Here we go again. What are the odds? Another plague rippling across the globe at the exact same moment as the self appointed guardians of world health are meeting to discuss a furthering of their already extensive powers, creating a framework for one world government via amendments to the WHO constitution and a draft Pandemic Treaty? Remarkable.
It so transpires that one of the problems associated with not seeing through a fraudulent Plan A is that the subsequent deployment of Plan B attracts considerable scrutiny and an incipient measure of skepticism that may prove difficult to surmount, even amongst the terminally gullible. But perhaps I'm getting a little ahead of myself. After all, the monkeypox 'epidemic' could be genuine. That's one of three possibilities that I can conceive.
It could instead be the result of an engineered virus (whether deliberately released or otherwise) or it could be a nothing burger; in other words, it only exists in a PCR test and the symptoms, such as they are, are symptoms of a different disease entirely. In that scenario, the entire spectacle is merely an attempt to cover up the eruption of auto-immune diseases which is occurring as a result of the Covid 'vaccines'. In order to arrive at a working hypothesis, it's useful to look a little deeper into what monkeypox actually is (historically), what it is about this outbreak that may be different and what outcomes may be pressed upon us.
What is monkeypox?
As noted in a previous essay, it is a disease that originates in west Africa. It's extremely rare in humans. It's not just monkeys that can pass it on. In one of the first recorded outbreaks outside the African continent (in the US, amazingly, in 2003), the carriers included giant pouched rats, squirrels and prairie dogs. The original source from Ghana wasn't human, either. Having said that, this information comes to us from the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and should, therefore, be treated with caution.
However, the disease itself is not particularly transmissible between humans and there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread. Symptoms – indistinguishable from any number of other diseases – include fever, body aches and chills, together with swollen lymph nodes. There may be a rash on the palm of the hand or the face which then spreads to other parts of the body. The rash becomes a scab which eventually falls off, revealing intact skin underneath. It is only then that the individual is no longer contagious. Infection can only come about via close physical contact.
“Key takeaway: this is not influenza or Covid – this virus mutates slowly, it is not highly infectious, naturally acquired immunity is potent and long-lasting, and Orthopox vaccines are usually cross-protective. The risk of immunologic escape is very, very low. And the spread of this virus can be readily stopped by simple, inexpensive classical public health measures. If it were otherwise, we would already have experienced a pandemic of monkeypox decades ago.”(1)
Monkeypox mutates slowly because it is comprised of double stranded DNA; the presence of two strands acts as a checking mechanism that is absent in RNA type viruses such as Covid. The other key fact is that there is no evidence that the disease is infectious prior to the presence of symptoms. This is not wholly surprising as this is the case with all known viruses, but the fiction of asymptomatic spread was one of the main drivers of Covid panic porn and a justification for measures such as masks and lock-downs. In any event, so far, so good. But things go downhill from here.
Initial reports indicated that clusters of infections were springing up across the western world (the West does seem to having a rough time with diseases that don't even come from the West, doesn't it?) simultaneously. This despite the fact that the disease is rarely seen outside Africa. This circumstance is the first red flag. However, there was a seemingly viable explanation, which mostly revolved around gay festivals in Belgium (2) and the Canary Islands (3) and a sauna in Madrid, which acted as super-spreader events.
Figure 1 Countries with most monkeypox cases
I'm of the opinion that we give too many free passes to things that don't actually make sense. How is it that a rare disease, which is not historically easily transmissible (and only then by a symptomatic individual) is making an appearance at different venues, outside of its natural habitat, simultaneously? I understand that it would be theoretically possible for festival goers to return to their own country and test positive there, rather than in Antwerp or the Canaries, but I do find the coincidences difficult to believe. Couldn't the pox have made an appearance in a village somewhere instead and been easily contained? It had to be present in a gay man who had decided to attend a festival in another country and, presumably, sleep with at least one other gay man? This raises a rainbow flag.
Nonetheless, we were treated to familiarly hyperbolic statements from most of the usual suspects. Why anybody would believe the WHO any more is beyond me, but they were busy trolling us with half formed concerns and outright speculation masquerading as expert advice; apparently, more people could get infected in the summer, because of mass gatherings; festivals, parties, general socializing, being in the same hemisphere as another live human – you get the drift.(4)
Belgium went so far as to mandate quarantine for pox sufferers when they had a grand total of three cases,(5) because nobody can be trusted these days and government must put their foot down with a firm hand whenever they get the opportunity. Biden told everybody to be concerned, but didn't see fit to mention any of the real epidemics (like the opioid crisis ravaging his country or the suicides among military veterans), about which he is doing precisely nothing. So, no change so far and strangely comforting, even with the red flags waving. I no longer expect official pronouncements on pandemic matters to be coherent or believable.
