Perhaps it's due to my gradual accumulation of knowledge. Perhaps the media itself is still regressing. Either way, I am finding that my approach to daily research is becoming increasingly intemperate due to the realisation that almost all of what constitutes the news is BS – it's simply the depth that varies. I'm not just referring to what Literally Hitler long ago christened the 'fake news', the cascade of lifeless phrases and moribund storylines that Establishment hacks inflict upon us daily; it's a descriptor that can be equally well applied to most of the house trained so-called conservative media who, almost without exception, offer analyses and sage words of advice while refusing to acknowledge truths that they must be aware of which, if recognized, would completely undermine what it is they have to say. Almost uniformly, they lack the guts to douse Big Lies in sunshine. Truth is not in vogue. Instead, the lies are magnified by bot farms like these, operating at the behest of the narrative engineers, and the truth is swamped.
Figure 1
Figure 2
“...a single (fake) account can post 350+ times PER DAY, just on Twitter. This isn’t factoring in Facebook or other platforms they are also utilizing....That means a room full of phones...…can easily crank out 360,000 comments PER DAY. That’s over 130 MILLION per year.”(1) emphasis in original
This psyop magnifies 'conservative' narratives, as long as they serve to hide the truth. At times, when a disaster is impossible to ignore, a limited hangout is the best option, one that can be fed and steered at will. The lab-leak farrago is a shining example of the latter, as the Right can wrap itself in the warm blanket of the Incompetence Defence and ignore the possibility that Covid was leaked deliberately. Which would also entirely miss the point, as a viral pandemic does not emerge in different corner of the world simultaneously, nor does it respect state and national borders. This particular limited hangout is still providing sterling service, as nobody with a mainstream voice – not even prominent dissidents in the Resistance, with only one or two exceptions – has been willing to confront what are obvious anomalies.
This well-worn defence is currently enjoying yet another airing, with milquetoast Republicans dutifully filling their boots with the ever-popular 'progressives can't organise anything' trope, whilst overlooking the fact that Leftists also steal elections and are, by definition, pretty damned organised. But the 'conservative' media are of one voice; anything to avoid broaching the subject of intent. I refer to the LA fires, which have been burning since January 9th. The Right is full of righteous indignation, with Governor Newsom and the Mayor of LA, an alleged DIE hire, both the subject of much ridicule - most of which is fully deserved – but the pile-on isn't intended to illuminate; it's intended to give the clapping seals from one wing of the Uniparty the opportunity to do their bit in guiding the public away from the light.
Perhaps the best way to approach the subject is to deal first in irrefutable facts about these fires (and the similarities they share with others), then to detail some more established truths, then float a hypothesis or two and then indulge in a spot of informed conjecture combined with speculation. The one thing we can be absolutely sure of is that the same people who bring us 'climate change' and a 'pandemic' shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt about anything.
Forget 'trust, but verify'. Is it probable that governments are less than trustworthy? Do creatures of an ursine persuasion deposit faecal matter in large, densely wooded areas? I'm told that the consensus is that they do. The Establishment lies, endlessly. Government works by breaking your legs, then selling you a wheelchair. Then it taxes the wheelchair. Then regulates the use of the wheelchair and, finally, assures you that without government, you wouldn't be getting around so well. A similar dynamic is at play here, where both the problem and the solution are authored by the same entities. But it's not wheelchairs that the string-pullers are trying to sell us – it's climate change and the whole panoply of restrictions that they want to inflict upon all of us in the West.
The problem is that they are having to make stuff up – on a vast scale – and, inevitably, they are leaving traces. Not the odd loose thread here and there; instead, a slew of impossibilities that defy physics, which cannot be reconciled and must either be ignored entirely or defended with the usual mix of ad hominem attacks and a confection of tinfoil hat theories which can be promoted in a way that detracts from any credible counterpoint to the official narrative.
I'll start with glass, aluminium, plastic and trees. These photos are from the Palisades Fire in LA.
Figure 3
Figure 4
This one is from Lahaina, August 2023.
Figure 5
This is from the Camp Fire, Paradise City CA in 2018.
Figure 6
The Almeda Fire, Phoenix, Oregon in 2020.
Figure 7
Here's one from a 'wildfire' in New Mexico, in May 2022.
Figure 8
And here we have one from the Tubbs Fire in Santa Rosa in October 2017.
Figure 9
By way of variety, this one is from Chile in February 2024.
Figure 10
And this is from Australia, in January 2020.
