They say timing is everything and when it serves to advance a stated purpose, impeccable timing is deeply suspect. What has happened with Covid? Where's it gone? We've gone from talking about nothing else to talking about everything else; inflation, fuel prices, an upcoming famine, Ukraine and now monkey-pox. Granted, the first three are all linked, but doesn't it feel like quite a lot has happened since the Covid 'pandemic' started falling apart?
We are taking fire from multiple directions and at such a rapid rate that we don't have time to peer out of the fox hole and properly take stock of the world around us which is, of course, part of the design. I say that because it is clear that crises are being created deliberately and we are being manipulated into believing a specious narrative that holds no water. Whenever appeals to emotion are being promoted – as with the 'heroes of Ukraine', otherwise known as reprehensible neo-Nazis – it's a guarantee that the facts themselves are unlikely to be as advertised.
Clearly, as well as serving to exacerbate and excuse disasters that were already inevitable due to policies implemented by Western regimes, worrying about dwindling resources or the possibility of World War III (this time between two nuclear powers) also distracts from all things Covid. There are several very good reasons for that.
Does it not seem like there is a fundamental disconnect between the reality we can see around us and what we are told is the reality by regimes and their mouthpieces in the media? We were informed, at around the turn of the year, that the rise of Omicron and its ubiquity was a godsend; some even hailed it as 'nature's vaccine'. The idea was that, because Omicron was so mild, all the obstreperous anti-vaxxers who had refused to submit to the jab were about to be rewarded with a mild headache followed by natural immunity. Bill Gates felt that this was 'unfortunate', especially as it offered better immunity than the 'vaccines'.(1) Those of us who are onto Mr Gates thought it was past time he took a long walk off a short plank.
Nonetheless, we were informed that we would have to live with Covid, rather than attempt to eradicate it. This was a somewhat abrupt change in direction, as the previous two years of lock-downs and countermeasures were clearly predicated on the belief that it was necessary to triumph over viral adversity, rather than to accommodate it. Most people seemed prepared to overlook this obvious anomaly. Very few people were prepared to state the obvious, which is that all viruses display a marked tendency to ameliorate over time and Covid, far from being 'novel', would do so as well. The main reason why it had taken two years to get to that point, when even the Spanish Flu had burned itself out in eighteen months, was because regime policies had kept it alive for far longer than its natural virulent lifespan. Of course, that's if Covid has ever existed as a separate entity, which must be doubtful given the wholly inadequate testing protocols – the PCR test cannot differentiate between Covid and seasonal flu – and the alleged almost total absence of the latter over the past two winters. So why is Covid getting the silent treatment?
Figure 1
This graph is odd. When Omicron did the rounds, well over 70% of all these populations were 'vaccinated'. One might have thought that, by around two years in, the number of 'unvaccinated' who had yet to be infected must be vanishingly small; if they hadn't had it by then, they were likely never going to. This assumes, of course, that the 'vaccinated' actually had the jab that they thought they were getting and not saline or some other concoction. Whilst an absence of testing capacity probably contributed to the low numbers of cases at the very beginning of the 'pandemic', the numbers for 2022 are still much higher than at the height of the panic and for a prolonged time-frame. Infections only seem to be abating with the onset of summer. What could have caused that, I wonder?
Figure 2
Ah. I see. And yes, I know, correlation does not prove causation, but when it fits with what we know about these 'vaccines', not the version that we've been consistently been told by the 'experts', then it makes complete sense. More on that in a moment. Still, at least Omicron isn't a deadly variant - the South Africans who discovered it were adamant on that point – and many people are likely to have been infected with it without being aware of it, so hospitalisations and deaths shouldn't be an issue, even if cases somehow are.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Still fretting about causation? I accept that these numbers must come with a huge health warning; regimes have distinguished themselves with their seemingly limitless capacity for misinformation and outright falsehoods about all things Covid, but these are the numbers they are providing to us. Less easy to fake are the numbers of excess deaths from all causes. The only caveat here is that the figures are compared to projections based on previous years and we don't know whether that calculation has been manipulated. However, it seems that a pattern is starting to emerge.
