As a general rule of thumb I believe it's fair to assume that if our rulers undertake a course of action that is of benefit to us, they're not shy about letting us know. There is very little hiding of lights under bushels in a democracy where votes still have currency, however limited that now is. It follows that, when they neglect to inform us of actions that directly impact us, it is likely that they are not beneficial, but harmful. The 'vaccines' are a case in point.
By now, the awake have largely come to grips with some unpalatable truths about the Covid narrative, chief amongst them the fact that incontrovertible evidence of a genuine pandemic has not been located (and, given the gaslighting that has been uncovered, clearly won't be located in the future either, because it doesn't exist) and that the jab doesn't do what they said it would do. However, there is still much confusion as to why the 'vaccine' doesn't work.
This suits Big Pharma and the blob just fine, because bafflement disguises both their culpability and the secrets they want to remain hidden. They especially don't want us to think that they intended any of the bad outcomes that are becoming apparent and so they deploy two main methodologies in service of the narratives – a wall of the silence, if at all possible (and for as long as possible), or a textured defense characterized by outright lies and misdirection. And it isn't just the legacy media and the authorities who dispense the latter; it's also false prophets and traitors on our side of the fence. But they did intend harm. It's obvious once you clear the fog.
Take mRNA, which is now to be the platform for a swarm of new 'vaccines'. Our erstwhile 'ally' Robert Malone (more on him later) is said to the originator of the technology that uses mRNA in some sort of a healing way, by getting the body to produce antibodies to the SARS-COV-2 spike protein. More than that we don't need to know. It is, of course, unfortunate that the inoculated can still get Covid – and pass it on – but that's because all these variants have come along and they're too different from the original Wuhan strain to be neutralized. Hence boosters et cetera. Plus, it's nonsense to suggest that your DNA is changed, or that the jab is anything other than 'safe and effective'. That seems to be the current state of the accepted narrative.
Malone's original paper, entitled Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection (published in 1989)(1) talks of the difficulty of introducing mRNA into a cell, largely due to both its fragile number and the robust defense systems of the human body, which are trained to destroy foreign mRNA. It's a different story with DNA, apparently:
“The wide variety of methods to introduce genetic material into cells includes relatively simple manipulations....In nearly all cases DNA has been introduced into cells because of its inherent stability and eventual integration in the host genome.”(2) (emphasis mine)
Hold that thought – we'll come back to DNA. mRNA, we are told, cannot transcribe itself into our DNA, which does rather beg a question; why was Malone interested in getting mRNA into cells and why was there that reference to the host genome? Is it because he was trying to find a way for mRNA to have a similar action? If not, why mention it? Malone's paper suggests that his discovery was pursued because his team was studying the effect of mRNA on eukaryotic cells (cells with a membrane-bound nucleus, like ours) and needed to find a more efficient way of getting the material into the cells. This was accomplished by pairing it with lipofection (a positively charged liposome), which is cytotoxic – meaning toxic to cells.(3) So, a somewhat Pyrrhic victory, one might think.
It's worth remembering, at this juncture, that getting mRNA into a cell from the outside is the opposite of what happens in nature. mRNA originates in the nucleus of a cell and is then transported into the cytoplasm where it is translated and then, swiftly, degraded.
Figure 1
We are required to believe that Malone's mRNA does the necessary within the cytoplasm, but never enters the nucleus where our genetic code is stored. In this way, the cell is hijacked by foreign mRNA, which manufactures spike protein which our body then produces antibodies to. However, this is only a temporary phase (because it's a 'vaccine') and it'll all go quiet until Covid comes around again, at which point the antibodies will spring into life and fail to protect you as advertised. But, at no point will the mRNA pierce the nucleus and fundamentally alter our DNA. We know this because every fact-checker under the sun has told us so.
“It all made sense on paper. In the natural world, the body relies on millions of tiny proteins to keep itself alive and healthy, and it uses mRNA to tell cells which proteins to make. If you could design your own mRNA, you could, in theory, hijack that process and create any protein you might desire — antibodies to vaccinate against infection, enzymes to reverse a rare disease, or growth agents to mend damaged heart tissue.”(4)
Lots of things make sense on paper, yet don't when challenged in the real world. We can count miracle mRNA among their number. The first mistake was to play God; to lack respect for the body's natural processes, to seek to circumvent them without an understanding of how doing so might have other consequences. Foreign mRNA would ordinarily have been destroyed in short order, but creating this hybrid that could sneak into cells negated human defenses. Their second mistake was in lying about what their version of mRNA actually does although, given what they've engineered it to do (both Pfizer and Moderna), they couldn't be upfront about it.
For the longest time, molecular biologists insisted that reverse transcription (mRNA into DNA) was impossible. mRNA could not penetrate the nucleus and reprogram the DNA to produce copies of itself – or so they believed. The DNA in the nucleus programmed the mRNA which crossed the membrane into the cell's cytoplasm and that's where the magic happened – the creation of the proteins that sustain life. Until HIV came along, anyway.
HIV reverse transcribes into DNA and replicates itself (quite how that came to pass will be a subject for another day), but conditions need to be right. Certain enzymes need to be present, enzymes that must also be imported to the nucleus. One of them is called LINE -1 and the Pfizer 'vaccine' causes cells to produce the LINE-1 enzymes necessary for reverse transcription. In the lab, human liver cells were genetically modified within six hours.(5) This means that the
“...Pfizer mRNA vaccine changes our genetic code that determines how our organisms operate, that you inherited from your mom and dad. Now your DNA was changed from what your mom and dad gave you, by adding a little mysterious "edit" from Pfizer. Your organism acts in accordance with your DNA program, and now, well, the program has been hacked and modified by Pfizer.”(6)
The Moderna 'vaccine' is also manipulated. Instead of both jabs simply being encoded to enable the cytoplasm to produce spike protein, other processes are prompted, too. An anonymous 4chan post from December 2020, claiming to be from an industrial engineer at Moderna, alleges that small quantities of additives were manually added to the brew (highly unusual for a continuous process production). These additional ingredients were “highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants”; allegedly.(7)
In fact, it was discovered that mutated versions of two enzymes were added, along with an additive that enabled LINE-1 reverse transcription activity. The effect of the two mutant enzymes was recessive, but mildly oncogenic (cancer causing). It was “unlikely to be noticed for many years....but since most of population vaccinated [sic], in next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure.”(8) So, an engineered 'vaccine' that alters DNA and is also a cancer promoter, specifically aimed at population reduction. That's what they injected into the malleable and the blackmailed.
There's more. The genetic code of what is allegedly the original SARS-COV-2 virus contains a insert that only exists in a Moderna patent from 2018.(9) The patent is about making cancer-causing proteins and the sequence appears in a key part of the spike protein, the very protein that the 'vaccine' is supposed to boost cell production of. So, more cancer genes added deliberately - in addition to the HIV sequences that are also a part of the alleged virus's genome. Whether the virus was ever anything more than a synthetic construct or a genomic code on a database is open to debate (as far as I'm aware, it still hasn't been isolated), but the sequences said to be its genome have been used in the 'vaccines'.
