“This time it's different.” Sir John Templeton
Adverse Events
Except, of course, it isn't different. Or, to be more precise, it isn't really, but there's a concerted effort to make you think it is and that, in its own way, is different. Glad we cleared that up.
There was a time, in a galaxy far, far away when things were done relatively properly; when common sense was still worth something, when a suspension of disbelief wasn't a necessary condition if you wanted to make sense of the world.
More specifically, a time when an agency like the Federal Drug Agency (FDA) in concert with the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the NIH (National Institute for Health) and their transatlantic counterparts in the European Medical Agency (EMA) and the clunkily named Medicines & Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK weren't in a state of regulatory capture, by which I mean under the control of the companies they are charged with regulating and working with, as well as being in hock to the state.
One example in passing; although the NIH (NIAID) (Fauci's mob) are not the regulator, it would be difficult to deny that he - and, by extension, his organisation - have played a major role in the Covid narrative. Does anybody think that the fact that the NIH, collaborators at the University of North Carolina and Moderna have joint ownership of the Moderna 'vaccine' patent is in any way a conflict of interest?(1)(2)
How else can their role in our current predicament be explained, unless by such subversion of good practice? It is not within the purview of this article to examine the fine grin detail of who funds these organisations, although it isn't solely the state, which is clearly should be if they are to maintain a semblance of impartiality. Granted, if the state itself goes rogue or we come to the realization that government and private interests have fused, then that won't help us, either. Whichever way we wish to paint the background, it is clear that regulators are not operating in our best interests.
There are a number of Covid 'vaccines' approved for emergency use, as even the least well informed must know by now, and an ever increasing number of injuries ascribed to them; further, although each and every injury has not been verified (you'd be entitled to wonder why they haven't, given the experimental nature of the drugs in question and the need to stay informed of any emerging problems), it is widely accepted that this is a fraction of the true number; in the US, at least. This has been shown to be the case with other vaccines because, in large part, it requires the patient to self refer; another questionable condition if the true aim is to understand, in real time, any dangers associated with drugs.
In this instance, as initial clinical trials were so short lived and focused on a small, healthy subset of the population (and due to the deliberately partial interpretations of the results by the drug companies – who'd have seen that coming?), the variety and severity of adverse events were not well understood from the beginning. However, as time passes, things are becoming clearer, due to research into the action of the 'vaccine' and the spike protein, in particular.
It was previously understood, by the medical establishment in general, that the distribution of the spike protein in the human body was limited to the injection site; the jab is usually administered intra-muscularly, into the shoulder. This is wrong and clinical trials demonstrated a much wider bio-distribution (3); it seems the likes of Pfizer didn't feel the need to correct false impressions.
It was also believed that the action of the spike protein was not harmful, in and of itself; another uncorrected error. It was known that polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used as part of the shell of the 'vaccine' nano-particles (which contain the spike protein and which extend its useful life enormously), although the well established fact that 72% of Americans have antibodies to it, which indicates a pathogenic effect, was ignored.(4)
Finally, the fact that graphene oxide is also present in the three main 'vaccines’ – Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca – had not been established and is still not accepted, probably because it is known to be toxic to humans.(5)(6) Obviously, the 'vaccine' makers could not have been unaware of all of the above; it's just the rest of us who are being treated like mushrooms.
The bio-distribution of the spike protein, its action and the presence of PEG and graphene all have quantifiable short term adverse effects. The longer term problems, which should have become apparent in clinical trials (once again), can only be guessed at, although in an educated manner.
If tobacco is your poison, your lungs are vulnerable. Drinkers risk liver damage. Whilst there are other secondary vulnerabilities, the risks are well understood. But how do we narrow down disease risk with a toxin that spreads throughout the bloodstream, which can cross the blood-brain barrier? Which can seek out individual weaknesses, exploit them, exacerbate them; weaknesses that may not even be known to the individual? How can we understand cause and effect? Well, if we utilize science that existed prior to January 2020 – apparently, some upstart doctors are insisting that there is some – we would discover that the likely action of the mRNA 'vaccines' spike protein is as follows:
(a) The spike protein (SP) doesn't stay at the injection site, in the intramuscular tissue, but travels around the body through the bloodstream.
(b) The SP will be taken up by the endothelial cells (cells lining the blood vessels), particularly at sites with slow blood flow, such as smaller blood vessels and capillaries.
(c) People previously infected with coronaviruses will possess lymphocytes (cells containing the immune systems 'B' cells, ‘T' cells and natural killer cells - antibodies) that will attack the spike protein and any cells to which it attaches itself.
(d) This will cause damage to the endothelial cells, which will trigger blood coagulation via platelet activation, wherever this occurs in the body. The SP is known to bind to the ACE2 receptors on platelets when they arrive, which activates them.
