The Emperor's New Clothes

Opinion

Dec 17, 2021

We have reached a point in proceedings where the facts themselves, the specifics of the disease, the 'vaccines' and all other Covid related matters are of far less importance than they were. Not because of a loss of their inherent value (it's always favorite to be abreast of the facts), but because it has been apparent for some considerable time that the facts are only relevant for a relatively minor part of the intended audience. It's difficult to be precise, but it seems that perhaps 25-30% of the population are still inclined to focus on reality, whilst the rest are either members of the Covidian Cult or not of a mind to look too closely at any detail that may make them question the narrative and therefore cause them disquiet. Facts don't matter to cult members and they don't seem to be making much of an impact on anyone who is not in full possession of their critical faculties. This is now nakedly about obedience.

And so one finds oneself either writing for one audience or another, rather than an ensemble; either factually for the eyes wide open crowd or philosophically for the vast herds of ostriches. There is always a hope that one of two things will happen, both of which will lead to an awakening. Either the regime pushes too quickly and the jarring nature of the double declutch will awake the masses from their torpor, or the sheer weight of the regime's nonsensical contentions will prove too much for those people who have already contorted themselves into logically unsustainable positions in order that they might still believe in the official version of events. This piece, then, may be nourishment for some and an eye opener for others.

In truth, the current establishment tactics in the ongoing Covid saga are less believable and more transparently manipulative than pretty much everything that has gone before. The Omicron variant story, the booster shot logic, the legions of sportspeople suffering public heart injuries (to say nothing of those happening behind closed doors), the invention of a condition labelled PPSD (Post Pandemic Stress Disorder) to account for the vast increase in heart problems among otherwise healthy people, the surges in 'positive' tests and genuine hospitalizations in the most 'vaccinated' areas and other phenomena; none of these narratives are credible, not even slightly. Updates on these strands and more will follow. One question that matters above all others; will these revelations make the slightest bit of difference, or will the mulish masses continue to take the path of least resistance and condemn us all to the inevitable consequences of giving in to the totalitarians?

I updated information on all things Covid less than three weeks ago and yet, already, things have moved on substantially. Reassuringly, the working hypothesis that I mooted some time back is still looking shiny and new, with no blemishes in its paintwork. To briefly summarize; we are currently living in 1984 where double speak is ascendant and pretty much everything we are told is the complete opposite of the truth. And so, less than a month later, let's conduct another whistle-stop tour of Covid World, the parallel universe that our lords and masters have created with our help.

More Omicron

In my last update, I was a little dismissive of the Omicron variant and its alleged threat. This would seem to have been a mistake. I should have been way more contemptuous than that. According to Prime Minister Johnson:

“There is a tidal wave of Omicron coming. The good news is that our scientists are confident that with a third dose – a booster dose – we can all bring our level of protection back up. At this point, our scientists cannot say that omicron is less severe. And even if that proved to be true, we already know it is so much more transmissible that a wave of omicron through a population that was not boosted would risk a level of hospitalization that could overwhelm our NHS, and lead, sadly, to very many deaths.”(1)

Boris is wasted, really. He should be up in Newcastle selling coal to the locals or convincing some American millionaire from the boonies to buy another bridge.(2). Sadly, the UK, the supposed home of sober and well judged politics, the last country that you might expect to be panicked into hasty measures (I say panicked, I mean steered), immediately went to Def-Con 4 and the political class promptly started leaking thinly veiled threats of imminent lock-downs unless a million people a day got their boosters. I fear that poking that many people may be beyond even Boris.

Apparently, there has already been one death from Omicron.(3) The impact of this dreadful revelation was somewhat compromised by the unwillingness of government to provide any of the details, citing patient confidentiality. This seems fair and, if we're honest, we were presumptuous to think that we would be entitled to private medical information. It's not as if random strangers such as waiters or bouncers have the right to ask us anything that would compromise that principle, is it?

