It seems to me that, even in dissident circles, some hard questions about the 'vaccines' and their effect have yet to be asked. There is a mountain of recently disclosed evidence showing that the inoculation is injurious to health, some of which I will detail below. When I say injurious I, of course, mean lethal and not just in the short term. The rate of excess death, which is already elevated, shows no sign of abating, despite the fact that the enthusiasm for booster shots evaporated many months ago. How is this possible?
Figure 1
Much discussion has revolved around what damage the 'vaccines' do without taking it to the logical conclusion – what if it's already too late for the 'vaccinated' and whoever else (usually their children) that they've also managed to inoculate via shedding? What if the injuries that they have sustained, whether they are yet aware of them or not, are irreversible? In the absence of a 'cure', isn't this the only logical outcome? Do we have to take the Malthusians at their word when they state (in the complete absence of evidence) that the ideal global population is around 500 million, rather than 8 billion and counting? Is it possible that they've implemented their own Final Solution on the quiet?
Figure 2
Yes, I know that it sounds like the conspiracy theory to end all conspiracy theories – the ultimate tin foil hatter's wet dream. But isn't that more to do with us instinctively recoiling from the notion that such a level of evil could possibly exist, rather than a dispassionate examination of the facts as we know them? I believe so. I shall attempt the latter, instead.
Firstly, the depopulation advocates are plentiful. A few of them pop up at the annual WEF jamboree in Davos, including the likes of Sir David Attenborough and Jane Goodall, an animal rights activist. Attenborough has been a leading voice in the movement for decades, availing himself of the elites' habitual evidence-free mantra;
“We now know the disasters that continue to inflict the natural world have one element that connects them all… The unprecedented increase in the number of humans beings on the planet...It needs actions by governments. In my view, all countries should develop a population policy.”(1)
Goodall who, along with Attenborough and world renowned climate scientist Greta Thunberg is being used to sell the United Nation's 30x30 land grab as a “new deal for nature” (more on that in an article in the near future), is on the record as saying;
“All these [environmental] things we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.”(2)
Which would be the 500 million or so previously referenced. Bill Gates' much circulated comment, in relation to world population, that “if we do a really good job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive services, we could lower than by 10 or 15%”(3) is also somewhat illuminating, whatever the context.
And then we have Yuval Niah Harari, another of Schwab's associates over at the WEF. This is a man who believes that the fast approaching Fourth Industrial Revolution will create a class of “useless human beings” who will find no meaning in life and will have no purpose, either. The logical next step, for a man like him anyway, is to ask “What do we need so many humans for?” He believes in culling the population; those that remain can be hacked and manipulated. Obama, Gates and Zuckerberg are all fans.(4)
These comments are not made in a debating hall; they are not intended to reference a hypothetical. They are not innocuous. They are part of an ongoing attempt to normalize the concept of depopulation without going into the detail of how this will be accomplished. Going into the fine grain detail on any of the elites' treasured conceits is never to be recommended – see 'vaccines' and climate change, in particular.
In practical terms, given that global population is continually increasing, depopulation will require a decline in birth rates and an increase in death rates. How could it be otherwise? Infertility, miscarriages, abortion on the one hand, a quiet genocide and a promotion of suicide (see Canada and the Medically Assisted In Dying law, which is being actively promoted by the establishment) on the other. And how is this to be accomplished? Well, let's have a look at what's happening in the here and now; perhaps we will be able to see the outline of a plan.
The first thing to note is that total population growth has actually slowed to a trickle. It's now under 1% per annum, the lowest rate since 1950. Despite massive influxes of migrants, European population is steadily declining; the US and Japan are also suffering from birth rates that are well below replacement level.(5) The reasons for this phenomenon are many and various (and will be set out in more detail in another missive), but a drastic fall in sperm count over the past forty years has been the primary cause.(6) Astonishingly, average sperm counts have been declining at 2.64% a year since 2000 and have dropped 51.6% between 1973 and 2018.(7) This trend has not abated and if it continues, sperm count will fall by another 50% in the next 20 years. By that point, infertile men will outnumber the fertile.