An Italian study tested vaccinees six months after their last booster and found that 50% of subject were still producing synthetic spike protein. One of the possible explanations that they floated was the obvious one – that “the mRNA may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells”.(10) Not just a lab phenomenon any more then and the likelihood is that, as with HIV, the reprogrammed cells will endlessly produce cancer-inducing spike protein. Quite why only half of the cohort weren't suffering these ill-effects is unknown, but it's entirely possible that they were not the unwitting victims of a 'hot batch'.(11)
Then there's Plasmidgate. Plasmid DNA are small DNA molecules that are separate from chromosomal DNA, but which are still capable of replicating independently.
Figure 2
This is DNA contamination and has been found in both Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines' in vast quantities – a single Pfizer dose has been found to contain 200 billion pieces of DNA.(12) This level of DNA is a therapeutic level and it will last as long as the host organism lasts. It is used as part of the manufacturing process for mRNA and should never be in a drug for humans. And, yes. The DNA will find itself into the nucleus of the cells. In fact, there are five different mechanisms by which it does so. As Dr. Phillip Buckhaults said in testimony in South Carolina:
“This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix … we do this in the lab all the time; we take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex, like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells. And a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It’s not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell from now on and all of its progeny from now on and forever more …”(13)
It won't surprise you to learn that this isn't favorite. The DNA is “basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.”(14) These findings have been replicated in the lab. “These cells did not merely interact with the vaccines but absorbed them, incorporating foreign DNA into their very structure”.(15) It was immediate and the plasmid DNA wasn't merely absorbed; it was replicated by the cells. And, depending on where the DNA lands, it can induce cancer. Once more.
Pfizer's 'vaccine' also contains further 'contamination', this time from Simian Virus 40 (SV40). It's a small piece of the virus but, coincidentally, it's “an oncogenic virus piece. It’s not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression.”(16) It's a sequence that is “used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies.”(17) Translated into layman's terms, it's also a piece of the virus that, if it lands in the wrong place on human DNA (having been integrated), will promote turbo-cancers. Just for a change. As a Japanese professor has also noted;
“The question is why such a sequence that is derived from a cancer virus is present in Pfizer’s vaccine. There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine...Pfizer produced the vaccine without removing the sequence. That is outrageously malicious.”(18)
But they weren't done yet. The original experiments with mRNA kept bumping up against the same problem. The ideal dose was triggering dangerous immune reactions, but lower doses weren't strong enough to provoke a beneficial effect.(19) That was why Moderna had pivoted towards the vaccine market, where perhaps one or two doses would show an effect without too much toxicity. And yes, I know; why would the boosters be considered appropriate, given these shortcomings? Answer – they were beneficial to the shareholders.
Scientists also needed to speed up production of the mRNA, as the natural process was glitchy and time-consuming:
“Luckily, scientists found a way to overcome this problem, by doing code substitution: instead of using the original genetic code to generate the protein,they changed the letters in the code so the code would be optimized. This is known as Codon Optimization.”(20)
I think the use of the word 'luckily' may be ironic because, once again, it transpires that messing about with natural processes has consequences. It turns out that this method of speeding up the production of spike protein engendered by the mRNA 'vaccines' is deeply flawed, and was known to be so prior to the development of the Covid 'vaccines'. This is because the optimization process is prone to producing misfolded proteins and misfolded proteins are known to produce completely unforeseen consequences. When I say unforeseen, what I really mean is that the specific consequence is unforeseen, not the range of possible outcomes. They are largely known and none of them are good; Alzheimers, Parkinsons, heart disease as well as a number of other possible conditions. This was known as long ago as 2011.(21)
Pfizer has admitted that the optimization process results in elevated levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which in turn is an early marker for heart failure. So, why optimize codons? Because unless they do, the 'vaccines' won't produce enough protein to be 'effective'. Can you sense the circular logic? They have to make the jab dangerous or it won't be able to protect against something that's (allegedly) dangerous. A sensible person, or one not in thrall to the potential for easy profits at the expense of millions of people's health, might think that the technology is not up to the job.
To summarize, then. The makers of the mRNA Covid 'vaccines' have produced gene therapies, not vaccines. These 'therapies' include material that assists in the reverse transcription of the mRNA into human DNA. In addition, free floating plasmid DNA – which shouldn't be present – also integrates into the genome. In addition, Pfizer and Moderna have variously included genetic excerpts from the HIV virus, from a cancer inducing genome and from a monkey virus that also induces cancer.
In addition, they have introduced misfolded proteins that stimulate the development of Prion diseases. That's without getting into the anaphylactic properties of the lipid nanoparticles, immune degradation or any other disbenefits such as auto-immune conditions or endocrine disruption, which also occur but which could have been prevented.(22) So, the question is a simple one and one that can be simply answered; is there intent to do harm, or are they simply criminally incompetent?
Incompetence is often characterized by sins of omission and carelessness and some of the blame might have been laid at the door of shoddy manufacturing processes, were it not for the fact that sins of commission have also been committed via the inclusion of specifically harmful code and extracts. They knew that they could then integrate these malignant sequences into human genomes if they also included the necessary enzymes – which they did. As Attorney Renz says:
“These jabs are designed killing machines and were distributed knowing that they would shed and kill people. They created a gene therapy product, marketed it as a ‘vaccine’ then schemed, coerced, bribed and lied to get it into as many arms as possible.”(23)
And it's worked, hasn't it? The herd is being thinned and turbo-cancers, especially in the young, are surging, much to the studied surprise of the medical community. Athletes have been dropping like flies for three years (four footballers have collapsed within the past week)(24) and both men and women in the 15-44 age range have been suffering. They are not generally eligible for early screenings and the cancer has often metastasized before they are even diagnosed.(25) Rates of cancer are two to three times higher than previously.
“It is cancers in young people just turning up, one day you’re absolutely fine, the next day you’re told you have terminal cancer and you’re dead in a week... Tumors are not only faster growing but you’re getting more types of cancer occurring in the same person. It used to be very very rare. Just occasionally I’d see a very, very aggressive inflammatory cancer in young people. But now everyone has stories.”(26)
The 'vaccines' were never intended to help – not even slightly. All the talk of their effectiveness gradually wearing off is simply misdirection. They were engineered to kill people, both in the here and now and also further down the line and while there is clearly much variability as to dose (and response), there is no guarantee that harm has not also been caused to those whose bodies haven't been hijacked and turned into a spike protein factory.