Unfortunately, the government response started some distance from the peak of believability and went downhill from there. It wasn't long before a former government advisor was pointing out that

“the first real-world study looking at 78,000 omicron cases in South Africa found the risk of hospitalisation is 29 per cent lower compared with the Wuhan strain, and 23 per cent lower than delta, with vaccines holding up well. Far fewer people have also needed intensive care from omicron, with just five per cent of cases admitted to ICU compared to 22 per cent of delta patients.”(4)

Easy to see why he isn't welcome at Westminster any more. Following hard on the heels of those revelations was news from their cousins across the pond. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which is not an oxymoron despite rumors to the contrary, told the world that of the initial 43 cases of Omicron, 34 were fully 'vaccinated' (in fact, 14 of the 34 were triple jabbed) and only 8 were 'unvaccinated'.(5) They felt that “mutations in Omicron might increase transmissibility, confer resistance to therapeutics, or partially escape infection- or vaccine-induced immunity.”(6) Or, to put it another way, the vaccines offer less protection against Omicron. We're lucky to have the CDC. Who else could have worked that out?

This wasn't the only contra-indicator to the Narrative. The South Africans clearly hadn't got the memo, either. Not only did the chairwoman of the South African Medical Association have the temerity to reveal that Omicron symptoms were mild, the Assistant Minister of Health and Wellness then told parliament that the only patients in the Botswana 'outbreak' to show even mild symptoms were the 'vaccinated' ones. The 'unvaccinated' showed no symptoms at all.(7) Not at all helpful; a promotion to full Minister status is some way off.

None of this had an impact internationally, of course, because...well, just because. The South Africans were already on the naughty step due to their refusal to buy any more vaccines, because they couldn't persuade the population to take the shots they already had in stock.(8) The UK, US and Japan immediately closed their borders to travelers from the country, China announced a “zero tolerance” approach to the variant (whatever that means) and the Australian states breathed a sigh of relief as they now had an excuse to delay opening up from their restrictive mandates.(9) Curiously, the variant has already been found in Australia, despite the fact that the national border has been closed to the 'unvaccinated' since March 2020. This is not a conundrum that the politicos Down Under are rushing to explain. Generally, though, it was panic stations around the world; amongst governments, at least.

Hilariously, two planes that were mid-air when this latest 'crisis' buffeted the globe, were sent back whence they came and, when the 600 passengers (all possessing a 'vaccine' passport) were tested, 61 returned a positive result; 13 of them for Omicron, the rest for Delta or A.N.Other deadly virus variant.(10) That's why we've got 'vaccine' passports. To stop the spread and flatten the curve.

And, to be fair, it wasn't just countries stuck out in the geographical hinterland that were selling the rest of us a bill of goods. It was also people like Frank Ulrich Montgomery, the esteemed chairman of the World Medical Association, who took it upon himself to share the following:

“My great concern is that it could lead to a variant that is as infectious as Delta and as dangerous as Ebola. The fewer infections we allow, the better.”(11)

His immediate fix was to close down all Christmas markets. But, to his credit, he had given some thought to longer term solutions:

"If people are not aware of their social responsibility or if they do not want to take it on, then one has to remind them a little more rigidly. In the case of a general compulsory vaccination...from the age of five - all measures could soon be omitted. We would have our old life back.”(12)

We are fortunate that people like Frank Ulrich are using their scientific training to inform their opinions and that solutions are at hand. The last thing we need is a self important windbag scaremongering on the back of no evidence at all. That would be bad.

In any event, the current theory is that Africa is the source of this new mutation because they have very low infection rates and also very low 'vaccination' rates; only 6% of Africans have been fully jabbed.(13) I'd have thought this was an obvious conclusion. After all, it's logical that a virus, when placed under minimal selection pressure in an environment where it hasn't established a foothold, is bound to be mutating frantically. And anybody who says the opposite needs to get their head out of the textbooks now.