We also had the spectacle of a different WHO apparatchik contradicting the first WHO apparatchik, another increasingly frequent occurrence. This time, the head of the Smallpox Secretariat reminded us that mutations to the monkeypox virus were likely to be low in number and that there was no actual evidence that the virus had mutated so far.(6) There was further, additional confirmation of same:
“What researchers can tell from this preliminary genetic data is that the strain of the monkeypox virus found in Portugal is related to a viral strain predominantly found in West Africa. This strain causes milder disease and has a lower death rate — about 1% in poor rural populations — compared with the one that circulates in Central Africa.”(7)
Then it all started to go a bit pear shaped.
Engineered?
It turns out that the Portuguese had rather more to say and that initial reports were somewhat misleading, as is frequently the case. Because there were a number of Portuguese cases, scientists were able to gather nine samples between 15th and 17th May. Their main observations are as follows:
1. Due to the fact that the genomic sequences were tightly clustered together, the outbreak likely has a single source.
2. It's most closely related to a 2018/19 outbreak in Israel, the UK and Singapore and sourced to Nigeria.
3. Regrettably, it's not as closely related as it should be. There is a mean of 50 mutations per viral sample. This is many more than there ought to be, given the rate at which DNA stranded viruses should mutate.
4. Not only that; it is also evolving into a form that is more transmissible between humans as, even within the samples collected, there are what are termed micro-evolutions of seven mutations.(8)(9)
To recap; instead of contending with a barely believable outbreak of a very rare disease, the explanations for which failed the sniff test, but instead appeared to be an uncomplicated, crude attempt to sow confusion and unwarranted fear - it now seems that we may be dealing with something else entirely. It appears that this version of monkeypox isn't what it should be. Not only is it disobeying the rules of DNA genomes by having mutated too far from its original form, it is also continuing to do so and in a way that makes it more transmissible. This is not known in nature, which leads one to suspect that it has been manipulated by man which, as we are now learning, is something that happens to viruses on a regular basis.
At least one of the cases in the UK was a child in hospital. As a recent trip to a gay festival in the Canaries or a visit to a sauna in Madrid can, presumably, be ruled out, it does raise the possibility that transmission is easier than it should be. However, it's very early days and there are other possible scenarios.
Convenient Cover
How are the authorities sure that they have cases of monkeypox? I accept that the Portuguese lab says that they have samples, but we don't know how they got them or their chain of custody. So, what is the usual way of confirming infection? Well, it's the good old PCR test once again.(10) You'll never guess the identity of one of the entities that developed one of them – it's another familiar name, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Given that the disease had been first identified in 1970 (some say 1958), when do you think the test was designed? February 2022.(11) Apparently, this test is for the variety found in the Congo Basin.
Because the Chinese at Wuhan are completely on top of their game and scrupulously responsible, they only created one third of the monkeypox viral genome to test their PCR test against – or so they say. What isn't explained is their failure to secure actual monkeypox, instead choosing to create a synthetic version.(12) It isn't difficult to secure the live virus, but they claim that it is. Why, with a project that is funded to the tune of $10 million, would the researchers not be able to hop on a plane to Nigeria and snaffle a sample or two of the real thing? Why would they synthesize it instead? The other concern arises from the manifest inability of the Covid PCR test to perform its function with any degree of accuracy (almost certainly be design). I am no virologist, but is it not possible that, by using only a third of a viral genome In synthetic form, at that), the PCR test may not be designed to pick up monkeypox or only monkeypox? And might that be the whole idea?
There are other concerns with this project. Once more, Fauci's NIH is found to be involved; that institute is funding the entire project over five years, starting in September 2020.(13) Also involved, from the US end, is a certain Lori Dodd from Leidos Biomedical Research in Maryland. She has previously appeared on the radar via her involvement in efforts to falsify data concerning remdesivir in order to make it appear safer and more effective. It seems as if the whole gang is back together again, or maybe they were never apart.(14)
Roche has also managed to develop three PCR tests within the past month.(15) Interestingly, PCR tests on blood are usually inconclusive and antigen and antibody detection results are unspecific as to the particular virus. So, testing skin lesions and dry crusts is the way to go, although this cannot be done until they actually appear. This is when the PCR test makes its appearance.
