In calmer, genuinely bipartisan times, Trump would not be our champion; he would not be needed. His character flaws would likely be a hindrance, his thin skin, in particular. His habit off going off the deep end at every perceived slight would grow tiresome and would threaten what we would be told was a harmonious working relationship between Left and Right. Leaving aside the assumption that this alleged state of grace is always the best way to govern (I don't believe that it is – I'd always want the opposition to do their job and, at the very least, keep the administration on its toes), continuous eruptions from The Donald might not be favorite.
I appreciate that he would, in all likelihood, be less cantankerous if he wasn't constantly being assailed by witch-hunts and 'fake news', but I'm still of the opinion that he wouldn't be in the picture, if only for the simple reason that he probably wouldn't have run were it not for Obama's progressive makeover and the likelihood of a third term full of the same nonsense, but with Hillary in the chair, instead.
But, in the end times, when the state is openly hostile to the majority of its citizens, a leader who always punches back is just what the doctor ordered. Not dying in a ditch over every enemy action when the opposition is composed of psychopaths who will never compromise on anything, simply hands them win after win and gives them the impression that their franchise is destined to triumph. Then, when we finally say that enough is enough, they won't believe us and will keep pushing. In these circumstances, the pursuit of bi-partisanship is a symptom of terminal weakness.
Trump is the only candidate who truly understands this dynamic and, crucially is a) independently wealthy and, b) the recipient of large numbers of small donations from his base, rather than having to be reliant on big donors whose desires must be accommodated. That way disaster looms; there are precious few power players who are prepared to take the path less traveled and oppose the DEI/ESG, woke progressive bullshit that infects the corporate world. Plus, those that back Trump do so because of his positions, not in order to change them.
And so, a potential flaw is, instead, a great strength. Trump being rude to a journalist who lies about him or attempts a gotcha moment is fine by me; that type had been accorded way too much respect for way too long. Nicknaming Haley 'Birdbrain' or calling Ron 'DeSanctimonious' is fair game, when one considers that both of them are trying to deceive the Republican base as to their true intentions; Haley, particularly so. A man who is unafraid to say it like he sees it is, in some ways, a breath of fresh air, whether we agree with him or not. And the MAGA base voter knows that only he will speak for them.
Haley seems to be the favored candidate of the Republican donors and also of the Democrat Party. Some of the latter's voters turned Republican for a day to boost her chances in Iowa, which ought to tell you all you need to know about the woman.(1) It that is insufficient, there is the fact that Reed Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn and funder of another civil case against Trump, and also of Newsom and a PAC that's purpose is to physically harass Republican candidates, is also a major supporter of Haley.(2) Her lack of appeal amongst Republicans was ably demonstrated at the Iowa caucus:
“Across the board, just 11 percent of Republican caucus-goes said they would flip and vote for Biden if Trump is the nominee. When looking only at Haley supporters, that number jumped to a whopping 43 percent. Just 23 percent of Haley’s supporters said they would vote for Trump over Biden. In contrast, 64 percent of DeSantis supporters said that they would vote for Trump if he is the nominee.”(3)
But, until the next primary at least, she is the standard-bearer for the Never-Trumpers. If she underperforms there, their next move is difficult to predict; they've already abandoned DeSantis and there isn't anyone else to prop up.
There is a second factor that must be addressed – a tendency that should be resisted, but often isn't and that is the 'there's nothing wrong with his policies, but I just can't vote for him because he's vulgar and mean' canard. If this is your visceral reaction, then you may be more of a liberal than you think you are. I cannot think of a circumstance in which the way the way that the message is delivered isn't supremely unimportant; the message itself is always the only thing that matters.
In a previous life, I had cause to remind myself of this truth on a regular basis. The ungrammatical paper, the stumbling verbal delivery, an unfortunate physical appearance or an annoying tick – none of these factors are intrinsically linked to the veracity or otherwise of whatever message is being communicated. So, you are entitled to be pissed at Trump's brashness, but the alternative is a progressive; we are supposed to be critical thinkers, not turkeys voting for Christmas because we are emotional knee-jerkers.
