Lesson One in the Propagandists’ Playbook states that if you repeat a lie often enough, most people will end up believing it – it might even be possible to convince yourself. However, problems may still arise due to the sheer quantity of lies that can be required to maintain a narrative – this is especially so when they are not confined to one specific topic. This is the position in which we find ourselves. Regimes' desire to impose upon us a new normal that we accept, however unenthusiastically, requires them to gaslight us about clinical trials, lock-downs, masks and several other elements of what we are still referring to as the 'pandemic'.
Some are measures that, whilst currently in abeyance, have yet to be publicly repudiated; this allows them to remain in the toolbox for future deployment. There are also truths about Covid's origins and, lastly, there are homicidal current practices that absolutely must not be acknowledged. Much of the information that follows is readily available to those that are prepared to spend time looking and many have done just that. However, the various distractions that the elites have recently conjured up have dispersed attention.
It does seem that the media, despite its one-eyed approach to its craft, is prepared to accept a two-tier system of compliance; they rail against misinformationists, on the one hand, while absorbing participation numbers which show that even those who wee favorably disposed to them are switching off. As long as the vast majority aren't making a fuss, the media doesn't seem to care. The Big Lie doesn't insist that everybody is a deluded zealot, but it does require obedience and the illusion of fealty.
I don't propose to give chapter and verse on what was already known prior to the turn of the year. The purpose of this series of essays is to show how many seemingly disparate events and actions are actually connected. Those topics are covered in other articles, but I felt that it was also important to briefly deviate from the crises that regimes want us to focus on and set down what evidence has recently come to light in relation to the Covid saga.
Altering DNA
Yes, the Pfizer 'vaccine' can alter your DNA, which means that the Moderna one can too, as they both employ the same methods. This is a process known as reverse transcription, which is the opposite of what should normally happen. Ordinarily, the cell nucleus (which is where the DNA is) produces messenger RNA, which then travels to whichever part of the body it has been programmed to go and is used to grow cells. That is known as transcription.
In yet one more example of 'settled science' being bunkum, while it was previously held that the reverse – RNA entering the cell nucleus and re-coding DNA – couldn't happen, it now transpires that it can and, in fact, that the possibility existed all along, as that is the mechanism that AIDS employs; the RNA persuades the cell nucleus to make copies of itself.(1) So, Big Pharma has managed to hack human DNA. The exact mechanism involves a disruption to what are known as line one proteins which, wouldn't you know, causes females to miscarry and is also a precursor to several types of cancer.(2)
Ostensibly, the reason that this was not within the knowledge of Big Pharma or regulators prior to authorization is due to the fact that none of the required genotoxicity or carcinogenicity tests were done. Nonetheless, this information was made publicly available on 2nd November 2021 and yet, still, no action has been taken.(3) This is very far from being the only problem with the clinical trials.
Tampering with data
The mRNA used in the 'vaccine' tested in the Pfizer clinical trials was supposed to conform to certain agreed standards. One of these conditions was to mandate that the integrity of the spike protein was to be a consistent 72%. However, Pfizer couldn't stabilize it at that level when it came to commercial production, which seems odd. If they'd managed it once, one would assume that they could repeat the performance, but perhaps their were issues with quality control at various plants. In any event, they subsequently received permission from all the regulatory authorities in the West to drop the level to 50%. Even then, there was considerable variety – between 81.3% and 55.7%.(4)
We are left with a situation where the dose administered (and allegedly monitored) in the trials isn't then used when that same 'vaccine' is authorised. Even if we were to assume that the 'vaccine' worked as advertised, how would the authorities know whether 81% was toxic and/or 55% was ineffective? They can only collect data on it performance at 72%. Further, if I were at the FDA, for instance, I'd also want to find out why the mRNA was so unstable and what the possible effects of that might be. But, no. The clear and present danger of a disease that was by then known to have a case fatality rate of 0.4% - and that without any attempt at early treatment, but with a concerted effort to detain as many patients as possible in hospital emergency rooms – overwhelmed any and all concerns.
