One of the most discombobulating notions that has circulated since March 16th 2020 to this very day is the one that holds that we find ourselves where we are as a result of 'mistakes' made by governments and health authorities. To be sure, there is space for the more cynical type who believes that a combination of venality and opportunism have also played a major role, but even they still hold fast to the 'never let a good crisis go to waste' paradigm, wherein natural events have been leveraged for gain.
Even those who are sufficiently independent-minded to have realized that Covid was likely man-made are still prone to the lab leak theory. They can accept man's stupidity (in the form of gain of function research, without realizing that the alleged pursuit of biodefence requires the creation of the bioweapon, initially), but are unable to take their thinking further and contemplate an alternative explanation. To be fair, they are hardly encouraged to do so; the bounds of acceptable public discourse are rigidly enforced and any theory that doesn't pass muster is exiled to Tinfoilhatland.
There is also the problem of locating reliable evidence about most elements of the 'pandemic' which, on one level, tells its own story – why would there be such obfuscation unless there was something worth hiding? - but on another level makes fleshing out a hypothesis very difficult. In a world where even the bleeding obvious can be denied with impunity,establishing the truth can be hugely problematic.
When it comes to the 'vaccines', however, there are ways of connecting the dots. We can establish intent, both from words and actions, we can examine patents and identify ingredients and we can look at outcomes. When we've got the detail in sharp relief, we may zoom out and see where the 'pandemic' fits into the grand plan – or, Great Reset as Klaus and King Charles would have it. This is not an exercise that hasn't (increasingly) been done by others; it's more that it's usually not done with enough courage.
Whilst this is not the first time that I have banged this particular drum, it is worth reiterating the point – it's the big lies, perhaps counter-intuitively, that often have the best chance of success. It can be remarkably difficult for people to countenance true malevolence, partly because we don't get much practice (we assume) and also because most of us seem to be congenitally incapable of thinking the worst of others. Thus, the truly evil outliers almost always get a free pass for an unconscionable duration.
The most frequently proffered explanation for their behavior is incompetence, even when it is clear that all the 'mistakes' that they make are ones that benefit the same interests, when they ought to be randomly distributed. We seem to be afflicted by an evolutionary glitch that renders us incapable of confronting this type of reality. But the evidence is out there and much of it has been provided by those who are either the authors or the enablers of the latest manifestation of evil.
The ruling class' obsession with eugenics and population control has been apparent for centuries. In 1798, the Reverend Malthus argued that "the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man.”(1) In the absence of war, disease or famine, the human population would, therefore, explode and lead to a catastrophic collapse of the food supply. (As an aside, it seems that man's distrust in Nature's ability to adapt and overcome, thus necessitating human meddling, also has a long history).
Malthus' ideas gradually seeded the ruling class. Primitive birth control measures were encouraged and numerous Malthusian groups actively worked to increase mortality in the ranks of the poor. Social Darwinism held that natural selection (or unnatural, as culling the poor required effort) was necessary, not evil because
“The advances of society were making it possible for many of the weaker members of society, who previously would have died off, to survive long enough to reproduce and, over time, significantly weaken the gene pool.”(2)
Eugenics, in particular, was also de rigeur in the years prior to World War I. Indeed, Churchill organised the International Eugenics Congress in London in 1912 (3) and the Eugenics Society included Conservative Prime Ministers Chamberlain and Balfour. Darwin himself espoused eugenics, as did H G Wells,(4) D H Lawrence (5) and Bertrand Russell.(6) Lawrence's attitude to the congenitally sick was particularly uncompromising:
“If I had my way, I would build a lethal chamber as big as Crystal Palace, with a military band playing softly and a Cinematograph working brightly; then I’d go out in the back streets and main streets and bring them all in, all the sick, the halt and the maimed; I would lead them gently and they would smile me a weary thanks, and the band would softly bubble out the “Hallelujah Chorus.””(7)
And, while the idea's popularity faded somewhat after the stock market crash of 1929 (because many of the elite lost everything, but weren't prepared to accept that they themselves were therefore in some way defective), it was still mainstream as recently as the 1960s. And, as well as disposing of the sick, the elites were keen to sterilize 'defectives'. In 1907, Indiana passed a law which aimed to “prevent the procreating of confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists.”(8) Within five years, a dozen other states had done likewise. Virginia filed a petition to sterilize one Carrie Buck, an adult with a mental age of eight. The case made it to the Supreme Court where the Chief Justice, no less, had this to say:
“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.”(9)
Which seems a little harsh, to say the least. But the cream of society was aware that, as a general rule, the masses had more children than they themselves did and they weren't keen on being swamped. And so, it wasn't simply that the gene pool was being weakened, or that the ruling class were in danger of losing their power, or that there wouldn't be enough food for everyone – it was all three.
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), written by Kissinger in 1974, postulated that population growth in the least developed countries (he named 13, including India, Mexico, Turkey and Nigeria) would account for 47% of the all world population growth.(10) In his view, this constituted a critical national security issue for the United States and he outlined a variety of policies that might mitigate the threat. This was no flight of fancy; both NSSM 314, a memo adopting population control policies both at home and abroad, and the original NSSM 200 are still official US policy today and encourage the use of “specialized agencies” to carry out “a global population strategy” aimed at providing “functional assistance programs to create conditions for fertility decline”.(11)
Paul Erhlich, author of The Population Bomb (1968), popularized the erroneous theory of over-population for a modern audience. He maintained that hundreds of millions of people would starve to death in the 1970s and advocated for coercive population control.(12) Undeterred by the fact that his predictions came to naught, he was still giving us the benefit of his fraudulent insights in 2012:
“The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people....so we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off."(13)
The Club of Rome, a think tank which seems to specialize in crisis creation, produced a report in 1972 entitled “The Limits to Growth”.(14) It introduced the concept of 'sustainability', birthed the Green New Deal agenda and concluded that societies were best organised by some form of scientific dictatorship, which would bring the human herd down to a manageable number. Its conclusions were the result of computer simulations rather than any real world data, a notable feature of the Malthusians. As usual, rubbish data in results in rubbish data out, but results can be easily manipulated to suit the desired outcome. One of the main authors of the report, Dennis Meadows (a member of the WEF), is also unfazed by the fact that none of the predicted limits have, in fact, been experienced. As recently as 2017, he was still unreconstructed:
“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably, if we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living … But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people. And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.”(15)
The likes of David Attenborough, the late Prince Philip, Jane Goodall, Bill Gates, the WEF's Yuval Noah Harari (he of the 'useless eaters' mindset), Klaus Schwab himself and a roll call of our current ruling elites are all fervent believers in overpopulation.(16) They do not hold homo sapiens in high regard. They don't want us to procreate and exacerbate the 'problem', while they are doing their level best to find ways of fixing it.