There were other ingredients, too, but these have attracted rather less attention from the resistance. And there are prominent figures, nominally on our side, who have taken up indefensible positions. What I have set out so far is demonstrably true and the likes of Chudov and Renz are unafraid to call it out. Others, not so much. Malone, for instance, won't go anywhere near it. Any question of intent is determinately unaddressed. Graphene is a third rail, as it also is to Ryan Cole, another Hero of the Resistance. It seems that some subjects are off-limits and we should not give the enemy an opportunity to deride us – as if that will stop them. According to them, we must present a united front.
I've always felt such an insistence to be one of the hallmarks of collectivism, rather than a feature of critical thinking. It seems to me that getting to the truth is rather more important than adopting positions in a developing scenario and then refusing to adapt them as new truths emerge. The Covid saga has necessarily been a journey of discovery, as the perpetrators of the scam have been understandably reluctant to reveal their own culpability. Further, while taking fixed positions on philosophical or moral grounds is one thing, taking them on questions of fact needs to be done with considerable care. Some are temperamentally unable to exercise those levels of caution and some have too much skin in the game to allow for critical self-assessment.
But it must be apparent to all who have eyes to see that the 'pandemic' wasn't solely about an allegedly novel pathogen. It must be obvious that the threat was deliberately over-hyped, that the year 2020 was not plagued with excess deaths and that Covid was the vehicle that was used to usher in layers of societal control that hadn't previously existed and which breached our collective rights as citizens. It's also clear that these powers – lock-downs, quarantine and mandates to the fore – haven't been repudiated and that any 'inquiry' that might be ongoing is not designed to address abuses (think the farcical Hallett Inquiry in the UK), but rather to normalize them for future deployment.
A working hypothesis which states that the scam pandemic was staged, at least in part, to get a couple of jabs into every arm shouldn't, therefore, be beyond the pale. The next inquiry might be to question why our rulers should want to do that. The answer to that question ought not to be constrained by a desire to avoid being ridiculed by an enemy who will excoriate anyone who has the temerity to suggest that their narrative is phony, regardless. Yes, it is apparent that the jab causes harm and only the terminally naïve would consider that to be accidental. Nonetheless, might there, perhaps, be more to it than that? And shouldn't there always be a follow-up question when malfeasance is uncovered – if they're doing that, what else are they up to?
So, when scientists searched the 'vaccines' for non-biological matter and came up with graphene oxide, shouldn't that finding have been taken seriously, rather than being dismissed out-of-hand? I believe so and I think the reason some haven't been willing to do just that is due to what the discovery implies. Because why would graphene, of all possible materials, be in the 'vaccines'? And it is there. Numerous independent studies have confirmed its presence, despite Big Pharma's insistence that it isn't.(27) It even sheds from the 'vaccinated' to the 'unvaccinated'.(28) The next three images are of healthy red blood cells, the blood cells of a jabbed individual (complete with coagulation and graphene fibers) and, lastly, the blood of an vaccine-free three year old who has, nonetheless, shards of graphene in its blood.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
So, it's there alright – loads of it. It's a single layer sheet of carbon atoms, which is only one atom thick. It's harder than steel, shrinks with the heat, expands with the cold and is extremely conductive. It's a wonder material and its derivatives (graphene oxide and graphene dioxide) are likewise lauded.(29) The oxide version is praised for its “‘ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area’ and its exceptional ‘chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity and excellent biocompatibility’.”(30) It's been widely investigated for biomedical applications, so finding it in the 'vaccine' is not exactly a bolt from the blue. But it should raise the alarm as it is severely toxic to humans, causing “neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, DNA damage, lung damage, and many other alarming outcomes.”(31)(32)(33) So why use it?
Well, given the damage that other ingredients cause, why not? Our welfare is clearly not a priority; in fact, active harm is a desired outcome. But there are other, more troubling reasons too and they involve the use of nanotechnology which is, I know, yet another conspiracy theory that must be jettisoned. Except it isn't a theory – it's a fact. The US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) was broadcasting its research programme back in 2018.
Figure 6
Moderna's Chinese supplier of lipids, Sinopeg, advertised the ingredients which included graphene, “ the thinnest, strongest and stiffest material ...an excellent heat and electric conductor” and the Chinese patent also lists graphene oxide as an ingredient of the coronavirus 'vaccine'.(34)(35) Indeed, the presence of graphene oxide shouldn't be a surprise to anybody familiar with the field of drug delivery. Research has been ongoing for years, especially as it pertains to hydro-gels.
“Graphene and graphene derivatives (e.g., graphene oxide (GO)) have been incorporated into hydro-gels to improve the properties (e.g., mechanical strength) of conventional hydro-gels and/or develop new functions (e.g., electrical conductivity and drug loading/delivery).”(36)
Another reference to the strength of the material. But might that quality be a double edged sword if the graphene was simply floating around in our blood? Yes, it would.
“...a team of biologists, engineers and material scientists at Brown University examined graphene’s potential toxicity in human cells. They found that the jagged edges of graphene nanoparticles, super sharp and super strong, easily pierced through cell membranes in human lung, skin and immune cells, suggesting the potential to do serious damage in humans and other animals.”(37)(38)
A further warning sign, if one were needed, would be the fact that the aforementioned hydro-gels are being researched by the likes of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Bill Gates. Indeed, a Silicon Valley company called Profusa, backed by both of the above, has developed a biosensor chip that is implanted under the skin using hydro-gel. It is marketed as an early warning system for Covid,(39) but it does a lot more than that, including transmitting biological information over the internet. Wouldn't that be handy? Anybody with a slightly raised temperature could be marched off to quarantine.
But an implant under the skin is different to nanotechnology in 'vaccines'. Just because one type of technology is being developed doesn't mean that there has been any nefarious goings-on with the Covid jabs, does it? It doesn't, no – not without further evidence. But we still have the unanswered question; why is some sort of graphene in the 'vaccine'? Pfizer have attempted to offer the definitive explanation, by inference, by revealing that it's possible for graphene oxide to contaminate the jab, because it is used in the manufacturing process (nothing to do with its deliberate used as revealed by the Chinese patents). What an unfortunate coincidence.
Figure 7
Then there's that pesky further evidence. Strange mechanical structures that assemble and disassemble. Rectangular structures that resemble circuitry and microchips. Like these from Pfizer's 'vaccine'.
Figure 8
Figure 9
And these.