In and of itself, this is not proof of any shady business. There are, after all, a limited number of facilities doing this kind of work. Nonetheless, the oddities are starting to stack up. Or rather, a familiar pattern is starting to emerge. PCR tests are designed for secondary diagnoses – to confirm or deny what an actual physical examination has suggested. I don't yet know what protocol is being utilized with monkeypox, but it wouldn't be a huge shock if we were to discover that they are being misused. Nor would it would it be surprising to learn that this test is somewhat less than infallible.
Could it actually be something other than monkeypox, notwithstanding the work by the Portuguese? For instance, there are now warnings that lesions could concentrate in the genital area alone; patients may just present with a sore rectum and any diagnosis could be confused with herpes or varicella zoster, which also causes chickenpox. Might it therefore be that a monkeypox diagnosis could be given incorrectly, either accidentally or on purpose? It would hardly be the first time. But what else might it be confused with on initial diagnosis?
Well, chickenpox for one. A 1988 study found that, of 977 people with skin eruptions tested in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo). Of the 730 diagnosed with chickenpox, 3.3% were found to be infected with human monkeypox, but only after lab testing. Physical examinations were insufficient.(16)
It could easily be confused with shingles, too. Shingles is the grown up version of chickenpox; after an original infection, most typically as a child, the virus lies dormant. Shingles is a reactivation of the original chickenpox infection and it can afflict the unfortunate multiple times. Around one in five people are sufferers. It differs from chickenpox inasmuch as it cannot be passed on to another person, in the way the highly infectious pox can be. However, somebody who has never had chickenpox itself could develop it after contact with a person with shingles. In such a case, the rash would take between 10 and 21 days to develop, a lot longer than the rash for monkeypox takes to emerge (17) and would typically show all over the torso, whereas a monkeypox rash is usually on one side of the body only.
So, at minimum, we are up to three alternates that present with sufficiently similar symptoms to warrant a 'mistaken' diagnosis. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), for instance, is strikingly similar:
“Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) is a common cause of ulcerative skin disease in both immune-compromised and immune-competent individuals. Most individuals infected with HSV have either no symptoms or mild symptoms that go unnoticed. When symptoms do appear, they initially present with tingling and/or redness, followed by blister-like lesions that rapidly merge into open, weeping sores. The sores are often quite painful and can be accompanied by a fever and swollen lymph glands.”(18)
First world countries (for want of a better term) are already suffering immune system collapses – vaccine induced AIDS - from the Covid 'vaccinations' and herpes infections are among the symptomatic expressions of the immuno-compromised; they are spreading from the mouth or from the genitals and severe infections are making it as far as the brain. By the end of February 2021, Pfizer alone had reports of 8,152 herpes infections following Covid 'vaccination', 18 of which had already led to multiple organ dysfunction. (19) The CDC themselves class severe HSV as an AIDS defining illness.(20) And there is yet another auto-immune blistering disease listed as a possible adverse event.(21) Maps of the monkeypox outbreak also have a disquieting similarity to maps of the most 'vaccinated' countries.
Figure 2 WHO map of monkeypox cases thusfar
Figure 3 Map of most 'vaccinated' nations
This theory, which holds that the monkeypox outbreak is an attempt to pin the blame for 'vaccine' injuries on yet one more PCR pandemic, may hold water; but surely only as a secondary benefit. There are a large number of adverse events associated with the Covid 'vaccines – including more immediate and serious conditions such as cardiac arrest and strokes – and it's difficult to understand why regimes would seek to obscure lesser conditions instead. It seems like a lot of effort to go to if that is intended to be the foremost outcome. That's not to say that the PCR pandemic won't feature again, but the primary purpose of that plan would be to force us into another 'vaccination' campaign. This would not be good, as I shall now explain.
Vaccines
There are two vaccines and one treatment, all for smallpox and monkeypox; the vaccines to be taken primarily as prevention, while the treatment is to be taken to reduce smallpox once it is already active. The latter is called TPOXX and is licensed to SIGA Technologies and, as the only approved smallpox treatment, it enjoys monopoly status. The oral version was first approved in 2018 by the FDA (and in January this year by the European Medical Agency) and the intravenous version was approved last month. Notably auspicious timing, you might think.