(e) As is known, this will then lead to a shortage of platelets in the blood. Bleeding disorders are then likely to occur and, depending on location, could lead to profuse bleeding or strokes. Clots that have formed may do so in small blood vessels, blocking them; again, depending on location, cardiac and neurological problems can and will ensue (at least, in some cases).
All of this was set out, in very clear terms, in a letter to the EMA in February 2021, with an invitation to rebut the existing science.(7) It will surprise you not to discover that the offer was declined via a method that has become increasingly familiar – they ignored it, which is mystifying if the EMA is on the level. After all, if we are to judge them on their actions, then it is fair to say that they are uncommonly keen for the 'vaccine hesitant' to stop dragging their feet and hotfoot it to their nearest surgery, sleeve rolled up, ready to go.
To that end, you might think that they would welcome the opportunity to put the record straight and decisively rebut the skeptics' hypothesis. It could then be trumpeted far and wide by Big Media, increasing the pressure on the recalcitrant ones. But they didn't; because they can't. As set out in the letter, the spike protein – on its lonesome – will do the exact same damage as it would if it were part of the alleged virus.
Spike protein
“We made a big mistake. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”(8)
“It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation … The spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”(9)
A FOIA request in Japan for trial data (as at (3) above) showed that, within hours, the spike protein is distributed around the body via the bloodstream. It enters the spleen (from which diseases such as Alzheimers and Parkinsons originate), bone marrow (leukemia), liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, heart, brain, lungs etc. The 'vaccine' is also expressed in breast milk; not the antibodies, the spike protein itself.
So, it is not muscle cells that are replicating the spike protein. It is also the cells of the blood vessels walls and the organs. It has been widely known for many months that it is the spike protein that causes many, if not most, of Covid's symptoms, especially clotting.
“When whole blood was exposed to spike protein even at low concentrations, the erythrocytes (red blood cells) showed agglutination, hyperactivated platelets were seen, with membrane spreading and the formation of platelet-derived microparticles.”(10)
Common sensibly, immune system responses leading to adverse events are likely to be stronger in the young, as their immune systems are more robust than those of older people.(11) And, of course, what are we finding? The hospitalized, those who are vaccinated, are far younger than those who were typically experiencing difficulty last year, although the narrative is that it is the delta ‘variant’ that is doing the damage; you remember, the milder but more transmissable 'variant' that is somehow causing younger, stronger people more issues than the stronger 'variants' of the past. Makes sense, doesn't it?
The immune system will attack cells that present as foreign, those with the spike protein, which will be found in the bloodstream and the heart. This happens around 2-3 weeks from from infection – a cytokine storm, which is the body's immune system doing the damage. The second jab will also stimulate a very strong immune response, which should cause the spike proteins to be overwhelmed by antibodies.
That's the theory, anyway, but as nobody knows how long the mRNA will remain active – and nobody in officialdom is making any effort to find out – we don't know for sure. We do know that the spike protein of the two adapted 'vaccines' (Pfizer and Moderna) doesn't soon collapse, like a natural SP would, which is a serious problem.(12) The synthetic spike protein has been adapted to become stiffer and more robust and, once attached to the ACE2 receptor on the human cell, it stays put rather than spearing into the cell, disabling the receptor by its continued presence. If cells are disabled in this way in the heart, the result is heart failure. If it's in the lungs, the result is pulmonary hypertension and if it's in the brain, it's a stroke.(13)
We also know that there have been very rare blood clots in the brain and the abdomen, as identified by the EMA:
“The PRAC (pharmacovigilance risk assessment committee) noted that the blood clots occurred in veins in the brain (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, CVST) and the abdomen (splanchnic vein thrombosis) and in arteries, together with low levels of blood platelets and sometimes bleeding.”(14)
Translated, this leads to an unavoidable conclusion. It is not possible for a low platelet count to have come about due to blockages in these small veins; there would not have been anywhere near enough of the clotting that would be required to deplete platelet counts. Those clots must also have occurred in the larger blood vessels and have gone unrecorded. That's a lot of clotting, but if the spike protein is attacking cells in the blood vessels throughout the body – which it is in everyone – it is not entirely surprising.
Then we move on to myocarditis, which has been so prevalent (especially in young men), that it has achieved the unique distinction of being listed as an official side effect. Again, not entirely surprising as endothelial cells are found in the lungs and the heart, as well as in the blood vessels and the spike protein is especially partial to that type of cell. Strokes and cardiac arrests are also on the menu, as is deep vein thrombosis, due to the clotting action. Counter intuitively, profuse bleeding is also a problem because, if all the platelets are used up elsewhere in the body, there may not be enough to cover any new emergency, should one arise.
Clearly, due to the endothelial cells in the lungs, symptoms that will doubtless be put down to 'Covid' may also present themselves, simply due to the ongoing effects of a human body becoming a spike protein factory. This will, once again, affect the elderly and vulnerable more than any other group, although there should be a more even demographic spread, as the enhanced spike protein response in younger bodies will make up some of the difference in recorded illness.