It would seem, therefore, that the population train is being brought to a rather abrupt halt. So far, so good if depopulation is your bag. I realize that I haven't set forth any evidence that implicates the likes of Gates and Goodall in any active scheme. For now, it's enough to note that what they have been advocating for decades has also been happening for decades, which is not a coincidence that should be taken lightly. However, if we know anything about leftist 'advocates' it is that they are impatient and generally intolerant of others who do not hold their views.
Theirs is not a hands-off approach to life; they are, instead, normally anxious to give nature a little nudge. The theory of adaption and man's evident mastery of its practical application does not resonate with them. The 'leave well alone' gene is absent, which is why they are leftists to begin with. For these reasons, while population growth has slowed dramatically and is currently destined to decline, they aren't going to wait 20 years for that to happen. Paul Erhlich, author of a 1968 book entitled The Population Bomb, the godfather of the depopulation movement and repeat offender in the false prophecies department, suggested that “ various forms of coercion” would be necessary if voluntary methods failed.(8) These people aren't subtle.
All of which brings us to the 'vaccines'. As on many previous occasions, an open mind is a prerequisite. That and the ability to identify what “they” have the ability to do, rather than indulging in a less reliable tendency to theorize about intent instead. Plus, as noted previously, the need to remember that an estimated third of all jobs will have disappeared by 2030, due to the increasing prevalence of AI in industry.(9) This revelation may strike a chord shortly, when age ranges are referenced.
As noted in many previous articles, the 'vaccine' isn't a vaccine; it's an unapproved, experimental gene therapy (EGT) which has been shown (in vitro) to reverse transcribe itself into human DNA.(10) Any such alteration would result in the installation of a genetic code that replicates a damaging and lethal protein permanently. It would also mean that this code would be passed on to the next generation.
As it is, we know that it enters the human cell and instructs it to make vast quantities of synthetic spike protein, proteins that are wholly ineffective at either preventing disease in the recipient or in its transmission to others. It is not known how long this production continues, because it hasn't been checked. There is seemingly no appetite for this knowledge. But the lipid nanoparticles have been artificially enhanced and have the ability to linger far longer than is natural.
Doctors like Dr Peter McCullough know that the spike protein is still being produced by the body two weeks after inoculation. They also know that mRNA has been found in the body months after the jab and that no entity has so far shown that the contents of the injection ever leave the body. Evidence of EGT shedding onto the 'unvaccinated' is also compelling,(11)(12) which would mean that even those of us not duped into getting the clot-shot may still have been infested via mRNA shed by another. The questions then would be;
“1) for how long is a recently vaccinated person at risk to shed on to others? 2) can shed mRNA be taken up by the recipient and begin to produce Spike protein just like vaccination? 3) can shed Spike protein cause disease as it does in the vaccinated (e.g. myocarditis, blood clots, etc.)?”(13)
Shedding is a distressing possibility. However, getting any straight answers to the above is going to take a considerable time. As per usual, few researchers are motivated to inquire and even fewer funding sources are available to aid them. In the meantime, some evidence of harm is becoming impossible to ignore.
It was apparent that there were huge problems with the jabs from the very beginning. If you recall, victims were obliged to stay put for a while after injection, in case anaphylactic shock caused them to keel over. Then people started dying suddenly within weeks of taking the EGT. The authorities attempted to cover this up by only defining a person as 'vaccinated' two to four weeks after their second shot, thus leaving any sudden deaths within that time frame uncounted.
Figure 3
Over time, it was also clear that some 'vaccine' batches were considerably more lethal initially than others. 4% of Pfizer lots and 5% of Moderna's were responsible for all the deaths. All of them. 96% of Pfizer's and 95% of Moderna's didn't have a single death report attributed to them. Even more remarkably, 94% of Pfizer lots (2,908) didn't even have a single adverse event recorded against them. But Pfizer also had five lot numbers that returned between 61-80 deaths, five that had 81-100 deaths and two that registered over 100. It was a similar story with Moderna.
Figure 4
Figure 5
I'm inclined towards the belief that the toxicity of the batches – the proportion of active ingredients in each one – is responsible for this huge disparity, but it's impossible to be sure because autopsies were as rare as rocking horse excrement at the time. However, if you can further recall, it was then that we started to become familiar with the terms pericarditis and myocarditis which, we were assured, were merely short lived inflammations of the heart which left no lasting damage. This is not true. We're talking dead heart muscle.