The trials themselves also have the appearance of a hastily put together exercise, with more than a hint of fraud about them. One trial site, in Argentina (site 1231) recruited 4,501 participants in just three weeks, without any outside assistance. For context, each trialee recruited required the completion of 250 pages of paperwork. Further, the academic running this trial was also a consultant for the FDA,(5) an author of the subsequent safety paper,(6) an investigator for a business funded by that man Gates and a part time professor.(7) He would seem to have had his hands full already and to be laboring under several conflicts of interest. There were also big problems at trial sites in Texas:
“[F]or researchers who were testing Pfizer's vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety ... Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding."(8)
It further transpires that Pfizer (and, by extension, the regulatory authorities) were also ignoring evidence that did not comport with the desired outcome, which was clearly emergency use authorization for the 'vaccine'. The ongoing Pfizer document dump, a monthly event until August of this year, has revealed that the drug company knew that their panacea was unsafe.(9)(10)
Document 5.3.6, labelled Postmarking Experience, reveals that, by February 28th 2021, Pfizer alone had received 42,806 reports of adverse events, with 1,223 mortalities among them. Although there may be some duplication with VAERS, not all such reports will be copies and Moderna, AstraZeneca and J&J will also have been in receipt of similar reports. And this is after authorization had been given. How could the trials have failed to pick up the danger signals? After all, Pfizer managed to list 150,000 possible adverse events that would be of interest, should they occur,(11) but they couldn't find evidence of harm in their trials?
Other problems were also revealed. There was missing trial data concerning serious adverse events and the convenient lack of an adequate bar-code trail that would match samples to participants, thus muddying the waters further. In addition, the teams responsible for investigating adverse events occurring during the trials dismissed some reports, even though the the symptoms described were listed as possible side effects of the 'vaccines'. There were other anomalies, with adverse events being incorrectly categorized as 'not serious' when they had involved a stay in hospital. Brand new disease problems in previously healthy people, such as impaired kidney function requiring inpatient treatment, were viewed as unrelated. You get the picture. It's important to remember that, when all the 'incompetence' serves the same purpose (in this case, under-reporting evidence that might compromise 'vaccine' authorization), it's actually an intentional course of conduct instead.
CDC deleting data
The US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) is also at it, as are the Europeans and the Brits. The vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) is supposed to be an early warning system. It operates by a self reporting mechanism; both doctors and patients are able to report adverse events. It's not supposed to be tampered with and the data has never previously been curated or altered.
However, at least 10,000 reports of deaths and serious injuries related to the Covid 'vaccines' have been deleted from VAERS. Around 5% of all reports of mortality have been erased. These are not duplicates. There is no valid reason why this has happened. This is clearly not something that can be done by anybody that lacks administrator status, which means it must be someone at the CDC. Reports are also being misclassified – 65% of them are being referred to as less serious events, but these include heart attacks, strokes and embolisms.(12) Additionally, registration of a report is proving problematic; at least some of them are being slow walked, leading to delays of 12-18 months.(13) Not much chance of an early warning if reports can't even be filed.
The inattention paid to VAERS has had another knock-on effect. Even though myocarditis was eventually listed as a possible side effect (due to its prevalence), there are over 200 other side effects that are more frequently encountered but which remain unlisted. These are symptoms that are elevated by a factor of ten or more over baseline levels. It is not possible for any person to give proper informed consent to the 'vaccine' if this information is not provided.(14) These are not minor afflictions, either; topping the list are neurological diseases, cardiovascular conditions and problems with the female reproductive system.(15)
Pfizer lied about the risks that the shots posed to pregnancy and to the possibility of fetal abnormalities. They had the true data from the animal trials, even though these were insufficient in size. There were abnormalities recorded and problems with implanting fertilized ova – the success rate was around 50% of what it should have been. As a direct result of what is criminal negligence (not that any entity will be sufficiently motivated to investigate it and seize the receipts), VAERS is showing 4,113 fetal deaths associated with the Covid 'vaccines'. For reference, in the preceding 30 years (for all vaccines), the figure was 2,239.(16) But the 'vaccines' are still in circulation and official advice remains the same; that they are safe for pregnant women.
Lock-downs don't work
Not that many people still think that they do. Since they were implemented, there has been a substantial increase in drug overdoses, alcoholism and general depression. Further, lock-downs necessarily mean that treatments for existing conditions are curtailed, sometimes with disastrous consequences, and diagnoses of new conditions aren't made. Plus, of course, there is economic devastation that underlies all of the above.