Figure 11
In every instance, the aluminium and glass have melted. Aluminium starts melting at around 1200°F and wildfires can burn as hot as just over 1400°F (without the aid of an accelerant), so we are technically within the realms of possibility. Glass, on the other hand, doesn't melt until temperatures are in excess of 2000°F.(2) With a fire that hot, trees burn. Except the trees are largely intact when the sap should combust at only 300°F. A forensic arborist with fifty years experience of outdoor pursuits became interested in the fires – of which there are many more than we probably register – and, over the past seven years, has made a site visit to 46 separate fires. In all but three of them, the fire patterns are unnatural. He has seen “800 vehicles in seven years and, without exception, every window is gone and every aluminium or alloy rim is melted out”.(3) The only cords that don't burn are the polyester ones, but the metal ones burn the entire tyre.
In addition, plastic bins, playgrounds and above-ground swimming pools all survive, trampolines have no holes in them from flying embers, yet houses are gone. Trees burn from the inside out and those with the most water content burn first, yet leaves frequently don't burn at all. The quantity of heart wood, dead wood in the middle of the trunk, is present in far larger quantities than it should be. And wooden fence posts only burn around the metal nails.
Figure 12
These phenomena are not explicable if we cleave to the narrative. Cars do not burn at the necessary temperatures when assailed by a genuine wildfire. Trees do not survive when in close proximity to such intense heat. Plastic melts. The laws of physics would need to be retooled if we are to accept the Establishment's mantra. Which is to say nothing of the effect these 'wildfires' had on houses, nor the selective manner in which these fires operated in residential neighbourhoods. Nor, in many cases, is it possible to identify how a fire actually torched a settlement without making its way there first.
Figure 13
Figure 14
All these 'wildfires' cause the same flavour of damage. Respectively, Santa Rosa, Almeda, Los Angeles (Pacific Palisades fire), Lahaina, Chile and Camp Fire, Paradise City.
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Notwithstanding the smoke in the air in LA, my first observation is that these scenes don't look much like the aftermath of an out-of-control wildfire. This image from the 2012 Waldo Canyon, Colorado Springs fire probably shows that best.
Figure 21
Everything in these houses has been reduced to dust; that includes granite work-surfaces, roof tiles and porcelain toilets, the latter typically melting at a minimum temperature of 2381°F.(4) Non-combustible materials transformed into white ash – indicating extreme heat - yet trees are still leafy, as are the bushes. Items that shouldn't have burnt did so and yet wood, which should have gone up like a torch, didn't. Blackened timbers from the houses themselves are a rarity. The streets are usually entirely unmarked, but dwellings turned out to be more flammable than trees.
This next image is also from the 2012 fire and it's rather peculiar. While there has clearly been a genuine fire on the right of the picture – which has created black ash, as expected – there is no evidence that it managed to cross the road and the ash from the settlement on the left (and the small cul-de-sac bottom right) is a different colour. Further, in the bottom left, nearly every house is untouched and yet one has been levelled.
Figure 22
The patterns of destruction are also inexplicably random elsewhere.
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
This is what actually happens when a regular wildfire reaches houses.
Figure 27
This is what the aftermath of a house fire looks like.
Figure 28
Figure 29
And this is what the forest would look like weeks or months later.
Figure 30
This is the aftermath of yet another fire in Lytton, British Columbia. It doesn't look a whole lot like Figure 28 or Figure 29.
Figure 31
'Pyro-lightning', combined with strong winds (hold that thought) were said to be the cause:
“Indeed, satellite radar detected over 9000 strikes on June 30 in the smoke plume in interior BC. But satellite radar showed that the strikes were in straight-line and box shaped patterns.”(5)
Which doesn't sound overly natural, does it? And when one has a gander at the burn scar for the Almeda Fire, one is struck by the markedly linear nature of that fire, also.
Figure 32
But so far, I'm just listing facts, such as yet another common denominator – extremely high winds. All of the fires that I have so far referenced have been accompanied by unusual wind events which have greatly exacerbated the effect of the initial wildfires, which clearly do exist in most cases. We are informed that the 100mph gusts in LA were the work of the local Santa Ana winds except that, despite Wikipedia's protestations, these winds have historically been a feature of autumn and the locals seem pretty sure that they don't come in the winter. Probably just another coincidence – one of those things.