As it stands, Biden has to deal with what's in front of him, or at least give the impression that's what he's doing. And so, his election 'campaign' has finally engaged first gear. He fought his Teleprompter for half an hour or so the other day, during which time he managed to accuse Trump and “MAGA extremists” of being a threat to democracy on no fewer than eleven occasions.(4) Of course, it's possible that he simply re-read portions of his speech – would we be any the wiser if he had?
Amongst the usual vapid bloviating and fear-mongering, he promised his audience “freedom from fear”, a condition that could not be attained were they to elect Trump. The not-so-subtle subtext was that such an enemy of the Constitution should be stopped, by hook or by crook. This from a man whose attempts to override that same Constitution have been repeatedly struck down by SCOTUS:
“The Supreme Court struck down his COVID vaccine mandate, his moratorium for evicting deadbeat renters, his $500 billion federal student loan forgiveness scheme, and numerous other Biden policies.”(5)
Biden wasn't alone in his paranoia. Dr Jill also regaled us with her own finely calibrated observations, branding all Trump supporters “insurrectionists” and “dangerous extremists”.(6) Nobody, least of all Jill Biden, has ever bothered to explain how January 6th was an insurrection - against the government of Donald Trump, incidentally; he was the sitting president then and for another fortnight, thereafter. Nonetheless, she did her bit. I'm sure the progressive shock-troops lapped it up.
Michelle Obama, also the wife of a president and someone whose personal views ought to be profoundly irrelevant, has also shared her insights, included in which was the assertion that she couldn't sleep at nights for worrying what would happen if Trump were to be re-elected. “And you wonder, you know, “where are we in this”, you know, where are our hearts?”(7)...you know.
Next at bat was Nancy Pelosi, who was somewhat incoherent (as is her wont), asserting that “I think many of us know that it's impossible for him [Trump] to be president again.”(8) Quite what that meant wasn't probed, but I imagine she was referring to her fellow progressives' take on matters. It sounded an awful lot like a decision had been made. Transatlantic support for Nancy's position came in the form of comments made by an ex-head of MI6, who stated that:
“Trump’s re-election, which I think for the UK’s national security is problematic because if Trump, as it were, acts hastily and damages the Atlantic Alliance, that is a big deal for the UK. ‘We’ve put all our eggs in defense terms in the Nato basket. If Trump really is serious about, as it were, changing the balance, I mean, the American nuclear umbrella for Europe is, in my view, essential to Europe’s security and defense’.”(9)
Leaving aside the fact that the nuclear umbrella is, in all likelihood, a political chimera, two further questions present themselves; who is it that we think might drop a nuke on us (my guess is that we'd get the standard-issue response of “Russia”)? And, if Europe is so enamored of NATO, why is it that only seven of 30 NATO countries spent the required 2% of GDP on defense in 2022.(10)
Figure 1
One might also question the seriousness of the UK's overall commitment to both NATO and US-led interventions elsewhere, when one realises that the Royal Navy can't deploy their state-of-the-art £3 billion aircraft carrier to the Red Sea, because they don't have enough trained sailors to man the only supply ship that is capable of servicing the HMS Queen Elizabeth. The carrier group must, perforce, remain in dock in the UK.(11) Methinks he doth protest too much.
I digress. The constant theme will still be that Trump is a threat to Our DemocracyTM. There will be no credible evidence to back up these statements, a familiar trait that also applies to every other Leftist obsession, although there has already been an attempt to misrepresent a post of his from late 2022:
“So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”(12)
The Left would have us believe that Trump was calling for the “termination of the Constitution to put him back in power”,(13) when what he is clearly saying is that constitutional rules that seek to protect the integrity of elections should not be co-opted into embedding fraud instead. I'm sure the likes of NBC realize this distinction; they're just hoping that we don't.
Unlike wider policy, which is informed by what's good for the globalists and Deep State as a conglomerate, Biden's election campaign looks likely to be the exclusive preserve of the political psychopaths in the Democratic Party. Hence, we are likely to see an even larger-than-usual disconnect with reality, as the ideologues disappear up their own jacksies; but, it'll likely be more of what they truly believe, as I suspect the Deep state will have to be a little hands-off.