Figure 5
The US is very nearly off this particular chart, but the other countries (with the exception of Canada) are also performing poorly. The UK has lost an additional 133,000 and America has a total of 1.1 million excess deaths over the past two years. What's more, the numbers keep rising when, if we are to believe what we're being force fed, the 'vaccines' should be saving lives. In addition, one would expect a reversion to the mean as the weak and vulnerable succumb sooner than they would otherwise have done. This should result in a spike followed by a slump, as they can't die twice.
These questions are not being asked in mainstream media, as each new crisis gives them an excuse to further memory hole Covid. What's more, the same regimes that imposed drastic measures at the merest whiff of danger – and who were excoriated if they delayed even a week in doing so - are now ignoring numbers that would have had them hyperventilating this time last year. So, what's going on? How can people be dying from the Omicron variant at such a rate?
The 'vaccines', that's what. This essay will deal with the issue of the ongoing harm they are causing and the unwillingness of our elders and betters to acknowledge their mistake (or plan, depending on your perspective). There will be at least one further screed which will analyse the other aspects of the 'pandemic' that they wish to preserve for future use and which would be stripped from their arsenal if they were subjected to proper scrutiny.
AIDS
We've all heard the one about the 'vaccines' wearing off, haven't we? The experts professed themselves disappointed that protection didn't last longer, but never fear; there's a solution. Just take a booster shot and then another one and so on, ad infinitum, and you'll get the protection that you need. Try to ignore the fact that the boosters are allegedly comprised of material that was designed to combat the Wuhan variant - which is now ancient history - and jab on regardless.
This is one of a plethora of major lies about the Covid 'vaccines'. Their effectiveness doesn't wane and this is not the case with any vaccine. What's waning is immune system performance:
Vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipient's immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
Vaccines allegedly help develop immunity by imitating an infection. Once the imitation infection induced by the vaccine goes away, the body is left with a supply of “memory” t-cells and antibodies that will remember how to fight that disease in the future.
So, when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.(2)
No vaccine is forever active. Once it's done its initial job of creating an immune response, it lies dormant awaiting its opportunity. It only activates if the particular infection it is designed to guard against invades the body. This makes sense. After all, that is the precise purpose of a vaccine. It's not supposed to a treatment such as Aspirin, which can be taken repeatedly over time. It's supposed to be an injection that primes the body to fight off infections before they take hold. We know, for instance, that exposure to the original SARS has left people immune to Covid infection, even though twenty years separate the 'pandemics'. We know that the two SARS diseases only share 80% of the genome and, further, that none of the Covid variants have diverged as much as 3% from the original Wuhan strain. Yes, that's an example of natural immunity, but that is what vaccines are designed to mimic and these clearly aren't.
Talk of waning immunity is, therefore, a canard. The problem is with the immune system of the 'vaccinated' which, over a relatively short period, becomes deficient. We have a name for that; Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, or AIDS. We have difficulty in believing that this could be possible, but that's because we don't fully understand how AIDS comes about. Most of us (me included, until I did the research) believe that HIV, if left untreated, progresses to AIDS and this is believed to be true, as far as it goes. But HIV isn't the only thing that can lead to AIDS and this is where our knowledge is incomplete.
As the name suggests, AIDS is acquired and it decimates human immune systems, but other diseases, such as leukemia, can also destroy the immune system. Malnutrition, if severe enough, can do so too, as can radiation treatment and chemotherapy and any drug that depresses immune response.(3) Clearly, some of these circumstances of immune deficiency will be temporary, but some can be permanent. The Covid 'vaccines' cause permanent damage.
The VAERS database in the US contains information on vaccine averse events, dating back to 1950. While they are grossly under-reported – it has been estimated that no more than 1% of all vaccine injuries are recorded – it's the best publicly accessible information in existence. 67% of all reports of adverse events (to all vaccines) since the year 2000 have been reported in the past sixteen months, the vast majority associated with the Covid 'vaccines'. The average number of acquired immune disorders reported to VAERS between 2000 and 2020 is 31. The number for 2021 was 386.