“The oral formulation of TPOXX (tecovirimat) is approved in the US, Canada and Europe for the treatment of smallpox. The European approval also includes the treatment of monkeypox, cowpox, and complications from immunization with vaccinia. The IV formulation of TPOXX was cited in the recent U.S. president’s budget request as being used to treat a patient in the U.S. with monkeypox.”(22)
The company is owned by a corporate raider who is a huge Clinton donor and currently in dire financial straights (inasmuch as a billionaire can ever be described in such terms) and its tentacles reach out to all the entities you would prefer it to abjure; it is partnered with the CDC, Fauci's NIH, Meridian Medical Technologies (owned by Pfizer) and a company called Lonza who are partnered with the WEF and Moderna. That's a who's who of unsavory characters.(23) Unsurprisingly, Moderna themselves are also anxious to clamber aboard the gravy train and are in the process of developing their own vaccine.(24)
The current offerings are from Emergent Biosolutions, a company so steeped in corruption that it makes Pfizer look like the business equivalent of a choirboy and Bavarian Nordic, who are somewhat of a dark horse. The former were in bad odor as recently as three weeks ago, for trying to cover up quality control issues with their production of Covid 'vaccines'. They exist for government contracts and, in company with SIGA, their shares have enjoyed a healthy hike since the outbreak came upon us. In fact, it's the second time in seven months that they have benefited from a media scare campaign. Last time out it was Gates (yes, him again) sharing his innermost thoughts on an upcoming smallpox pandemic and, just days later, the CDC telling us that they'd found some vials marked 'smallpox vaccine' at a research lab in Pennsylvania.(25) It's déjà vu all over again. These people aren't known for their subtlety.
In any event, this vaccine – known as ACAM2000 – is being stockpiled by the US government and, no doubt, others who have not yet informed us of their 'counter-measures'. It's actually a smallpox vaccine, that can also treat monkeypox but it is not something that anybody should be taking. Although approved in 2007 and used on military personnel (who are, after all, seemingly expendable in the eyes of the regime) it is a dangerous drug, which is contra-indicated in those with severe immuno-deficiency. If an outbreak of shingles – due to a trashed immune system - was misdiagnosed as monkeypox and a vaccine administered, the outcome would be disastrous. And yes, while
“…smallpox and monkeypox vaccines are effective at protecting people against monkeypox when given before exposure to monkeypox. Experts also believe that vaccination after a monkeypox exposure may help prevent the disease or make it less severe.”(26)
This is utter drivel. Why would anybody wish to take a vaccine after infection, when they would already have immunity? More to the point, why would they take this vaccine? The risk of myocarditis is greater than one in 200 recipients and adverse events also include encephalitis, blindness and death for both fetuses and adults and children. Other members of a household are also at risk through shedding.(27) Despite all of the above, an oral version of this vaccine (known as TEMBEXA) was also approved in June 2021.(28)
Jynneos, the other vaccine, has nothing to recommend it either. Although 85% efficacy is claimed, it cannot be verified as this number has only been arrived at via animal testing; due to the scarcity of smallpox cases, no human's had formed part of any clinical trials. Instead, the drug's effectiveness has been estimated by testing for antibodies which are then touted as proving immunity. However, this rather depends on whether the chosen antibodies do, in fact, provide immunity; they may not be reliable indicators. And we don't have to reach back very far to find that such claims can be false – the Covid 'vaccines' are claimed to have 95% efficacy and that is now known to be a bald faced lie.
The FDA doesn't see it that way, however. They approved it on 24th September 2019 for the treatment of smallpox and monkeypox by subcutaneous injection, yet another departure from reason.(29) No smallpox vaccine has ever been administered under the skin, due to the fact that they have always been considered 'dirty'. The CDC doesn't see it that way, however:
“Occurrences of serious adverse events are expected to be minimal because JYNNEOS is a replication-deficient virus vaccine. However, because the mechanism for myopericarditis following receipt of ACAM2000 is thought to be an immune-mediated phenomenon, it is not known whether the antigen or antigens that precipitate autoantibodies are present in JYNNEOS as well.”(30)
They don't have a single clue what Jynneos will do to humans; they do know what ACAM2000 does, but this hasn't prevented the CDC recommending the use of both of them for laboratory personnel and for first responders to outbreaks.(31) Neither has it stayed the hand of Canadian authorities who are already anxious to vaccinate those who, puzzlingly, have been exposed to the virus already,(32) seemingly with the Jynneos vaccine.(33) One might think that, at that point in the disease's progress, it would be better to treat symptoms, if they arrive; but, apparently the nuclear option is what is required.