Anything that contributes to mass sterilization or which inhibits child bearing is encouraged and anything that works against that agenda is excoriated. Hence, birth control, abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality, the catastrophic reduction in male testosterone, prohibitively expensive health care and virtually unfettered access to potentially lethal drugs are all to be encouraged (either implicitly or explicitly), while stable marital relationships and religion are undermined and attacked at every opportunity. The elites' support for the latest fad – transgenderism – is typical of their approach. In US states that allow minors to bypass parents in their bid for 'gender-affirming care', suicides rates are 14% higher,(17) and puberty blockers, surgery and the hormone treatments that they must take as adults ensure that they are are unable to have children, as well as causing extensive damage to their hearts.(18)
This is the Cliff Notes version of the population control agenda as it exists today, but which is seldom (if ever) exposed to sunlight. Perhaps it's baldest iteration is the version proferred by Jacques Attali, a close associate of Mitterand and founder of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development:
“In the future it will be about finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as he is over 60-65 years of age, man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly. Then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially finally the stupid ones.
Euthanasia targetting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. Of course, we cannot execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of it (sic) by making them believe it is for their own good. Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive.
Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to a screeching halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to give intelligence tests to millions and millions of people, you can imagine.”(19)
The second half of that particular quote, where the method is suggested, will feature later in this piece. So, this is the mindset of the ruling class and has been for decades. It must, therefore, be recognized as a relevant factor as we attempt to decipher the reasons behind the smörgåsbord of policies and actions that are currently being enacted and which have recently been inflicted upon us.
And so, with that said, let us return to the 'pandemic'. Before dealing with the ingredients of the 'vaccine', a quick summary of the other measures that were introduced, by way of detailing a litany of bad faith decisions that all ensured that extra harm would befall those obliged to live with the consequences.
The most widely used Covid test has been the PCR test. However, it is a research tool, used in labs, or a secondary diagnostic tool used by physicians in order to confirm/deny a diagnosis from observed symptoms. What it is not is a community testing kit. It was not designed that way and shouldn't be used in that fashion, as the test cannot discriminate between whole virus and virus fragments, or determine infectivity – at least, not in the way it is being deployed. The test doesn't have a unique positive control to specifically identify SARS-CoV-2, nor a negative control to exclude other coronaviruses.
“External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.”(20) Again, “the test cannot discriminate between a living virus and a strand of RNA which broke into pieces weeks or months ago.”(21)
Once more… “the PCR test...is an exacting tool, prone to invisible errors, especially due to the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code.”(22)
The test works by amplifying genetic material from a swab. The number of amplifications required is called the cycle rate. According to Professor Heneghan, the director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM), if you have to use more than 25 cycles of amplification, you do not have an infectious person. But the cycle threshold is not noted in the result, as given to you – it's a binary choice of positive or negative.
So what cycle rate was being used in the US and the UK to determine a positive test? In the US, either 37 or 40. In the UK and Ireland, 40 to 45. This inevitably led to vastly inflated numbers of positive tests, where there is, in fact, insufficient viral load for them to be infectious. The diagnostic sensitivity of the test can only be measured in an operational setting, where tests are being conducted, rather than in a pristine laboratory. This has never been done. These errors are not accidentally made – they are obvious shortcomings that have been exploited in a dishonest fashion to create fear porn where none should have existed.
Furthermore, masks should never have been mandated. They never had been before and with good reason:
“In addition to hypoxia and hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial and germs components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. These toxic components are repeatedly rebreathed back into the body, causing self-contamination. Breathing through facemasks also increases temperature and humidity in the space between the mouth and the mask, resulting in a release of toxic particles from the mask’s materials. A systematic literature review estimated that aerosol contamination levels of facemasks including 13 to 202,549 different viruses. Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression.”(23)
This was known; the CDC in the US had financed its own research which demonstrated that masking was futile.(24) It's not yet another of those supposed revelations that came from regime health experts diligently following the science as it developed, although they'd be chuffed if you still believed that it was. They've been seeding that narrative just in case a Truth and Reconciliation spectacle is ever proposed. Mask mandates were a deliberate tactic which made people more ill and also served to reinforce unquestioning compliance.
Then there were the lock-downs; yet another way of making matters worse, not better. Besides the economic and mental health cost, lock-downs killed people:
“What can be said is that COVID produced a bump of up to about 15% “excess deaths” in a small number of relatively rich, NATO countries, but in world-wide terms produced no extra deaths beyond what would have been expected for 2020. Most of the hard-hit countries were under, and may still be under, the severest forms of “lockdowns” and “social distancing” such as Italy, UK, France, Spain, Portugal, and parts of the US.”(25)
By April 2020, more than half the world's population had been locked down. It was inevitable that this would result in excess mortality, if only by virtue of a denial of ongoing medical care for those who relied upon it to stay alive. These measures might conceivably have been characterised as knee-jerk reactions from panicked regimes that suddenly found themselves beyond the limits of their competence – just maybe, although that would still have been an erroneous judgement, as none of the science that they assured us they were relying on would have supported them. But how do we assimilate active attempts to deny us early treatment?
A vaccine is not the only way to deal with Covid 19 and it never has been. One sensible strategy, instead of betting everything on a jab, would have been to see if any existing drugs could be repurposed and whether there were any natural compounds that could ameliorate the virus. Re-purposing drugs is an industry within an industry already, and as a number of the drugs in question are no longer protected by patent, it's a more altruistic endeavor than the headlong pursuit of a new vaccine. Indeed, one might hope that 'saving lives', the constant mantra to which we were subjected, is more important than profit; 'might' being the operative word, given the tranches of evidence to the contrary.
Re-purposing didn't happen to any great extent, at least not in the West. In other parts of the world, several drugs and vitamins were used to great effect, but efforts to draw attention to the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or even the more humble minerals, Vitamin D and Zinc, were met with much resistance and claims of insufficient clinical evidence, which is richly ironic when one examines the paucity of evidence accumulated during the 'vaccine' clinical trials.
Hydroxychloroquine, a venerable anti malarial treatment which has been in circulation as an approved medication for around sixty years, was shown to be very effective if taken in moderate doses, whilst a patient was in the early symptomatic stages of the disease. Some studies found that symptoms were swiftly dispersed in two or three days in 80-90% of cases. Currently, there have been more than 200 studies, with over 350,000 patients; or, to put it another way, about four times as many patients as the vaccine trials, combined.(26) Not only that, but in moderate doses there are very few side effects and, as an off patent drug, treatments are very cheap. And therein lay one problem, certainly.