Diseases associated with AIDS are being reported at record levels; over the same time-frame, reports of herpes averaged 926; the number for 2021 was 18,336. The figures for encephalopathy, known as AIDS-dementia complex, are 39.6 and 745 respectively. Common cancers associated with AIDS; 21.3 and 430, respectively. And so on.(4) These auto-immune diseases are merely the tip of the iceberg. Regimes don't want you to know any of this.
ADE/VAED
As predicted, both Antibody Dependent Enhancement and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease are also proving to be a major issue for the 'vaccinated'. There appears to be something of a divide between the double and triple jabbed. While AIDS is prevalent among the more zealous group, those who stopped at two are the poster children for ADE. This is when antibodies from a past infection (or 'vaccine') fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure which, in turn, leads to an enhanced version of the disease.
For instance, health authorities in the UK have been publishing data relating to infection rates of both the 'vaccinated' and the 'unvaccinated'. At least, they were until 1st April this year when they discontinued the practice on the grounds that, as they were no longer providing free universal testing, the figures would henceforth be impossible to verify. Naturally, as with most things the regimes tell us, this statement doesn't withstand scrutiny, as the numbers of hospitalisations and deaths would still be collectible as every hospital asks patients for 'vaccination' status, but the lie enabled government to stop providing the enemy with the ammunition it was being shot with.
The last month on record, March 2022, make for interesting reading. In the 18-80+ category, there were 1,318,690 'cases'. Of that number, 1,008,836 were boosted, only 56,942 were 'unvaccinated' and the rest had received one or two inoculations – the vast majority two. The 'vaccinated' account for 96% of the total, as against a total 'vaccine' uptake of around 62% for adults. The members of the hard of thinking club, the trebles, make up 76% of the 'cases', but only 50% of the target audience. The roughly 17% of over 18's who resisted every blandishment supply 4% to the total.(5)
It is clear from the re-infection rate that ADE is happening. It's clear from the data in figures 1-4 that enhanced disease is also a feature. Vaccines that stimulate non-neutralizing antibodies upon reinfection with disease aren't just useless. The antibodies provide a gateway to allow re-infection of cells that are usually inaccessible, typically immune cells. This is not a surprise to Pfizer, at the very least. They knew about it in February 2021.(6) In reality, this was mere confirmation, as the original coronavirus vaccine trials in the early 2000's had already shown there to be a link; the animal trials were abandoned then, due to serious (mostly fatal) ADE.
If the 'vaccines' are dangerous, one might think that more jabs equals more danger. One would be right, but the boosters seem to be a lot more dangerous than the first two; at least, they do so far. The boosted currently inhabit the worst of all worlds. They are still producing high viral loads nine days or more after re-infection, long after symptoms have faded. This suggests that prolonged viral damage is being done in the absence of antibody opposition, which is the same pattern found in AIDS sufferers.(7)
Nobody with any influence seems to have stopped and had a bit of a think about the logical fallacies inherent in the concept of Covid boosters, namely that if the 'vaccines' were effective, why are repeated boosters required? And if the opposite is, in fact, the case and the 'vaccines' are ineffective because of the variants now in circulation, why instruct people to boost themselves with an original Wuhan variant jab?