“The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic’s observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%. Survival with giant cell myocarditis is substantially lower, with <20% of patients surviving 5 years.”(14)
If we indulge ourselves and engage in a fleeting moment of critical thinking, does believing that there might just be a connection between Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, which almost invariably features a cardiac arrest, and clinical and sub-clinical myocarditis not make sense? Does this seem remotely far fetched? I don't think so. Would this (at least, partially) explain why the number of excess deaths isn't temporally correlated to the booster uptake? By that I mean that the number of deaths keeps rising despite boosters largely becoming a thing of the past – for now.
Some further food for thought. Clearly, the vast majority of the 'vaccinated' are still with us. However, there is reason to doubt their long term prospects. There is compelling evidence that mRNA 'vaccines' damage the hearts of all recipients, not just some. A recent study from Switzerland found elevated troponin levels (which indicates heart injury) across all jab recipients and 2.8% of them showed levels that indicated sub-clinical myocarditis.(15) That man Dr McCullough notes that pre-pandemic myocarditis levels were 4 cases per million. Now, after shot two or three, the rate is 25,000 per million.(16) That's clinical cases; it doesn't include the sub-clinical. But the latter is seemingly equally dangerous, especially in the active.
An enormous number of professional athletes – primarily men and with an average age of 23 – are collapsing during competition. High level amateurs, also. Between March 2021 and March 2022, that number was more than 769.(17) Other investigators point to many more, with nearly 70% of these collapses proving fatal.(18)
Figure 6
As noted in the introduction, excess deaths of the 'died suddenly' variety across the most 'vaccinated' countries – mostly those in western Europe and the Anglosphere, a total of 38 countries – number over 750,000. Those numbers include an increase of 552% in the number of children that have died unexpectedly.(19) The raw excess deaths figures in the Five Eyes countries alone show nearly number nearly two million since January 2021.(20) These data come from the countries themselves. Funeral homes are not always coping. Some having taken to storing the excess bodies in garages.(21) The CDC published a report in November 2022 showing that, since the emergency authorization of the 'vaccines' in December 2020, there had been 1,106,079 excess American deaths. Additionally, the mortality rates per 100,000 are highest among the 'vaccinated' population in every single age group.(22)
It isn't just the United States. If we were to name five other countries which were members of the totalitarian vanguard with regard to all things Covid, Australia would almost certainly feature. The following is the outcome;
“Official figures published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics confirm that Australia recorded 15 times more excess deaths in the first 7 months of 2022 than it did throughout the whole of 2020. Further figures also reveal the country suffered 8.5 times more excess deaths in 2021 following the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection than it did in 2020 prior to the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection.”(23)
The UK wouldn't be far behind. There, government figures show that one in every 310 people have died within six weeks of a booster shot.(24) But what are the mechanisms? We have perhaps all become aware of the clots that have been found during many autopsies. These aren't primarily blood clots and they don't respond to anti-coagulants. Researchers have instead found that when spike protein was added to human blood samples, it caused irregular, misfolded fibrous clots to form which proved resistant to enzymes produced by the body. These fibrous clots spiral out of control and dominate the clotting process. The body's mechanism for removing them is overwhelmed and, at the point at which the clot fills the blood vessel, the inevitable happens.(25)
So, now we have two straightforward, 'vaccine' induced reasons to die suddenly. Both of them would seem to be a circumstance that will apply across the board, with all jab recipients. They all have heart damage and, given that they are endowed with human blood, they are all also prone to the formation of these clots. There is at least one further effect, which is directly related to the specific action of the shot. A recently published study explained how a team of physicians monitored immunized individuals (1,006 of them), who subsequently experienced what might be termed health issues. This study began in March 2021.
