Canaries in the coalmine
We have departed from the commonsensical long ago and are floating in a sea of obfuscation, so here's a challenge; let's practice our critical thinking and bring some clarity to proceedings. Let's assume, for the sake of this little thought experiment, that we believe that there was a genuine natural pandemic. Let's ignore the evidence that shows that the US Department of Defense awarded a contract for Covid 19 research in December 2019, one month before it was detected and three months before the disease was even named.(1) Let's also ignore all the incriminating patents filed by Moderna et al years before the 'pandemic' struck.(2)
Let us look away from the evidence that shows that Fauci funneled millions of dollars of taxpayer money to the Wuhan lab – for coronavirus research.(3) Let's just pretend that there was a genuine outbreak of an infectious disease and that, initially, the deaths purportedly caused by said disease in China and then northern Italy spooked the politicians. And let's just ask a sensible question – what would they have done if they had the general public's interests at heart? Given the fact that it was clear from the outset that it was the old and infirm who were most at risk.
Chinese data might not be deemed particularly reliable, but the average age of the alleged victims in Italy was 78; not only were they old, they also suffered from an average of four co-morbidities and lived in care facilities.(4)(5) Government should have taken this data under advisement and, as an initial response, taken steps to warn these populations and mitigate the risk. Not with mandates, but with compassion. Government should then have delved deeper because, on the face of it, China and northern Italy seem to be strange bedfellows. So the next question should have been this – we understand that this virus is said to have originated in China; why would its next port of call be northern Italy?
Had governments performed this basic task, they would have discovered a possible explanation. Italy (along with others) had introduced a new 'super vaccine' for influenza in September 2019. It had been developed using a new technique that stimulated a much greater immune response than previously, which would also have resulted in a longer period of depressed immune response post-jab.(6) As we know, nursing home residents have the honor of being the primary victims of influenza vaccines every year. Connecting those particular dots oughtn't to have presented too much of a challenge, even to bureaucrats.
Government should have taken these data and combined them with a risk/reward analysis of the various options available. Had they done so, they would have swiftly learned that the medical profession had ready-made solutions, chief among them ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They were already prescribing these drugs off-label, as they had proved effective on the first SARS go-around in the early 2000s.(7) Remember, this is back when doctors were still allowed to diagnose patients themselves.
By this point in proceedings, even a politician wholly unversed in virology would have come to the following conclusions; firstly, that the elderly and infirm were most at risk and, secondly, that early treatment options were readily available and should, therefore, be obtained and dispersed as widely as possible. It would also be sensible to issue an advisory that emphasized which groups were most at risk.
And so, despite man's propensity for drama, salvation was most definitely at hand. The storm could have stayed in its tea cup. As time passed, more data would be available and tweaks to public policy may have needed to be made. It should be stressed - this is Janet and John stuff. What an ethical politician would definitely not have done is the following:
a) Shut down the economy and lock down the population.
b) Mandate mask wearing, social distancing and exhaustive testing with a device that was never intended as a primary diagnostic tool and which had been programmed to give a false positive rate of 97%.(8)
c) Actively campaign to trash working remedies while rushing an unproven, experimental gene therapy through clinical trials instead.(9)(10)(11)
d) Brainwash the population (via government sponsored propaganda) and create an entirely false narrative that serves to harm them, whether through 'vaccination' or ostracization.(12)(13)(14)
And yet, that is exactly what happened in country after country, in lock-step. That narrative is currently collapsing and those at most risk of exposure are struggling to morph it into another narrative that won't be true either. Huge dollops of falsehoods have been lathered over every aspect of the 'pandemic' and the 'vaccines'; so much so, that it's often difficult to sort the wheat from the chaff, particularly when it comes to assessing the true effects of the jabs. We can't even be sure of some of the most basic facts, such as how many people have truly been 'vaccinated' and how many have actually died of the disease, as opposed to other 'vaccine' related injuries. Calculating the proportion of such injuries, for instance, becomes problematic if one cannot be sure that governments are telling the truth about the percentage of the population that is jabbed.