There is a well established formula for calculating the effect of unemployment, in particular, on mortality. Such a study was undertaken, which drew
“upon existing economic studies on the health effects of unemployment to calculate an estimate of how many years of life will have been lost due to the lockdowns in the United States, and have weighed this against an estimate of how many years of life will have been saved by the lockdowns.”(17)
The following chart shows the result. It compares Sweden (which didn't lock-down) and the UK (which did). The red boxes are indicative of the years of live lost; Sweden's are hypothetical, the UK's are not.
Figure 1 Years saved (blue) versus years lost (red)
By mid 2020, when the 'pandemic' should have been over, Sweden's Case Fatality Rate was 56.6 per 100,000 people. The US number was 50, the UK's 70.(18) Sweden, whilst doing the right thing by remaining almost completely unrestricted, fell into the same trap as everybody else with nursing home deaths, which make up a near majority of their mortalities. However, by avoiding the collateral damage that the rest of the West mandated, they demonstrated that lock-downs do far more damage than good. And it's not as if the primary aim, curbing the spread of the disease is actually accomplished either. Even if lock-downs prove to be briefly effective, prolonged incarceration among the citizenry only succeeds in kicking the can down the road. The virus is still going to land eventually, as New Zealand and Australia re discovering at present.
Figure 2 Antipodean Covid resurgence
China's initial response, locking down aggressively and early, was held to be the gold standard by the alleged experts in the West. The Chinese themselves made zero Covid their stated aim and believed that they had succeeded in that task. They hadn't, so they are now locking down the entire country in a further attempt to hold back the tide. This is clearly folly. Lock-downs merely delay the inevitable and, when combined with a leaky 'vaccine', offer a far inferior package herd immunity does. Even Gates and the WHO are now attempting to backtrack, suggesting that perhaps locking everybody down wasn't the brilliant idea they'd thought it was, but this doesn't mean that we have seen the last of this tactic.(19)
Lock-downs were never truly about disease prevention, anyway. They were about enforcing compliance and thereby exercising control. This is a measure that the regimes will be in further need of but I suspect it will meet resistance if a further imposition is proposed. They may have to get us to stay cooped up by means of another mechanism.
Masks don't work either
We are, I'm sure, all aware of the problem with plastics, which is the one environmental hazard that we should be concentrating on rather than emoting about a globe that hasn't warmed for twenty years,(20) but politicians and activists (whilst not exactly ignoring the issue), still appear to lack the desire to actually do anything constructive about the prevention of micro-plastic pollution. As micro-plastics found in the environment can cause cell damage and death, this is clearly not favorite.
Chemicals found in plastic products act as endocrine disruptors,(21) which interfere with the the function of natural sex hormones (22) and micro-plastics are seemingly everywhere. A 2021 study found that, of 20 cadavers examined, 13 had micro-plastics in the lungs.(23) Other studies have found at least 12 types of micro-plastics to which we are vulnerable; curiously, men are considerably more likely to be afflicted.(24) Most of the plastics were found in the lower art of the lung, which finding brings us to the problem with masks.(25) Not that they are actually masks as they don't fit the legal definition of same – they are better classified as 'breathing barriers'. We can be clear about one thing, though - they are shedding micro-plastics small enough to be inhaled.(26)
“A proper mask has engineered breathing openings in front of mouth and nose to ensure easy and effortless breathing. A breathing barrier is closed over both mouth and nose. And by doing that, it captures carbon dioxide that you exhale, forces you to re-inhale it, causing a reduction in your inhaled oxygen levels and causes excessive carbon dioxide. So, they’re no safe to wear.”(27)
Micro-plastics aren't the only problem, either. Mandatory masking has been found to increase the Covid mortality rate by 52-85%.(28) This is not particularly confounding when you consider that re-inhaling viral droplets that have been previously deposited on the mask can never be a good thing. It is highly probable that these plastics also find their way into other organs, too, as they have been located in the bloodstream and in a new-born's feces,(29) in high concentrations.