“The following images are from the slide which had one drop of fresh human blood mixed with one drop of vaccine liquid. When the liquid met up to the blood, the white blood cells were annihilated, and the red blood cells heavily damaged.”(40)
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
What could they possibly be? Perhaps Dr Fauci can help us out with that one. In 2019, just prior to the 'pandemic', he gave evidence before Congress about the state-of-the-art platform technologies that the NIAID was developing, as per the brochure referenced earlier in this piece:
“These platform technologies include DNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), virus like particles, vector based, and self assembling nanoparticle vaccines.”(41)
Or there's this, from our friends at Profusa from a press release in March 2018:
“Today scientists are presenting results showing tiny biosensors that become one with the body…and stream data to a mobile phone and to the cloud….tiny biosensors composed of a tissue-like hydrogel, similar to a soft contact lens, that are painlessly placed under the skin with a single injection.”(42)
Or we could take from a 2019 article entitled ‘Aerosolised Nanobots: Parsing Fact from Fiction for Health Security – A Dialectical View’:
“Nanoscalar robotics can be used as both sensors and receiver-delivery devices, and the controllability of these technologies enable their directed activity in biological organisms...As recent studies have indicated, these approaches can be used in clinical care to more precisely monitor tissue, organ, and overall bodily states and to alter the structure and function of biological tissues and systems at a variety of scales, from the subcellular to the systemic and organismic.”(43)
Or this paper from as far back as 2008:
“The recent developments in the field of nanoelectronics, with transducers progressively shrinking down to smaller sizes through nanotechnology and carbon nanotubes, are expected to result in innovative biomedical instrumentation possibilities, with new therapies and efficient diagnosis methodologies....It should provide high precision pervasive biomedical monitoring with real time data transmission.”(44)
There are plenty more I could reference, but you get the picture. There is nanotechnology in the 'vaccines'. They are likely made from graphene. Additionally, the graphene conducts electricity. Nano-nodes that disseminate through the body, nano-sensors that monitor biological function, virus sized transistors embedded in cells, nano-routers and a nano-interface to magnify the signal;(45) capable of being targetted at different organs. The stuff of science fiction, but which all exist in the real world:
“In the case of brain tissue, the scientific literature is very profuse and includes a multitude of experiments and tests with carbon nanotubes and graphene and graphene oxide nanosheets to act as electrodes capable of acting as bridges between neurons and stimulating their electrical activity...”(45)
The transmission from the nanotechnology doesn't have to go far – at present, it only has to be powerful enough to reach what is referred to as the “gateway”; a cellphone, to you and I. You can prove it if you please. You can conduct an experiment, similar in style to one conducted by an inquisitive general practitioner in the summer of 2021. He found himself the only operative in his office most afternoons – in the midst of the lock-downs – and he used his 'phone to detect Bluetooth signals upon the arrival of individual patients. He treated the patients and asked each one whether they had been 'vaccinated'. He would then ask them to temporarily switch off any electronic devices that might emit a signal.
None of the 137 patients refused to answer the 'vaccination' question; the only wariness he encountered was in the minority who had refused the jab. The 'vaccinated', in contrast, were socially comfortable in revealing their status. 112 said they had been jabbed, 25 said they hadn't (the doctor thinks that a small minority of the latter category may have lied to him and claimed they'd been inoculated). Of the 112, 96 still emitted a Bluetooth signal – a Mac address of unknown provenance – when all electronic devices had been switched off.(46) When the patient left the building, so did the Mac address.
I myself have downloaded a Low Energy Bluetooth app (a more advanced way of doing the same thing) and, in public spaces – both inside and outside – I pick up dozens, if not scores, of unknown Mac addresses. I also find the odd 'phone, printer, TV or Smart watch, but they generally show their identity. My current record is over 600 hits in a 300 metre walk, nearly all unknown Mac addresses. What does this mean? I don't think it's particularly difficult to work that out; the only obstacle to understanding is our own reluctance to accept seemingly outlandish truths.
An application of Occam's Razor would lead us to the most likely conclusion, which is that the self assembling nanotech that has clearly been developed has also been deployed - in the 'vaccines'. The question is, once more, why? What plans could possibly be afoot? In order to get a better handle on that answer, it's necessary to briefly disappear down an unlikely rabbit hole. I offer the information, as unlikely as it sounds, as one possible explanation along with others that are less out there.
Profusa, in partnership with the US Department of Defence and the infamous DARPA (the same military industrial complex that was in charge of Operation Warp Speed), was making promo videos about bio-chipped soldiers back in 2020:
“Profusa’s promotional shows how the bio-integrated sensor enables a soldier to be tracked by remote computers using GPS in addition to monitoring real-time biomarkers, such as oxygen levels and heart rate.”(47)
So far, so good. However, it doesn't take much of a mental leap to identify other possibilities that are less wholesome:
“While this biotechnology is portrayed as potentially lifesaving to a soldier on the battlefield, the implications of GPS tracking individuals is a terrifying step towards a surveillance state in the general population. Furthermore, tracking people in stages of sickness can only result in medical tyranny in the hands of any government.”(48)
Indeed. But of a piece with the current approach of Western governments, which seek control to the exclusion of citizens' rights. However, nanotechnology isn't simply used to track - it has active applications, also. DARPA and Profusa are attempting to produce super soldiers with heightened senses and superhuman strength (through a programme called the Neural Engineering System Design),(49) but there are more insidious possibilities that the Pentagon (among many other entities) has been aware of for a couple of decades or more.
As far back as 2005, the US military was toying with the idea of using nanotechnology to target particular parts of the brains of what they termed 'religious extremists', so that they might be dissuaded from waging jihad.(50) Matters have moved on considerably since then. DARPA has specific programmes researching how to read and write to human brains from a distance – using EMF.(51) CRISPR technology has also been developed, which uses gene editing technology to target specific parts of the brain.(52)
Brain/Computer Interface (BCI) research has been ongoing for decades, always with links to DARPA. DARPA is the under-acknowledged author of many technologies that have changed the world we live in; the internet, mobile GPS, driverless cars and stealth technology to name a few.(53) It's Brain Initiative, launched in 2013, seeks to create a wireless BCI that crosses the blood/brain barrier (as, coincidentally, the 'vaccines' spike protein also does) and which can be implanted in a non-surgical manner;
"...while may include ingestion, injection, or nasal administration, and involve technology that includes self-assembly inside the body...the major goals ...[are] developing neural read out and write in capabilities...”(54)
So, that's research to come up with a method of implanting this technology by stealth (think 'vaccine' or PCR test); a technology that provides “fine-grained, two-way monitoring and control of neural activity [that] could be used to alter mood and cognitive states, robbing people of agency.”(55) And what material might be best suited to house these sensors? Well, “graphene-based active sensors are promising candidate for this application, thanks to the flexibility of graphene, its electronic properties, as well as its high stability and biocompatibility.”(56) Curiouser and curiouser.
To recap, then; nanotechnology is a thing, as is research aimed at two-way communication with human brains by using that same nanotech. Research to introduce this material in a non-invasive fashion – by needle or nasal swab – commenced more than a decade ago. It is known
“…that there are extensive databases that locate by electroencephalography the specific regions of the brain that are pulsed by certain actions, thoughts, attitudes, feelings, and even words, and phrases and sentences.”(57)
Does this mean that neuromodulation might be feasible? Apparently so.
