We currently exist in two parallel universes; there's the real world, where real things actually, verifiably happen. That world, at present, is not comforting in the least. Then there's the one in which the state and the legacy media rule, where the information is curated according to the narrative of choice. This universe is a construction, a fantasy. It's comforting to some, bizarrely, and traps the unwary. Even though the messages themselves are divisive and frightening, they are familiar and provide reference points to people who need them to succor their world view.
But there is much information that we are not being told and many misconceptions and outright lies peddled, especially about Covid and the 'vaccines'. Here are some of the facts that the mainstream media and our lords and masters would rather you didn't know.
Child death rate
It's difficult to know whether public officials are genuinely stupid or whether they have managed to bury their cognitive dissonance so deep that they forget its existence. In Scotland, in the month of September 2021, 21 babies died. Up until that point, there had only been one child under one year old who had died of (or with) Covid. Now, public health officials are examining what could possibly have caused the spike in baby deaths and the whole approach is based on a working hypothesis that it might be the virus that is to blame. Twenty months after the beginning of the pandemic? When the 'delta variant' is acknowledged to be milder than the original strain? There is no suggestion that anything else could possibly be the cause.(1)
Experience has taught me to be skeptical of figures provided by the authorities, especially any purporting to show percentages of hospital admissions among the 'vaccinated' and the 'unvaccinated'. In this case we are spared the trouble, as the article doesn't deem this information worthy of note. Neither do they, or the health officials, think it worth examining other potential causes, such as the ‘vaccination’ status of the mothers.
Perhaps there are other examples of this phenomenon. Perhaps it is not just limited to Scottish hospitals. Perhaps we can make a general assumption, this being that the 'vaccines' have a similar, if not identical, effect one to another. Perhaps another assumption, which is that first world hospitals generally have a reasonable idea of what they are doing. I know that hospitals have become dangerous places over the past two years, but I don't think that's because they don't know what they're doing.
Between January and July 2021, in Waterloo, Ontario, there were 86 still births. For context; the usual rate is 5 or 6 a year. This is documented fact. Anecdotally, a Vancouver birthing hospital experienced 13 still births in one 24 hour period. And what was the only common factor, other than the fact that the mothers were all women and the babies were all babies? The mothers in Ontario, every single one of them, were 'vaccinated'.(2) What is the betting that the 13 mothers in Vancouver were too?
This should not be a surprise, as it follows logically from a study, conducted in part by the CDC and reported in the New England Medical Journal, that purported to show that the rate of miscarriage among 'vaccinated' mothers-to-be was in line with what would be expected of the unvaccinated, around 12% (104 out of 827). As is now depressingly familiar, upon closer examination, the finding is deliberately and inexcusably misleading.
By their definition, a miscarriage occurs prior to 20 weeks of pregnancy. 700 of the 827 were ‘vaccinated’ in their third trimester, between weeks 27 and 40 and were therefore unable to miscarry, as per the terms of the study. It follows that the true finding was that 104 out of 127 women ‘vaccinated’ prior to 20 weeks lost their baby, a catastrophic rate of 82%.(3) Although I cannot be sure, it seems likely that the still births didn't count in the figures either, if the study even collected that data. All this, without even taking account of witness testimony; a UK undertaker stating that there are so many baby deaths that there isn't sufficient storage space in the child section of the morgue and they are being stored in the adult section as well.(4)
It's not just babies, either. The rate of child myocarditis is through the roof. Within eight weeks of the ‘vaccine’ being rolled out for the 12-15 year olds, there was a nineteen fold increase against the background rate.(5)
No matter. Next, the kids aged 5-11 were up for a jab. The programme started on 7th November – by the 20th, the deaths started. Three 8-10 year olds in Pennsylvania in one day, eight year olds presenting with myocarditis.(6) There will, inevitably, be many more, most of whom will die unremarked.
What about the clinical trials? What about the NNTV? The NNTV is Number Needed To Vaccinate to prevent a single case of Covid. It's a routine calculation in vaccine trials, because it has a bearing on the ratio of risk versus reward. If the number is too high and the side effects too problematic, the vaccine doesn't get approved. That's the idea, anyway. However, the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) has shown itself to be remarkably reticent on this score. The best we can do is take an educated guess:
“Various health economists have calculated a NNTV for COVID-19 vaccines.