Similarly, sudden upticks in other diseases cannot be definitively attributed to the deleterious effects of the 'vaccine' – often, the vaccination status of the victim is unknown. One can usefully speculate but it is, after all, in the best interests of those who pushed the jab to suppress any information that may implicate them in bad actions, committed wittingly or otherwise. About the only measure we may still be able to rely on is excess mortality and even that is really a rough and ready statistic that can be used to link 'vaccine' rollout and extras deaths temporally, but which is still vulnerable to being fudged by the 'correlation does not equate to causation' crowd. Additionally, as we shall see, the reporting of excess mortality can simply be terminated when the numbers start raising questions that cannot be satisfactorily answered.
What we need is a community that is 100% 'vaccinated'. That way, the statistics (if reported truthfully) pertaining to infections, hospitalizations and excess deaths from whatever cause cannot be in dispute. These events are, therefore, all happening to the jabbed; the deliberately seeded forest of uncertainties can be largely stripped away. Fortunately, there are several examples of moderately sized territories or countries that took the bait, the hook, the line and the sinker – Gibraltar and Singapore prominent among them.
There are also some countries that serve as control samples; those with very low rates of 'vaccination', such as Burundi, Haiti and the DRC. In fact, there was an entire continent that gave the lie to both narratives - the 'deadly pandemic' and the 'safe and effective vaccines' – and that's Africa. The globalists are currently doing their best to remove any evidence that demolishes the claim the jab is necessary, by kindly making it available to low income countries, but there is still some efficacy in looking at the before and after there, too.
Firstly then, Gibraltar. Although Gibraltar hadn't escaped what is characterized as the pandemic, by September 2020 there had only been 217 confirmed cases among its population of 34,000. The first three deaths – in nursing home – didn't arrive until November and by January 10th, the day mass 'vaccination' began, the official death toll stood at 16. The first question might be “why was there a need to 'vaccinate' at all? I suspect that the governor was leant on by the home country; the media in the UK (and elsewhere) was replete with story after story, all selling the hopium, showing any recalcitrant deniers in the UK that life could go back to normal if they could just stand in line like the good old Gibraltarians.(15)(16)
Needless to say, they were lying. Within 10 days of the first jab (which took place on 10th January 2021), the death toll had risen to 53, by 2nd February it was 79 and by the end of that month, 93. All, allegedly, from Covid. Total infections, by end March, totaled 4,271.(17)(18) Operation Freedom, using Pfizer's 'vaccine', was nothing of the sort. Naturally, authorities denied there was any connection to the 'vaccine', or indeed any connection to jabs of any kind, but they refused to say how many of the people who had died since the campaign began were 'vaccinated', which tells its own story.
It's striking that the 'vaccination' was voluntary and that, even in a small community crammed into 2.6 square miles of territory, where it would have been impossible to ignore the unfolding tragedy, nobody thought to call a halt and the population kept lining up to be jabbed. Was it peer pressure? Herd mentality? Or a particularly effective fear campaign combined with lock-downs? Perhaps a deadly combination of the three. Certainly, the government was still zealous in its pursuit of a fully jabbed population – even after the initial wave of deaths, they still bought an additional 11,700 doses.(19)
The disaster did not go entirely unnoticed, despite the usual deafening silence from the mainstream media;
“...a possibility is that the Rock could be the ‘canary in the mine’ signalling a potentially lethal vaccine hazard in susceptible people, perhaps made worse by concurrent or immediate past Covid-19 infection. The vulnerability may also have been increased by a flu vaccination campaign this winter, the most intense in Gibraltar’s history.”(20)
The same flu campaign that had wreaked havoc among the nursing homes of northern Italy and elsewhere:
“A peer-reviewed study published last October, based on data from 39 countries, found ‘a significant increase in Covid-19 deaths from eastern to western regions of the world’ associated with flu vaccination among those aged over 65.”(21)
The total of 94 dead, in a population of approximately 34,000, gave Gibraltar the highest Covid mortality rate in the world at the time. This shouldn't have been a surprise to the UK government. Between January 8th and January 22nd, just after the commencement of the UK's own 'vaccination' roll-out, deaths in nursing homes tripled.(22)
Figure 1
It didn't end there. Cases continued to rise throughout the year.