Giving too much prominence to a discussion of the ins and outs of Omicron would be a mistake, as it would be playing a game with their rules and, as we well know by now, the true believers cannot be persuaded by means of logic. There is one final oddity, though. Genetically, this variant

“...has the hallmark of a viral agent under tight genetic selection for evolution to escape the ‘vaccine’ responses against the receptor bonding domain. The question that is outstanding right now is — because this is so different from the other strains that are being tracked; it’s in its own separate little evolutionary branch — how did this happen? Why did this suddenly pop up with all these new mutations?”(14)

Or, indelicately, it has the hallmarks of a laboratory engineered virus, with a history that makes no sense and with a ratio of non synonymous to synonymous mutations that has never been seen in nature. But there's a first time for everything, right? Or a second.

Boosters

Booster shots, or a third dose of what's already failed, are now the most important weapon in the battle against Covid, according to the grown ups in the room, who are showing little sign of dialing back the hyperbole.

Regrettably, there are one or two wrinkles in the Narrative cloth. A recent study, measuring effectiveness of booster shots against Omicron found the following:

“A measure of antibody levels, called geometric mean titers, fell from 1,419 against the original coronavirus strain to 80 against omicron among people who received Pfizer shots. The same measure fell from 303 against the original strain to undetectable levels against omicron in those who had received J&J’s shot.”(15)

On the face of it, this seems to be bad news. And entirely unexpected. You would have thought, theoretically at least, that a booster shot formulated from a genetic sequence published online by the Chinese in January 2020 would do a fine job against a variant that has emerged two years later and which is sweeping through the ranks of the already 'vaccinated'. Surely. However, it turns out that junk science isn't always settled science, after all. The only upside to this study was that it was done by another South African, so it can almost certainly be ignored.

There was recently another blow, from a more familiar source; Sweden. The health services of Sweden bucked the trend in the initial phases of the 'pandemic', refusing to lock-down and mandate mask wearing and other measures. The legacy media hounded them relentlessly to begin with, when Sweden made the same catastrophic mistake as others and allowed the virus to sweep through their care homes. However, when it became apparent that the entire population was not going to be wiped out, the media started to lose interest.

Later, when it was clear that Sweden's approach had been the correct one, inasmuch as their deaths and illnesses statistics were better than most and they hadn't tanked their economy in achieving those numbers, nor had they inflicted unintended consequences such as depression and other mortal outcomes on their citizens, the media was too busy deifying Saint Fauci to report on it.

However, the Swedes were enticed back on board the global Covid train with the advent of 'vaccines'. They had the foresight to instigate a massive study in January 2021, one which encompassed 1.6 million individuals.(16) What they found was that, by around six months, the most vulnerable 'vaccinated' groups were at more risk than their 'unvaccinated' peers.

“Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.”(17)

It seems probable that “immune erosion” will accelerate, rather than remain static, upon receipt of yet more mRNA in the form of a booster shot. That raises the spectre of more and more frequent boosters in an effort to stay ahead of infection, which will exacerbate the effect of post-vaccine illnesses. It doesn't end there:

“The vaccines do not prevent infection in the nose and upper airways, and vaccinated individuals have been shown to have much higher viral loads in these regions. This leads to the vaccinated becoming “super-spreaders” as they carry extremely high viral loads. In addition, the vaccinated become more clinically ill than the unvaccinated. Scotland reported that the infection fatality rate in the vaccinated is 3.3 times the unvaccinated, and the risk of death if hospitalized is 2.15 times the unvaccinated.”(18)(19)

That doesn't seem right, does it? After all, while it is now reluctantly acknowledged that the 'vaccines' don't prevent infection and transmission (which is, admittedly, what vaccines are supposed to do), they are still held to be effective in saving the 'vaccinated', even if they have no benefit to everybody else. Less severe infections, less hospitalizations, less death. Do your duty; take the 'vaccine' for the sake of your community of one.

All in all, though, not an advertisement for boosters; neither in general, nor against Omicron. And, if we're going to get technical about it, not against Delta either.(20) Hard to credit.