Pregnant women
The presence of the protein syncytium in the spike protein is yet one more accident waiting to happen. This protein is found in the outer layer of the placenta. The theory is that, if the body is making antibodies to fight the spike protein that your body is now producing and the spike protein contains syncytium, then the immune response could also harm the placenta, particularly as the the surface of the placenta is the only part of the fetal bundle that is in contact with the mother's own immune system.
A study, conducted in part by the CDC and reported in the New England Medical Journal purported to show that the rate of miscarriage among 'vaccinated' mothers-to-be was in line with what would be expected of the unvaccinated, around 12% (104 out of 827). As is now depressingly familiar, upon closer examination, the finding is deliberately and inexcusably misleading. By their definition, a miscarriage occurs prior to 20 weeks of pregnancy. 700 of the 827 were ‘vaccinated’ in their third trimester, between weeks 27 and 40 and were therefore unable to miscarry, as per the terms of the study. It follows that the true finding was that 104 out of 127 women ‘vaccinated’ prior to 20 weeks lost their baby, a catastrophic rate of 82%.(15)
It is clear that pregnant women are especially vulnerable, as they are immuno-suppressed, so that they don't reject the fetus which the body regards as foreign – they are the last people who should be inoculated and this is indeed the policy with any other 'vaccine'. Hence, the large number of reported miscarriages after inoculation, at least 995 in the US up until the end of July 2021 although, as we know, the reporting system is an abomination.(16) It won't just be miscarriages, though. If the human body is primed to produce antibodies to syncytium, there is the distinct possibility that a placenta will be unable to form from the start, effectively causing infertility.(17)
The vulnerable
Naturally, senior citizens are not going to escape scot free, either, especially if they combine the flu vaccine with a booster shot this winter. It cut a swathe through nursing home populations last year (as covered in Move along now) and that was usually after just the one 'vaccine' shot. Now they will have had the dubious benefit of a combination of three, in all probability and, if combined with an exposure to a live virus of any sort and/or the flu inoculation, they are guaranteed to have a rough time of it.
It would seem that if the biological function of the jab can be explained then, surely, as we all share the same basic biology, it must have the same action in all of us; or, at the very least, it must attempt the same action. So what physical factors can explain the different responses? Among them must be age, existing medical conditions, obesity, the health of the immune system and others. However, if everyone got a jab of the smallpox virus or yellow fever, our symptoms (such as they were) would be pretty damn similar. But ‘vaccine’ injuries are many and varied and mimic the symptoms of 'Covid 19', for which read any coronavirus. At least, they do in the short term.
This illustrates another conundrum; even symptoms that present six months after the jab are relatively short term. And if the ‘vaccines’ are programmed to work the same way in everyone, all the ‘vaccinated’ are spike protein factories. And the synthetic spike protein itself is a pathogen, harmful to humans. Therefore, it would seem that the best case scenario is that, by some quirk of nature, a ‘vaccinee’ is unscathed, not just in the here and now but in the long term. But it is far more likely that damage is caused.
It is well worth remembering the history of coronavirus vaccines. It is inglorious, to put it mildly, encompassing trials on animals with traditional vaccines that seemed to be promising, initially. That is, until they were then exposed to the live virus, whereupon things went bad, quickly. The mice and ferrets which were the subject of the trial sickened badly, with lung inflammation to the fore. Some of the test subjects died and side effects increased with the number of shots administered. Interestingly, the unvaccinated control group responded much better when exposed to the live virus.(18) The same thing happened with vaccine testing for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. (19)
It was further suspected that PEG, which even then was coating the lipid nano-particles as 10% of trialees had an adverse effect. For that reason, it was recommended that all potential recipients should be screened prior to the administration of a PEGylated drug, especially as the nano-particles possess the ability to cross the blood brain barrier and to cause anaphylactic shock. Naturally, there has been no screening with these ‘vaccines’. Back in 2009, as Moderna themselves acknowledged:
“Currently, no mRNA therapeutic is approved for use in humans, and a beneficial safety profile in patients still has to be demonstrated. A first clinical application will likely not be a prophylactic vaccine, because the tolerance for side effects is very low for a drug that is injected into healthy individuals.”(20)
Overall, it is extremely difficult to see how the jabs can be justified with any segment of the population. Some of the talking heads, the ones wheeled on to provide well mannered skepticism, usually say that whilst 'vaccinating' the elderly is probably an acceptable course of action, they have their doubts about the wisdom of ‘vaccinating’ groups of people who are at the most minimal risk from any sort of coronavirus. This is clearly nonsense. For those above 60, during the first 14 days after 1st dose injection, deaths are 14.6 times more frequent per day than for unvaccinated.(21)
The previously infected
There is good reason to believe that, just as any and all previous trials of coronavirus vaccines have foundered on the dangerous immune response triggered with subsequent exposure to the live virus, there are also problems when the process is the other way around. It has been conclusively shown that those previously infected with symptomatic 'Covid' suffered a significantly increased incidence and severity of side effects after just one shot of the 'vaccine'.(22) This adverse reaction didn't show up in clinical trials, because such candidates were largely excluded from the cohorts; naturally.