Figure 2
That even drew the attention of the hopelessly naïve John Campbell, of YouTube fame. He spent nearly five minutes resolutely refusing to recognise the elephant in the room, as per usual.(23) Since then, Gibraltar has pretty much gone radio silent. They solved their statistical issues by simply discontinuing data reporting for excess mortality.
Figure 3
A couple of years ago, we might still have been clinging to a sense that, as a fully 'vaccinated' territory, the Gibraltar government might have felt some sort of moral duty to fully share their experience with the rest of us. They obviously didn't and I fear that such an expectation would be laughable in the here and now. We do know that they, along with the Singaporeans, are still far keener on boosters than the rest of the world, which suggests a level of stupidity that I find difficult to comprehend.
Figure 4
And, in Singapore's case, that's after a remarkably similar ordeal.
Figure 5
By the end of September 2022, at which point Singapore's government seems to have stopped reporting data to some organisations, they had administered 2.6 shots per person.(24) However, the Department of Statistics was still able to provide some figures, which paint a dismal picture. The government started 'vaccinating' on 30th December 2020. Comparing the death rate in 2022 to the pre-pandemic year of 2019, reveals an increase of 26%, the highest rate since records began 61 years earlier. The perinatal mortality rate (defined as stillborns and deaths in the first seven days of life) is up a staggering 84%.(25)
These data come from a highly controlled environment. It is generally felt that fudging of data is what other countries do, not Singapore. Over 85% of the population is jabbed, with a smörgåsbord of four 'vaccines' to choose from. The jab was mandated from February last year,(26) despite the fact that 'Covid deaths' had already sky-rocketed.
Figure 6
I would suggest that Gibraltar is in a similar position currently, given the lack of transparency. Other smaller, highly 'vaccinated' countries exhibit a similar pattern.
Figure 7
Not every country reports excess deaths. For those of the above that do, the situation is dire.
Figure 8
By May 2022, perhaps six months into global 'vaccinations', the situation on the ground was crystal clear. Out a total of 202 countries,
“...in only 38 countries is there a discernible reduction in Covid deaths after vaccination programmes began. For the other 164 countries both the rate and the number of Covid deaths after vaccination programs are higher than before.
In not one of the 101 countries that report all-cause mortality is cumulative excess mortality lower than it was at the time mass vaccination programs began. And in 70 of these countries, the rate of cumulative excess mortality is higher after Covid vaccination programs began.”(27)
Deaths per million per day – globally – have risen to 2.0 from 1.4 since the campaigns began; a 42% increase.(28)(29) There are other standouts, as well, but wherever they occur, the authorities are always befuddled as to causes. In the Balearic islands, deaths in 2022 were 398.6% higher than they were in the first year of the 'pandemic.'(30) Spain has apparently 'vaccinated around 87% of its eligible population and I'm willing to bet that holiday locations are probably some of the most jabbed of all. The authorities there, without any apparent sense of self awareness, refute that these excess deaths have anything to do with the 'vaccine', noting that
“ignorance leads to speculation, which is followed by rumour-mongering and, in the end, we have theories to suit all tastes” and that “the excess deaths in 2021 and 2022 will be, above all, due to an increase in strokes, myocardial infarction, pulmonary thromboembolism and coronavirus infection itself.”(31)
Well, precisely. He either doesn't know that all those conditions have been shown to be known side effects of the 'vaccines', or he does know and is hoping that we don't. The Japanese, as well as being one of the more highly jabbed people on earth, are also world leaders in booster dissonance. The over 65's have jab rates of 91%, 82.5% and 56% respectively for the three respective boosters.(32) They simply cannot work it out.