They found the following anomalies in blood samples taken from these patients;
“Severe hemolysis (destruction of red blood cells). Aggregation and rouleaux stacking. Presence of manmade materials & metallic objects. The appearance of graphene-family super structures. Abnormal distribution of red blood cells Deformation of the cell profile. Clumping & clotting of the red blood cells.”(26)
None of which sounds good, even to a layperson. There are two additional shockers. These abnormalities were found in 948 of the patients (94%) and they did not appear to dissipate over time. Granted, these individuals were all unwell already and, one assumes, they are not representative of every jab recipient who isn't unwell. Nonetheless, the picture that we are presented with (in all three circumstances, now) is one of permanent injury.
All of the above is evidence that is well documented and available to all those who have eyes to see. If we accept its veracity – or even if we are inclined to include it in a working hypothesis – what comes next? Does the blood heal itself? Do damaged hearts somehow recover? Do the fibrous clots dissipate? Because if the damage remains, there are some inescapable conclusions to be drawn, which I'll come to in conclusion. However, in seeking to understand the full extent of the destruction that is currently being wrought, it's necessary to look beyond the obvious and consider the daddy of all side-effects; Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or VAIDS. Because the evidence for it, while initially hypothetical, has been playing out in front of us for months.
In the past two years we have been plagued by a plethora of inexplicable 'outbreaks'. Remember monkeypox? Or the outbreak of deadly hepatitis in children back in April last year? What you may not recall is that the jab is responsible for persistent post jab shingles (also known as herpes zoster),(27) a disease whose symptoms are almost indistinguishable from monkeypox. And it's also possible that you missed the revelation that the 'vaccine' is also capable of eliciting immune-mediated hepatitis, which is particularly noticeable in children.(28) The government had rolled out the jab to five million five-to-eleven year olds at the beginning of that month.
In both cases, the mechanism is the same. The Covid shot suppresses the immune system by impairing the type-1 interferon pathway, which is the first-stage response to any kind of viral infection.(29) It’s suppressed because type-1 interferon responds to viral RNA, and viral RNA is not present in the COVID shot. The RNA looks like human RNA, because it's been modified to do so, and the interferon pathway is therefore not triggered. Even the EU agrees with that proposition.(30)
It's sometimes startling how revelations of great import can sound so banal in the telling. In truth, if the immune system is compromised by the synthetic spike protein and unable to mount a defense against any virus; and if there is no evidence that this spike protein exits the body or, indeed, ceases producing itself, then what we are are describing is a form of AIDS. What you would then expect to see is a greater prevalence of certain cancers in previously healthy people, which would spread rapidly.(31)
You would also expect to see outbreaks of pretty much every disease that might affect the immuno-suppressed. These might be serious diseases or minor infections that cause far more suffering than they should, due to the almost total lack of an immune response. Among these infections would be Covid itself and other typical winter infections such as flu and RSV and others. Two recent papers have highlighted the fact that, far from providing a protection against Covid, the jab vastly increases the chances of contracting it again;
"The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19."(32)
"Six months after the index date, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly higher in vaccine recipients (6.7%) than the previously infected (2.9%)."(33)
This doesn't seem controversial. It's painting by the numbers. If the type-1 interferon pathway is indeed blocked, this outcome is what one would expect. And we'd also expect people to still be dying of Covid because they, the 'vaccinated' host, would be more vulnerable now to even the weaker variants that predominate. And this is what we find,(34) although we will have to take a leap of faith there (and elsewhere), as the one question that is never answered is the one that illuminates 'vaccination' status. I think, by now, given the establishment's propensity for using any and all tools to gaslight us into taking the EGT, if that question had been asked and the 'unvaccinated' were shown to be the sufferers, they'd tell us soon enough. The fact that it's the most obvious question and it's not being addressed tells its own story and is all of a piece.
Of course, other outcomes would be expected too. And, lo and beyond, we are being inundated. There has been a huge spike in Respiratory Syncytial Virus, which is typically not a major concern, but now is – or so they say. There is certainly a huge spike in respiratory disease, but there are reasons to be cautious as to the true cause. In the first instance, miscounting Covid cases is highly likely to now be being practiced in reverse; it would suit the narrative to misrepresent 'vaccinated' Covid sufferers as victims of RSV. In the second instance, there are many RSV 'vaccines' in clinical trials, including an mRNA based one from Moderna, and creating a crisis this winter would bolster an expedited approval process and 'vaccination' campaign. Incidentally, in an echo of the original SARS vaccines back in the early 2000s which actually exacerbated the disease, the original RSV vaccine was pulled because it too enhanced respiratory disease.(35) So, color me cynical.