The reason for these enhanced reactions is straightforward. If viral antigens are already present, the immune response to the 'vaccine' triggers inflammation in tissues where the antibodies are to be found. If they are in the endothelial cells in the blood vessels, they will cause blood clotting. In the elderly and infirm, those with cardiovascular disease, the risks are obvious.(23)(24) In everyone else, the risks are also obvious. A downside with no upside and effectively the same chance of a dangerous, exaggerated immune response as per the original vaccine trials in 2003. Instead of vaccine followed by virus, it's virus followed by 'vaccine'. There is absolutely no benefit conferred:
"A natural infection induces hundreds upon hundreds of antibodies against all proteins of the virus, including the envelope, the membrane, the nucleocapsid, and the spike. Dozens upon dozens of these antibodies neutralize the virus when encountered again.
Additionally, because of the immune system exposure to these numerous proteins (epitomes), our T cells mount a robust memory, as well. Our T cells are the 'marines' of the immune system and the first line of defense against pathogens. T cell memory to those infected with SARSCOV1 is at 17 years and running still."(25)
As the spike protein freewheels about the body, leaving destruction in its wake and facilitates a plethora of diseases to which all are vulnerable – but especially the vulnerable – it cannot be said to be benefiting anybody. Would you rather inject yourself with a toxin, that will be a permanent addition to your system and which may be doing deadly work quietly and unseen; or, take your chances with coronaviruses that we now know respond very well to a number of repurposed drugs? Besides, only the first scenario is an absolute certainty.
And, so far we have only been dealing with the spike protein itself. The presence of polyethylene glycol and graphene oxide, a compound hundreds of time stronger that titanium with sharp edges that cut into cell membranes, do not improve matters one jot. Neither of these substances has ever been approved for use in vaccines before and both are harmful. It's not difficult to imagine the damage an extremely sharp, durable ingredient such as graphene will do if it is freely circulating in the bloodstream; its action would seem to be tailor made to produce blood clotting and PEG is sufficiently toxic to produce antibodies to it in the majority of the population.
How many heart attacks and strokes will happen, which will not be attributed to the jab? No demonstrable cause and effect. If the walls of blood vessels are damaged then clotting is much more likely to occur.
Longer term
“Vaccines have been found to cause a host of chronic, late developing adverse events. Some adverse events like type 1 diabetes may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered [1]. In the example of type 1 diabetes the frequency of cases of adverse events may surpass the frequency of cases of severe infectious disease the vaccine was designed to prevent. Given that type 1 diabetes is only one of many immune mediated diseases potentially caused by vaccines, chronic late occurring adverse events are a serious public health issue.(26)
It is also almost certainly true that there will no definitive way of linking cause and effect, further down the road. The conditions will be so varied and the percentage of the population double jabbed (or triple, quadruple etc) will be high enough so as to preclude any comparison to the unvaxxed, who would be a control group, effectively. At least, that seems to be where we are heading. But auto-immune diseases along with cancer and neuro-degenerative disease will increase and strike seemingly healthy people earlier in life.
It's already apparent, from the increasing incidence of the recently ‘vaccinated’ suffering from outbreaks of herpes and shingles, that latent viruses that don't normally bother people are being activated. This is a sign that the immune system is otherwise occupied, trying to counter the effect of the spike protein. Whilst this is a shorter term problem that may recede over time, the same mechanism would be involved in activating other latent diseases and it is estimated that around 6% of the US population is asymptomatically infected with gamma-retroviruses from previous, contaminated vaccines.
If we can manage to take a step back for a moment – to remove ourselves from the constant barrage of fear porn and engage our critical faculties. 'Covid 19' is allegedly a coronavirus – it belongs to the same family as the common cold. There have been no excess deaths worldwide nor, specifically, in the US in the year 2020. If the WHO hadn't changed its definition of 'pandemic' (27), the past eighteen months would not have met the standard. How can what has happened be said to be serious, once facts and not hype become important again?
Coronaviruses are known to be dangerous to people who are inherently vulnerable, either by reason of age or physical condition, or both. But, that was it. For instance, in the UK 99.995% of children and young people (under 18) survived Covid in 2020.(28) And, until the vaccination campaign kicked in, that was the pattern we saw everywhere. The average age of a Covid fatality was over 80 and 94% of them had at least one co-morbidity; in fact the average was 2.6. (29). And yet now we are told that the hospitals are filling up with people of all ages, the young and healthy featuring prominently among them. Remarkably, we are being told that they have Covid. Does that seem even remotely likely?