Hydroxychloroquine was approved for use in 1955 as a treatment for malaria – it's also used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. It's not obscure – this recently maligned drug is on the World Health Organisation's 'List of Essential Medicines'. It's been used, safely, for 65 years and was available over the counter for pennies; until, that is, governments started to restrict its use. France converted it into a prescription only drug suspiciously early on in proceedings, on 15th January 2020 and other countries followed suit. And here's another interesting fact. By 2005, it was known that HCQ was a potent inhibitor of SARS, either as a prophylactic or in the early stages of disease.(27) You read that correctly.
At the outset of the pandemic, 300,000 people in the United States were already taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ). At least that many in the UK, also, as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.(28) And initially, physicians who actually treated patients with Covid 19 believed HCQ to be the most effective treatment (37%), with AZ coming in second (32%). A typical treatment protocol was 800mg prescribed on day one with 200-400mg for 4-5 days thereafter. Doctors didn't wait for Covid test results; they knew that early outpatient treatment was the key.(29)
After all, the alternative, which was employed by the vast majority of other doctors, was no treatment at all for high risk patients; come back when you're worse and we'll send you to hospital. So, naturally, the authorities decided that clinical trials had to be conducted, despite the fact that the drug was approved worldwide and was clearly working. As far as I'm aware, this course of action was unprecedented – no approved medication has ever been subjected to further clinical trials before it can be repurposed.
There were two large scale trials – the Solidarity trial in the US and the Recovery trial in the UK. Now, given the treatment protocol being followed by physicians, as stated above, what would you expect these trials to do? The idea would be to test the hypothesis in a controlled environment, would it not? Apparently not. Instead, hospitalized patients (not outpatients) were given 2.4g on day one and 800mg thereafter, three to four times the safe amount. These are toxic doses, given to patients who were already ill enough to be in hospital. The trials were designed in such a way that they tested neither of the parameters of real world prescription. And the trials weren't just botched; a large number of patients died. Why would anybody do that?
At the same time, in May 2020, one of the world's most prestigious medical and scientific journals, The Lancet, published an article purporting to show that HCQ treatment was associated with increased mortality. After a hail of criticism from medical professionals, it was discovered that the entire article was a lie and it was retracted two weeks later. But the damage was done – which must have been the entire point of it. France, Italy and Belgium immediately revoked HCQ authority and the WHO pressured other countries to do the same. The corporate media, who had fallen over each other to cover the publication of the article, predictably ignored the retraction.
Across Europe and the US, pressure was brought to bear on medical associations, on front-line physicians, on medical journals. Instead of being an over the counter medication, HCQ became a prescription drug and from there on in, state control was re-established. But out in the real world, there have been hundreds of studies demonstrating the curative powers of HCQ.(30)
“A reverse natural experiment happened in Switzerland. On May 27, the Swiss national government banned outpatient use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. Around June 10, COVID-19 deaths increased four-fold and remained elevated. On June 11, the Swiss government revoked the ban, and on June 23 the death rate reverted to what it had been beforehand. People who die from COVID-19 live about three to five weeks from the start of symptoms, which makes the evidence of a causal relation in these experiments strong.” (31)
Excess deaths (attributed to Covid) seem to be confined to a smallish group of Western European nations who share certain characteristics; among them, draconian measures involving lock-downs, social isolation and a refusal to contemplate or allow safe, effective treatments with repurposed drugs. There cannot be a benign explanation for these actions. Whether one wishes to believe that malign intent extended only as far as Big Pharma greed matters not. If the likes of Moderna and Pfizer were to hit the jackpot, lives has to be sacrificed – lots of them.
And so, for the duration of 2020, early treatments were lethally squeezed. . No medical societies had bothered to issue advice for nine months at that point, whilst the stage was being set. It's astonishing that the first set of treatment guidelines for Covid patients didn't exist until 8th October 2020 and were published by the National Institute for Health (NIH) Predictably, the guidance was that patients were to stay at home and be sick in private until they became unwell enough to come to hospital. Crucially, unwell enough was defined as having difficulty breathing. The hospital would, at some point, provide oxygen and a considerable number of patients would find themselves ventilated and on both a sedative (often Midazolam) and Remdesivir.
“Notably, they chopped antibiotic prescriptions in the US by 50 per cent during 2020. They ensured large numbers of frail elderly people were mechanically ventilated, a procedure which, in such subjects, is close to contraindicated. Some were administered remdesivir, which is a poison for the kidneys. In care homes, they were given midazolam and morphine, respiratory depressant drugs which in combination are all but contraindicated in patients with breathing difficulties. If used, close monitoring is required, most usually automated alarm systems attached to vital cardiorespiratory monitoring, including fingertip monitoring for blood gases. That didn’t happen in care homes.”(32)
By this time, 12-14 days would have passed and any virus still left in the patient would be in sharp decline; either that or gone entirely. The lung problems that present in severe Covid patients are to do with the damage the spike protein causes, not the virus. Micro clotting and inflammation are the enemy at this point in the illness and Remdesivir is of almost no value. Forced oxygen exchange via a mechanical ventilator further damaged lungs that were already compromised. Victims broadly fell into three categories:
a) Patients who genuinely had had Covid, but then didn't, being intubated and given a sedative, an anti viral and forced oxygen which, in combination, worsens the existing condition and also destroys kidney function.
b) Patients with other respiratory diseases which present the same symptoms as Covid but may be bacterial in nature, instead. Unless they were also given a course of antibiotics (some were), anti viral treatment will present no benefits and their disease will worsen.
c) Patients who were at the hospital for something else, but who tested 'positive', despite having no symptoms. They were then isolated in the Covid ward, in amongst others who were genuinely ill and left to take their chances.