It seems as though the regulatory bodies had become very laissez-faire by the time it came to authorizing booster shots. The FDA gave Emergency Use Authorisation to three boosters, in August 2021 (8) and on 29th March this year.(9)(10) They also issued guidance recommending that J&J 'vaccine' recipients could safely indulge in a Pfizer booster, despite there being not a shred of evidence to support any such conclusion.(11) The only evidence they cited was an Israeli study which found the following:
“Breakthrough infections were common, mostly very mild, yet, with high viral loads. Vaccine efficacy against infection was 30% and 11% for BNT162b2[Pfizer] and mRNA1273 [Moderna], respectively. Local and systemic adverse reactions were reported in 80% and 40%, respectively.”(12)(13)
One might ask how it is that the FDA felt that it was appropriate to grant authorization to booster shots that worked between 11-30% of the time and yet provoked adverse events in 40-80% of cases. This might explain why one study found that 22% of triple jabbed health workers tested positive for Omicron.(14) Boosters are an unsustainable strategy, in any event, which is even acknowledged by those who are still 'vaccine' apologists.(15) They are also a wholly impracticable proposition in poor countries, if only by reason of the expense involved in such a programme. Further, according to the US Centre for Disease Control, while the original double shot lasts for five months, the booster wanes after just four, thus necessitating yet one more jab which will presumably be even less advantageous. In fact, the Israeli data shows that the booster's effectiveness at preventing severe disease declines by 56% in just seven weeks.(16)
The experts would far rather we didn't focus on poorer countries anyway, on the grounds that the African ones (in particular) have done considerably better than the affluent West. Two-thirds of sub Saharan Africans have Covid antibodies, so it swept through that continent much as it did elsewhere, but there were very few lock-downs, far fewer deaths and that semi mythical state of grace otherwise known as herd immunity has been reached.(17)(18)
Whereas, in the highly 'vaccinated' West, we are still seeing catastrophic levels of inexplicable (according to the media, when it feels that it has to report anything at all) levels of deaths and injuries in the fittest amongst us. For example, as of the end of 23rd May, at least 1,044 athletes are known to have collapsed, with 683 of them dying, mostly from cardiac arrests.(19) This level of harm was not a feature of the pre-'vaccine' era, but anybody drawing attention to the phenomenon is targeted on Facebook and Twitter, with large numbers of posts being taken down.
The baseline numbers from earlier in the century are minuscule in comparison. The International Olympic Committee came up with an average of 29 annual deaths in athletes under 35 over the course of nearly 40 years. Sudden deaths in US athletes (across a broader range of sports) found a rate of around 69 deaths per annum.(20) Another study found a total of 769 cardiac arrests in athletes with an average age of 23.(21) There is no reason to think that this problem is going away.
Ordinarily, one might think that a story such as this would command plenty of column inches in the national dailies, but we have been forced to learn that the media is not there primarily to inform us, but instead to feed us whatever propaganda is on the day's menu. Otherwise, they'd be informing us that increasing incidences of cardiac arrests in younger people are not limited to athletes nor to any given country. Public Health Scotland data show that cardiac events, strokes and myocarditis in people aged between 15-44 have increased by 67% since the 'vaccines' were offered.(22) In England, as well as there being a massive increase in ovarian cancer cases, data shows that double 'vaccinated' 18-39 year olds were, on average, 92% more likely to die than the more skeptical 'unvaxxed' from the same age group, during the year 2021.(23)
A German study found that severe complications from the Covid 'vaccines' were forty times higher than reported – this from a study of 40,000 participants.(24) The Danes discovered that they were in the midst of a pandemic of the 'vaccinated'. Two shots were substantially worse than none, three shots worse than two. The alleged Covid deaths are increasingly numerous, season by season, and the all cause mortality figures were substantially higher.(25) None of this should be a surprise; if deaths are substantially up in the younger age groups, excess deaths are inevitable.
None of these facts are being publicly acknowledged. A country like Australia, known for being in the ruthless vanguard of lock-downs and 'vaccine' passports had, according to their own figures, a seven day average of four Covid deaths a day in April 2020. Two years later, that number was 74, having peaked (so far) at 88, and yet there are no lock-downs and life has largely returned to a new normal.(26) For completeness, I should note that the boosters were rolled out from 18th December 2021, midsummer in Australia, and that the almost vertical line representing the explosion of Covid deaths in Figure 5 has December 27th at its beginning. That pesky question rears its head again; why should deaths be so high from the mildest variant yet known and why is it that the most recalcitrant regimes are trying to ignore the data and carrying on as if nothing jarring and inexplicable is happening?