'Breakthrough Cases'
Has anyone noticed how these 'cases' (read tests) are reported? It would appear that the CDC is intent on having its cake and eating it. New cases among the unvaccinated are still being hunted down using a PCR test set to a cycle rate of 40, which is known to be medically meaningless,(30)(31) whereas the vaccinated get a special deal, whereby the cycle rate is set at 28, thus ensuring that fewer of the virtuous vaccinated will test positive. Shocking, isn't it?(32)
So, leaving aside the almost total inability of the PCR test to tell us anything useful (except, perhaps, that we possess human DNA) and the shameless bias, the proportion of vaxxed to unvaxxed getting a positive test is still roughly 50-50. What does this tell us? As ever, wading through the nonsense and lies is time consuming and the end result is rarely clear cut.
In the most vaccinated countries in the world, the percentage of hospitalized citizens who are fully 'vaccinated' is an approximate match for the percentage of the adult population who have been double jabbed; likewise with the unvaccinated. In other words, it makes no difference whether you have had the jab or not. Moreover, the argument advanced for the ‘vaccination’ campaign, once it became widely known that the jabs didn't actually prevent disease, was that it would reduce the severity of symptoms. If proportionately the same numbers of both categories are being hospitalized, that assertion is untrue.
However, if we bear in mind that the PCR test was not designed using a live viral isolate of something called SARS COV 2, it is not possible to be certain what is being detected. Influenza? In the summer months, unlikely. Any one of a number of circulating coronaviruses? Quite possibly. Coronaviruses circulate all year round. They are just more symptomatic in the colder months because that is when our immune system is more vulnerable. Random genomic sequences that are present in some people and not in others? Possibly that, too.
It's as well to be aware of another potential sleight of hand. When the media refers to hospitalized Covid 19 patients, they may not always be referring to people hospitalized by Covid 19 itself. It could equally well be someone who is admitted for an entirely different medical reason, who is subsequently tested via PCR – after establishing which cycle rate would be appropriate, of course.
So, given all that is known about virology and the seasonal nature of coronaviruses, something odd is happening. There are spikes in infection in the middle of summer, something that didn't even happen last year, when the virus was allegedly novel and more virulent; and the only variable of note that is different is mass vaccination. And it's worse the more 'vaccinated' a country is.(33)(34)
We have been told, time and again, that the jab isn't an injection of Covid. It's new technology; 'safe', 'effective', 'a vaccine'. But you can't get Covid from it. So, how is it that they are testing positive, then? The cognitive dissonance is deafening. If it wasn't so pervasive, likely explanations would present themselves without a huge amount of effort. The Dartmouth Scare is being repeated.(35)
In that incident, in 2006, a positive PCR test for percussis (a spasmodic cough) at a hospital resulted in mass vaccinations, isolations, shut downs; the entire panoply of epidemic responses. Only it wasn't an epidemic – the PCR test was wrong. However, if you exclude that possibility from your calculations (unjustifiably), you then have to believe that something else must be the reason; in other words, a genuine outbreak. This is faulty thinking, on a major scale. For a factor to be excused from debate in any circumstances there must be incontrovertible evidence. By contrast, the PCR test has never been (and is not designed to be) a primary diagnostic tool. Using it as such was negligent, at best.
It's the infallible PCR test that is the culprit this time, also. You know, the one that the CDC is now withdrawing,(36) the implication being that it cannot tell the difference between flu and 'Covid', which isn't a stretch when you consider that the flu has almost disappeared this past year, but what's the betting that it comes roaring back in 2022?
That same PCR test has latterly been used to prove that patients have 'Covid', when it is highly likely that they are ill because of the ‘vaccine’, which induces the same symptoms, but which is not a coronavirus. Why? Well, the PCR test is supposed to pick up Covid; it has been programmed with the code for viral fragments which allegedly belong to a disease called Covid, including the spike protein. Would it be a huge shock if the test was also capable of picking up a synthetic spike protein from the vaccine?
I think not. But to acknowledge that possibility, would be to risk the whole house of cards collapsing. The sanctity of the PCR test must be officially maintained, at all costs. Until it is quietly abandoned with the minimum of publicity, that is.
There is another dragon to be slain. Whilst they whispered it quietly, so quietly that most people don't know it, the clinical trials were not designed to produce a product that prevented transmission of disease between humans. They said that it would merely prevent serious symptoms in the vaccinee. The reason for the soft shoe approach is that keeping that fact relatively quiet allows a lot of people to believe that they are getting the jab to protect society at large, when it does no such thing.
If it were more widely known or, more importantly, accepted as part of the narrative, it would prevent the majority from occupying the moral high ground or enable them to point the finger at the 'selfish anti-vaxxers', which is a vital part of the game. To bolster the impression that the 'vaccines' are effective, so everyone must have one, the CDC went one step further. On 14th May 2021, they announced that they were no longer counting 'breakthrough cases' unless they resulted in hospitalization or death.(37)
One other rather obvious fact is also being overlooked. If the vaxxed and unvaxxed are turning up at hospital in equal numbers (pro rata), the 'vaccine' isn't preventing serious symptoms, either. The possibility also exists that the 'vaccinated' can pass on an infection to either a vaxxed or unvaxxed individual without ever knowing they had an infection in the first place. In which case, they would be driving outbreaks. But if they do get a proper infection, they are as likely to be hospitalized as their unjabbed fellow citizen. In fact, more so, as they won't count as a positive test at 40 cycles; just 28. At 40 cycles, there would clearly be many more of them testing positive.