So, January 6th and the future of democracy will be the dominant themes. But there are other factors in play, such as Trump's legal travails and the attempts to kick him off the ballot in every state with a Democrat AG, plus the progressives' connected desire to control both presidential candidates. Is Biden's antediluvian strategy predicated on Trump making it to November as the Republican nominee – in other words, is it a genuinely conceived Plan B – or is it a construct that will simply go through the motions until another engineered event intervenes, whether that be a false flag, martial law or another (this time monumentally crass and obvious) steal in the days and weeks after the nominal day of the election?
It seems that the Biden campaign is trying to assert that Trump must be denied the presidency which, in Leftist lore, justifies any attempt to do just that a moral imperative, whether by illegitimate or legitimate means. That would include all means, extra-judicial included. Back in March 2023 (Bring Me The Head Of Alfredo Garcia),(14) I figured the options available to the Democrats were these:
“Plan A. Disqualify Trump from running by ensuring that he acquires a criminal record. A perp walk and jail time would be a gratifying bonus.
Backup Plan. Fix the Republican primaries for (in all probability) DeSantis.
Def Con 3. Instruct the paramilitary wing of the regime (Antifa, BLM and other misbegotten thugs for hire) to reprise their 2020 campaign, throw in a few false flag incidents to make it appear that the lesser spotted 'domestic terrorists' on the Far Right really do exist after all, and arrest more Trump lieutenants on trumped up charges.
Hail Mary. If all else fails, conduct yet another round of massive fraud at the 2024 election and then brazen it out again. This would almost certainly provoke severe pushback, which makes it a win-win.”(15)
At that juncture, I hadn't factored in the possibility of the 'ultimate sanction'. Currently, the Backup Plan doesn't look like a winner, because the gap between Trump and DeSantis and Haley is too vast to bridge and he just won the first primary by 30 points, but we'll have to see whether they (and the GOP establishment simps) still believe they can further subvert the will of the MAGA base in the remaining elections.
Defcon 3 is alive and well and about to be implemented alongside existing strategy. The Department of Injustice Attorney for Washington DC, the man who has already charged over 1,400 Americans for crimes relating to the protests on January 6th - whilst openly admitting that large numbers of the George Floyd rioters of 2020 were never indicted - has set out the next phase of his cunning plan:
“An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who entered the building or those who engaged in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds. But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime. Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be present in in the first place.”(16)
Which, loosely translated, means that anyone who unknowingly trespassed on the Capitol lawn (and it would have been unknowing, because at least two of 'protesters' removed all signage that would have alerted them to the fact that they were in a restricted area) will be hunted down and slapped with a prison sentence. Also, some of the area has been retrospectively assigned restricted status, but wasn't restricted on the day. But these defendants' ignorance of their 'crime' will either not be permitted as a defense in court, or will simply ignored by the presiding judges.
That's not to say that Plan A isn't still alive and kicking. All four of the criminal trials and the kangaroo court in New York (Trump is being sued civilly, as well, with the prosecutor asking for a $370 million fine) are still ongoing, although the timelines are being squeezed relentlessly and the Supreme Court has a case before it that will likely demolish some of the indictments ranged against him.
The impression that these cases are simply lawfare, designed to imprison a political opponent of the currently installed president (an impression that was already widely held) has gained further currency in the past fortnight. It seems that the various prosecutors targeting Trump, as well as sharing a streak of vindictiveness, have something else in common; contact with the White House.
Special Counsel Jack Smith benefited from the White House Counsel waiving Trump's executive privilege, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg was assisted by a lawyer from Biden's DoJ, DA Fani Willis' special prosecutor had two meetings with the White House Counsel and even Letitia James (the prosecutor in the New York civil case) visited the Biden White House on three occasions between April 2022 and August 2023.(17)(18) In addition, Willis' staff also met with the sham January 6th Committee to review 'evidence' that might assist them to assemble a case against Trump.(19)
But, here's the thing; if it really comes to it, if Trump surmounts every obstacle placed in his way and wins the election, they will still not let him govern. There is no point at which they will place any store by how their actions appear (partly because they have no understanding of how their actions appear to anybody who doesn't think like they do), no depth they will not plumb, no option that they won't take in order to win. The signs are there, already.
