“One of my colleagues who is a very close friend has told me they have observed vaccinated individuals they know (primarily patients) seem to be having a significant decline in their health about 6 months after vaccination, although in many cases it’s not possible to determine the exact time they were vaccinated or if this was actually due to the booster (which you get 1 year after vaccination), so while the range could be anywhere from 3 months to 1 year, their guess was 6 months.”(1)
This time-frame is merely one boundary – we are only a year into the 'vaccination' programme, after all. And any examination of the data is unlikely to be picking up other conditions that aren't necessarily associated with the jab and which may take a lot longer to make themselves known; new or reactivated auto-immune diseases and cancers, for one. But the carefully ignored statistics demonstrate (beyond any doubt) that we are in the midst of what could legitimately be labelled a state sponsored genocide of sorts. Deaths of healthy, young individuals are catastrophically higher than the mean and the incidences of diseases such as myocarditis are on a dramatically upward curve.
Given the outrageous lies that have been fed to us thusfar, it is not impossible to envisage a scenario whereby 'vaccine' injuries are blamed on Omicron and the gullible majority believe the lie. It's not as if the dissenters have a mainstream voice, anyway. And yet, there has not yet been a concerted attempt to leverage any more lock-downs out of the 'pandemic'.
While it's not the end, it's fading into the background. It's has served its purpose – emergency measures that trash our rights in ways that have never previously been utilized and which are also legally untenable have, nonetheless, become normalized. Sure, mandates have attracted widespread protests, but what good have they done? And please don't say that it was the convoys and marches that turned the tide and made the totalitarians back off – there is no evidence to support that contention. The mandates were loosened not because governments accepted that they had gone too far in ruling by decree for the best part of two years – the mandates (and, be mindful, by no means all of them everywhere) have been abolished on the grounds that they are no longer needed.
The right to impose them has not been repudiated – far from it. That right could only be denied if there was some sort of public debate (one that was not curated by the legacy media) and that isn't going to happen. It cannot be allowed because an honest appraisal of government action would find them culpable for millions of unnecessary deaths (worldwide) via a variety of means. Banning safe early treatments, protocols that rewarded doctors who made patients sicker and 'vaccines' that kill rather than cure. And, if the state has decided that a debrief isn't going to happen, who or what can make them change their collective minds?
Any mechanism that might be expected to perform the task is under state control, whether directly or indirectly. Judicial systems that are allegedly independent enough to form either a separate branch of government or a brake on state excesses are no longer fit for purpose. Very few media outlets have the chops – even those that are superficially conservative are controlled opposition and the state and its minions are hard at work demonizing anybody else who doesn't toe the line.
It's difficult to see where to turn. Whether openly Progressive or nominally right of centre (such as the Conservative party in the UK), there are very few parties in Western Europe or the Anglosphere who are genuinely liberal or libertarian in character. And if the 'pandemic' has shown us anything, it is that there is a co-ordinating force involved; not just the obvious suspects such as the WHO and the EU. They were largely reduced to posturing and pontificating and it is only now that the heat has gone out of things that they are being fully utilized again. There is, instead, some behind-the-scenes entity at work; the uniformity of tactics across nations and even continents has been notable.
When government has passed the baton to big business, which they have done latterly in order to circumvent legal and constitutional barriers, it has been enthusiastically carried onwards. Between the state, big business and Big Media, all bases are covered. The political class has proven to be homogenized and party opposition to the status quo only exists as to tactics, not strategy. Victories for common sense and the common man are few and far between. Don't expect this to organically change, because it won't. The administrative state, the permanent government of experts and bureaucrats, doesn't really care who is in power, as long as they don't try to actively govern. In their view, that sort of thing is best left to those who are most equipped, which definitely isn't elected officials. Consequently, dissent finds no echo in the corridors of power.
It also seems very unlikely that we, the people, can effect the large scale change required; at least, not through openly political means. The truckers are either victimized (Canada) or ignored (everywhere else), marches go unreported and nobody with any clout cares, because the criteria for gaining influence specifically precludes caring about what the public wants and is focused on maintaining the hegemony of the elites. These globalists have their hands on all the levers of power and there is no prospect of that changing anytime soon.
So, even if the 'pandemic' is allowed to retreat into the background, it won't disappear completely. There will always be the possibility of a new variant, another stick with which to beat us. But the next part of the softening up process is going to involve food, fuel and money. Due to policies deliberately aimed at reducing access to gas and oil (disguised as ideological excesses), power stations have been decommissioned or simply not built and reliance has been placed on problematic suppliers. The typical right wing commentator will blame these failures on incompetence. This is not so; it's deliberate. Any idiot can see that long term policies explicitly designed to reduce fossil fuel usage to zero cannot do anything other than lead to an overall reduction in energy use. This will, in turn, inevitably lead to a regression of living standards in societies.