Texas, Lahaina, New Mexico, Colorado, Paradise City, Lytton – all victims of a “remarkable wind event”,(6) not created by the fire itself. In Colorado, firefighters were confronted with day after day of 'red flag' winds. A fire meteorologist unburdened himself of the following information:
"It is pretty extraordinary to have a red flag warning to last for 59 hours. It is, as far as my memory goes back, unprecedented."(7)
Drought is also a feature. The south-west of the United States – and California, in particular – has been suffering from drought or near-drought conditions for a number of years. And, when fire has suddenly appeared in less likely locations, such as in Lytton, British Columbia, it was preceded by highly unusual weather events, which temporarily mimicked the same tinder-dry conditions:
“The BC Coroners Service confirmed that there were 619 heat-related deaths during the heat dome, which took place from June 25 to July 1. The heat dome resulted in several days of high temperatures that approached 50 degrees Celsius (°C) in Lytton, setting an all-time temperature record for Canada.”(8)
Yet another common factor is the almost total absence of any rebuilding activity (with the honourable exception of the Waldo Canyon fire in 2012),(9) largely the result of officialdom making life difficult. The Paradise City fire was over six years ago and it conveniently rubbed out ten trailer parks (the Almeda fire also honed in on mobile homes, while sparing trees, and over 1,000 were destroyed),(10) none of which have been allowed to reconstitute themselves.
Lahaina is still a ghost town well over a year later and the Governor and Mayor are slow-walking the recovery process, cautioning that “it's going to be a very long time before any growth or housing can be built”.(11) There are a myriad excuses that can be trotted out, from toxic residue to new, costly fireproofing regulations and the ball can be batted around until people grow weary of their temporary accommodation and sell their land.
Figure 33 Almeda trailer park
California's Governor Newscum, as Orange Man Bad might say, couldn't contain his glee as he announced plans to create LA 2.0 and local officials are all-in on changing zoning regulations from single-family to multi-family,(12) especially in the working class areas. And in other areas, such as the Palisades, it's likely that a majority will sell their land and move on. This event isn't their first rodeo and some are tired of the suspense, as well as being comprehensively under-insured.(13) Even those whose houses survived are unlikely to relish living in a building site for the next decade.
Which brings us to another area of synergy – in the weeks and months prior to both the Lahaina fire and the current LA fires, home insurance policies for the subsequently affected areas were cancelled.(14) The justification provided, in LA at any rate, was that they were paying out more than they were taking in.(15) That and the regulatory system under Newsom which prevents them from properly calculating risk.(16) Insurance will soon be prohibitively expensive in California – if it can even be obtained -(17) and in Maui, the premiums have almost quadrupled on average.(18)
There are other common features. In Lahaina, the hydrants were dry.(19) The same in the Almeda Fire.(20) The hydrants also ran dry in the Camp Fire and, as we know, there was no water to fight the LA fires either.(21)(22) Neglect also played a part in Hawaii and California, as both states had failed to take adequate fire prevention measures over a period of years. Lahaina is (was) very susceptible to fire, as the town is surrounded by grasslands – mostly state owned and overtaken by highly combustible, non-native grasses.(23)(24) The risk had been known and documented for nearly a decade.(25) And the Loony Left in California is far more concerned about 'the impact on the environment' than it is on keeping its citizens safe (26), so Newsom slashed the state fire budget by over $100 million in 2024.(27)
Then there are the questions no-one in government wants to ask – how do all these fires start in the first place? California's 2024 fire season was, to the layperson at least, ridiculously prolific:
“Cal Fire has provided some surprising information about the number of fires in California in 2024. The number of fires in one year, 2024, which is not over at the time of this writing, shows that 7,997 wildfires reported this year...These impossible totals average out to over 600 wildfires a month.”(28)
Although, having said that, 2020 was even more outlandish with over 10,000 'wildfires' burning up 4.2 million acres.(29) 'Climate change' is usually the knee-jerk explanation dutifully trotted out but, as that is a hoax (if defined as anthropogenic, carbon driven warming), other explanations must apply. Especially when fires start simultaneously, as they seem to do with regularity. 'Jumping embers' cannot explain this.
Figure 34
Figure 35
Mainstream 'fact-checkers' foam at the mouth whenever anyone has the temerity to depart from their curated narratives, but the fact remains that all of South Quebec's wildfires on 2nd June, 2023 started at the exact same time, as did Alberta's five days later.(30) Three fires in Nova Scotia on the 2nd were also believed to be deliberately set (31) and the five fires that have devastated LA all started on the same day. Arsonists were caught on camera in Santa Monica and one character with a blowtorch and an attitude was the subject of a citizens' arrest in the City of Angels.(32)(33) Comically, the LAPD didn't think they had enough evidence to charge him, despite the fact that he was detained while “attempting to set numerous old Christmas trees and garbage cans on fire”.(34) Around 84% of all fires are thought to be the work of arsonists.(35)
In stark contrast with the relatively recent past, containment has become a major issue. The current LA fires aren't being contained swiftly and are burning thousands of acres. Another huge fire, the Hughes Fire, broke out on 22nd January in northern LA, a full two weeks after the first blazes.(36) And millions of hectares are being torched.