Consider these three elements. Firstly, the feds are buying up ammunition in unprecedented amounts. This was first remarked upon a decade ago, when the Obama administration went on a spending spree and the DHS alone had stockpiled 1.6 billion bullets; enough to shoot each American five times over. For context,
“...experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, DHS is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war.”(20)
Even the Social Security Administration, on the front line in the war against senior citizens, had ordered million of rounds. The trend has continued; the IRS felt the need to stockpile five million rounds of ammunition in 2022 alone.(21)
At the same time, the blue states have been ginned up to submit a demand that the White House halts the sale of 5.56 caliber ammunition (used in AR-15 rifles) to law-abiding civilians, because it's apparently 'military grade'. Just as the AR-15 is an 'assault rifle'. Both terms are devoid of meaning; I'm not sure whether Democrats are ignorant enough to think that AR stands for assault rifle, or whether they are simply attempting another gaslighting, but the term is as useful as 'hate speech'. None of them have any legal meaning. As for the 5.56 cartridge, many other calibers that the military use are also used by civilians including 9mm, .308, .30-60 and 12 gauge shotgun rounds.(22)
Secondly, Congressional Democrats have introduced a bill intended to prohibit many activities of militias or paramilitary groups, including training. Naturally, January 6th is referenced once again, despite the fact that no firearms were in play, other than those worn by the police.(23)
Lastly, the same group of bad actors – this time, Leftists in the three letter agencies and the higher echelons of the military – are making public their “concerns” that “former President Donald Trump might leverage the U.S. military to enforce his political will if he returns to the Oval Office”,(24) a concern that is evidenced by the square root of diddly squat.
But, as per a play-book that is becoming tiresomely familiar, if one puts up a straw man, one can then elucidate one's righteous intentions to 'resist [that straw man's] tyranny'. In this case,
“...bracing for Trump’s potential return, a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers is quietly devising plans to try to foil any efforts to expand presidential power, which could include pressuring the military to cater to his political needs. Those taking part in the effort told NBC News that they are studying Trump's past actions and 2024 policy positions so that they will be ready if he wins in November. That involves preparing to take legal action and send letters to Trump appointees spelling out consequences they'd face if they undermined constitutional norms.”(25)
The arrogance that such statements illustrate is breathtaking. The administrative state is attempting to tell an elected official what he can and can't do. The “constitutional norms” is simply a fig-leaf justification; there is little about the current administration's actions that are, in any way, business as usual. But the fact that they are signalling their intentions is interesting, as is the acknowledgement that a Deep State exists; perhaps it's partly aimed at the conflict-avoiders who aren't up for a battle and who will abandon the MAGA cause if times get hard.
However, it seems to me that all of the above are of a piece. The federal agencies hoard ammunition, the Democrat lawmakers and state officials try to prevent civilians obtaining ammunition and training to use it, if necessary, and the leadership of the military lets it be known that they will commit treason by refusing to obey the civilian Commander-in-Chief, if they deem it necessary. That would possibly be the precursor to a military coup, because such a stand-off would be unsustainable. Another reminder, if one were needed, that Leftists will double, triple, quadruple down and burn everything, rather than accept that they are beaten.