It's striking that the experimental gene therapies masquerading as 'vaccines' and lock-downs and masks all contribute towards death and destruction, when the stated purpose of all three is the amelioration of disease. How could that be? I believe we can rule one possible explanation out; incompetence is an insufficiently compelling explanation for this state of affairs. Nonetheless, all of these measures were (and presumably still are) beloved of the cabal, regardless of the empirical evidence, and I'm sure that they will want to redeploy some or all of them at some point in the not too distant future. To that end, any public discussion of the utter futility of doing so is not to be given the time of day.
Omicron Origins
The debate about the origin of the Wuhan virus is unlikely to have totally passed you by and, as no natural source has been identified and the structure of the SARS COV 2 genome is clearly manipulated, that particular topic has also slipped off the radar of the mainstream media, as the narrative does not do well when subjected to detailed inquiry. Less has been said about Omicron – the general consensus seems to be that, whatever your beliefs are as to the veracity of the 'natural' explanation for the original virus, Omicron is verifiably a later variant of it. Not so fast.
There are some virtually insurmountable oddities about Omicron that indicate that yet another gain of function programme has gone rogue. For starters, SARS COV 2 cannot infect wild type mice – Omicron can. That being the case, for Omicron to be a direct descendant of Wuhan, an unfeasible amount of evolution would have to have occurred in an impossibly short time period. Furthermore, natural mutations in viruses always occur randomly; most have no real effect. These types of mutations are known as synonymous. It's the non-synonymous ones that we are interested in, the ones that prove to be impactful, and there is a consistent proportion of one to the other in cases of natural evolution. Not so with Omicron; almost all the mutations are impactful.(30) This outcome is one arrived at via manipulation. There are also no intermediate versions of it, no discernible lineage. It seems to have landed fully formed, with no recent ancestors.(31)
All of this points to the overwhelming probability that Omicron is another manufactured virus, not a variant of the Wuhan strain. But how could this have been accomplished and who could be responsible? And what would be the purpose of releasing a variant that also infects animals? Well, it probably won't surprise you to learn that, far from being chastened by the hue and cry over gain of function research and its probable role in the 'pandemic', scientists have been further manipulating Covid itself to make it capable of infecting mice as well. They aren't hiding it – Ralph Baric, from North Carolina and others published a scientific paper in Nature magazine, detailing the method by which they accomplished it.(32)
It's difficult to credit the arrogance. Baric's project is, in microcosm, the perfect example of how gain of function has gone far beyond any justifiable remit. Why would it be necessary (or even useful) to adapt a virus so that it infects mice, in order that a counter-measure might be created, when the chances of such an event happening in nature are extremely slim to none and many years away, in any event? It is far from certain that, even if man had the same close interaction with mice and he does with cats and dogs, any mutations would ever cause the disease to jump from one species to the other and yet we find scientists pursuing this line of research anyway. Surely, there must be more pressing matters to attend to.
But no, apparently not, despite the fact that there is no moral justification for carrying out risky research for no discernible benefit. Baric did it anyway and then patented the methodology.(33) So, the timeline is a) paper published in August 2020, b) Omicron discovered November/December 2020 and c), patent filed February 2021. Baric's virus is also engineered to be particularly pathogenic to aged mice.
To be clear, this virus (SARS COV 2MA) and Omicron are not identical, but both are mouse adapted and computer designed.(34) The timing is also persuasive. Could it be that Baric also designed Omicron, using the same methods? It's not possible to be definitive, but it would be a hell of a coincidence if he or his colleagues didn't. And the purpose? Well, one outcome, whether by design or otherwise, has already landed as authorities are making much of their belief that wild deer are also capable of being infected with Covid. Wouldn't it be convenient if there was a consensus that gave the cabal the opportunity to further target meat consumption, a task which they are already engaged with?
More fake numbers
It turns out that regimes can public all sorts of data that serves to undermine every position they've taken on the 'pandemic' and rely on the media to look the other way. For instance, while the UK government has been claiming that Covid has caused over 170,000 deaths (up to late April), their own National Health Service was publishing numbers that showed that, by that point, only 5,115 people had actually of Covid itself.(35) Everybody else had allegedly died with Covid, although even that cannot be said to be a certainty, given the inadequacy of the testing protocols. What's more, only 1,854 of them died before the first 'vaccines' were rolled out; the rest had died since. So much for 'safe and effective'.