“The first three Covid drugs approved under EUA were Remdesivir, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib. All were EUA approved for inpatient use (in hospital) only, demonstrate dismal effectiveness and are replete with black box warnings and side effects such as organ failure, blood clots, serious infections and malignancy.”(33)
Yet another accident/misjudgment? In the UK, the regime was also knee deep in 'incompetence'. We know that the NHS asked care homes to implement blanket DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate orders) on all their patients and that around 10% of care homes did so – again without agreement.(34) Additionally, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued guidance (that word, again) which promoted the use of morphine and midazolam, neither of which is an anti-viral and both of which are sedatives, which had the predictable effect of killing people.(35)
Back across the pond, the Americans were also doing their very best to extinguish the last vestiges of medical humanity. Copious witness testimony indicate that rapacious hospital boards plundered the riches on offer from the federal government, while abrogating the basic human rights of their patients. They were assisted in this endeavor by the guidance provided to them by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid,(36) who took it upon themselves to issue blanket waivers (retrospectively to March 1st 2020, just in case some had already jumped the gun). The forty four page document reads like a charter to obviate rights and legitimise abuse. For instance:
“CMS is waiving the requirements at 42 CFR §482.13(g) (1)(i)-(ii), which require that hospitals report patients in an intensive care unit whose death is caused by their disease, but who required soft wrist restraints to prevent pulling tubes/IVs, no later than the close of business on the next business day.... provided any death where the restraint may have contributed is still reported within standard time limits.”(37)
It's not the easing off of reporting restrictions that was shocking, it was the casual acceptance that restraints may have contributed to death. Or this:
“CMS is waiving the requirements at sections....., which require hospitals and CAHs to provide information about their advance directive policies to patients. CMS is waiving this requirement to allow staff to more efficiently deliver care to a larger number of patients.”(38)
So, there was no longer a requirement to inform the patient about the care plan envisioned for them. This is so far outside the bounds of informed consent as to be over the horizon. It is astonishing that CMS felt they had the right to do these things and profoundly disturbing that they were confident enough to commit them to paper. It illustrates a health care system that is out of control, where the patient's autonomy no longer matters.
Once the 'vaccines' arrived, of course, the co-ordination of talking points became obvious. This is Sajid Javid, the UK's Health Minister at the time:
“The vaccines are safe, effective and have built a huge wall of defense around us that is keeping the virus at bay.” (39)
I'll use Javid as a proxy for whatever health minister has lied to you for the past three and a half years. There is absolutely no possibility that he believed what he was saying. He had access to all the data that I do and much more besides; he had people briefing him with it every day. Even if they wanted to deceive him, they couldn't, because it's all checkable. He must, therefore, have known that what he's telling us is a lie. So, let that be point number one: the Secretary of Health, a public servant whose salary is paid from our taxes and whose job it is to lead the department responsible for safeguarding the health of the public, lied to us.
If you got ill, they denied you early treatment. They told you that vitamin D didn't work, they carried out trials on hydroxychloroquine and deliberately overdosed (with triple the safe level) over 100 vulnerable patients who died. If you ended up in hospital as a result of their negligence, they did their level best to get you sedated and intubated, if they treated you at all.
If you were a nursing home resident, paying through the nose for the privilege, they sent Covid ravaged patients back to the home from hospital, they imposed blanket DNRs and made sure you had a 'good death', on your own with no family present. They cancelled cancer treatments and other critical care procedures and tens of thousands of people died unnecessarily. They made sure you were locked-down, often with sick people. They ruined lifestyles, businesses and relationships for no reason. That is not guesswork, neither was it impossible to foresee - Sweden and Florida are the control groups.
Thusfar, then, we find ourselves ranged against a ruling class that has long been possessed by the notion that the serried ranks of useless eaters need a drastic thinning out, which supports every initiative that stunts population growth, which did everything in their power to make a 'pandemic' of their creation as lethal as possible by denying access to life saving medications and adopting protocols that killed patients that they were charged with protecting. And it was of their creation – the furin cleavage site of SARS-COV-2 (the part of the disease that attaches to cells) was derived from a Moderna patented gene sequence.(40)
My contention is that there should be no confusion as to why the 'pandemic' measures were enacted. Given the predominant belief system of the elites, it would be the equivalent of a self inflicted wound had they done otherwise. But, despite their best efforts, there were no excess deaths over the course of 2020. Yes, there was a manufactured uptick in April, but that was all. Covid was just the set-up; the 'vaccines' were the punchline.
But what is really in the 'vaccines'? My working hypothesis is that whatever ingredients are present are there by design. That presumption makes more sense than a fanciful belief that any unexpected elements are there accidentally. The ruling class do not deserve the benefit of the doubt; it is far more sensible to examine whether the contents of the 'vaccines' advance the stated aim of depopulation than it is to search for excuses as to why certain substances are 'vaccine' ingredients. While doing so, it would pay to be mindful of the second half of the Attali quote, where he suggests a way of reducing global population rapidly:
“We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the big, it doesn't matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.
We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots will thus be done by themselves; they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”(41)
We are told that the jabs contain messenger RNA (mRNA), made in a laboratory, which instructs cells to make harmless pieces of spike protein, which trigger an immune response; the mRNA is then broken down and eliminated from the body within days. However, this is not an accurate depiction of the process, firstly because the jabs don't contain mRNA, but rather modified RNA which is far longer lasting and which can access every cell in the body, including those in the heart and the brain.
Irrespective of the coding of the modRNA (the programming required to produce the desired protein), the molecule itself is inflammatory and toxic. In addition, a properly functioning metabolism does not naturally produce inessential proteins, as they may interfere with cell function. Any cell that keeps producing vast quantities of a foreign protein will become a target for the immune system, which will attack it and attempt to destroy it.
The 'vaccines' also contain an unknown number of microRNAs, which are hidden within the genomic sequence of the modRNA. We don't yet know how these might disrupt innate and adaptive immunity by affecting protein levels, but the chances are that they will. Likewise, the long term effects are not known, but are unlikely to be good.
“MicroRNAs are abundant and are critical for normal animal development. They are involved in gene expression, mRNA stability and degradation, regulation of protein translation, and wound healing. They can exhibit hormone-like activities by mediating cell-cell communication and can be released into the extracellular fluids to reach other cells and organs. It is estimated that 60% of mammalian genes are influenced by miRNAs which affect regulatory pathways involved in cancer, apoptosis (programmed cell death), metabolism and development. MicroRNAs have been detected in plasma, serum, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, breast milk, urine, tears and seminal fluid.”(42)
None of this information has been disclosed by health authorities. Nor has the fact that there are also unacceptable levels of double stranded DNA plasmid in the jab, which is hugely problematic as it is replication competent, meaning that it too can invade human cells. This can cause cancer, sepsis and all sorts of other issues.(43) This DNA lasts forever and, if it integrates into the human genome, it will be reproduced for as long as that person is alive. That would be on top of the modRNA which has been shown to be reverse transcribed into DNA in human liver cells in just six hours.(44) And there are at least five ways in which the DNA-RNA-protein combination can take the DNA into the nucleus of human cells,(45) all of which are features of the 'vaccines', not bugs. They were designed that way.