But why? Those that read my last offering will know that the psychopathic nature of Leftists trend in that direction on any issue, no matter how seemingly minor. However, in this instance, they are right to be afraid. This time, the battle really is existential. It's a zero-sum game; one side will win, the other will likely be destroyed. Leftists know this because Trump, in typical fashion, has told them exactly what the stakes are:
“I am your warrior, I am your justice and, for those of you that have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution...I will totally obliterate the Deep State...”(26)
That's a challenge that is difficult to misinterpret. He's also told them that he knows who and where they are:
“In addition, there must also be a complete commitment to dismantling the entire globalist neo-con establishment that is perpetually dragging us into endless wars, pretending to fight for freedom and democracy abroad, while they turn us into a third-world country and a third-world dictatorship right here at home. The State Department, the defense bureaucracy, the intelligence services, and all the rest need to be completely overhauled and reconstituted to fire the Deep Staters and put America First. We have to put America First....
..These globalists want to squander all of America's strength, blood and treasure, chasing monsters and phantoms overseas—while keeping us distracted from the havoc they're creating right here at home. These forces are doing more damage to America than Russia and China could ever have dreamed.”(27)
The Leftists and their masters in the shadows know that Trump is unlikely to be duped again, as he almost certainly was by Fauci and the intelligence services at the onset of the 'pandemic', which will be the subject of another article at some point soon. They know that they had to delve deep into their bag of tricks the last time around (Russiagate, impeachment, Covid, January 6th, another impeachment) and they've also gone all-in on the lawfare option since he's been out of office. With the exception of the 'pandemic', none of it has really gone to plan.
They also know that planting their moles within a second Trump administration will be exponentially more difficult than it was in his previous term. Hard times have a way of sorting the genuine from the fake and the past three years have revealed which Republican players belong in which camp. Additionally, Trump's policy team has been hard at work for months; they will hit the ground running.(28) Even Yuval Noah Harari, Schwab's sock puppet, whilst attempting to argue that nationalism and globalism aren't mutually exclusive viewpoints, asserted that Trump's election victory is “very likely and if it happens, it is likely to be kind of like the death blow to what remains of the global order. And he says it openly.”(29)
As Ben Carson explains it:
“The Deep State is terrified because he [Trump] now knows who they are. The system doesn’t want to be fixed. That’s why they will do anything to keep him out of office. Be looking for dirty tricks...They will be coming up with all kinds of things.”(30)
The very fact that the Deep State is being openly discussed is, in itself, deeply problematic to these background actors. It would have been unthinkable only a few short years ago, but Trump has normalized it and now even the likes of NBC are prepared to say the quiet part out loud. That particular genie is going to be exceedingly difficult to stuff back in the bottle.
If there is a faction within the Democrat leadership that is of the sober-minded variety, they may have arrived at an increasingly inescapable conclusion, and that is that they cannot possibly win on their own merits in November. There are several potent reasons for this state of affairs:
Before Biden was inaugurated, it was possible to contend that the future was replete with sunlit uplands. However, the progressives have been comprehensively unmasked – the economy is tanking and the contrast between 'Bidenomics' and Trump's pre-'pandemic' economy is stark and getting starker still. There's also the small matter of no new wars, as against the world on fire.
While there undoubtedly were voters who were naïve enough to hope that a vote for Biden might buy some relative peace and quiet for at least four years, I suspect a goodly proportion have turned the page on that plan and will now vote for political chaos over self-destruction. This cohort has cycled through the five stages of grief in both a short and novel order; denial, anger, depression, acceptance and then more anger.
Other groups of voters are also reassessing their allegiances. Even voters who are not Trump supporters and who have never previously voted for him will do so in 2024. They see that the 'justice system' has been weaponised against the former president and it offends their sensibilities. They resent the attempt to undermine the electoral system and they will punish Biden accordingly.(31) The Black vote for Trump is also surging, possibly doubling since 2020.(32) Many others are indicating that, while they previously voted for the Democrats and can't quite bring themselves to put a tick in the box for Trump, they will stay at home this time around.
In using Biden as a cognitively impaired puppet, which must have seemed like a good idea at the time, the ruling class have, instead, shot themselves in the foot and it's conceivable that they haven't yet diagrammed the source of their pain, nor understood the full ramifications of the error. They may be laboring under the misapprehension that pulling the plug on Biden and parachuting in a Michelle/Newsom ticket will turbo-charge their campaign. I think not. I suspect that the voting public will be able to divine that Biden couldn't possibly be the author of his own policies and that whoever it is that is pulling his strings, will also be pulling Michelle's. Having an incompetent as the front man doesn't, in fact, provide plausible deniability; it pulls back the curtains, instead.