Figure 9
Most of the deaths have apparently come from heart failure or kidney disease. It's all most peculiar; or so they're saying. But, as we should all know by now, myocarditis is a known side effect of the Covid jab (33) and acute renal failure has always been associated with remdesivir (an approved Covid treatment in Japan), from the aborted clinical trials onwards.(34) Then there's this.
Figure 10
Would anybody like to take a guess as to when the three booster campaigns began? If you do so correctly, you'll be in possession of more knowledge than the Japanese medical profession; allegedly. But even doctors can't be that stupid.
The case for the prosecution would seem to be pretty robust, but there is the possibility of adding to it via the means of negative correlations, too; namely, countries at the opposite end of the 'vaccination' spectrum – the aforementioned Burundi, Haiti and the Democratic Republic of Congo and, perhaps, the African continent in its entirety.
Figure 11
Figure 12
As can be seen, if the 'vaccination' campaign continues unhindered, any differences that might be apparent are likely to be eradicated at some point in the future, but some evidence is still available presently. Excess mortality is difficult to measure in what the UN likes to call 'low-income countries', because conditions can change rapidly, either for good or bad and stability is required if a meaningful calculation is to be made. What we do have is the data on deaths per thousand, which is illuminating enough. Haiti's number was 8.6, Burundi's was 8.0 and the DRC came in at 6.8. A little context is clearly required – these countries were well in excess of those rates; Portugal (10.6), Germany (11.2), Japan (10.4), the UK (9.4), South Africa (9.5) and the United States (8.7).(35) In fact, most countries in Europe, part of what we call 'the developed world' have death rates in excess of Haiti's number.
Figure 13
Whilst I appreciate that data from nations with less efficient bureaucracies may not always be relied upon, the deaths per thousand rate surely shouldn't be in the same ballpark as that of western nations. This graph may, additionally, reflect a more honest accounting method. Inflating the number of Covid deaths was a profitable undertaking in the West, as was a veritable genocide of the elderly and infirm. It is known that, in the UK and undoubtedly elsewhere, at least a third of NHS staff were pressured to put Do Not Resuscitate notices on disabled Covid patients,(36) and there is a mountain of evidence that demonstrates that the UK Government authorized the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable by Midazolam injection, while blaming Covid.(37)
Figure 14
So yes, an artificial bolstering of the number of Covid deaths was a necessary part of the narrative in the West, the better to frighten people into getting the jab. It seems that African nations, with the dishonorable exception of South Africa, did not share the same motivation and coronavirus infection never really became an official necessity.
Figure 15
There are other reasons for the continent's resilience to the 'pandemic':
“It so happens that two of the most effective treatments for COVID, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, are also routine prophylactic weekly medicines throughout equatorial Africa, because they happen to be known for a half-century as the most effective, applicable and safest anti-parasite medications. So the population, particularly through about 31 countries, the tropical middle rectangle roughly, of Africa already were well-equipped prior to COVID events launching in late 2019 to early 2020.”(38)
Figure 16
Other countries, those either less in thrall to the West or more solicitous of their own citizens, also acknowledged the obvious and dosed their populations with hydroxychloroquine.
Figure 17
Clearly, widespread public knowledge of the efficacy of these inexpensive and widely available drugs (although availability was sharply diminished in short order) was not part of the plan, which is why Africa's success has never been discussed in the legacy media. However, it seems that governments in Africa are as corrupt as those in the West, as there is no conceivable benefit to a 'vaccination campaign' and yet it appears that one is still well underway.
In fact, one of the many tragedies of the entire Covid imbroglio is the way in which countries virtually unaffected by Covid during the entirety of 2020, still fell victim to the 'vaccination' scam with predictably tragic consequences.