It was also known (as long ago as 2013) that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing the DNA accumulated in the ovaries in animal studies,(46) yet another fact that didn't make its way into the brochure. The presence of the plasmid DNA is a regulatory no-no, but niceties of that stripe were left behind long ago.(47)
There are also fragments of SV40 (a monkey virus) in the Pfizer 'vaccine'. SV40 is infamous, due to its ability to enhance genes; in fact, the monkey virus is able to turn on a gene and never switch it off, which makes it popular in a lab setting with scientists who want to get cells to produce large quantities of a particular protein.(48) However, if the fragment gets into the human genome next to a cancer gene, it could cause cells to divide in an uncontrolled manner, potentially causing turbo cancers. The inclusion of these fragments was not random; it was inserted deliberately.(49)
“...not only did the people that made this product not seem to care whether there was a cancer-causing SV40 enhancer sequence injected into recipients, but that sequence was coincidentally the only one that could have been chosen that had a specific property of facilitating the transport of any foreign DNA that happened to be present into the nucleus.”(50)
We have, of course, been continually gaslit into a belief that the 'vaccines' could not integrate into the human genome when they have been designed to do just that. Even mainstream scientific publications are waking up to that fact, with a recent study in Nature – Scientific Reports finding that this can happen with a frequency of one cell in five.(51) Integration in this manner is heritable; it can be passed on to our children, were we still able to have them. There will be no good outcomes.
The presence of graphene oxide, said to be yet another fever dream of conspiracy theorists, has now been proven by multiple scientists and acknowledged by Pfizer in their court-ordered document dump.(52) Graphene is a relatively new substance and is not well understood, but it is known to be toxic to human cells, inducing oxidative stress and inflammation.(53) For this reason (and, perhaps, others) the 'vaccine' manufacturers, regulatory authorities and the fact checkers are still in denial. In experiments on mice, the graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs, liver and spleen.(54) It is thought to be responsible for the destruction of red blood cells and the production of large clots.(55)
A further, brief recap then; now, not only do we have a ruling elite that is obsessed with population control, which manufactured a 'pandemic' and then mandated measures that caused further harm to citizens, while denying them access to effective treatment. They have also introduced 'vaccines' that aren't vaccines, which have been designed in ways that are unacknowledged, but which are clearly detrimental to human health. We now have a number of dots that are capable of being connected without a great deal of effort.
The short term effects of these jabs are many and varied. While data is being hidden and manipulated (in the UK, deaths now take up to a year to be recorded in official statistics, the better to obscure the signal),(56) anecdotally and demonstrably, rates of cancer are off the charts. Dr Angus Dalgleish, renowned oncologist and Professor at St George's Hospital Medical School in London, has noted an explosion of B cell based disorders after patients had taken their booster shot. These encompass rapid cancers, increased incidences of lymphomas, leukemias and kidney cancers, in particular. Some of these rapid cancers were affecting people who had been in remission or cured, some for 25 years or more. He stated that colleagues from around the world are reporting the same outcomes.(57)
Certainly, the PIP numbers (those claiming disability in the UK) back up the Professor's observations. The number whose disability was a form of cancer rose by 35% in a single year, 2022, without exciting any official comment.
Figure 1
If these figures are replicated around the world, at least a million extra cancer cases would have been caused by the 'vaccines' – so far. Health authorities are doing their level best to find excuses, if they care to comment at all. Apparently, the dip in diagnostic screening between March and May 2020 is solely responsible for any increases in cancer rates; no scientists affiliated with any regime has (to my knowledge) ever admitted that the jab induces cancer.(58) Nonetheless, cancer in all ages – but particularly the young – is fast becoming an epidemic:
“Young vaccinated people are being diagnosed with cancers in numbers previously considered impossible, because the covid-19 vaccine has “compromised” immune systems by disabling the body’s ability to “gobble up” non-normal cancerous cells … Clinicians have been seeing very strange things: For example, 25-year-olds with colon cancer, who don’t have family histories of the disease – that’s basically impossible according to the known paradigm for how colon cancer works – and other long-latency cancers that they’re seeing in very young people.”(59)
But cancer is very far from being the only malign outcome that is afflicting the 'vaccinated'. The jab also disrupts the formation of bone marrow stem cells and inhibits the body's ability to produce mature blood cells.(60) Independent researchers fret that this characteristic of the 'vaccine' will lead to a rise in instances of leukaemia.
The jab also attacks the heart. This can be evidenced in a variety of ways, one of which is to compare the takeup of myocardial F-FDG, which has a molecular similarity to glucose. If the heart exhibits an abnormally high demand for F-FDG, the heart has suffered inflammation. A study examined 303 unvaccinated individuals and 700 who were 'vaccinated' and found that all of the latter group had an elevated takeup – not some, all. The estimate was that it was 40% higher than in the unjabbed across all age groups.(61)(62) Another cardiologist's best guess is that over 50 million Americans sustained heart damage from the shot, although the above cited study indicates that the number may be even higher.(63)
Deaths from heart failure in the UK in the fifteen weeks between March 24th and 30th June 2023 were 27% higher than the same period in 2020.(64) The regime is, once again, trying to finesse the data by increasing the estimate of how many people would be expected to die from heart failure in any given week and trying to excuse the rise by blaming the failings of the NHS which is, undeniably, a shambles, but not the root cause of excess deaths in the UK.(65)
There is also growing evidence that the 'vaccinated' are developing VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). The mechanism is now known, from a study conducted with children, which found the the jab caused a marked decrease in immunity to pathogens such as viruses, bacteria and fungi.(66) This didn't take long; it was apparent within 28 days and included reduced responses to streptococcal diseases, which had led to any number if headlines about the “unexplained rise in children infected”.(67) The rate of degradation of the immune system of the 'vaccinated', across all ranges, is similarly rapid.
Figure 2
This leaves every 'vaccinated' individual over 30 in dire straits – they may have already lost their entire immune capability (or close to it), leaving them vulnerable to viruses and certain cancers. Canadian data demonstrates the devastation that has been wrought; the figures show that the jabbed are 3.8 times more likely to catch Covid than the pure bloods, if we can give any credence to their testing regime.(68) This is the way the vaxxed/unvaxxed totals stack up.
Figure 3
And yet this is the rate of infection.
Figure 4
There have also been some peculiar cognitive effects for the 'vaccinated'. Dutch data shows that
“...in the first quarter of 2023, there was a 24% increase in GP visits related to memory and concentration problems among adults (age 25 years and older) compared to the same period in 2020.”(69)
The increase in visits was highest in the 45-74 group, but was also significantly elevated in the 25-44 group. Anecdotally, this phenomenon was widely observed – in nursing homes especially, where a rapid cognitive decline frequently followed 'vaccination'. One whistleblower in the US has reported that there has been a 25 fold increase in sudden dementia at the nursing home she works at.(70) It's highly likely that there will also be people who develop less severe (but nonetheless impactful) cognitive issues, also.