Or we could believe the official explanation, which is that the vaccine was only ever shown to be 95% effective in clinical trials, so the breakthrough cases are the other 5% and, because so many people have now been 'vaccinated', the number of breakthrough cases is relatively high. If the numbers stacked up, then this version of events might have something going for it and the state is doing its best to massage the statistics to their advantage. Conveniently, using different cycle rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed makes it impossible to make direct comparisons which, in turn, allows whichever narrative is flavour of the month to become the dominant theme. Not counting a 'breakthrough case' unless they end up in hospital is an even more egregious and obvious attempt to muddy the waters.
How about this for a possibility? The PCR test has never picked up Covid 19, but some other genetic sequence instead. And that sequence is present in both the vaccinated and the great unwashed. Or, as well as all the white noise, it has been picking up an unrelated coronavirus that the 'vaccine' has no effect on? Or, a combination of the two? These scenarios are at least as plausible as the official narrative. In reality, breakthrough cases ought to be happening predominantly among those with a weaker immune system – i.e. the elderly, but that isn't the case.
Shedding
Shedding is not an unknown phenomenon, despite the ridicule it attracts currently. After all, traditional vaccines that inject a live, attenuated virus in order to stimulate the production of antibodies are giving the patient a weakened virus. Imagining that, every now and again, things don't go entirely to plan, is not beyond the wit of man. It's not unusual to see signs at hospitals requesting that people recently inoculated with certain vaccines refrain from entering the wards. Polio was an early problematic example, whereby the vaccine actually produced a live virus, even though the disease had been almost eradicated in the wild.(38) And even today, vaccine case numbers are three times that of natural case numbers.(39)
In addition, there has been copious anecdotal evidence that this is an issue with the Covid 'vaccines', although it can't be the virus itself that is expressed, but rather the spike protein. In the initial stages after vaccination, when the body is a spike protein factory and there are billions of them circulating, it is entirely possible that they can be secreted through skin, bodily fluid and even aerosols.
It does seem far fetched; were it not for the fact that Pfizer have accepted that environmental exposure to the 'vaccine' happens. In the document setting out the clinical protocols for the trial, they are clear on the subject. They are particularly concerned about pregnant women, which is deeply strange, when you consider that they are now recommending that it is safe for this group of people. Seemingly, not only is it possible for transmission to occur through bodily contact or through breathing the same air as a recently 'vaccinated' individual, it can also happen via breast milk.(40) Once more, we are told by 'fact checkers' that something is false, another trope of the anti vaxxers, whereas it is unquestionably true.
So far, we have been dealing with what we might term unintentionally shedding vaccines, if we were inclined to give the drug companies the benefit of the doubt; given what we know about Pfizer and the like, that is a risky approach. Especially when those same companies have been doing research on vaccines that shed by design. Naturally, the initial justification will be to experiment in animals, by inserting a small piece of genetic material into a virus that already spreads within the animal community. Apparently, this has already been done in rabbits.
Next up will be a PR campaign to sell the idea as a cost effective way to vaccinate humans, especially in poorer, economically challenged nations (read Africa), particularly against diseases which cross from animals to humans (41), which is a vanishingly small number of less than 0.01%, only bolstered by the curious appearance of four new coronaviruses in the past 18 years; not that we will be told that.
However, as with the polio vaccine, there are risks. A self spreading vaccine would have a much wider spread than one which is injected into a single arm and the more the replication, the more the chance of mutation and immune escape.(42) Naturally, scientists will think they can find a way around this, because they believe that they can manipulate nature to their own ends, without repercussions. In that spirit, they are already trying to run before they can walk and proposing a version that will 'combat Covid 19'.(43) This is despite the fact that there have been no long term trials, in animals let alone humans and even the known knowns are potentially catastrophic, in terms of mutation and having exactly the opposite effect to the one desired; and that's without the unknowns which should become apparent during trials. But quibbles such as these have had no effect on proceedings so far.
And how could such a thing ever be recalled, when its very natural mitigates against it? Once it's out there, it's out there for good and there is nothing that can be done, which makes the need for comprehensive research even more vital. Bear in mind also that there will likely be no redress. Vaccine manufacturers are generally exempt from liability, remember?
It's impossible to see how these could ever be squared with the requirement for informed consent. How can it possibly be ethical to deliberately spread a vaccine to unwilling or unknowing recipients? However, this is not something that is overly concerning to scientists; not really their field. In fact, it doesn't seem to be anyone's field. Giving the patient all the relevant information, including ingredients and side effects, has not been a feature of this current campaign, so maybe that's one more right that will be consigned to history.