Figure 36
Some areas are getting more attention than others. Canada's annus horribilis was 2023, with 18 million hectares up in smoke.(37) Europe was also under the cosh, with massive fires in Greece, Spain, Portugal and elsewhere.(38) This past year, the Amazon experienced the highest number of reported fires in 20 years.(39)
“While forest fire damage varies each year, there has been a clear upward trend since 2001. For example, 2020, 2021, and 2023 were the fourth, third, and first worst years for forest fires globally.”(40)
Record-setting fires are becoming the norm and tree cover loss is accelerating.(41) American wildfires are up to four times larger and three times more frequent than they were in the 1980s and 1990s.(42) Mockingbird media explanations are, as we have come to expect, designed to mislead rather than educate. Climate change, land-management practices and human activity usually lead the way, anaemically. The more enlightened scribblers might mention the role of arsonists but, even then, we're presented with a twofer; as in there are always arsonists, but now their activities are enhanced by a warming planet.(43)
In seeking a fuller explanation of why cars melt, houses are burnt selectively, trees survive or burn from the inside out, high winds seem to spring up at the most inopportune moments and the burn temperature is so high, it may be instructive to set out a different set of facts, one that our elders and betters would rather we weren't aware of. Some of these facts may seem unsuited to the task at hand but, hopefully, all will become at least partially clear in due course.
The first is one of the worst-kept secrets around – what are colloquially known as chemtrails. Officially, of course, they don't exist, but anybody from a NATO country who possesses a modicum of curiosity along with an bullshit detector, knows very well that they do. They know that these aren't clouds; it's something of a commentary on the gullibility of the sheeple that many still don't realise what it is that they are looking at.
Figure 37
Figure 38
The absolute bare minimum of research (provided the bare minimum doesn't involve Wikipedia) would teach us that contrails are, in fact, ice crystals formed from water vapour, which can only physically start forming at 28,000 feet and minus 40 Celsius), but are more usually seen at altitudes between 36,000 and 38,000 feet, where the temperature is around minus 63. Chemtrails aren't that high. Typically, they are applied between 10,000 and 12,000 feet. The contrail explanation is, therefore, contrary to the laws of physics.(44)
Which it already was anyway, because contrails don't behave in the way that chemtrails do. As the ice crystals fall towards the earth they become water vapour. They don't spread out in the skies afterwards – they disappear from sight. So, it's not water vapour. Furthermore, the planes that spray chemtrails don't show up on apps like FlightRadar; according to a former pilot a software fix has been introduced, so that certain transponder codes cannot be seen by the great unwashed. But if we're not looking at water vapour, what are we seeing instead?
The chemicals (elements, in fact) in question include aluminium, barium, and strontium, amongst others. And because we're in the fact-based portion of the 'conspiracy theory', we know this because researchers in the US managed to obtain samples and analysed them with a mass spectrometer.(35) We know it because rainwater, when analysed, is contaminated with aluminium, arsenic, barium and boron. Lots of it, in amounts that are well in excess of safe levels.
Figure 39
We also know it because water samples from the peak of Mount Shasta in California (height 14, 179 feet) have aluminium levels which are “4,800 times the maximum contaminant level of drinking water.”(45) You might wonder why anyone thought to test the water at the summit of a mountain. Well, they'd already tested the soil in the valley, because trees were dying and grass and crops weren't growing and they found that vast quantities of aluminium and barium (together with other elements) had changed the pH level of the soil.(46) This is a result that has been replicated around the world, thus making it a global, not simply a localised, phenomenon.(47) In Hawaii, a dozen years ago, aluminium was measured at 20,300 parts per million. Any level above 1,600ppm is considered excessive; any number above 400ppm is harmful to soil.(48)
It is believed that this programme has been ongoing since the late nineties. I mention it in this context because aluminium, barium strontium and are all highly flammable – the latter two near explosive. And trees will take up whatever 'nutrients' are in the soil. But never mind trees and undergrowth; even soil saturated in these substances is going to burn. Twenty plus years of spraying will do that:
“Millions of tons of aluminium and barium are being sprayed almost daily across the U.S...when wildfires break out, the aluminium/barium dust results in levels of fire intensity so great as to cause firefighters to coin a new term - “firenados”...the fires are burning differently and more aggressively. It has been reported the firs move faster than anyone has ever seen and that barriers that in years past contained them such as rivers, no longer do.”(49)
They were spraying Hawaii – with the aircraft flying out of an airbase base in Honolulu – as long ago as 2012.(50) They were spraying LA like fury the day before the first three fires broke out.(51) Firenados hundreds of feet high have been reported.(52) These are facts. I'll get to the why later.