Loss of cognitive function is increasingly widespread and frequently characterized as “brain fog”. One doctor described the situation thus:
“In my practice of treating vaccine injuries, one of the three most common symptoms I see is brain fog. So many of my patients had been in the prime of their lives, can now barely function, have significant cognitive impairment and need a lot of help from our nurses to carry out their treatment plans. I never imagined I would see any of this in people far younger than me and instead I see it every day. I bear witness to an immense amount of suffering on a daily basis that is hard to put into words.”(71)
Quite what the mechanism for these changes is is not yet well known. Small, unnoticed strokes may be doing the damage. There may be other causes, such as Prion-type diseases brought on by misfolded proteins created by the 'vaccine'. And it may be some time before the reason comes to light, as very few scientists are willing to go down that particular rabbit hole.
In addition to this kind of damage, one would expect more direct effects on populations. Not simply through the excess mortality of those actually jabbed, but also via the destruction of procreation. And one would be right. Between January and July 2021, in Waterloo, Ontario, there were 86 still births. For context; the usual rate is 5 or 6 a year. This is documented fact. Anecdotally, a Vancouver birthing hospital experienced 13 still births in one 24 hour period. And what was the only common factor, other than the fact that the mothers were all women and the babies were all babies? The mothers in Ontario, every single one of them, were 'vaccinated'.(72) What is the betting that the 13 mothers in Vancouver were too?
This should not be a surprise, as it follows logically from a study, conducted in part by the CDC and reported in the New England Medical Journal, which allegedly showed that the rate of miscarriage among 'vaccinated' mothers-to-be was in line with what would be expected of the unvaccinated, around 12% (104 out of 827). As is now depressingly familiar, upon closer examination, the finding is deliberately and inexcusably misleading.
By their definition, a miscarriage occurs prior to 20 weeks of pregnancy. 700 of the 827 were ‘vaccinated’ in their third trimester, between weeks 27 and 40 and were therefore unable to miscarry, as per the terms of the study. It follows that the true finding was that 104 out of 127 women ‘vaccinated’ prior to 20 weeks lost their baby, a catastrophic rate of 82%.(73) Although I cannot be sure, it seems likely that any still births weren't counted in the figures either, if the study even collected that data. All this, even without taking account of witness testimony; a UK undertaker stating that there are so many baby deaths that there wasn't sufficient storage space in the child section of the morgue and they were being stored in the adult section as well.
Figure 5
Men weren't spared either. There is a paper from 2018 which shows that mRNA passes into the testes and wreaks reproductive havoc.(74) And, once again, the structure of the clinical trial is clearly indicative of foreknowledge. Obvious tests were not performed, the better to conceal the existence of inconvenient truths. No tests were carried out on men's semen (75) or on the development of offspring,(76) even though it was already known that the mRNA reached the testes.(77) Men were not allowed to donate sperm, either.(78)
The aforementioned 2018 study did the work that the clinical trial avoided and detailed the damage that occurs to men. The epididymis, which transports sperm from the testes is compromised. The Sertoli cells, vital to the development of the testes, are also damaged as are the Leydig cells, which are responsible for the production of testosterone. This compromises masculinity and is especially problematic when the EGT is injected into pre-pubescent boys. To add to the devastation of the male productive system, anti-sperm antibodies were also found in male sperm, as early as February 2021. Not before then, of course, because Pfizer had avoided doing the requisite testing. These antibodies prevent the sperm from reaching the egg and fertilizing it.(79)
So, the 'vaccine' takes care of one end of the population control continuum and the regimes are still pushing them on pregnant women even now.(80) And what about the other end; the active elimination of those already born? How are those numbers looking? Well, they're getting there.
Figure 6
Among all age groups, including children.
Figure 7
And, yes; we can always retreat onto the safe ground of 'correlation does not prove causation', even though we know that would be ducking the issue. Except the chart for all age groups (in highly 'vaccinated' countries) looks like this one for 40-49 year olds.
Figure 8
Even our old friend Dr John Campbell has finally twigged that countries that most enthusiastically downed the Kool-Aid and/or effectively forced their citizenship to get jabbed are suffering the worst.(81) A recent study out of Canada looked at 17 countries (mostly from the southern hemisphere, including Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Thailand), making up 10.3% of world population. Every single one had an unprecedented rise in all-cause mortality which corresponded temporally with the 'vaccine' rollouts.(82) The estimate is that deaths averaged one in every 800 injections, for a total of 17 million attributable to the 'vaccination'. The researchers had previously seen the same trend in India, the US, Canada and Israel. Australia's numbers are representative of the group.
Figure 9
Insurance actuaries have been coming to similar conclusions about 'vaccine' lethality. In the last quarter of 2022, in the 35-44 age group, deaths in the US were up 34%. This was an improvement on the third quarter of 2021, when the number was 101%.(83) Not that you'd know if you relied on the authorities for your information; the silence from that direction is deafening. Campbell reports that, between June 2022 and May 2023 (taking the 'unvaccinated' death rate as the baseline), there were 155,803 additional deaths among the jabbed in the UK – 426 per day, on average.(84)
Hospitals, allegedly overwhelmed by the recently disabled – fully 25% of working age Britons don't work due to health problems -(85) are actively contributing to excess mortality. In an increasing number of hospitals the cut off age for resuscitation is as low as 50.(86) The old are regarded (by officialdom, at least) as an expensive burden and doctors and nurses seem to now hold the view that they must be allowed to die, because keeping them alive isn't cost effective.
None of this should be in any way surprising. The death and destruction visited upon the 'vaccinated' doesn't exist in a vacuum; the ruling class is coming at us all from a variety of directions, after all. For example, they are doing their level best to blow up Western economies; their actions are too obviously damaging to be the result of incompetence. It's possible to understand the play-book even if you (or I) are a financial pygmy. It goes like this.
First, hugely inflate the available money supply, thus ensuring that more dollars (pounds, yen etc) are chasing a quantity of goods and services that hasn't been artificially expanded; if possible, do this towards the end of a period when the means of production have either been temporarily halted or, at the very least, severely compromised – perhaps after a prolonged lock-down, for instance. This will greatly enhance the inflationary effect that is always present when the money supply is swiftly and massively expanded. Generally, asset prices rise first, followed by goods and services.
Once the inflationary conflagration is well established (having done nothing to ameliorate its effects, obvious though they were to all and sundry), announce an intention to take money out of the economy. Don't just end the supply of fake money (Quantitative Easing) and take a neutral stance. Actively reverse course instead by switching to a practice known as Quantitative Tightening (QT), citing some half baked intention to eventually balance the books. If feasible – and anything is feasible if you're a central bank – raise interest rates at around this time, making a single whammy into a double. Be careful not to raise them far enough that they actually have any real effect on inflation.