So, instead of using a treatment such as TPOXX, either orally or via injection, the better option is a vaccine that has never been trialed on humans and whose safety and efficacy is totally unknown, but potentially deeply problematic and all in order to treat a disease that, while unpleasant, is not viewed as dangerous to those of us in advanced economies? Does that make any sense at all?
Plans
Whatever else we might think of them, we have to give our elders and betters credit for preparation, planning and perspicacity. They have an extraordinary track record for forecasting imminent disasters. We had Event 201, in October 2019, a tabletop exercise in countering the threat of a global pandemic. Not just any scenario, either; the simulated pandemic was caused by an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats which eventually becomes efficiently transmissible in the human population. It was arranged by the Bloomberg School of Public Health at John Hopkins University, The WEF and, you've guessed it, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.(34) And, wouldn't you know it, three months later we had the real thing.
But that wasn't the first demonstration of the elites' uncanny predictive powers. In June 2001, the same university was also involved in war gaming a bio-terrorism attack on the United States – Operation Dark Winter.(35) Three months later, the US was hit with anthrax attacks. 9/11 was a week prior and, remarkably, on the day of the attack on the Twin Towers by terrorists in aircraft, the US military was war-gaming a scenario of a terrorist hijacking of an aircraft (Operation Vigilant Guardian).(36)
The year 2005 saw a new player on the predictive scene, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). Together with John Hopkins University, once again, they were involved in sponsoring Operation Atlantic Storm, another exercise simulating a bio-terror incident.(37) This time the pathogen of choice was smallpox. Shortly afterwards, we were treated to what was hyped as a bird flu pandemic, which never properly took off due to the virus's inability to easily spread from person to person.(38)
I accept the fact that, without context, these coincidences may have an innocent explanation. Perhaps there are dozens of simulations every year and, by cherry picking those that construct a narrative, I am being disingenuous. There is, however, more. In March 2021, the NTI and Gates (39) were partners in yet another tabletop exercise, once again simulating a high consequence biological threat in a bid to improve international responses to pandemics; the usual spiel. This time the pathogen of choice was monkeypox. (40) Who'd have thunk it?
Ever since this connection has been made by enterprising citizen journalists (the mainstream media unsurprisingly deeming the story as radioactive as Hunter's laptop), the NTI have become rather defensive. They point out that this is the third exercise they've conducted, not the first - which explanation has limited utility as the first two were not specific, but rather more generic run-throughs related to general biodefence. However, the first time they introduce a hypothetical pathogen, they hit the jackpot. They are happy to mention one co-sponsor of the event, but Gates fails to get a shout out. They also state that their scenario envisaged an engineered virus that was more dangerous and more transmissive than the strains found in nature. Well, it's early days yet. This was their nifty one page summary:
Figure 4 Let's hope not. NTI Paper BIO-TXX Final
They were a week out on the start date. Let's hope they're wrong about some of the other detail, too. As you might expect, given Gates' sponsorship and what we have learned about his involvement with the WHO and his advocacy of what he calls his GERM team, all the NTI conclusions support the implementation of the measures that Gates wants to put in place, including automatic international triggers the moment the WHO D-G states there's a 'pandemic'. This would include, as it does already, a requirement for governments to buy vaccines. Just so we don't forget – Gates is a noted investor in vaccines.