There is no reliable alternative energy source (other than nuclear, also foresworn) and there will be no serious attempt to find one, because providing enough 'clean energy' to maintain or enhance our standard of living is not part of the game plan – not that they are going to tell anybody that. If it were, then we would all be building nuclear power stations, like France, rather than closing them down, like Germany. So, given a lack of alternatives, the power to open or close the tap is in the hands of a small number of countries. And if Western energy companies are starved of finance (which they will be, via the implementation of stakeholder capitalism and ESG), then there won't even be a product available. It'll still be in the ground. It's that simple.
You may have noticed this scarcity tactic already being implemented. Currently, shortages of certain products are causing higher prices. As well as gas and oil, there is a lack of computer chips from the Far East (due to mysterious factory fires, a problem that has also plagued the production of hydroxychloroquine) and a dearth of foodstuffs. Soon, there will be serious shortages, exacerbated by sanctions imposed on Russia that will hurt the West more than them. Political analysts step back in amazement – how stupid can governments be, eh? Not that stupid. The idea is to encourage discord and fracture societies and nothing will do that more efficiently than a lack of fuel and/or food.
Soon, these problems will be impossible to ignore. A lot of this will be down to the higher price of fuel (which is the major component in the manufacturing cost of fertilizer), but war in Ukraine will not have helped, due to the importance of their grain exports – and that of neighboring countries such as Hungary, who are drawing in their horns in anticipation of a crisis. So there will be a double whammy – a shortage of materials needed to grow our own wheat, plus a war at the start of the growing season which involves the world's largest exporter of same. But never fear – it's all the fault of the Russians and our leaders (having provoked the crisis) will provide us with the solutions.
Because what generally happens in times of dire shortages? Hoarding, followed by rationing. How best to manage rationing? It used to be ration cards, but in this Brave New World (on the verge of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, don't forget) the answer will be technological. How about something digital, which already exists in some form? Perhaps a QR code on a cellphone? It'll have to be programmable, obviously, to ensure that nobody gets too much of anything. And it might work better with a digital currency. What better way to ensure the individual bows to the collective? You thought that the Covidian cultists were bad – wait until it's all about food instead of 'vaccines' and imagine how much worse that will be.
This will be the next phase of the plan. The measures imposed upon us for two years have caused us to grow accustomed to a curtailment of our rights and there are enough people who fail to understand where this is heading to make further abuses (like the aforementioned rationing) viable. And, ultimately, if the products aren't available, what else can be done? Gaining support for protests against rationing will be a tough sell and those people sufficiently knowledgeable about how to reverse the effect will not be allowed a voice; it'll be a repeat of the pattern we have seen with Covid. They will be the equivalent of the 'anti-vaxxers'. There won't be any time for reflection or analysis.
But Covid may yet make another guest appearance come winter time. It may be necessary to lock us down again – in the US because of the mid-term elections, which the Democrats cannot win without a mammoth ballot harvesting effort combined with algorithmic trickery, all of which will be much more easily accomplished if the voters stay home. Real voters, turning up in person, tend to act as a brake on the amount of achievable fraud.
This year is shaping up to be an utter disaster – financial markets on the brink of collapse, raging inflation, shortages of essentials, unnecessary wars with power to add from bad actors emboldened by Biden's weakness (China, North Korea and Iran) and a public health crisis that is already upon us, even if it is yet to be officially acknowledged.
None of this had to happen – it is all by design. But the vast majority of conservative thinkers are locked into the narrative that holds fast to the notion that governments are useless. They'd like you to ignore the obvious dissonance, the far more likely explanation, which is that random stupidity doesn't result in a stream of outcomes that all lead in the same direction. Anybody with half a brain will realize that we’ve been here before, recently. The Covid lab leak theory was about as far as any conservative was willing to go. Nobody wanted to articulate the possibility that, if it came from a lab, it might have been deliberate. And it's the same in this instance. Critics would rather ply you with the narrative that the state is moronic, rather than the belief that the state is doing exactly what the plan requires it to do.
The world can provide more than enough food and fuel, so the fact that it currently isn't (when it pretty much always has) is not happenstance. The failure to stand up to the Covid tyranny until it was politically acceptable to do so – it took 'vaccine' mandates to mobilize opposition, a year in – has given the would-be tyrants the green light. They have nothing to fear from us because they control everything of importance; a fact that they are in the process of demonstrating.
So, if necessary, 'vaccine' deaths will continue to be re-branded as Covid deaths and the rank impossibility of the mildest variant yet (the one that has been acknowledged as close to harmless), killing healthy adults in large numbers will not get called out. Populations, 70% of whom are 'vaccinated' (whether previously infected or not) will continue to suffer excess deaths, which fact will continue to be ignored. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better and the mechanism by which that latter circumstance can occur is yet to be identified. On that cheery note, à bientôt.
Citations
(1)