Canaries in the Coal Mine

In the meantime, something needs to be done about young people, who seem determined to live up to their 'snowflake' image. This past weekend has been especially embarrassing with three top flight footballers claiming heart problems in the full glare of the TV cameras, including one from Manchester United.(21) This is hardly an isolated occurrence, either. It's been happening for months and now we have legendary footballer Sergio Aguero retiring at 33 with 'health issues'; or, seeing as how the last time he was seen on a football field he was clutching his chest, heart issues.

I appreciate that they are all footballers and feigning injury comes is in the job description. But this contagion has spread to other athletes and even regular people. In the month of October, at least 69 sports people were reported to have collapsed mid exertion, some of them dying.(22) Presumably there are more, probably many more. Tennis players, free divers, cyclists. The list goes on. And now the medical profession is finally getting to grips with it. And not before time, as conspiracy theorists were starting to have a field day.

They seemed to believe that these heart problems were as a result of the 'vaccines'. That there was actual proof of this, as the FDA had issued a warning as to this very thing and that this type of adverse event was now acknowledged to be due to the 'vaccines'.(23) Plus, of course, the thousands of incidences of heart inflammation and cardiac injury on the VAERS database.(24) And the EU database.(25) Not forgetting the UK database.(26)

On VAERS alone, in the eleven months to November, 19% of deaths were from cardiac issues. But it now seems likely that the cause is something else entirely. These heart problems are actually due to PPSD; Post Pandemic Stress Disorder.(27) And London physicians are the point of the scientific spear, having identified around 300,000 people who are suffering from this disorder. They are accounting for a 4.5% rise in cardiac cases.(28)

Curiously, the age group 30-45 seems to be most affected. Even more curiously, this anxiety is said to have also caused swelling of the heart (a groundbreaking new diagnosis) as well as the more traditional type of heart attack. But these people are only the tip of the iceberg, as it's believed that around three million people in the UK are suffering the wider effects. The solution is to recognize PPSD as a real thing, because some neophytes seem to doubt its existence, and then throw huge amounts of freshly printed cash in the direction of the NHS. That sounds like a plan that the medical community could get behind.

So it seems that these footballers are suffering from pandemic stress that is manifesting itself when they are exercising, with heart attacks and sudden death. But it's definitely nothing to do with the 'vaccines', which is a relief. Despite the fact that heart problems are a known side effect. What is required is a healthy mind to match the healthy body. But what about the other outbreak? The one concerning neurological conditions, such as Guillain–Barré Syndrome, which the FDA warned us about?(29) Or paresthesia (tingling), Bell's Palsy, convulsions and temporary strokes?(30)

Well, it turns out that there is a perfectly good explanation for this too and while it does involve the 'vaccines', admittedly, it's also much more to do with the mental fragility of the patient than it is the contents of the jab. It's called FND, or Functional Neurologic Disorder for short, and is a well known condition which has been attached to patients previously, whenever a true diagnosis is difficult or inconvenient.(31) Historically, there is no known cause and no settled diagnostic test, but anyone can develop it and it does conveniently include most of the neurological symptoms of what have been erroneously labelled 'vaccine' injuries. And treatment?

“Although there is no medication designed to specifically treat FND, medications are available to treat pain, anxiety, depression, insomnia, or headache that may occur...Cognitive behaviour therapy can help you modify your thought patterns to change emotions, mood, or behaviour. Psychodynamic therapy can help you identify and resolve patterns in your thoughts, beliefs, and emotions that may cause some of the neurological symptoms.”(32)

So, once again, it's the feeble-minded who are at the greatest risk of injury. There is some dissonance here, perhaps a lack of co-ordination in the medical world. The Brits are claiming that some of the physical symptoms can be explained by a generalized stress at being locked down, having to wear masks or similar, but definitely nothing to do with the 'vaccines', whereas the Americans are working their way around to an explanation that says that some of the other physical symptoms are a result of the 'vaccine', albeit indirectly. In any event, what they are agreed upon is that it's all in the mind and that the 'vaccines' are safe. Presumably, that also means that the various databases that report vaccine injuries are wrong; that they are mostly a record of the general population's overheated neuroses.