There are problems with other numbers too. While the propagandists in the UK government have been proclaiming that only a small minority of the eligible population have resisted indoctrination and remained unjabbed, it now transpires that the number is nearly 19 million. So, not a small minority at all. Proportionately, the Americans have been a little more compliant, but there are still 74 million refuseniks across the pond.(36) There are a lot more of us than we think which, again, is something that the cabal doesn't want us to know. Strength in numbers and all that.
Nanotech
The idea that the 'vaccines' contain some sort of nanotech has always been a conspiracy theory too far for most people. Graphene oxide and mac addresses seem too far fetched, even though the technology is known to exist and, in addition, the globalists have a thing about AI and the Internet of Bodies. And it's not like they wouldn't have us over, is it? But this theory has never gained traction in the way others have.
Information on the actual content of the shots is difficult to verify, inasmuch as the sources that provide this intelligence are few and far between (and have been relentlessly attacked by the usual array of partisan 'fact-checkers') and because the phials themselves are jealously guarded by the medical establishment. Having said that, reports that purport to show nanotech in the blood of the 'vaccinated' have still been circulating for the best part of a year.(37)
Additionally, research has found that red blood cells in 'vaccinated' blood have acquired a positive (rather than a negative) electrical charge, which then permits them to stack in what is known as a rouleaux formation. This stacking, or clotting, is also seen in blood cancers.(38) These blood samples come from several different countries, including the UK and the Netherlands. American doctors have further confirmed the presence of graphene in the 'vaccines'.(39) The broader the research base, the more compelling the findings become.
Further research in Canada, on sealed Pfizer and Moderna samples, which have remained un-refrigerated for up to two months prior to examination, produced confounding conclusions - there was a complete absence of mRNA in the samples. Indeed, of the four elements necessary for biological life – nitrogen, carbon, oxygen and phosphorous – only two were present. There was no nitrogen and no phosphorous, so there had never been any mRNA. Instead, there were shapes colloquially referred to as nano-octopi, composed of aluminium, bromine and carbon. A rare element called thulium was also detected. Thulium is used as a radiation source in portable X-ray machines.(40)
Much is still unknown and, if all is not as it should be, there is a powerful motivation to keep the truth hidden. I've no reason to doubt the findings of these different studies. All the scientists involved in them are on a hiding to nothing, professionally. But we don't even know some of the basics, such as whether these structures are present in all the phials, or just some. We don't know the purpose behind introducing these structures into human bloodstreams. I am going to speculate (not wildly, but not mildly either) that there is a nanotech element to most, if not all of these 'vaccines' and that the purpose of it is to provide biometric data to some other source.
There is one part of the theory that anybody can check. It's the work of a moment to download a low energy Bluetooth scanner onto a cell phone. Then you'll have the opportunity to while away the hours trying to understand why, whenever you're in a crowded environment, there are scores of unidentified mac addresses being scanned by your 'phone. I've done it and that is the consistent outcome. It's mystifying. After all, most people do not routinely activate their own Bluetooth and those devices that are emitting a signal are often identifiable by name. These mac addresses aren't like that, but there is no doubt that they exist, so devices must be giving off signals. The question is, therefore, where are they all?
It may be that I come back to this subject in the detail that it might then deserve. I'm aware that a perfunctory approach to what could be a huge revelation would not do the subject justice. If graphene has genuinely been found in the 'vaccines', then that is a big deal. It cannot have got there by accident and if red blood cells have had their polarity altered, there is further evidence of foul play.
Conclusion
I get the feeling that the cabal thought that the 'pandemic' was a home run; certainly for all of 2020 and much of 2021. They were hoping that Plan A was all that they were going to need. I don't know whether there was dissension in the ranks or whether Boris wanted to be first amongst equals again (as he had been with the 'vaccine' roll-out), but somebody somewhere came to the realization that they hadn't managed to achieve critical mass and that too much credibility would be lost if the regimes pressed on with boosters and 'vaccine' passports in the face of mounting evidence demonstrating that this course of action would be hopelessly ineffectual.