“This is possible if the carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets in the neural tissue receive the appropriate electrical pulses, which will create electromagnetic currents that will alter the normal functioning of the brain, developing the desired behavior, emotion, mood, and even thought.”(58)
Seems bonkers, doesn't it? At first blush, anyway. But not so much if we give it some thought. Why would DARPA (and other countries' similarly tasked agencies, no doubt) be researching these technologies if they didn't intend to use them if they could?
“What if you had the ability to make everyone in an enemy nation walk out of their jobs and become listless and deranged by directly attacking their brains? The fields and factories would go fallow. The war machine would grind to a halt.”(59)
Or in your own population. There's the graphene coincidence, too. Then there's the fact that Dearest Klaus, over at the WEF, has been banging on about the Internet of Things and the Internet of Bodies for a decade or more; the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution which, according to the UK government, “is characterised by a fusion of technologies – such as artificial intelligence, gene editing and advanced robotics.”(60) And, additionally, the continual attempts by the blob to control what we think and say.
There's also the strange case of 5G. To my knowledge, the blob has never come up with a reason for it. Is it so that homeless gamers can still get their fix? Doubtful. Isn't 4G enough? Do we really need to stream movies at double the speed? Then there's the involvement of Musk, the free speech absolutist-in-chief who is currently in the business of irradiating the globe with 5G emitting satellites that will result in blanket global coverage – or surveillance, depending on how one views it.(61) This is the same individual who makes billions from such technocratic wet-dreams as EVs that we don't need and transhumanism via Neuralink.
I can see that the digital future that they have planned for us will require considerable bandwidth. Ditto the requirements of self-driving cars and cameras everywhere. But, if the 'vaccinated' hoards are emitting neuro-signals that need to be monitored, blanket coverage and bandwidth are even more of an imperative. Especially if pulsed instructions need to be sent, too. I can also see that some form of mind-control might be very attractive to the technocratic elite. Imagine if the current suppression of dissent was merely a halfway house. Imagine if you could cut it off at source by modifying behavior. Do you think they wouldn't if the possibility existed?
And strangely enough, there is considerable anecdotal evidence of personality changes post-'vaccination', which perhaps isn't surprising, even without the specter of nanotechnology. The damage to the brain that could be caused by the spike protein and graphene might affect behavior, depending on where it occurred. Further, if brain cells are producing spike protein continually, I imagine there will be an affect. But perhaps nanotechnology and 5G also play their part. 5G certainly seems to have a detrimental effect on the 'vaccinated'. Perhaps some combination of targeted nanotech and EMF radiation can be used to take people out? I wouldn't imagine that it's a winning mix, in any event.
Figure 13
So, the proposition (so far) is this. The people in charge of Operation Warp Speed - the development and introduction of a poisonous gene therapy - are also the people who developed nanotechnology and who are fully signed up to the Internet of Bodies; they therefore put nanotech in the shots in furtherance of their stated goals and didn't tell us. I'm supposed to be surprised by that possibility? Really? Well, I'm all out of surprise now. Of course it's possible and, unless someone can come up with a better explanation for the Mac addresses, I would lean towards probable. But why would there also be a need to alter DNA? Simply to cull the herd some more via an array of serious side effects, both short and long term? Or is there more to it? As I've posed the question, you know that the answer is that there is more to it. It gets darker still.
It seems that the elites have a master plan. With the usual buzz-words running cover for them – in this case, primarily “biodiversity”, which somehow needs to be illuminated “to save our living planet” – they have been busy “developing globally accessible, DNA-based systems for the discovery and identification of all multicellular life.”(62) Which doesn't sound in any way nefarious, does it? How can developing a DNA database of all living things be a danger to anyone? It might be useful once the wave of extinctions due to non-existent man-made 'climate change' breaks upon us; we might want to recreate certain species that have vanished. Our betters call the project the International Barcode of Life (IBOL).
But...and there's always a 'but', isn't there? That's because a vanishingly small portion of their time is spent on the betterment of mankind; there's always an ulterior motive that results in their further enrichment or enhanced control. In this instance, we don't have to dig too deeply to see what their true motivation is likely to be. For starters, how did we suddenly get to a barcode from a database?
Because it was never about a pure concept like preservation; it was about ownership and control. This was discussed at the meetings that mark the genesis of the dreaded 'sustainable development' – the Rio Summit of 1992, which ran parallel with the Biodiversity Convention.(63) This was where the bastard child that increasingly plagues us - Agenda 21 - was spawned. It's where the original framework for The Great Reset was formulated; the plan for the
“…complete transformation of society and individuals that live in this society. The World Economic Forum is boldly talking about both. They talk about this technocratic takeover on one hand, to reform society, that is the structures of society, the institutions, but they also talk about the restructuring of humanity itself. That is, the merging of technology with the human condition, with the flesh, the changing of genetic code, Humanity 2.0, H+ is another term is used.”(64)
The diversity of life is simply equated to the diversity of genetic codes. And genetic codes can be manipulated. Once they have been manipulated, the animal or plant is no longer what it was. It is something new, something that the technocrats have created, something they own. Which they barcode. That is precisely what has been happening – a gradual genetic takeover of life on planet Earth. They want to own everything.
The clues have been there for a long time; we've simply been asleep at the wheel. GMO foods were a leg in the door in the mid 1990s, although resistance was substantial, due to the technocrats' obvious inversion of the precautionary principle – in typical style, they simply assumed (without evidence) that there was no risk attached to their processes.(65) Now, of course, they are 'vaccinating' livestock with mRNA ; on the QT, naturally. When I say now, I mean they started to do so twelve years ago for the poultry industry, five for the pork industry and a couple of years for beef. They simply swapped out the antibiotics they were using and substituted experimental mRNA – without telling us.(66)
God only knows what they've added to those jabs, given the establishment's open hostility towards natural food, but would it be in any way surprising to find that breeding is compromised, as it is in humans? It would be a familiar tactic – first make a resource expensive, then make it scarce and even more expensive. Perhaps, if one was creative, one might also mess with the other end of the chain; the biology of the consumer himself. Apparently, red meat allergies caused by the Lone Star tick are on the increase in the US. By September 2023, there may have been as many as 450,000 cases.
One is reminded of the US military's biological weapons program from the 1950s onwards, which sought to weaponize ticks. The idea was to develop weapons “... that could incapacitate victims by making them moderately ill for weeks to months. The idea was to target enemy population centers with illnesses, and then send in vaccinated soldiers to capture them without a fight.”(67) And would you believe it? The tick of choice was the very same species; the Lone Star.
Progress was a little hit and miss, as new kinds of microbes – to which humans had no defense – had to be created by randomly mixing bacteria and viruses together. The military also had to understand the Lone Star's migration patterns, so they released 282,000 radioactive ticks inside the US between 1966 and 1969. The ones released in Virginia went north. (I'm not making this up, by the way).