To some degree, the same applies to the surge in flu cases. It is reported that children are dying from the flu in Canada. Over the past decade there has never been a flu season that resulted in more than 13 deaths in under 19 year olds. There are already eleven this season, with much power to add.(36) However, public health officials the world over (and especially the Canadian version) have dissipated whatever trust we had in them to an alarming degree and now cannot be trusted on any subject. It's conceivable that destroyed immune systems are to blame; however, the same extraneous factors feature here, as they do with the RSV narrative – upcoming vaccines that need to be approved in a hurry and with minimal oversight.
Children are also allegedly dying from Strep A in the UK – by the beginning of January, there had been 30 victims since mid-September out of a total (including adults) of 122.(37) Again, maybe, maybe not, although you'd like to think that doctors would not deliberately misdiagnose children and prescribe antibiotics when an antiviral is what is required. Scarlet fever is also said to be in epidemic mode; at Christmas 2021 there were 2,538 cases. This past year there were 17,695.(38) Naturally, nobody associated with the legacy media is interested in connecting the dots.
Another epidemic is also just getting started, equally mysterious to media and medical ostriches; early onset cancer. The usual suspects, such as CNN, content themselves with profiles of poor unfortunates, despite the fact that a review of cancer registries from 44 countries has found that the incidence of early onset colorectal and 13 other types of cancer is rising rapidly.(39) These diseases used to be dangerous for people in their sixties and seventies, not their forties and younger.(40) It isn't just new sufferers, either. Legions of patients in stable remission are finding that their cancers are returning, with a vengeance. This is unsurprising, as the booster (especially) is triggering metastasis, as one brave oncologist pointed out in a letter to the BMJ;
“As a practicing oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel. Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters...I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes.”(41)
Figure 7
That's in the US, but the UK is experiencing something similar. This occurrence is what the experts call a statistically impossible 9-sigma difference, which I take to mean that it's quite unlikely to have happened naturally.(42) Cancers typically take many years to develop (perhaps around ten years)(43) and so the sudden emergence of numerous visible cancers within months of 'vaccination' is highly indicative of a chain of causation.
There are other diseases that are rapidly advancing, particularly Prion diseases which are already known to be a likely outcome of misfolded proteins post 'vaccination', but if you're not of a mind to contemplate the ramifications of what I've already set out, repetition isn't going to help.
However, that these excess deaths are occurring is beyond dispute. That the pattern commenced post the initial 'vaccination' campaign is also not a point at issue. Whilst correlation is not causation, as the authorities are desperately keen to assert, common sense requires that, if it's not the EGT that are the cause, then some other factor must be and it must have become significant within the same time frame. None has yet been identified, nor will it be. Plus, it's all too easy to just not look for causation, which is precisely what government's are doing.
There are three other factors that I include for your edification. Firstly, the completely memory-holed story of the patents. It has been confirmed that Moderna has a patent on a unique sequence of genetic material from the virus' spike protein. Not from 2020 or onward; from 2018. The sequence (CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG) is found in Moderna patent 9587003. There are many other Moderna patents connected to the virus, all from well before its sudden, 'natural' emergence. The chances of this appearing randomly through natural evolution is 3 trillion to 1.(44) This was far from being the only patent revealing some prior knowledge of the coming 'pandemic'. Fauci and his NIH was deeply involved.
Secondly, we have the unfathomably swift reaction of Big Pharma. Within days they had an mRNA 'vaccine' created from the genetic code that the Chinese posted online and, shortly after that, it was full speed ahead with the clinical trials. The patent saga may put the lie to that. It also lays waste to the contention that Big Pharma did the best that they could under enormous pressure, but the need to expedite the clinical trials inevitably resulted in some unintended consequences – unintended consequences years in the making. Fauci had been funding coronavirus gain of function research in Wuhan since 2014, after all.