Ronald Brown, a health economist in Canada, estimated that the NNTV to prevent a single case of coronavirus is from 88 to 142.
Others have calculated the NNTV to prevent a single case at 256.
German and Dutch researchers, using a large (500k) data set from a field study in Israel calculated an NNTV between 200 and 700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA shot marketed by Pfizer. They went further and figured out that the “NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 100,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate.”(7)
The clinical trials of 5-11 year olds were too small and too short; 2,300 participants, followed up for two months only. The probability of child mortality from Covid is very low, as generally accepted. The NNTV number ought, therefore, to be pretty low, too. For the shot to be worth it, only a small number of children should need to be 'vaccinate' in order to prevent a bad outcome. In fact, not a single child was hospitalised or died in either the treatment group or the placebo group. The NNTV number is, effectively, infinity. Every single child in the United States could be 'vaccinated' and it still wouldn't prevent a single hospitalisation or death.(8)
On top of that, in the 11-15 group, 86% of children in the 'vaccine' group had an adverse reaction after the first shot and 78.9% did after the second shot. 10.9% were sufficiently incapacitated as to be unable to perform daily functions.(9) The problem is, of course, that with the NNTV so high and the significant adverse effects so pervasive, the reward does not come close to matching the risk.(10)
Vaccinated more susceptible
A study conducted by Pfizer themselves, with 36,000 participants, a 'vaccine' group and a placebo control group showed that there was waning immunity over even a short period. The injected group were injected at different times, the later ones having been observed for an average of 5.1 months, prior to injection. This group was the interesting one. The trial counted infection rates for four months without protections and then the first four months, post jab. The infection rate was 1.3% v 4.34%, indicating that a person was more than three times likely to become infected with Covid if they were 'vaccinated'.(11) There is more, not from the trial, but from hospital data:
“The data published by Public Health England actually suggests that the risk of death increases significantly in those who have been fully vaccinated.
536 deaths have occurred among 219,716 confirmed cases in the unvaccinated population since February. This is a case fatality rate of 0.2%. Whereas 1,091 deaths have occurred among 113,823 cases among the fully vaccinated population. This is a case fatality rate of 1%.
This means the Covid-19 injections seem to be increasing the risk of death due to Covid-19 by 400% rather than reducing the risk of death by 95% as claimed by the vaccine manufacturers, Public Health bodies, and the Government.”(12)(13)
And, in the UK at least (and it's a big enough sample size to enable us to draw inferences about other countries which are less transparent with data), between 1st February 2021 and 12th September 2021, of the 'delta variant' cases hospitalized, 57% were vaccinated. Of the deaths, 72%.(14) These rates are far above the mean 'vaccination' rate for that period.
In Germany, all states are showing excess death rates, but the ‘vaccinated’ states all have 10%+ excess deaths, far more than those states with low ‘vaccination’ rates.(15) There are plenty more data showing the same outcomes because, as is logical, the same ‘vaccines’ being injected into a human being in different countries will produce pretty much the same results. It's not a pandemic of the ‘unvaccinated’, nor was that ever likely. And, bear in mind that an 'unvaccinated' person can only get Covid once (yes, that bit of science hasn't changed), whereas there is no hypothetical limit to the number of times a 'vaccinated' person can be re-infected.
The Africa puzzle
Fewer than 6% of Africans are 'vaccinated'. 'Experts' just can't work out why infection rates are so low. There are strenuous efforts ongoing in an effort to understand why; could it be that the African population is younger (average age 20 to Europe's 43), maybe a genetic factor, lower rates of urbanization, a tendency to spend times outdoors enjoying the sunshine or, could it be that for the last twenty years chloroquine has been extensively used to treat malaria?
That would be the same chloroquine that's in hydroxychloroquine, the drug that shall not be named, the one that you can't get your doctor to prescribe even though it has been approved and on the WHO's list of essential medications for decades. The same drug that has now been the subject of over 300 studies and, if administered correctly, reduces hospitalizations and death by over 80%.(16) I wonder.
Being an 'expert' sounds like a lot of fun, with far more poetic licence that I had bargained for. I thought that it had more to do with knowing things than with making them up.