“From 1968 to 1976, the coastal regions from Long Island to Cape Cod saw a series of unusual tick-borne disease outbreaks. Year 1968 saw the first cases of human babesiosis in the Eastern US appearing on Nantucket island, Massachusetts. That same year, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever appeared in Nantucket, Martha’s Vineyard, and Cape Cod. By 1970 hundreds of cases of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever had been documented in Long Island. Finally, in 1972, the first 51 documented cases of Lyme Arthritis appeared in Lyme, Connecticut.”(68)
That strain of Lyme Disease is a biological weapon, created at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center of New York. It was carried by Lone Star ticks. Would it be even slightly surprising to learn that red meat allergies are the result of a similar process? Especially when it suits the technocrats' agenda to a T?
Figure 14
Figure 15
Of course, they would like us to believe that their motivation lies in entirely the opposite direction:
“To have affordable food, we need to have continual innovation in the animal, medical, veterinary space and mRNA vaccines are safe and an effective way to treat the animal that does not change the final product.”(69)
One can almost taste the irony. “Safe and effective”, “does not change the final product”. So, the antithesis of what we now know happens to humans, then? That sounds somewhat unlikely. After all, they haven't been shy about propagandizing us about the need to eat bugs to save the climate. Or fake meat. Two of the usual suspects – in this case Bezos and Gates – are among the individuals most heavily invested in lab-grown 'meat', aka “technologically produced fake food with unknown ingredients causing untold harm.”(70)(71) Untold harm such as (once again) cancer, due to the fact that its production utilizes immortalized cell lines that replicate for ever.(72) Nonetheless, Bill thinks we should be eating all fake meat:
“I do think all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef...eventually, that green premium is modest enough that you can sort of change the [behaviour of] people or use regulation to totally shift the demand... for meat in the middle-income-and-above countries, I do think it’s possible.”(73)
He's even giving us a nudge in the approved direction by buying up farmland all over America, the better to keep control of the end product. In typical Gates fashion, he's continuing to profit from the farms while waiting for new regulations to propel us towards a synthetic future.(74) We shouldn't be surprised – this is a man who lives in a 66,000 square-foot home and flies around the world in a private jet that burns up to 486 gallons of aviation fuel per hour (making him one of the world's top-ten carbon emitters), but who also lectures us about the environment.(75)
Figure 16
Big Agriculture and the state are in bed with each other all across the Western world. The war on farmers is intense and, EU concessions aside, will continue unabated. It's part of a much bigger agenda that will not be denied. The non-compliant – such as Amish farmers' who grow food naturally – will be regulated out of business.(76) Small farmers and homesteaders, likewise.(77)
Figure 17
In the US (following in the EU's footsteps), the livestock that remains is being electronically tagged. Why would that be?
“The left wants to ban cattle and before you can ban anything you need a registry, you need to know where it’s at and who owns it and that’s why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe.”(78)
The beef cattle supply is already at its lowest since the early 1950s (as per Figure 14). But it would be handy to know where all the cattle are, especially if you happen to be an environmental activist. Then you'd know where to light the fires that consume them, or devastate their grazing lands with a wildfire in the snowy season – as just happened in Texas, in precisely the area where the outcome would be most severe.(79)(80)
Figure 18
Densely nutritious fresh foods are being targeted, because they are a threat to the technocrats' growing monopoly on the food supply – especially meat which, despite the claims of the vegetarians and vegans, “bestow[s] multiple and important nutritional benefits.”(81) What's needed is more low quality or synthetic food, the production of which can be controlled by the technocrats. To that end, DARPA (once more) is attempting;
“...to create a variety of healthy new microbial-based foods using three ingredients — air, water, and electricity—with minimal or no supplementation....three teams are now on contract to demonstrate production of microbial biomass consisting of all four human dietary macronutrients — protein, carbohydrate, fat, and dietary fiber...”(82)
DARPA aims to “break food down to the molecular level and substitute nutrition for function.”(83) The result will be food of low nutritional value, which users will be obliged to supplement with vitamins – which, no doubt, will be expensive and in short supply. Purely for the military, you understand. Anyone connecting the dots between the technocrats' war on the civilian supply chain, combined with the construction of replacement, synthetic and genetically engineered 'foodstuffs' and this project is an obvious tin-foil hatter.
Let me float a hypothesis, nonetheless. If the current means of food production can be captured by the technocrats, they can jigger with it however they please. To that end, if you inflated energy costs, regulated small farmers out of existence, culled the meat supply via sabotage and mRNA shots, replaced natural products with GMO foods whilst creating fake meat and microbial-based foods, you would own the genetic codes of every element of humanity's food supply chain, would you not? Klaus certainly thinks that this is the way to go (Bill agrees);
“...global food security will only be achieved if regulations on genetically modified foods are adapted to reflect the reality that gene editing offers a precise, efficient and safe method of improving crops.”(84)
And if our 'vaccine' does contain nanotechnology and does also alter our genetic code, might they also lay claim to us? Would we still be what we were, or would we have become a new, altered entity – that's been barcoded? I realize that even asking the question seems completely bizarre; so far 'out there' as to be over the horizon and into the Twilight Zone. Or is that more a function of suddenly being overwhelmed by an abundance of evidence of something that has been kept under wraps for decades? Something that we have no logical pathway towards, because of the huge knowledge gap that separates us from all things transhumanist? Something that therefore seems literally incredible, because there has been no incremental awareness that the something even exists?
One more reveal, possibly connected. I say that only because, if there is truth to be found in what I've already set out, the mindset that it reveals in those behind the grand plan is pathological, entirely callous and devoid of humanity. In this reading, humans are simply another animal, lacking in agency and unworthy of informed consent. In the US, the latter 'right' this year went the way of all things, not that it had ever really existed as anything other than an esoteric concept; but now, it's official. On 21st December 2023:
“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act)... the final rule permits an institutional review board (IRB) to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent, under limited conditions, for certain FDA-regulated minimal risk clinical investigations...according to this amendment, the state alone, acting through the NIH, the FDA, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will decide what is considered a 'minimal risk.'”(85)
This would be same CDC which still holds that the 'vaccines' are 'safe and effective'. All that billionaire-backed researchers now need to do is pay for a medical study or two which conclude that aerosol vaccines, mRNA in livestock or mosquito vaccines are minimal risk and the regulators have top cover and carte blanche to approve any or all of them.(86) If that is where we are in the moral universe, this last conundrum may not be as complicated as we might have thought.
Within the past week, scientists have informed us that they have developed a new method of creating human artificial chromosomes. (HACs) which, according to them, could revolutionize gene therapy. Are what are they?