“To fight inflation, interest rates need to exceed the inflation rate. That means a dollar saved loses purchasing power unless savings interest rates climb from less than 1 percent to something over current inflation (now around 8 percent). One rule of thumb provides that savings interest rates should reach 150 percent of inflation in order to reverse the trend. The theory holds that high interest rates encourage saving cash thus slowing down the speed at which money chases assets. If interest rates are less than inflation, it makes holding cash a losing proposition.”(87)
Of course, inflation is running much higher than 8%, because the fanciful 'basket of goods' that is relied upon in the calculation includes such fripperies as clothing and recreation, which are less of a factor when people are having to queue up at food banks because their entire pay-check is going on the absolute basic necessities of life. But, no matter. An increase in the interest rate to 12% would instantly crash the economy, but might also act as a corrective and finally get inflation under control. That doesn't form part of the plan. Under this ineffectual, too-little-too-late guise the idea is to prolong the pain.
Interest rate rises are not there to control inflation, because the inflation that we are experiencing isn't of the traditional demand side variety – it's there because of scarcities or expense on the supply side due to the policies that regimes are enacting. Raising interest rates in this scenario simply increases consumer debt, as very few have any cash spare for investment.
The policies that begat the inflationary pressure in the first place haven't been rejected; they've simply been normalized and placed on the back-burner while the media hyperventilates about the latest shiny object. The price of energy is the driver for the majority of the hardship that is being deliberately inflicted upon populations around the globe, but particularly in the West. Biden has drained the US Strategic Reserve, while simultaneously cancelling previously issued oil and gas leases in Alaska. This while Russia and the Saudis limit oil production.(88)
Figure 10
By mid-September, Californian gas prices had risen 52 times in the past 57 days.(89) Childhood poverty rates have doubled, adult poverty has jumped by the largest one year increase on record,(90) and increasing poverty will inevitably lead to more death.(91) In the UK, energy has never been more expensive, but nothing is being done to roll back the policies that caused it to be so. The PM and his cabal may make soothing sounds now that campaign season is upon us, but they will have to change the law if they really want to make a difference – which they clearly don't, as they are avoiding any discussion of that reality.
Conditions that are conducive to survival are being rapidly undermined and the US is in the vanguard of the charge. According to the National Association of Realtors tracking, the median house price in 2019 was $254,799. By 2023 that number had ballooned to $410,200.(92) Over the same period, mortgage rates have gone from 1% to 7%, all of which has resulted in house purchases becoming unaffordable for the average income earner in 99% of US counties.(93) As RFK Jnr has noted:
“Three giant companies, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard … who all own each other …They’re the biggest companies in the world. Rich, and they … own, I think they own 88 percent of the S&P 500 … and now they’ve decided they’re going to buy every single family home in America. They’re on track now to control, to own the corporate control of 60 percent of the single family homes in America within six years.”(94)
And the rental market is also wholly dysfunctional. The median rent is now of over $2,000 a month and accounts for an average of 67% of pay packets.(95) Evictions are skyrocketing and homelessness is also rising at the fastest pace that has ever been recorded. Bankruptcies are up 18%, year on year. Interest payments on credit cards have risen from 16% in February 2022 to 22% and banks have significantly tightened loan standards across all types of consumer loans.(96)
In short, regimes are pursuing policies – in the financial and energy areas, in particular – that are targeted at harming their own citizens and there are plenty more in the pipeline. The EU wants to phase out domestic fossil fuel heating systems by 2035 and wants to force homeowners to upgrade with 'green tech' too the tune of around €100,000 per house.(97) Except they don't really – they want to force you to sell it to the likes of BlackRock. The elimination of personal property (of any type) is a stated aim of Agenda 2030 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Everything will be rented - “all products will become services”, according to the WEF.(98) For those of us that remain. But they won't need all of us, according to a McKinsey Global Institute report that dropped in July;(99) because AI is going to remove jobs from the marketplace. Low-wage jobs are particularly vulnerable in the US,
“But it's not just low-wage jobs: across the entire labor market, activities that account for 30% of hours worked across the U.S. could become automated by 2030, the report indicates. To reach that 30% mark, 12 million workers in professions with shrinking demand may need to change jobs within the next seven years.”(100)
So it's not just older individuals who need to be culled. It's working age people, too. Paying Universal Basic Income to the unemployed is not economically efficient, so it makes sense to create the conditions where expenses can be reduced. Or rather, it makes sense if you think like a sociopathic population reduction advocate, who has no concept of human worth. Those of us that remain will be enslaved by a combination of CBDCs, social credit scores and ubiquitous surveillance, all of which are being developed. At least, that's the plan.
I'm not sure whether another summary is strictly necessary at this point. All the data points align; Western ruling elites have a depopulation agenda that has switched into high gear. Quite how effective it's going to be is not yet known – by us, at least. But Operation Warp Speed, the 'vaccine' programme, was run by the CIA, the intelligence agencies and the military. The presentation to the FDA was conducted by a spy agency, the NSA. The 'vaccines' themselves were developed by the NIH (National Institute of Health), which still owns 50% of the patents. They were manufactured by military contractors.(101) It was a military programme from the get-go.
And one analysis of what is to come is particularly alarming. In 2014, Deagel Corp (a company whose founder was a military contractor with sources throughout the Deep State) predicted massive population reductions in many Western nations by the year 2025, the UK by 77%, the US by 68% and Germany by 65%.(102) Many other countries were also cited, perhaps two thirds of nations.
Figure 11
“Until the impact of the Covid “pandemic” and resulting mass vaccination campaign, many researchers were scratching their heads as they reviewed the Deagel calculations. But now it’s beginning to make sense. Add in the rising potential for another manufactured “pandemic”, a manufactured global famine under the guise of fighting “climate change” and the race toward World War III, and suddenly Deagel's forecast becomes even more plausible.”(103)
I have no idea whether Deagel's forecast, however it was arrived at, is prescient. Interestingly, depopulation may already be underway, given record excess deaths and cratering birth numbers across many nations. China and India are key, both being highly 'vaccinated' (India mostly with AstraZeneca, the developers of which have ties to the UK Eugenics Movement)(104), with vast populations and possessed of either a lack of honesty or scrupulousness in the recording and reporting of deaths. But perhaps, globally, it'll take a little longer and be less dramatic. Perhaps.
But there can be no doubt as to the intentions of the ruling class and the part that the 'vaccines' have to play in fulfilling them. If we put ourselves in their shoes, they have other (non-economic) reasons for whittling down our numbers. We vastly outnumber them and some of us are still utilizing our grey matter; it's likely that the latter grouping has not succumbed to the jab, either, and may therefore become over-represented by default. The elites have a powerful incentive and have already instigated at least part of their plan with the 'vaccines'; how big a part is unclear.
