure of freedom.
And Trump, despite many a misstep and unwise staffing decisions, by refusing to bow the knee to the fake news press, assorted RINOs and the permanent government, provoked a derangement syndrome so severe that his enemies lost all semblance of control and revealed their true colors. Two failed impeachments (including one after he had left office, which was novel), continual harassment, copious lies and obstruction and still they failed to lay a glove on him; and so, they cheated so egregiously in 2020 that a substantial majority of Americans – including 30% of Democrats – finally realized who the progressives and the Deep State really are.(45) For the avoidance of any doubt, the Leftists then did it again in 2022 and comprehensively failed to cover their tracks (see Election Watch).
While we haven't won anything yet, the current is in our favor and may prove irresistible, in time. None of this means that the real opposition will yield; they can't and they are going to find it impossible to believe that things are getting away from them – or, even more remarkably, that the plebs that they have so much contempt for have worked them out and are suddenly showing some fight. We must, however, keep spreading the word, keep shining light on the inconvenient truths, because doing so has been one of the reasons that we are making ground. Perhaps, with the normies in tow, we might even triumph.
Citations
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Sri_Lankan_protests
(4) https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/justin-trudeau-called-tyrant-he-swarmed-angry-mandate-protesters
(5) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/albertas-new-premier-under-attack-refusing-associate-wef
(7) Ditto
(9) Ditto
(10) Ditto
(13) Ditto
(14) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/15/if-theres-one-thing-bureaucrats-like-to-do/
(18)
(19)
(20) https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/853096-every-society-is-three-meals-away-from-chaos
(21) https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/few-getting-updated-covid-19-boosters-despite-white-house-pleas
(23)
(24)
(27)
(28) https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-023-07998-3
(29)
(30) https://expose-news.com/2023/02/01/mit-professor-calls-for-immediate/
(31) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/growing-number-doctors-say-they-wont-get-covid-19-booster-shots
(32) https://expose-news.com/2023/02/02/investigation-into-bhf-for-suppression-data/
(33) https://expose-news.com/2023/02/04/uk-watchdog-found-pfizers-ceo-guilty/
(36) https://expose-news.com/2022/10/29/sweden-ditches-agenda-2030s-climate-change-scam/
(38) https://www.thewrap.com/cnn-just-suffered-its-worst-ratings-week-in-9-years/
(39) https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3849332-nbc-msnbc-staffers-threaten-walk-out-amid-layoffs/
(40) https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-start-layoffs-friday-morning-internal-email-2022-11-04/
(42)
(43) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/01/14/so-you-did-not-take-the-covid-19-shot-why-not/
Figure 1
Figure 2 WHO and John Hopkins Resource Center
Figure 4
You deserve more reader commentary.
Interesting photo - Sir John Franklin's failed search for the North West Passage?
___________
Australia is a mildly Fascist State. Victoria had the severest of severe lock downs and has been cited as "the test case".
____________
Others are weathering worse storms and Europe will be reminded that Nature Bats Last, as the globe continues to heat up, LaNina cooling cycle not withstanding.
____________
Could interest y'all . . . Decline of The West - https://les7eb.substack.com/