Figure 6
It's not just adults that are suffering. The 'vaccines' have a catastrophic effect on children, too. Some statistics, from the first three months of this year. Double 'vaccinated' 10-14 years are 39 times more likely to die than the unjabbed in the same age range. For the triple 'vaccinated', it's exponentially worse. They are 303 times more likely to die of Covid, 69 times more likely to die from any other cause. This may be why only 7% of 5-11 year olds have had the inoculation – the grapevine will be red hot, even as officialdom looks the other way while trying to bury the evidence.(27)
There is also the outbreak of a new form of severe hepatitis in at least twelve different nations. As of 3rd May, there were 163 cases of under 16's in the UK alone. Health officials, while currently clueless about the origin of the disease, are nonetheless adamant that it can't possibly be the 'vaccines' because only 18% of the UK cases involve inoculated children.(28) On its face, this seems to make sense but, once more, the regime is being disingenuous. While the definitive answer is not yet within our grasp, there are some substantial clues as to the likely origin.
Firstly, of course, the disease is not limited to one specific geographical location. Secondly, the cases are appearing in close temporal proximity. Thirdly, the strain of the disease is novel. In light of the above, investigative focus should be on the limited number of factors that are common to all cases.
It appears that the vast majority of the UK cases are in children under 5, but this, in and of itself, does not preclude 'vaccine' involvement. Pfizer's own study shows that the 'vaccine' spike protein accumulates in the liver (29) and several other studies provide confirmation that the jabs can cause hepatitis.(30)(31)(32)
Additionally, it is known from bio-distribution data that the spike protein is distributed around the body within 48 hours of the injection and that it can be secreted in breast milk;(33) this is why breastfeeding mothers were excluded from the trials.(34) There is also evidence of 'vaccine' shedding, when the spike protein transfers to an 'unvaccinated' person from the pliant, rule following jabbed. This information is also contained in Pfizer documents; it wouldn't be the only 'vaccine' to have that characteristic. And, coincidentally, a study found that 'unvaccinated' children living in a household with 'vaccinated' parents also had antibodies, whereas the children of those parents who were ruggedly individual enough to refuse the inoculation, didn't.(35)
So, the 18% 'vaccination' rate of the poor kids affected by this new form of hepatitis does not provide sufficient evidence to exonerate the 'vaccines' are the root cause of the disease. Far from it – the 'vaccine' mechanism exists and the circumstantial evidence is robust, especially when one considers that the VAERS system (in the US) averages 8 annual reports of hepatitis as an adverse event. This number is the total across all 70 vaccines. However, in 2021, there were 304 reports, just referencing the Covid 'vaccines'.(36)
It could be the viral vector 'vaccines' AZ and J&J at fault – hepatitis can come from adenoviruses and both of these 'vaccines' use one as a backbone for their drug. It's also possible that such a virus may have gone rogue; there is surfeit of evidence demonstrating that it's a possible outcome and that, while adults are more resistant to disease given their prolonged exposure to adenoviruses and a degree of cross immunity, children are less so, especially after the de-training of their immune systems during lock-downs.(37) Both explanations (or neither) may turn out to be the answer; it's too soon to tell. The only guarantee that can be made at this juncture is that the health authorities will seek to hide any evidence that may accumulate that demonstrates that Covid 'vaccines' played a role. My feeling is that the 'vaccines' are almost certainly the culprit.
Stillbirths and neonatal deaths are also much elevated. In Iceland, the total of stillbirths and deaths within a week of birth is up 82%. Deaths within 28 days of birth are up by the same percentage.(38) In Scotland, the number of deaths per live baby was 119% higher than expected.(39)(40) That the 'vaccines' interfered with female fertility should not come as a surprise and has been known since mid 2021, at the latest. It was then that a study found that the rate of miscarriage in the first trimester for the 'vaccinated' was 82%.(41) To subsequently discover that the 'vaccines' caused problems later in pregnancy, or after birth, is hardly revelatory.
Conclusions
We know that 'vaccine' nanoparticles collect in the heart, liver, bone marrow and spleen (a major immune organ) in very high concentrations.(42) We know there is a high incidence of spike proteins in the ovaries, which will likely impair fertility, interrupt the menstrual cycle and trigger more ovarian cancers.(43) The spike protein inserts itself into the nucleus of immune cells and impairs repair function. Given these facts, none of what is happening is inexplicable.