In a way, these revelations are a boon. If all these post 'vaccination' conditions can be explained away, if nobody comes along and demolishes the 'evidence', it might mean that there will be no need for a different pandemic this winter.

Crowd Control

In the meantime, in the Fourth Reich, social distancing measures are being enforced the old fashioned way. It's important to be precise, don't you agree? And nothing says precise quite like a folding ruler. Apparently, wearing a mask is now mandatory in Hamburg, if a distance of 1.5 metres cannot be maintained and those tempted to push the envelope by moving within 1.49 metres or closer still must be prevented from doing so. Fair's fair. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing well. And even when it's not worth doing, it still needs to be done well.

Image 1

Still, at least that is only distancing people in metres. One would hope that the words 'Germany' and 'camp' wouldn't start to feature in the same sentence again, but there are no guarantees at this point. As long ago as January 2021, German states were locking up 'quarantine breakers'. The Bavarian Ministry of Health, notably bullish in all matters Covid, unburdened itself of this classic example of authoritarian rhetoric, noting that it is usually possible to persuade people to comply “by emphatic instruction” and by pointing out “compulsory isolation and fines.” As a last resort, compulsory admissions to municipalities, for example to “closed parts of hospitals” could be an option.(33) You might have thought that, of all people, our Teutonic cousins might have learned the lessons of history when it comes to 'othering' people, but it doesn't appear that they have.

They are far from being the only ones. Denmark has passed a law permitting the state to detain citizens, isolate them in hospitals (or some other facility) and forcibly treat.(34) In New Zealand, there are 32 quarantine facilities for over 6,000 'patients'. When the government deems a particular stage in the 'pandemic' to be serious enough, all 'positive' cases are detained in these camps. Thankfully, there is nothing arbitrary about PCR tests (you can bet your house on their accuracy), rendering any potential manipulation of the statistics by the state all but impossible. The Prime Minister stated:

“If someone refuses, in our facilities, to be tested, they have to keep staying. So they won’t be able to leave after fourteen days, they have to stay on for another fourteen days. So it’s a pretty good incentive. You either get your tests done and make sure you cleared, or we will keep you in the facility longer. So I think people — most people will look at that and say, ‘I’ll take the test.’”(35)

In the US, in another example of the tightly worded, minimally invasive guidelines for which the CDC is rightly renowned, they declared that they have the

“legal authority to detain any person that may have an infectious disease that is specified by Executive Order to be quaratinable.”(36)

For a moment there, it looked as if they were giving themselves too much latitude, but it seems like all the necessary safeguards are in place and the possibility of overreach has been eliminated.

Canada and, particularly, Australia have no such qualms. They are now openly quarantining people in camps.

Image 2 Camp Covid, Canada

Image 3 Howard Springs Camp, Darwin, Australia

A word from Master Trudeau, Canada's very own Grand Poobah:

“If your test results come back positive, you’ll need to immediately quarantine in designated government facilities. This is not optional.”(37)

Righto, Justin. Not optional. Got it. Health Minister Patty Hadju:

“...the claim that the federal government is preparing to forcibly intern Canadians is patently false.”(38)

Back to optional then. The government asked for proposals on how to build these facilities last year.(39) And the proposal doesn't limit detainees to travelers alone.(40) It would seem that the Canadian government is in the business of contradicting itself or, to put it less kindly, lying through their teeth. And the Australians? They are currently leading the pack. In Australia, you don't even have to be a 'positive' test or a refusenik to receive an offer you can't refuse. Even a close contact (in this case, identified on CCTV via her scooter registration plate) can be summoned to the holiday spa at Howard Springs, for a two week sojourn at taxpayer expense.(41)

That's right. An original 'Patient Zero' tests 'positive' on a PCR test (no symptoms required), the authorities are allowed to scour CCTV for other close contacts, identify them and then visit them at home, requiring them to remand themselves in custody to be transported to a quarantine camp for fourteen days, all the while testing 'negative'. In a state without a single Covid death. Now, you can't say that isn't thorough.