Thirdly, mRNA isn't a technology that lends itself to the vaccine field. It's a gene editing technology, instead. That’s why it had never been approved for use in humans in its forty year history.(45) There is no such thing as an mRNA vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna didn't even test it for that purpose. In fact, more to the point, how do we know what they did actually test? If the plan was to introduce the EGT anyway and not for our benefit, but rather for our destruction, then the means justifies the ends. Give them all saline and fake the results – what difference does it make?
The devastating effect of the EGT is evident; deaths and serious injuries proliferate and there is no sign of abatement, despite a total loss of appetite for boosters. Given what we know of the depopulation agenda and the way in which the 'vaccination' campaign has dovetailed with it, is it more or less likely that there is a connection between the two? And that 30% reduction in gainful employment that I mentioned earlier? Many of the dead are of working age; 36% of them are millenials.(46)
Remember, we are still close to the beginning – we're in the phase where governments can still just about manage to bullshit those that are still desirous of being deceived, by inventing new syndromes and mislabelling disease to obscure the obvious. I'm not sure that this state of affairs can persist for much longer. The dam is finally cracking. Only 28% of Americans are worried about Covid any more and, incredibly, the same percentage personally know someone who died from the jab.(47)(48)
But where is the evidence that there's an antidote? Or that symptoms ameliorate over time? Where is there hope that the jab is anything other than irreversible in its effects? If I'm right, and immune systems are being decimated, then we are in the midst of a depopulation via medical genocide and there isn't going to be a way out for many of those that were tricked into consenting to inoculation. I don't know how many will perish and, as always, I hope I'm wrong. But I can't locate any evidence that says I am. And what evidence there is points to ever worsening outcomes.
Citations
(1)
(2)
(3) https://newschecker.in/fact-check/bill-gates-2010-ted-talk-on-vaccines
(4) https://www.newstarget.com/2022-05-02-world-economic-forum-believes-people-useless-eaters.html
(5) https://www.un.org/en/desa/world-population-reach-8-billion-15-november-2022
(7) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11429551/Mens-sperm-rates-halved-1970s.html
(8) https://www.corbettreport.com/ehrlich/
(9) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/11/a-third-of-all-jobs-will-disappear-by-2030/
(10) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
(12)
(13) Ditto
(14) https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532
(16)
(18) https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
(19) https://expose-news.com/2022/11/23/died-suddenly-75-million-in-2022-covid-vaccine/
(18) https://expose-news.com/2023/01/05/pfizergate-disaster-excess-deaths-mortality-rates/
(20) https://expose-news.com/2022/11/24/secret-cdc-report-1million-americans-died-suddenly-covid-vaccine/
(21) https://expose-news.com/2022/11/26/australia-15x-increase-excess-death-2022/
(22) https://expose-news.com/2022/11/10/1-in-310-triple-vaccinated-dead/
(25) https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/01/joseph-mercola/shingles-activation-associated-with-covid-jab/
(26) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/27/study-proves-covid-vaccine-killing-children/
(27) https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/01/joseph-mercola/shingles-activation-associated-with-covid-jab/
(29) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/27/fatal-link-covid-vaccine-aids/
(30) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf
(31) https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307112
(32) https://expose-news.com/2022/06/29/weaker-virus-killing-more-then-host-must-be-weaker/
(33)
(34)https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/child-influenza-deaths-1.6687187
(36) https://www.thesun.co.uk/health/20820031/scarlet-fever-cases-soar-children-die/
(37) https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/14/health/early-onset-cancer-increase/index.html
(38) https://www.uchealth.org/today/colon-cancer-in-young-people-on-the-rise/
(40) https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2018/10/18/science-surgery-how-quickly-do-tumours-develop/
(41) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
(42) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/08/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-mrna-vaccine/
(44) https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/only-28-americans-are-worried-about-covid-anymore-new-poll-finds
Figure 1 www.ourworldindata.org
Figure 2 Ditto
Figure 3 CDC
Figure 4 https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/16/how-bad-is-my-covid-19-vaccine-batch/
Figure 5 Ditto
Figure 6 https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
Figure 7
Thanks, Adrian. I'll check it out.
Hi Endurance! Love you writing/ work it's so clear concise and enlightening. Dr Ann thinks EDTA treatment could help the poor victims of the, cull shot, biowarfare countermeasure, bioweapon https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/there-is-hope-edta-chelation-works?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android