“Artificial chromosomes are lab-made structures designed to mimic the function of natural chromosomes, the packaged bundles of DNA found in the cells of humans and other organisms. These synthetic constructs have the potential to serve as vehicles for delivering therapeutic genes or as tools for studying chromosome biology.”(87)
Essentially, they are designer genomes which exist alongside natural chromosomes; two lots of genetic code in human cells. What could possibly go wrong? This 'breakthrough' comes hard on the heels of another bunch of meddlers who managed to create a human embryo without the use of an egg or sperm – they used embryonic stem cells instead.(88) Synthetic human embryos; something to be proud of. At present, they aren't viable, but who knows where that particular technology will end up? And what would any creature that might eventually be created actually be?
It seems that certain people have been well ahead of the curve with regards to what might be termed 'hybrids', especially an individual called Sir Julian Huxley, a prominent eugenicist. A man of his time (eugenics was all the rage among Leftist intellectuals in the early-to-mid twentieth century), he believed that;
“The lowest strata, allegedly less well-endowed genetically, are reproducing relatively too fast. Therefore birth-control methods must be taught them; they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilization, or at least relief should be contingent upon no further children being brought into the world; and so on.”(89)
He popularized the clade system of taxonomy, which replaced the Linnaean system under which we were humans, birds were birds and reptiles were reptiles. This was when we were reassigned to the primate clade. Matters have moved on from that relegation. John Hopkins University, infamous for their eerily prescient tabletop exercises (think Event 201 in October 2019), had run something similar in May 2018, due to their seemingly random assertion that we face a “rapidly evolving biological threat landscape”.(90) They called it Clade X and, from the day-long exercise, it emerged that a new system for categorizing life was about to be thrust upon us; the Phylocode, which further muddied the waters. Physical appearance was to no longer be of any real import. Now it was all about genes and common ancestors. We humans are lumped in with arthropods, birds and dinosaurs.
And that distinction, quintessentially eugenicist, could make all the difference. For them, animals aren't special. They have no soul. They aren't made in the image of God (or however you may define our separateness). They're just animals. We are just animals. There are different rules for animals, too. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) – with a membership of 183 countries – regulates animal health. According to them, an animal is “a mammal, reptile, bird or bee”.(91)
I'm not sure if this is important or not, as their Code also talks about 'persons', so it appears that they are making some sort of distinction between humans and other animals. It does occur to me, however, that a person who has been genetically mutated – perhaps via the addition of alien DNA – may no longer be classified as a person, but rather as some sort of hybrid animal; one that might be within our clade, but not fully human. An entity that can be owned or patented. An animal that can be 'stamped out' in a pandemic, if it was the safest, most cost-effective strategy; as happens now with livestock.(92)
I know; it sounds crazy to even speculate. The problem is that it would be foolish not to, because we have discovered that, time and time again, today's conspiracy theory is tomorrow's established truth. Additionally, transhumanism is no longer fringe and any movement which contains individuals who think that humans may be able to transform themselves into 'posthumans', is immediately suspect. We should also be mindful of the fact that much of what our rulers tell us is deliberately misleading.
Adopting 'clean energy', as a example, won't save us, it'll kill us off. Taking the 'vaccine' was not 'safe and effective' – it was the polar opposite. It is, therefore, entirely reasonable to be skeptical about the transhumanist agenda. Just for starters, here is a world of difference between Neuralink enabling a paraplegic to play chess and an injection that alters your genetic code without your consent.(93)
I appreciate the fact that I have speculated about dots that may not connect. And that some of the speculation seems a little wild. It may be helpful to identify what we can verify and what is unknown, most importantly once more, what could be done, not what we think will be done. Our elites are past masters in the art of drafting legislation and codes that are intentionally vague and then swearing, when challenged, that they would never, in a month of Sundays, ever think to interpret them in ways that they were never meant to be interpreted, while simultaneously failing to close any loopholes. If a certain possibility exists, it should be presumed that it is intended to. We have learned this the hard way.
Firstly, then, there is a wealth of evidence attesting to the contents of the 'vaccines'. There is spike protein, which is toxic; there are billions of scraps of plasmid DNA; there are enzymes that enable the reverse transcription of both mRNA and the plasmid DNA, thus altering the make-up of human genomes (which, logically, must also be handed down to any offspring sired post-'vaccine'). Graphene is also present. Any temptation to attribute the presence of these ingredients to a contaminated manufacturing process should be resisted – the presence of the LINE-1 enzyme, of the spliced inserts (with sequences from both HIV and SV40) and of the nanotechnology must all be proof of intent.
The jab has, therefore, been engineered to maim and kill and, further, to tag and track each recipient. Further, the 'vaccine's' lipid nanoparticles cross the blood-brain barrier. We can be certain then that the nanotechnology is capable of reaching the brain, along with other vital organs. The 'vaccine' also adversely affects reproduction.
We know that animals are being 'vaccinated' with mRNA. We also know that our rulers are on a mission to inexplicably bestow upon us the curse of 5G, a technology that is largely untested (because to do so would undo the project instantly, as most people would likely fail to be convinced that adopting a military weapon as a communications technology was a good idea)(94) and, currently, unnecessary.
What we can't say with certainty is whether individuals are emitting Mac addresses, although the circumstantial evidence is plentiful and we know that DARPA, Profusa et al have been developing the technology that would enable just that. We don't know the motivation behind the attempt to re-designate humans as animals. We also don't know whether any ambiguities as to a freshly-minted 'hybrid' human – genetically modified – will be exploited. Or whether these individuals have been barcoded in some way.
We must assume that there is an ongoing de-population campaign. The design of the jab and the way in which the elites tried to get it into every arm, from six months upwards, can surely leave us in no doubt. That and the fact that excess mortality, especially amongst the young, is showing no sign of ameliorating. We probably should assume that, in the light of this truth, nothing that the technocrats say or do should be taken on trust.
We might think it wise to begin taking their plans seriously. Klaus has, after all, written the following books; Covid-19: The Great Reset, The Great Narrative (The Great Reset Book 2), The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Transhumanism is here already and it's in the hands of eugenicists. The Wikipedia page openly states that part of the mission is to create a “highly intelligent animal species by way of cognitive enhancement”(95)(emphasis mine). We ought to know that the elites seek to own everything – they have, after all, told us that we will own nothing and be happy about it – and that monopolies, however acquired, must be a necessary part of that project.
Finally, we should discard (or, if already discarded, guard against reacquiring) any tendency to believe that our enemy thinks like us. They simply don't. Just because our minds may not be able to fathom the degree of malevolence that is required to maim and kill, doesn't mean that it isn't present in other minds. They want what they want and they have no moral framework. These people are not normal people. That's not just me saying that; it's a matter of record. They are psychopaths and narcissists, which makes them very dangerous people.(96) Transhumanism, as a philosophy, is tailor-made for that type of person. So, although some of the possibilities I have alluded to may seem fantastical, I would be reluctant to rule anything out. The past four years has taught that particular lesson above all others.