The sober-minded clique, if it exists, might be capable of acknowledging these truths, albeit within a tight circle of like-minded souls. They might conclude that, while Michelle/Newsom aren't capable of pulling their cojones from the fire, they might be used to astroturf the public into believing that the sudden, huge increase in the Democrat vote was, in fact, down to the Dream Ticket. This would be a variation on an already road-tested theme, which the Republicans were only too happy to endorse in 2022, because it allowed them to pretend that they were unaware of the elephant in the room – massive electoral fraud.
On that occasion, when the red tsunami transformed into a red low tide, the proximal cause for the disappointment was the overturning of the Roe v Wade abortion case. However, the only people who were enervated by that decision were unattractive pink-haired activists who were always going to vote Democrat anyway. And there is one other, possibly insurmountable problem. Even if everything else goes according to plan, the level of fraud that will be required in 2024 will be monumental. It'll have to dwarf the 2020 effort and a huge number of voters not only know what happened then, but know what to look for this time, too.
So, the Democrats have a sizeable problem. Nothing they've attempted has destroyed Orange Man Bad and, if they can't squeeze at least one DC jury trial in before the election, the lawfare gambit will have failed in its primary objective – locking Trump up. Their attempts to kick Trump off the ballot by other means have been spotty, at best, causing even some fellow Democrats to recoil.
Further, their preferred fake Republican looks like she's going to crash and burn in the primaries and their former knight in shining armor, no longer of utility, is starting to sound vaguely sensible on occasion, not that it will do him any good at the ballot box. Even though they will find it almost impossible to process, Teflon Don is still the overwhelming favorite for the Republican nomination. It's a racing certainty that the GOP establishment is equally appalled, but they can't afford to say that in public.
To cap it off, the Democrats have a candidate who is hugely unpopular, who gives every impression of being well past his sell-by date and who is almost certainly the laziest president in history. In the past 25 days, he has held just 4 public events and, for around 40% of his term, he has been on vacation.(33)(34) 69% of voters (this, from a Left-leaning news station) believe that Biden doesn't have the metal acuity to serve another term – which would suggest that they aren't going to vote for him, would it not?(35) On top of that, his campaign volunteers are leaving the sinking ship in droves and Obama is letting it be known that Sleepy Joe isn't exactly knocking it out of the park.(36)(37) So, the ruling elites have got challenges to resolve on both sides of the aisle. What to do, then?
Figure 2
Well, it's useful to separate fact from speculation. Biden will only get worse, not better. By November, even less people will deem him suitable for the job on the grounds of mental health alone. Trump will win enough delegates in the primaries to be the presumptive Republican nominee. If the GOP can somehow prevent him from being anointed as such at the Republican National Convention it will, at it stands, mean that either DeSantis or Haley will be the default option. The Left will use any and all means to prevent Trump from governing and they won't much care what it looks like to us. And that's about all we can be certain of.
If I were a Democrat strategist, I would be proceeding on a worst-case scenario basis. I would assume that the lawfare fails and that Trump is the overwhelming favorite to arrive at the Convention in mid-July with the votes to be nominated as the party's candidate. If I wanted to prevent that happening, my options would be severely limited. I could continue down the 14th Amendment route and count on him not being on the ballot in enough states to fatally undermine his chance of being elected, which would then give the RNC the opportunity to discard him, but that's yet another long shot. Short of causing him physical harm, the almost certain outcome is another Trump tilt at the presidency.
The battle then moves to the election itself. An October Surprise, of whatever magnitude, cannot be relied upon to hole SS Trump below the waterline. At this stage of the game, he appears to be unsinkable and my options are rapidly narrowing. I could already have swapped out Biden for Obama; perhaps another Big Steal is worth a go. I'd have already been filing lawsuits throughout the year, especially in the swing states, in an effort to undo whatever impediments to fraud have been put in place – just in case.