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
So, there we have it. Despite the best efforts of our elected officials and their poodles in the Fourth Estate, there is still incontrovertible evidence that the 'vaccines' are not worthy of the name and are, instead, effectively bioweapons. We can argue about whether they are so intentionally, but it's clear to me that they are. The dishonesty involved in the entire scam, from an engineered 'pandemic', through PDC testing, lock-downs, masks and all the other nonsense is powerful circumstantial evidence and, though knowing that our paranoia is not misplaced and that they really are out to get us is useful information, the fact that so much damage has already been done is a tragedy.
Ultimately, the exact mechanism of damage is downstream from the fact that there is a clear relationship between the 'vaccines' and subsequent bad outcomes. The signal in repeated across the globe, in countries big and small. It's robust and is apparent in several different modes; from controlled environments where there is a straightforward, temporal relationship (such as Gibraltar and Singapore), to booster obsessed Japan (a country that has shown us that the more jabs mean more damage inflicted), to control samples such as Haiti, Burundi, the DOC and much of Africa itself, which demonstrate that there is an absence of death and damage when 'vaccination' rates are low.
The 'experts' have been studiously avoiding both the massive grey animal in the corner and Occam's Razor to boot and, no matter what the current state of the narrative, they will continue to do so. There will be further limited hangouts, fallback positions that have either been long prepared (the recent acknowledgement of the lab leak theory, for one) or which need to be constructed on the hoof (Midazolam Matt and the Lock-down Files, perhaps; or perhaps not). However, there will never be an admission of guilt. They will never concede that the 'vaccine' needed a 'pandemic', which they were happy to provide. They will never admit that they knew the jab was a killer, nor that that was the entire point of it. But we don't need them to. It's obvious.
Figure 21
Citations
(1) https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_0004_9700_HDTRA108D0007_9700
(2) https://citizens.news/663687.html
(4) https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/03/03/coronavirus-italy-anniversary/
(6) https://www.doctorsinitaly.com/b/flu-shot/
(8) https://stop-mascarade.com/97-false-positive-pcr-tests/
(13) Cyber Security Campaign Playbook, D3P.
(14) Dodsworth, Laura. A State of Fear: How the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic (p. 68). Pinter & Martin. Kindle Edition.
(15) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9442063/Gibraltar-life-like-weve-vaccine.html
(18) https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-vaccine-connection-to-death-on-the-rock/
(19) Ditto
(20) Ditto
(21) Ditto
(23) https://www.midlandscbd.com/articles/gibraltar-vaccine-failure
(24)
https://www.ourworldindata.org
(25) https://expose-news.com/2023/03/01/deaths-in-singapore-hit-record-60-year-highs/
(27) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/01/death-rates-are-higher-after-mass-vaccinations/
(28) Ditto
(29)
(30) https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/11/20/excess-deaths-balearic-islands-skyrocket/
(31) Ditto
(33) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5
(34) https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.2145
(35) https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/death-rate-by-country
(37) Ditto
Figure 1 https://www.ourworldindata.org
Figure 2 https://deathship.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/the-powerful-case-against-covid-mrna-vaccine/
Figure 3 https://www.ourworldindata.org
Figure 4 Ditto
Figure 5 Ditto
Figure 6
Figure 7 https://www.ourworldindata.org
Figure 8 Ditto
Figure 9 Ditto
Figure 10 Ditto
Figure 11 Ditto
Figure 12 Ditto
Figure 13 Ditto
Figure 14 https://expose-news.com/2023/02/19/nhs-dr-confirms-orders-to-euthanise-patients-and-label-covid/
Figure 16 https://deathship.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/the-powerful-case-against-covid-mrna-vaccine/
Figure 17 www.hcqtrial.com
Figure 18 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-deaths-cause-unknown/
Figure 19 Ditto
Figure 20 Ditto
Figure 21 https://www.hartgroup.org/cumulative-excess-deaths-2020-2022-an-international-comparison/