We know, for instance, that some batches were far more toxic than others – initially, at least.(105)(106)(107) But the evidence of universal heart damage and the litany of other diseases that are appearing in the medium term are not limited to those individuals unfortunate enough to have encountered a 'hot' batch and the long term prognosis is unclear.
But the ruling class seem to have settled upon 'vaccines' s their instrument of choice, rather than an actual pandemic - presumably the former induces outcomes that are easier to control. As discussed elsewhere (Fight Like The Third Monkey On The Ramp To Noah's Ark), a further 'pandemic' is probably in our future, once the WHO is granted the right to dictate global health policies next year. There will then be a concerted effort to force us all to accept another jab, perhaps one selected from the stable of mRNA gene therapies currently under development. And, that too will be designed to maim and kill. I wish it wasn't so, but it is. If the elites wish to follow through on their long-held designs, then it must be.
Citations
(1)
(2) Ditto
(3) https://drpatwalsh.com/2017/05/26/the-eugenics-congress-london-1912/
(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells
(5) https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4439&context=etd-project
(6) https://vdare.com/articles/the-return-of-eugenics-or-something
(7) https://www.artandpopularculture.com/I_would_build_a_lethal_chamber_as_big_as_the_Crystal_Palace
(10) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/274/200/#tab-opinion-1931809
(11) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200
(12) https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Paul_Ehrlich
(13) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/26/world-population-resources-paul-ehrlich
(14) https://archive.org/details/TheLimitsToGrowth/mode/2up
(15) https://expose-news.com/2023/05/02/club-of-rome-genocide-of-the-worlds-population/
(18) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/30/david-attenborough-is-peddling-depopulation/
(19) “The future of life” - Jacques Attali, 1981, interview with Michael Salomon https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/The_Future_of_Life.pdf
(20) Borger et al Eurosurveillance 2020
(21) Prof Carl Heneghan Youtube interview 2020
(22) Dr Michael Yeadon, www.lockdownsceptics.org 20/9/2020
(23) Baruch Vainshelboim Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
(25) https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/06/09/global-data-shows-no-excess-deaths-worldwide-in-2020
(26) https://c19hcq.com
(27) Martin J Vincent, et al Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Virology Journal 2005, 2:69 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
(28) Dr Harvey Risch, Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients That Should Be Ramped Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis Vol. 189, No. 11 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa093 Advance Access publication:May 27, 2020
(30) https://hcqmeta.com/
(33)
(35) https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/26/cwh-discusses-blanket-dnrs-and-litigation-prospects/
(36) https://www.cms.gov/files/document/summary-covid-19-emergency-declaration-waivers.pdf
(37) Ditto
(38) Ditto
(39) https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-sajid-javid-blasts-school-105616754.html
(40) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
(41) “The future of life” - Jacques Attali, 1981, interview with Michael Salomon
(42) https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/The_Future_of_Life.pdf
(43) https://expose-news.com/2023/09/25/some-nasty-little-surprises-in-the-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/
(44) Ditto
(45) Ditto
(46) https://expose-news.com/2023/10/03/plasmidgate-plasmid-dna-in-pfizer-and-moderna/
(47) https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/54/11/1996
(49) https://expose-news.com/2023/10/03/plasmidgate-plasmid-dna-in-pfizer-and-moderna/
(50) Ditto
(51) Ditto
(52) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33862-0
(53) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/125742_S1_M4_4.2.1-vr-vtr-10741.pdf
(54) https://expose-news.com/2023/07/06/graphene-in-covid-jab-pfizer/
(55) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764161/
(57) https://expose-news.com/2023/09/19/ons-deaths-are-delayed-by-up-to-a-year/
(58) https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1707866498541211710.html
(59) https://newsaddicts.com/cancers-appearing-ways-never-seen-before-after-covid-shots-top-expert-warns/
(61) https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.232244
(62) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408629/
(63) https://expose-news.com/2023/10/05/100m-americans-serious-heart-disease-covid-vaccination/
(65) Ditto
(66) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1242380/full
(67)
(69) https://www.rintrah.nl/dutch-government-agency-admits-sudden-dementia-explosion-in-the-population/
(70)
(71)
(72) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/#r15
(73)
(74) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30587973/
(76) https://www.schc.org/assets/docs/ghs_info_sheets/schc_osha_reproductive_toxicity_4-4-16.pdf
(77) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf
(78) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_24_nonclinical-overview.pdf
(79) https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
(80) https://expose-news.com/2023/10/07/ukhsa-pushes-pregnant-women-to-get-covid-injection/
(81)
(82) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-rollouts-all-cause-mortality/
(84)
(85) https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/09/post-lockdown-idleness-means-britain-may-soon-be-bankrupt/
(86) https://expose-news.com/2022/10/01/over-50-then-your-government-wants-you-dead/
(87) https://amgreatness.com/2022/05/23/the-economic-doom-loop-has-begun/
(90) https://consortiumnews.com/2023/09/22/us-sees-highest-ever-increase-in-poverty/
(91) https://consortiumnews.com/2023/09/22/us-sees-highest-ever-increase-in-poverty/
(92) https://im1776.com/2023/08/03/the-urban-reconquista/
(93) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/homes-for-sale-affordable-housing-prices/
(94) https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/11/robert-f-kennedy-jr-blackrock-vanguard-state-street-tim-dillon/
(96) https://www.federalreserve.gov/data/sloos/sloos-202307.htm
(97) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/739377/EPRS_ATA(2023)739377_EN.pdf
(99) https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-work-in-america
(100) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-could-eliminate-service-jobs-mckinsey-report/
(101)
(102) https://nobulart.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Deagel-2025-Forecast-by-Country.pdf
(106)
(107) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/18/how-harmful-is-my-covid-vaccine-batch/
Figure 1 https://expose-news.com/2023/09/12/cancer-heres-what-corporate-media-is-not-reporting/
Figure 2 https://expose-news.com/2023/09/30/gov-reports-prove-covid-vaccinated-developing-ade/
Figure 3 https://expose-news.com/2023/10/01/gov-canada-data-triple-jabbed-have-a-i-d-s/
Figure 4 Ditto
Figure 5 https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/11/pfizer-docs-vaccine-accumulates-ovaries-cancer/
Figure 6 https://expose-news.com/2023/09/17/leaked-pfizer-data-death-rates-solidify-deagels-2025-prediction/
Figure 7 Ditto
Figure 8 Ditto
Figure 9 www.ourworldindata.org
Do you have any evidence that elites avoided mRNA injections?
PT Barnum was right; the bigger the humbug, the better people will like it.