But it would be a huge ask and impossible to hide. Perhaps that serves my purpose. Perhaps, that might be a win-win. Trump won't be able to stop calling us out and, just maybe, we can goad him into saying something that we can pretend is inciting an insurrection – again. Then, all the hoarding of ammunition won't have been in vain.
I have other options; an engineered false flag or another 'pandemic', martial law/lock-downs, universal mail-in ballots. The feds could do their thing; they've had plenty of practice:
“Now a new study has quantified signs of entrapment in a database of post-9/11 terror prosecutions. Out of 580 cases, 317 involved an informant or undercover agent, and most of those showed signs of entrapment, the study found.”(38)
Or the Pandemic Treaty and WHO amendments can take their first bow. But, if the timing is off – if other elements of the Great Reset aren't quite ready – I might have to suck it up and accept that Trump is going to be a roadblock and sabotage his administration from within and also without. The options are legion, but not without risk.
I could mobilize the rent-a-thugs in Antifa and BLM (having made sure the public knew that this would be an outcome if 'Trump the dictator' was returned) and make the riots of 2020 pale in comparison. I could ensure that my comrades in the administrative state – in the military, in the intelligence agencies and elsewhere – simply refuse to follow orders. If Trump persisted, I could make life so unpleasant that even his own party, the natural home of the spineless and treacherous, act against him simply to quieten the din. I might even be able to force them to impeach him again and, this time, remove him for good. Or, at any point in the arc of events, I simply get him taken out, à la JFK.
I (they) would have options. Which ones will they choose? We'll know soon enough. Perhaps the Uniparty has a bespoke plan that is under wraps and which will surprise us when deployed. Perhaps one of the long shots finds the target and Trump finds himself banged up, awaiting sentence come November. Perhaps the Supreme Court ducks its responsibilities and leaves the 14th Amendment in play. It would hardly be the first time that this Chief Justice has prioritized a political solution over a constitutional one. But, whichever way it goes down, it will result in a denial of the will of the people and I don't think that, this time, they'll take it lying down. It's going to get very messy. And that is going to have an impact on all of us.
Citations
(2) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/tucker-carlson-episode-65-what-do-results-iowa/
(3) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/trump-hammers-globalist-rino-haley-iowa-caucus-day/
(4) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jim-bovard-biden-says-vote-me-or-hitler-wins
(5) Ditto
(7) https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1744430534753673549
(8) https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1745837232756584485
(9) https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/mi6-trump-white-house-atlantic-sky-news-b1132215.html
(11) https://www.yahoo.com/news/uks-aircraft-carriers-not-ready-213414827.html
(12) https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109449803240069864
(14) https://endurancea71.substack.com/p/bring-me-the-head-of-alfredo-garcia
(16) https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1744568201638195411
(17) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/new-letitia-james-visited-joe-biden-white-house/
(19) https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/obama-homeland-security-vast-ammunition-purchases/
(20) https://www.realclearpolicy.com/2022/08/03/irs_stockpiles_more_than_5m_rounds_of_ammo_845858.html
(21) https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/obama-homeland-security-vast-ammunition-purchases/
(23) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-bring-bill-prohibit-armed-citizen-militias
(24) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/nbc-news-reports-deep-state-plot-prevent-trumps/
(25) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159
(26)
(29) https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1746943983564022000
(30) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dr-ben-carson-has-awarning-iowa-trump-supporters
(31) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/13/2024-the-backfire/
(33) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/joe-biden-calls-early-morning-lid-he-has/
(34) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/joe-biden-delaware-another-vacation-he-has-spent/
(35) https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-tops-opponents-biden-hits-new-low-approval/story?id=106335244
(36) https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-campaign-volunteers-are-quitting-droves-1857610
(37) https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/06/obama-very-worried-about-biden-campaign-n2168384
(38) https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/fbi-entrapment#.uvrnrQ2Rk
Figure 1 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/where-nato-defense-expenditure-stands
Figure 2 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/joe-biden-calls-early-morning-lid-he-has/