Molnuprivar

The new wonder drug by Merck, the pharmaceutical company that was extremely proud of its previous panacea to cure all ills (ivermectin) until its patent lapsed. No matter; there's a new kid on the block. I say wonder drug but, to be completely fair, the jury is still out on that and that is at least partly to do with the somewhat cack-handed approach that the FDA takes to clinical trial reporting. There is more than one set of results; an interim result and a snappily named post-interim result. The latter is more comprehensive so, naturally, the decision to issue an Emergency Use Authorisation is taken on the former.

In this instance, the first set of results came from 386 respondents and showed that the alleged risk reduction in hospitalizations and death was 50%. The second set of results was from 710 trialees (which included the original 386), but only showed a 30% reduction in risk, at the absolute best.(42) Unfortunately, the second set of results, which totaled 1433 participants with the placebo group included, demonstrated that there were more hospitalizations in the drug group than there were in the control group.(43) This is generally frowned upon.

Nonetheless, and despite the fact that the FDA had already issued EUAs to monoclonal antibody treatments that were more effective than molnuprivar, the yays had it by 13-10, with the caveat that it may not be given to pregnant women, those who are breastfeeding (usually women also, but not exclusively these days) and children. There is one other slight concern, beyond the fact that the data were incomplete and non-persuasive. The drug works by integrating itself into the viral genome and triggering spike protein mutations, thus allegedly killing the virus. However, it is not definitively known whether a drug that does such a thing may also be capable of triggering mutations in healthy mammalian cells. William Haseltine, previously chair of Biochemical Pharmacology at Harvard, had this to say:

“My misgivings are founded on two key concerns. The first is the drug’s potential mutagenicity, and the possibility that its use could lead to birth defects or cancerous tumours. The second is a danger that is far greater and potentially far deadlier: the drug’s potential to supercharge SARS-CoV-2 mutations and unleash a more virulent variant upon the world.”(44)

If molnuprivar sounds to you like something you may want to avoid, you would not be alone.

Pandemic of the ‘Unvaccinated’

The old favorite, the default sound-bite of our health czars and political leaders and a key justification for passport mandates and all the other paraphernalia of compliance. There isn't much value in laboring this topic too much; I appreciate that there is widespread ignorance, but the truth is so glaringly obvious that only a few pointers are necessary. Anybody that needs more than that isn't going to be persuaded by inconvenient things like facts.

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States.(45)
The almost entirely 'vaccinated' National Football League (NFL) has just achieved a new daily record of 37 new 'positive' tests. And no, they weren't all Omicron; only one was. So, 36 examples of the existing circulating variants evading the 'vaccines'.(46) American football isn't the only sport under the cosh; soccer in the UK and cricket in Australia are lurching towards systemic breakdown. The solution, certainly for the hard of thinking in the NFL, is booster shots.
“There is increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have a relevant role in transmission. In Massachusetts, USA, a total of 469 new COVID-19 cases were detected during various events in July, 2021, and 346 (74%) of these cases were in people who were fully or partly vaccinated, 274 (79%) of whom were symptomatic. Cycle threshold values were similarly low between people who were fully vaccinated (median 22·8) and people who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median 21·5), indicating a high viral load even among people who were fully vaccinated.”(47) Gunther Kampf, The Lancet.
A vast Israeli study, through to September 2021, showed that during the summer Covid wave (a complete anomaly in its own right), 1 in 20 vaccinated Israelis caught Covid. It also showed that natural immunity was much longer lasting, especially in cases of severe infection and that the 'vaccinated' were five times more likely to develop severe infection than the naturally protected.(48)
In the north-eastern US, an area of high 'vaccination' rates, hospitalisations are surging. Maine, New Hampshire and New York have even called out the National Guard to help treat Covid patients.(49)
Even the CDC is in the business of publishing papers showing that “we found no statistically significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated persons and persons who were not fully vaccinated. Therefore, our findings indicate that prevention and mitigation measures should be applied without regard to vaccination status for persons in high-risk settings or those with significant exposures.”(50)