Conclusion
There is complex human psychology in play here. Those who have been gulled into waiting for the 'vaccines' don't want to be shown to be wrong and I'm sure a healthy subset of them would prefer that the rest of us share their fate, rather than be rewarded for our intransigence. And the majority of the Western world seems to have become extraordinarily pliant in the past few decades. Even if we were to accept that being fooled initially was understandable, that time is well past and it requires a pathologically trusting mindset to line up for a jab now. It seems that Goebbels was right – if you keep repeating a lie, no matter how implausible it may be, vast cohorts will eventually believe you.
There was really no need to delve into the fine grain detail of the Pfizer or Moderna reports to ring alarm bells; the mere knowledge that this was an unprecedented mode of treatment in humans and the fact that the 'vaccines' had been developed in one year, rather than the normal ten, should have given pause. But, no. The percentage of the UK adult population, for example, who have had at least one shot is nearly 90%. The cynical, free minded Brits believing everything they are told and shaming those that don't, to boot. Who'd have thought that the people who voted for Brexit, rejecting government efforts to convince them otherwise, would be so trusting of that same institution no more than five years later?
As for the vaccines themselves – there's two ways of looking at it. Either they are going to be an unmitigated disaster (which will be very difficult to admit, either by oppressor or victim) or they are doing exactly what they were intended to do. We are still in the early stages of understanding just how much damage these jabs will do. Some of the processes by which harm will be caused are already well understood, but others that are merely speculation at present will harden into fact, because damage throughout the body is a certainty. It will merely depend on where individual weak spots are.
And the short term injuries already apparent will, in all likelihood, become much more prevalent when the colder weather comes. If flu vaccination is pushed as hard as it was last year, the winter months could be calamitous. But the narrative will be that it is the 'variants' doing all the damage. The 'delta variant' is currently in pole position, but perhaps the likes of the CDC and the EMA will have provided us with a new bogeyman by the autumn. Somehow or other, the unvaccinated will also be in the cross-hairs. It really does require an act of collective delusion to blame unvaccinated people for illness among ‘vaccinated’ people, but we've heard it already and there is no reason to think that we won't hear it again.
And the race is on. The state wants a needle in every arm; they cannot countenance a sizeable, defacto control group of unvaccinated citizens. Even if there is no official acknowledgement of ongoing trials (which we are necessarily part of whether we like it or not), that's what is happening. Much will depend on the strength of the resistance, which is running at around 40% in the US. It's likely that there is still a substantial number of refuseniks who can be bludgeoned into line by the judicious use of illegal mandates and more dollops of propaganda, but there will almost certainly be a hardcore group of diehards, who will not get a jab, no matter what.
To some degree, it will be a question of how many they number and how they are regarded by the ranks of the compliant. After all, it's much more difficult to admit that you are wrong to someone you detest. It will also depend how effective the gaslighting campaign about 'variants' is. 'Panic mode' needs to remain continually engaged in the population; any time for lucid reflection might result in an inconvenient realization that even the Spanish Flu was gone in a year.
The powers that be are all in at this juncture. It's all gone way too far to back out, as the blow-back that would be triggered if people realized that they had been manipulated - that hundreds of thousands of people had died unnecessarily, that the 'vaccines' weren't actually vaccines and so forth - would be devastating to them. The 'vaccines' and their booster cousins are here to stay and any dissent, evidence of injury and death will be suppressed with incremental ruthlessness. The US government encouraging Big Tech to deplatform the co-called Dirty Dozen 'misinformers' and deleting unbelievers' Twitter accounts will seem like foreplay.(44)
This is not hyperbole; there has been an obvious campaign against anyone who disagrees with state and Big Media orthodoxy, which has increased since the Biden administration took power. Nobody is stopping them; that being the case, they will keep going. Expect criminal investigations and arrests at some point soon, either specifically related to speech or through indirect targeting.
When is the penny going to drop? The ‘vaccine’ contains mRNA in the form of a spike protein, allegedly a copy of the original Wuhan strain, which is pathogenic in and of itself. It's poisonous to humans. In addition to the plethora of adverse side effects so far documented (and those that will inevitably become more evident over time), the ‘vaccines’ attack the endothelial cells in the bloodstream and the lungs, mimicking the symptoms of coronavirus in general. Whether by design or otherwise, there will be 'cases' that present as indistinguishable from what a 'variant' would be expected to look like. Because of that, there will always be plenty of space in which to excoriate the unvaxxed as the vector by which the vaxxed have become variant victims – we are seeing it already.
We are continually being told to 'follow the science'. That is absolutely not what is really happening. There is an overabundance of faith, on the one hand and manipulation on the other. 'Vaccines' have already become an 'us and them' thing, by design. But the virus won't mutate among the unvaxxed; it still has a host. It is the 'vaccinated' who are driving mutations. It's the 'vaccinated' who are, effectively, only protecting themselves and it is the 'vaccinated' who will become the primary vector of circulating coronaviruses.