Omicron
While we're in Africa, it would be remiss of me not to deal with the Omicron variant, which I am sure you are going to hear much about. Biden has banned travel from seven African nations, a policy entirely inconsistent with his views on President Trump's travel bans in early 2020:
“Trump further diminished the U.S. in the eyes of the world by expanding his travel ban. This new “African Ban,” is designed to make it harder for black and brown people to immigrate to the United States. It’s a disgrace, and we cannot let him succeed.”(17) Biden, Twitter, Feb 2nd 2020
Neither the WHO nor the South African government are worried by the variant, if indeed it actually exists. There are allegedly a few cases in healthy young men who feel really tired – that's it. It may be easily transmissable, it may not be. It is mild, though; as it should be because, in case a reminder is needed, that's what viruses do, despite the best efforts of governments everywhere to keep the pot boiling.(18)
However, this hasn't stopped the usual suspects from lying through their teeth. The variant is said to contain ten extra mutations on the spike protein. According to Fauci, the 'vaccine' and 'boosters' will contain Omicron. I know we live in a post truth world, but even so....if the 'vaccines' can't contain the 'delta variant', a reasonable supposition given the large numbers of hospitalized 'vaccinated', how are they going to be effective against a strain that is even less like the original Wuhan virus?(19)
Fortunately, New York Governor Kathy Hocul has grasped the potential disaster that would be occasioned by some young men feeling really tired, and declared a state of emergency, responsibly damping down fears by saying “It's coming.”(20)
Prion Disease
Prion diseases are incurable and always fatal. They include dementia, Alzheimer's, Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (CJD) and others which effect the brain and neurological system. A prion itself is a misfolded protein, which has the ability to infect other nearby proteins in ways not fully understood. It was suspected, early on, that the spike protein in the vaccines could cause prion diseases, although these could take years to develop and it would be very difficult to establish causation.
These are thirty year searches; CJD, in particular, is very rare. And the VAERS system is known to be hopelessly under-representative of the true rate of adverse events. And medical practitioners and patients alike are going to find it difficult to make the connections. Nonetheless, there are numerous academic papers showing causation. One more side effect that nobody is talking about.(21)(22)(23)(24)
India
How on earth did that happen? One of the lowest vaccination rates in the world (India at 29%) compared to one of the highest (Israel at over 68%). India is relying upon ivermectin rather than hydroxychloroquine, but the results look encouraging, despite the fact that they are taking the horrendous gamble of utilizing a drug that has won the Nobel Prize, the reckless fools.
Japan
Japan didn't lock down it's economy at any point, preferring to treat the WHO with a sensible degree of skepticism. Interestingly, even though the country is over 70% 'vaccinated', ivermectin has still proved to be a lifesaver. Japan had generally gone along with the recommendations of Big Pharma, with all the usual nonsense including social distancing, masking and contact tracing, but they had escaped crisis levels of disease until they started an aggressive 'vaccination' campaign at the end of May. 'Case' numbers hit an all time high on August 6th and a week later ivermectin was allowed as a treatment. Within two weeks cases were coming down and are now at 1% of the peak number, even while there are apparent surges in other countries all over the world. It would seem that ivermectin not only works on the 'unvaccinated', but also on the 'vaccinated'. Japan has suffered under 16,000 deaths so far. In comparison to its G7 partners, this is 1/14th their average rate per capita. This is yet one more story that the Western media don't want you to now about.(25)
Our World in Data
In closing
This is just a summary of the more obvious counter-narratives. Ordinarily, of course, any one of these incidences – from the data on the harm to children to the obvious efficacy of two well known drugs – would give rise to a flurry of media stories and, one would assume, some sort of responsible reaction from the state or its proxies. As we should know by now, these are not normal times and, far from being unaware of these issues, countries are actively burying the truth, in concert with Big Media. But now you know at least some of what’s going on. Pass it on.
Citations
(2)
(3) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/#r15
(4)
(5) https://rumble.com/vmpvy2--s-s-.html
(6) https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/we-are-killing-our-kids-does-anyone
cdc trials 12-15 notes
(7)
(8) https://openvaers.com/
(10)
(11) https://www.fda.gov/media/152176/download
(16) https://c19hcq.com/
(17)
(21) https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202003.0422/v1
(22) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v1
(23) https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
(24) https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF
(25) https://freewestmedia.com/2021/11/03/japan-sees-huge-drop-in-cases-after-it-switches-to-ivermectin/