Perhaps a small helping of common sense might be apposite. The 'vaccinated' and the 'unvaccinated' are treated as two monolithic, unchanging groups whenever any discussion of the merits of each is joined. But this is incorrect. The 'unvaccinated', for instance, are made up of three separate subsets; those who have contracted Covid and recovered, those who already had natural immunity and those yet to be afflicted. Any change in the balance of composition can only go one way. The naturally immune will stay immune, the recovered will stay immune and the ranks of the not previously afflicted can only diminish over time, so they will also eventually achieve immunity. In addition, their immunity is a full immunity.

The 'vaccinated' group, by contrast, may gradually increase in size as those stupid or stubborn enough to be 'hesitant' finally come over to the light on account of how they'll lose their income otherwise. What will also clearly occur is an erosion in their immune response; rapidly. Boosters and variant boosters will never be able to keep up with mutations, which are being driven by continual 'vaccination' campaigns. Further, the immunity provided by 'vaccination' is not full immunity; it doesn't prevent viral replication in the throat and airways. Now, which of the two groups do you think will be more likely to spread Covid?

Careful now. Free thought and critical thinking can be dangerous.

Green Pass

We've heard a lot of talk about boosters. We've had various government entities teasing us about ongoing 'vaccination' status, because the two shot regime has turned out to be less effective than they told us it would be. Shocker. If we allow ourselves the luxury of a little deductive reasoning, it would seem that governments will have to shift the definition of 'vaccinated'. It'll have to mean only those who submit to a third shot (for now). There would be very little point in having a 'vaccine' passport if the state couldn't pretend that it meant something – appearances must be maintained.

Israel has bitten the bullet, the US is clearly going to soon, the UK is wittering on about fourth shots already (as is Israel), Austria, Germany, Italy and Greece are all somewhere on that journey and the French have just helpfully spelled out exactly how it works. And it's remarkably simple, as any Chinese citizen could have told us. Anybody over 65 who refuses to get a booster shot has their precious QR code de-activated. Just like that. An immediate casting into the outer darkness, an instant relegation to the ranks of the unwashed. That's what you get for bending over the first time; more bending over. If human nature still existed, you might have seen that coming. And I wonder what else they could de-activate next time, when your finances, smart devices and God knows what else are all linked to and administered through that same code?(51)

Nothing to see here – move along

And to finish up, a random collection of the preposterous, the probable and the possible. Twitter has decided to widen its censorship campaign to include those users who claim that the 'vaccinated' can spread Covid 19.(52) I know that sounds like a silly thing for Twitter to do, given that even the state and Big Pharma admit that this claim is true, but it's still misinformation and may induce 'vaccine' hesitancy, thus preventing people from getting a jab that doesn't stop them contracting the disease or spreading it – which would be wrong. If there was still such a thing as a moral framework that acknowledged the existence of right and wrong. Anyway, that's why.

Next, a study out of Japan that finds that those under 20 are seven times more likely to die of the Pfizer 'vaccine' that the virus itself.(53) This is surprising news; I'd have thought it would be more like ten times. Also surprising is the fact that the link to this study is still up on Twitter.

As is so often the case, a Canadian province is leading the world in its zealous application of exciting new restrictions. New Brunswick, as of earlier this month, have given the green light to grocery stores to ban the 'unvaccinated', notwithstanding the fact that (according to Public Safety Canada):

“food is among the ten critical infrastructure sectors, and its delivery and preparation is considered an Essential Service and Function.”(54)

It could hardly be otherwise, could it? It will be an interesting test of societal cohesion versus market capitalism. On the one hand, the desire to maximize profits - and slavishly follow whatever diktats the state suggests (demands), regardless of the fact that they are ignoring their own rules and torching any semblance of human decency. On the other, the chance to demonstrate a solidarity with the customer and fellow member of the community. The result will be particularly illuminating given the voluntary nature of the exhortation.