He isn't the only one who seems to be in possession of a crystal ball, although he is the only person who said:
“We’ll have to prepare for the next one. That will get attention this time.”(41)
The WHO themselves, according to one of their own virologists, has planned for ten years of ongoing pandemics from 2020 to 2030.(42) Perhaps this is why many millions of Covid test kits were imported by most of the world's G20 countries in 2017/18.(43) Or why Fauci said this in 2017:
“There is no question there is going to be a challenge for the coming administration in the area of infectious diseases. There will be a surprise outbreak. There’s no doubt in anyone’s mind about this.”(44)
Perhaps it also explains why, in 2018, that renowned epidemiologist Melinda Gates thought that the next pandemic would be an engineered virus.(45) Or why the EU published a book called Infected, all about a virus which escaped from a Chinese laboratory, which then set the scene for the imposition of global tyranny and a One Health Approach - the latter now having been in implemented in the real world.(46) It may also explain why, in September 2019, the WHO instructed governments to prepare for an imminent pandemic due to a “rapidly spreading lethal respiratory pathogen.”(47) In totality, there do seem to be rather a lot of coincidences, don't you think?
Other possible outcomes
A monkeypox pandemic could also serve to further other outcomes that are dear to the globalists' hearts. Already, the CDC has raised its travel advisory alert level to 2,(48) which will have the effect of reducing CO2 emissions. There are only three levels, unless we want to include mandatory lock-downs as level four. There is also a focus on the potential for monkeypox to become endemic in the West, infecting the food chain. The NHS, in the UK, while intoning the usual buzz phrases about “significant and concerning” rises in cases were also at pains to inform us that:
“it may also be possible to catch monkeypox from an infected animal that has not been cooked thoroughly enough...”(49)
The wording is key here; lots of things may happen in any given circumstance, but what evidence is there that they will? Given that this advice was meant for people in the UK, the NHS were subsequently obliged to back off from the fear porn by clarifying that they were referring to meat in Africa, in regions where monkeypox is endemic. Nonetheless, the thought has been planted, using a tactic that has already been deployed; scientists “believe” that deer may be infected with Omicron, if you recall.(50) Globalist efforts to degrade the food supply, especially meat, are already well advanced. Any suggestion that monkeypox could become endemic to Western food sources would further that agenda.
The apparent emergence of another pandemic would also tally with the WHO's ten year plan and bolster the current attempts to effectively persuade the nations of the world to surrender national sovereignty to that organisation. It may be that several different aims are being satisfied, not just the one. This is the WHO's current position:
“The World Health Organization (WHO) maintains that the growing monkeypox outbreak remains “containable,” and that there’s no immediate need for mass vaccinations against the orthopoxvirus; since May 7, a total of 131 confirmed cases and 106 suspected cases have been reported in countries where it usually does not spread.”(51)
Once again, language is key; “there is no immediate need for mass vaccinations...”. I don't recall anybody saying that there was, do you? But by introducing that straw man, they have begun the process of preparing us and normalizing a vaccination campaign if they deem it necessary. Naturally, this will once again benefit Big Pharma. Once again, our tax dollars will be used to pay them. Once again, the safety and efficacy of these vaccines will be unknown, but all the indications are that they will be at least as damaging as the Covid ones and, this time, Big Pharma won't even have to fake the clinical trials on humans. A further enfeebling of the population will ensue.
Conclusions
I had originally intended to write a section setting out the evidence that might lead to a conclusion that this was a genuine, unalloyed outbreak, but the only voices that have been raised in support of that notion belong to the people who have lied to us consistently for the best part of two and a half years, forfeiting our unquestioning trust in the process. The circumstantial evidence of tampering, the echoes of Event 201 and its precursors, the maneuverings of Big Pharma, the timing, the array of familiar bad actors and the general implausibility of a scenario that has never previously occurred are all factors that mitigate against a natural explanation.
Add to that the obvious benefits that might accrue to a cabal that has demonstrated what its priorities are, which include the phasing out of meat, a wilful blindness to, and cover up of, its last vaccination campaign and a desire to inoculate us with supposed vaccines at the merest hint of danger, and the chances that this is a genuine outbreak are, to my mind, vanishingly small. It should be remembered that the Covid play-book is, in all probability, the template if the plan includes going large on monkeypox.
A pandemic plan doesn't necessarily need a genuine disease as a component; it needs the perception of one. To that end, keep an eye on the testing regime. If the strangely formulated Wuhan PCR test starts to be used as a primary testing tool, beware. If, as seems possible, this version of the disease behaves in a manner that is inconsistent with its viral forebears – particularly if one of the anomalies is increased transmissibility – be mindful. If regimes start overreacting, à la Canada, mischief is abroad. And if they try to foist toxic vaccines upon us, remember what happened last time. This series of charts might help in that endeavor.