In the meantime, the various long term vascular and neurological problems that would have been revealed by properly conducted clinical trials can now be waved off, as causation will not be able to be established – not only because there is no acknowledged control group against which to compare, but also because, even if there is one, its existence is known only to the drug companies and it is highly likely that any detrimental findings will be publicized; turkeys are not known to vote for Christmas and drug companies do not have a history of killing the goose laying the golden eggs.
It is all increasingly beyond parody. Even if we disregard all the inconsistencies and outright falsehoods about excess deaths and so forth that were currency prior to the ‘vaccination’ campaigns and focus purely on the past six months, it would still be true to say that the state is attempting to coerce its citizens to take an experimental jab, which doesn't meet the definition of a vaccine, the contents of which even the pharmacists are in ignorance of, in flagrant contravention of the Nuremberg Code and every charter on informed consent that followed it.
That will not be all. Self spreading 'vaccines' will be the next frontier. A familiar path is being trodden already. Float the idea in medical journals, having already mastered the basic technology, then move on the mainstream media, accelerating the latest round of brainwashing. I strongly suspect that there will be minimal push-back, provided they don't move too quickly. Informed consent has already bitten the dust; these types of 'vaccines' will be the next logical step and it's a relatively easy sell, both on the grounds of cost and as a way of effectively enforcing a vaccine mandate without having to hold anyone down; not that the prospect of the latter will any longer be a problem for a sizeable number of people.
The only way to make sense of all of this is to understand that the rules don't matter any more. It used to be that they needed to be changed and that requirement was a necessary check on any tyrannical desire to rule by executive fiat. Now, it seems, the way ahead is to fear-monger, propagandize and then proceed without even acknowledging that the rules exist. That's what the New Normal looks like. There will be less and less reference to the powers relied upon to make decision and whether they are legitimate. The ruling class will just tell us what to do and no one will question it any more.
Anyone who thought they could just take the shot and get it over with, like with the tetanus jab for instance, has been sorely disappointed by the prospect of boosters every year, ad infinitum; as was always going to happen. But, due their compliance, they've enabled the regime to find a way to force the rest of us to surrender sovereignty over our bodies as well. Each booster shot will cause more damage. This cannot possibly end well.
Citations
https://rumble.com/vjxix4-there-is-no-variant-not-novel-or-no-pandemic-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fu.html 34.32 onwards
https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document- translated-to-english.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6512330/
Prof Dr Pablo Campra Madrid, Interim Report, Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension Observational Study in Optical and Electron Microscopy, Universidad de Almeira, Spain.
https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/
https://www.stichting-jas.nl/2021/03/letter-to-ema-by-professsor-sucharit.html
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210310/SARS-CoV-2-spike-S1-subunit-induces-hypercoagulability.aspx
https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays- additional-key-role-in-illness/
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/06/03/covid19-the-spike-protein-and-blood-clotting/
ijvtpr.com/index/IJVTPR/article/view/23
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-ema-finds-possible-link-very-rare-cases-unusual-blood-clots-low-blood
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/#r15
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/monitoring-pregnant-people.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20201209042033/https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf
Chien-Te Tseng, et al Immunisation With SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads To Pulmonary Immunopathology On Challenge With SARS Virus, 2012.
Anurodh Shankar Agrawal, et al Immunization with inactivated Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus vaccine leads to lung immunopathology on challenge with live virus HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS 2016, VOL. 12, NO. 9, 2351–2356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1177688
Berenson, Alex. Unreported Truths About Covid-19 and Lockdowns: Part 4: Vaccines (p. 13). Blue Deep, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Ongoing%20Covid/death%20rate%20over%2060s%20jab%206097799a8f5a5318e5e6073f_Exp-Herve-Seligmann-Eval38-H-signed.pdf
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.26.21252096v1
https://wwmt.com/news/nation-world/questions-arise-over-cdc-guidance-on-covid-19-vaccines
Dr Ryan Cole The Blaze July 14th 2021
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/10/30/929080692/the-campaign-to-wipe-out-polio-was-going-really-well-until-it-wasnt
Classen JB. COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 5(1): 1-3.
https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/who-changed-definition-influenza-pandemic
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/covid-19-rt-pcr-test-how-mislead-all-humanity-accepting-societal-lock-downs
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
https://sentinelksmo.org/cdc-maximum-28-ct-for-post-vaccine-covid-pcr-tests/
https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/102179-lessons-from-the-pertussis-epidemic-that-wasn-t
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
https://www.econotimes.com/COVID-19-cure-Scientists-plan-to-develop-self-spreading-coronavirus-vaccine-1592958
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/anti-vaccine-disinformation-dozen-social-media-influencers-covid-19_n_609f0d84e4b03e1dd389db79