Big Pharma spent $6.56 billion on media advertising in 2020.(44) Pfizer spent $55 million on social media alone. That buys a lot of influence and, sure enough, those who don't toe the line are targeted. Doctors get their medical licences revoked,(45)(46) ordinary Joes get shadow-banned or doxxed. But
even if posts are removed and stories censored, the people who posted or wrote still know what they know; that reality is not being addressed at all. They just don't know how many others have their experiences as well. And the wider world doesn't get to hear the truth, which means that regimes are not forced into action in walking back their plans. It also means that they are not being held to account.
And, of course, regimes must be painfully aware of how little credibility they would retain were these facts to see the light of day in a more comprehensive reveal. So they hide as much of the evidence as they can and promulgate other crises that occupy our attention instead. But what is really happening is explicable in only one way – the 'vaccines' are killing people and it's going to become increasingly difficult for them to explain. Ignoring the situation doesn't solve it in the hearts and minds of those affected; at least some of them will know what ails them and why.
I expect governments and health authorities to keep covering their tracks, probably in outlandish and unfeasible attempts to explain adverse events and deaths. Monkey-pox may be one such, but more on that soon. While regimes still have the support of the legacy media, they are going to be increasingly hard pressed, but the plan doesn't call for them to be democratically accountable for ever and ever, amen. They are conducting a holding operation at present, while simultaneously trying to preserve some of the tactics that worked so well last time around. That's the subject of my next effort.
Citations
(1) https://americanfaith.com/bill-gates-sad-covid-infections-offer-better-immunity-than-vax/
(2) https://expose-news.com/2022/04/17/gov-refuses-publish-vaccinated-suffering-ai-ds-ade/
(3) https://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/what-to-know-secondary-immunodeficiency-disorders
(4) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/13/33715percent-increase-aids-related-disease-usa/
(5) https://expose-news.com/2022/04/17/gov-refuses-publish-vaccinated-suffering-ai-ds-ade/
(6) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
(7) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.02.22273333v1.full
(8) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e2.htm
(9) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e3.htm
(11) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full
(13) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202542
(15) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.02.22273333v1
(17) https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/23/health/covid-africa-deaths.html
(18) https://bdnews24.com/world/africa/2022/03/23/trying-to-solve-a-covid-mystery-africas-low-death-rates
(19) https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
(20) Ditto
(21)
(22) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/17/covid-jabs-increase-risk-heart-attack-death-young-adults/
(23) Ditto
(25) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.07.22274789v1
(26) https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths
(27) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/23/children-303x-likely-to-die-following-covid-vaccination/
(28) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/12/whats-causing-deadly-hepatitis-children/
(29) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf
(30) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
(31) https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(21)00237-3/fulltext
(32) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827822002343
(33) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf
(34) https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
(35) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full
(36)
(37)
(38) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/05/iceland-stillbirths-and-neonatal-deaths-increase/
(39) https://scotland.shinyapps.io/phs-covid-wider-impact/
(40) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/06/newborn-baby-deaths-hit-critical-levels-2nd-time/
(41) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/#r15
(42) Sen. Ron Johnson on Covid-19 vaccine injuries to test subjects.
(43) Huff E. Idaho doctor reports “20 times increase” in cancer among those “vaccinated” for covid. https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-09-14-idaho-doctor-20times-increase-cancer-vaccinated-covid.html
(44) Bulik BS. The top 10 ad spenders in Big Pharma for 2020. Fierce Pharma Apr 19, 2021 https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-report/top-10-ad-spenders-big-pharma-for-2020
(45) Breggin PR, Breggin GR.editors. Top Medical Journals Sell their Souls. Breggin PR, Breggin GR. Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey. Ithaca, NY: Lake Edge Press; 2021. p. 285-292
(46) Ross E. How drug companies’ PR tactics skew the presentation of medical research. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/may/20/drug-companies-ghost-writing-journalism