Figure 5 Most 'vaccinated' countries
Figure 6 Same countries Covid cases
Figure 7 Same countries deaths
Figure 8 Least 'vaccinated' countries
Figure 9 Same countries Covid cases
Figure 10 Same countries Covid deaths
It even works for the countries in the middle.
Figure 11 Countries neither here nor there
Figure 12 Same countries Covid cases
Figure 13 Same countries Covid deaths
Most importantly, even when poring over the minutiae, don't lose sight of the big picture. That's what they want you to do. But Covid, the fuel crisis, the food crisis, the cost of living crisis, the war in Ukraine and now monkeypox? Really? What are the chances that a succession of engineered crises are then followed by a genuine one? And another possible 'pandemic' at that?
Citations
(1) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/23/monkeypox-truth-vs-fearporn/
(2) https://archive.ph/1QZsM#selection-1463.0-1463.79
(3) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10839877/Monkeypox-outbreak-Europes-biggest-100-cases-reported.html
(4) https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-warns-monkeypox-could-accelerate-during-summer-cdc-alerts-us-doctors-virus-reaches-13
(5) https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/belgium-begins-monkeypox-quarantines-biden-warns-everybody-should-be-concerned
(6) https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/who-says-no-evidence-monkeypox-virus-has-mutated-2022-05-23/
(7) https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01421-8
(8) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ON563414
(9) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/31/monkey-pox-a-significant-development/
(10) https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/best-time-to-get-a-pcr-test-for-monkeypox-smallpox-vaccines-effectiveness-and-other-faqs-about-this-fast-spreading-virus/articleshow/91854100.cms
(11) https://www.visiontimes.com/2022/05/22/wuhan-institute-of-virology-wiv-monkeypox-pcr-test.html
(12) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995820X22000414
(13) https://reporter.nih.gov/search/sLt357_GeUyXtIUvUOY0MQ/project-details/10506292
(14) Ditto
(15) https://gnnhd.tv/news/13486/pharmaceutical-giant-roche-develops-monkeypox-pcr-tests
(16) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2907258/
(17) https://www.healthline.com/health/chickenpox-vs-shingles
(18) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/25/monkeypox-used-cover-up-covid-vaccines-cause-a-id-s/
(19) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
(20) https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-are-the-aids-defining-illnesses-49581
(21) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
(22) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/24/monkeypox-arrived-in-time-to-rescue-companies/
(23) https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/siga-receives-approval-from-the-fda-for-intravenous-iv-formulation-of-tpoxx-tecovirimat-fda-approval-provides-an-important-option-for-those-unable-to-take-oral-formulation-of-tpoxx-/
(24) https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-testing-potential-monkeypox-vaccines-2022-05-24/
(25) https://multidimensionalocean.wordpress.com/2021/11/20/just-days-after-bill-gates-warned-of-a-coming-smallpox-bioterror-attack-15-vials-labeled-smallpox-are-found-in-research-lab-in-pennsylvania/
(26) https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/smallpox-vaccine.html
(27) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/29/smallpox-money-pox-and-the-vaccines/
(28) https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/05/investigative-reports/monkeypox-fears-may-rescue-endangered-corporations/
(29) https://www.fda.gov/media/131802/download
(30) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7122e1.htm
(31) https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/vaccines/98968
(32) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/monkeypox-vaccine-quebec-1.6466449
(33) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7122e1.htm
(34) https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about
(35) https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/dark-winter-bioterrorism-exercise-andrews-air-force-base
(36) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Guardian
(37) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Storm
(38) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2006/01/year-end-review-avian-flu-emerged-high-profile-issue-2005
(39) https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2017/10/opp1185378
(40) https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/strengthening-global-systems-to-prevent-and-respond-to-high-consequence-biological-threats/
(41) https://rumble.com/v13ghrb-the-plan-the-who-plans-for-10-years-of-pandemics-form-2020-to-2030.html
(42) Ditto
(43) https://web.archive.org/web/20200905210427if_/https:/wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Imports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
(44) https://stopworldcontrol.com/proof/
(45) Ditto
(46) https://www.who.int/health-topics/one-health#tab=tab_1
(47) https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf
(48) https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/alert/monkeypox
(49) https://uk.style.yahoo.com/nhs-issues-warning-anyone-eats-163442613.html
(50) https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/07/health/omicron-deer-staten-island-covid.html
(51) https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/98889