Figure 19
Citations
(1) https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.86.16.6077
(2) Ditto
(3) Ditto
(5) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
(6)
(7) Ditto
(8) Ditto
(9)https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/01/6e/60/8951ab8f4118b5/US9587003.pdf
(10) https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behind-COVID-19/98/i38
(11) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/18/how-harmful-is-my-covid-vaccine-batch/
(12) https://expose-news.com/2023/09/19/200-billion-pieces-of-dna-in-a-single-dose/
(13) Ditto
(14) https://www.scstatehouse.gov/video/archives.php?key=13489&part=1
(15)
(16)
(17) https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots/
(20)
(21) https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1211-1536
(22) https://expose-news.com/2024/02/08/pfizers-pfrankenstein-proteins-in-billions/
(23)
(24) https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1771368475291996229
(25) https://slaynews.com/news/turbo-cancer-deaths-surge-vaxxed-15-44-year-olds/
(26) Ditto
(27) https://expose-news.com/2022/12/01/graphene-nano-covid-vaccines-scientists-worldwide/
(28) https://expose-news.com/2024/02/17/drs-find-graphene-shed-vaxed-to-unvaccinated/
(29) https://expose-news.com/2024/02/23/research-into-graphenes-toxicity-is-very-limited/
(30) https://expose-news.com/2022/11/05/covid-vaccines-graphene-nano-cancer/
(31) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088662/
(32) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30549182/
(33) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213470/
(34) https://www.sinopeg.com/excipients-for-dna-rna-delivery_c138
(35) https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en
(36) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41428-020-0350-9?proof=t
(37) https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/
(38) https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/09/1222276110
(39) https://www.mddionline.com/implants/early-warning-system-detecting-infections-being-studied
(40) https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2022/01/new-zealand-scientists-have-found.html
(43) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424153/
(44) https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/8/5/2932
(45) https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2010/12/virus-sized-transistors
(46)http://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Corona2Inspect_Transcript.pdf
(49) https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841982/SUPER-SOLDIER-DARPA-US-army
(50)
(51)
(52) Ditto
(53) Ditto
(54) https://govtribe.com/file/government-file/hr001118s0029-hr001118s0029-dot-pdf
(55)https://expose-news.com/2022/03/22/spartacus-covid-19-deep-dive-part-iv-mind-control/
(56) https://icn2.cat/en/news/4662-graphene-based-neural-interface-allows-improved-brain-activity-mapping
(57) http://xochipelli.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Corona2Inspect_Transcript.pdf
(58) Ditto
(59) https://innovationhub-act.org/cognitive_warfare/
(62) https://ibol.org/
(63) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Biological_Diversity
(64) https://expose-news.com/2022/06/13/global-agenda-technocratic-great-reset/
(66) https://brownstone.org/articles/a-fauci-for-every-farm-animal/
(67) https://im1776.com/prints/issue-3/lyme-disease/
(68) Ditto
(69) https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/education/livestock-and-mrna-vaccines-what-you-need-know
(70) https://expose-news.com/2024/03/19/bezos-demonises-farming-and-invests-in-fake-food/
(71) https://expose-news.com/2022/08/17/bill-gtes-sinister-plan-force-you-eat-fake-meat/
(72) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-02-07/lab-grown-meat-has-bigger-challenges-than-the-fda
(73) https://expose-news.com/2022/08/17/bill-gtes-sinister-plan-force-you-eat-fake-meat/
(75) https://expose-news.com/2022/08/17/bill-gtes-sinister-plan-force-you-eat-fake-meat/
(76)https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/an_amish_farmers_food_rights_battle.html
(78) https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1771504799642534112
(80)https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/everything-gone-texas-wildfire-ravages-americas-cattle-mecca
(81) https://expose-news.com/2023/05/05/eating-meat-is-essential-for/
(82) https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2023-02-03
(83)https://expose-news.com/2023/05/29/synthetic-biology-aims-to-replace-natural-life-forms/
(84) Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, The Great Reset, Forum Publishing
(86) https://brownstone.org/articles/the-era-of-informed-consent-is-over/
(87) https://studyfinds.org/scientists-create-designer-chromosomes-in-landmark-genetic-engineering-feat/
(89) Huxley J.S. 1947. Man in the Modern World. Chatto & Windus, London. Originally published in The Uniqueness of Man, 1941, p.66
(90) https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/clade-x-tabletop-exercise
(92) https://www.fao.org/3/y0660e/Y0660E.htm
(93)https://www.chess.com/news/view/paraplegic-plays-chess-helped-by-neuralink-chip-in-brain
(95) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism#Theory
(96) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-023-04463-x
Figure 1 By National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH - Own work using: mRNA illustration, NIH, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=126381443
Figure 2 By User: Spaully on English wikipedia - Own work, CC BY-SA 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2080850
Figure 3 https://expose-news.com/2024/02/17/drs-find-graphene-shed-vaxed-to-unvaccinated/
Figure 4 Ditto
Figure 5 Ditto
Figure 6 https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NIAID-VRC-Brochure.pdf
Figure 7 https://expose-news.com/2024/03/21/court-docs-graphene-covid-jabs/
Figure 8 https://expose-news.com/2022/02/12/injection-secret-ingredients-whats-the-aim/
Figure 9 Ditto
Figure 10 https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2022/01/new-zealand-scientists-have-found.html
Figure 11 Ditto
Figure 12 Ditto
Figure 14 https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/everything-gone-texas-wildfire-ravages-americas-cattle-mecca
Figure 15 Ditto
Figure 16 https://expose-news.com/2024/01/22/why-has-bill-gates-spent-113-million-on-nebraska-farmland/
Figure 17 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/over-140000-farms-lost-5-years
Figure 18 https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/everything-gone-texas-wildfire-ravages-americas-cattle-mecca
Figure 19 https://twitter.com/joshg99/status/1529856356911546369
Hi Endurance every thing you say I do believe to be true.
Dr Ana thinks only EDTA therapy will clean the blood https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/another-confirmation-edta-combined?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=ypw1y
Chile introduced a law to ban discrimination of genetically modified people law no.21.422
The day tapes explain a lot of the how why and what https://youtu.be/WILcw6OlV1E
It's getting very dark when you research and realise what the cunts have been up to...but hope must remain...my hope is that the lack of surplus net energy will cause a system collapse and electricity will be a scarce and sporadic resource (I know.... society collapse as been the saving of humanity... lol I'm a apocalypse optimist) https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/
Dr Henry Ealy thinks grounding or earthing will help with all the quantum dots and nanotechnology, I doing it for the last week with a bed mat and I have to say my sleep has improved drastically https://content.blubrry.com/americaoutloudpulse/Dr_Henry_Ealy_saved_me_personally_and_now_the_world.mp3
All I can really say is to stay positive, start a garden, love your family and enjoy your life. Just doing that will piss those cunts off and sure that must be worth something 😉
Adrian