However, this does present the elites with a considerable problem. To get where they need to get – the destination set out in UN agendas, numerous speeches, books and conferences (including the current WEF knees-up in Davos) – there needs to be a foment of fear and despair, which only they can resolve with a new normal. Another 'pandemic', within three months of Covid's alleged subsidence would probably be asking too much of even the most ardent alarmists; not to say that one won't be along soon enough. Plus, of course, there is the increasingly hard to ignore Covid resurgence that is gathering pace despite widespread jab compliance. And the explosion in auto-immune diseases, heart problems, strokes and cancers. Extraordinary risks demand extraordinary measures. Hence, the series of engineered crises in rapid succession.
But, as I've noted previously, I believe that they are committed to their trajectory. They've invested too much effort in the Covid narrative and they've succeeded in exciting a level of compliance that has, reportedly, surprised even them. There is no logical reason for them to back off now and, in any event, any period of calm will likely result, on behalf of the people, in a tendency to reflect on recent events. This is not an outcome the cabal would welcome and, to that end, they will continue to keep us off balance, querulous and myopic. They also need to keep their true purpose hidden.
To that end, they will continue to lie to us. They will keep the Covid pot bubbling away on the back-burner, dropping the odd hint about a coming resurgence of the disease,(41) or insisting that mask mandates still stalk the hemisphere.(42) They will also continue to distract us with inflation, food shortages and war. However, the current post-pandemic era still feels like a temporary reprieve, partly because it is clear that the cabal are still actively undermining the West and also because it is inevitable that more of the truth about Covid and the 'vaccines' will be incrementally revealed. Regimes must realize this. There are clues, after all. Nobody is lining up for booster shots any more.
So the elites are going to have to act soon. Perhaps, this time, it'll be a combination of factors that may still include a 'pandemic' of sorts. If that is the plan, they will want to have us masked and separated once more. Just remember; none of the measures that they will seek to introduce will work as advertised, nor are they meant to.
Citations
(1) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
(2) https://expose-news.com/2022/01/17/australia-avn-pursues-federal-court-case/
(4) https://expose-news.com/2022/04/02/covid-vaccines-not-the-same-as-those-trialled/
(5) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
(6) https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1523617233255436289.html
(7)
https://www.infant.org.ar/
(8) https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
(9)
https://www.icandecide.org/
(10) https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
(11) Ditto
(13) https://covexit.com/a-dive-into-the-vaers-reporting-system-with-albert-benavides/
(14)
(15) Ditto
(16) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/05/pfizer-hid-dangers-covid-vaccination-pregnancy/
(17) https://www.revolver.news/2020/08/study-covid-19-lockdowns-deadlier-than-pandemic-itself/
(18) https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
(19)https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/new-rift-between-who-and-china
(21) https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2020/plastics-pose-threat-to-human-health
(22) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-24505-w
(23) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389421010888?via%3Dihub
(27) Ditto
(29) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022001258?via%3Dihub
(30) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.14.472632v1.full.pdf
(32) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2708-8?error=cookies_not_supported&code=ccdc1f30-dd1f-4e90-bccb-19a475a9b6b0
(33) https://patents.justia.com/patent/11225508
(36) https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/05/04/74million-unvaccinated-231million-not-boosted-usa/
(40) https://expose-news.com/2022/05/27/carbon-nanotech-and-thulium-in-covid-injections/
Figure 1 https://www.revolver.news/2020/08/study-covid-19-lockdowns-deadlier-than-pandemic-itself/
Figure 2
https://ourworldindata.com
a quote from Ourfiniteworld.com:
Gail Tverberg says:
May 29, 2022 at 2:41 pm
Collapse seems to happen in steps. We are already in the midst of collapse. The clearly downhill path started in 2019, and 2020 (with COVID) pushed the world economy further.
Different parts of the world, and different people within different parts of the world, experience collapse differently. The rising conflict among political parties is part of collapse. Rising conflict actually started before Donald Trump was elected in 2016.
We are basically dealing with “not enough to go around.” Some have described the situation as “catabolic collapse.” How it looks precisely keeps changing. Government organizations that seemed to be trustworthy before, stop being trustworthy. Wars start. The level of world hunger rises. Death rates rise. The number of broken supply lines and empty shelves keeps increasing.
Like an avalanche, collapse happens slowly at first, and then (perhaps), all at once. We are likely to miss the starting parts of collapse, if we don’t look for them.