In other news, Forbes magazine published a piece by their resident all seeing eye on matters Covid, entitled “Yes, The Vaccine Changes Your DNA. A Tiny Bit. That’s A Good Thing.” (55) This is almost certainly news to the rest of us, who have been laboring under the media propagated illusion that no such thing happens. In fact, this was one of the main objections to mRNA technology at the outset. The article was written in order to refute the 'anti-vaxxer trope' that – you've guessed it – the 'vaccine' alters our DNA, and it does so via the novel mechanism of telling us that the 'deniers' were right:

“The way it does this is really rather extraordinary: many little pieces of your DNA are cut and pasted together, in millions of combinations, each making a different antibody. Eventually, one of these antibodies ‘recognizes’ the pathogen (by binding to it).”(56)

I'm forming the impression that the author was attempting to perform a familiar authoritarian trick, admitting that the opposition was right all along, but that it was necessary (for people like him) to deny that truism in the service of the greater good, as defined by him - again.

Shifting gears once more; the data for global excess mortality are uniformly showing the same trend; the most heavily 'vaccinated' countries are the ones with the biggest problems.

Figure 1 Scotland

Scotland, 87% 'vaccinated' as of mid November, had had twenty consecutive weeks of excess deaths above the five year average. Germany has 78,000 more deaths than expected (10%). In Denmark, Finland and Norway 'mystery deaths' are higher than ever previously recorded, while in Denmark there are virtually no deaths attributed to Covid. Ireland, the UK and Israel are all in the same boat.(57)

Figure 2 England

And, while Covid deaths are primarily among the elderly, 'vaccine' injuries affect the young.

“According to VigiAccess, the adverse event database for the World Health Organization, 41% of the more than 2.4 million vaccine injuries reported so far are among those under age 44, and just six percent are among people over age 75.”(58)

In truth, none of this should be a surprise. It will only catch you off guard if mindless obedience is still your bag.

And finally, just a punt on a groundless theory. What happens if the resistance solidifies? There are signs that the grand scheme, of which our leaders are so enamored, is starting to fray around the edges. In the US, federal courts have halted Biden's vax mandates (at least, temporarily), one or two airline CEOs are venturing to suggest that mask mandates on flights are stupid, protests around the world are proliferating and self imposed, vax mandate deadlines in some countries are coming ever nearer. The elites are all in now; there's no going back for them. But what happens if the political tide starts ebbing away, if the opposition finds a voice, if the people get the whiff of napalm in the morning? How are the global mafia going to stay in power, because that's the only real way to ensure that they are not held to account? Vax to vote, anyone?(59)

Citations

(1) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/boris-johnson-warns-tidal-wave-omicron-pushes-covid-booster-shots-uk-raises-covid-alert-level-4-video/

(2) https://www.history.com/news/how-london-bridge-ended-up-in-arizona

(3) https://www.thecable.ng/just-in-uk-records-first-death-from-omicron-variant

(4) https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/medical/omicron-may-be-no-worse-than-flu-says-government-adviser/ar-AARNwve

(5) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7050e1.htm

(6) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/cdc-confirms-80-covid-19-cases-caused-omicron-variant-us-fully-vaccinated-individuals-33-booster-shots/

(7) https://www.facebook.com/TheGazettebw/videos/203507168606615/

(8) https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/exclusive-south-africa-delays-covid-vaccine-deliveries-inoculations-slow-2021-11-24/

(9) https://archive.md/F3lfY

(10) https://nltimes.nl/2021/11/27/61-600-passengers-south-africa-test-positive-coronavirus

(11) https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/world-medical-association-chair-demands-national-lockdowns-compulsory-jabs-fears-covid?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=308