Chemtrails are by no means the only 'geoengineering' efforts ongoing. There's also the small matter of HAARP which, we are earnestly informed, was simply a research programme in Alaska that shuttered in 2014.(53) It didn't do much of anything in practical terms – just bouncing radio waves off the ionosphere, using technology proposed by Tesla, originally. Which is why many aspects of the programme were kept secret for reasons of that oldie but goldie, 'national security'. The problem (as well as not believing a single thing that government says without independent verification) is that these sorts of unnatural events were occurring – some domestic, others as far away as Africa, Australia and Antarctica.
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
The EU was on the case as long ago as 1999, when it passed a resolution, calling the project a global concern and were unabashed in labelling HAARP “a weapons system which disrupts climate”.(54) The Americans refused to be cowed by the European chapter of their empire and ignored repeated requests for “its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing.”(55) And we never even became aware of any such facility because the press failed to report the details.
I'm not convinced that anybody outside the conspirators knows precisely how capable HAARP is, but it is known to excite (heat) the ionosphere – “the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere which ranges from about 30 miles (50 km) to 600 miles (1,000 km) above the surface of the Earth”.(56) It is also immensely powerful - an increase in temperature of several hundred degrees is possible in a very short time span and it can be accomplished by “transmitting from earth based antenna high frequency radiation”.(57) This heating effect “can be made to act on electrons anywhere above the surface of the earth”,(58) preferably at heights between 50km and 800km (see Peeling More Onions for the full SP).
Figure 45
All of which sounds impressive, but not very illuminating in terms of the specific effect it can have on the weather. Well, a commercial radio station tend to broadcast at around 50,000 watts in all direction – HAARP is capable of the precise application of up to 10 billion watts to a small target area in the ionosphere (although there were calls for a peak radiated power of 100 billion watts).(59) Apparently, microwaving the atmosphere does actually have an effect, although the scientists running experiments didn't know precisely what that effect would be. Previous experiments of this type had resulted in disturbances to the jet stream. Still, nothing ventured, nothing lost. Like when the Americans detonated a hydrogen bomb in the magnetosphere on July 9th 1962, without so much as a by-your-leave and created another Van Allen belt.(60) In the nineties, they were messing about with 'heat domes':
“...they hope that a 48-kilometre-wide plume of superheated atmospheric particles will bulge outward into space like the skin of a poked balloon. With high-speed computers and newly developed software pulsing powerful radio waves, HAARP’s antennae will be fired sequentially to steer this ionospheric bulge as if it were a lens.”(61)
Perhaps, latterly, over Lytton, BC ? Or California? Maui? The US patent also references other capabilities, amongst them “altering the upper atmosphere wind patterns using plumes of atmospheric particles as a lens or focusing device” to disturb weather thousands of miles away.”(62) There is known to be a strong electrical coupling between the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere. Also, charged particles can be persuaded to stream into the atmosphere and form rain clouds.(63) And clouds have been undergoing something of a redefinition, courtesy of this atmospheric meddling. In 2017, the International Cloud Atlas update its database and added twelve new cloud types. The media seemed to regard this as cause for celebration and displayed its habitual incuriosity, yet it is clear that these new species are not natural formations.
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
So – cloud, rain, wind and heat domes are all outcomes that can be finessed by HAARP. This is in addition to cloud seeding technology and hurricane and tornado formulation and manipulation, as evidenced by patents filed decades ago:
“A method is disclosed for affecting the formation and/or direction of a low atmospheric weather system. Audio generators are positioned to project sound waves to project sound waves towards a peripheral area of a weather system. The sound waves are generated at a frequency to affect the formation of the weather system in a manner to disrupt, enhance or direct the formation. The sound waves can be projected in a manner to cause the system to produce rain.”(64)
You will notice that there is reference to audio generators, which would infer that HAARP is not alone (or may even be obsolete). And it isn't – it has company; lots of company in the form of NEXRAD, which stands for Next Generation Radar. In the US, these present themselves as high-resolution S-band Doppler weather radars bouncing microwaves onto targeted areas, simply to collect data about the atmosphere, you understand. Except, of course, microwaves are not a passive technology; instead, this strain of radar “effects precipitation and atmospheric temperature”(65) and the judicious use of particular units can steer weather systems by pushing them away. This is what they look like.
Figure 50
And this is where they are located in the United States (although they are not only to be found there).
Figure 51
This is what the radar map looks like when certain installations are active.
Figure 52
This activity (in Figure 52) was correlated with the creation of Tropical Storm Barry in July 2019. Governments are hiding in plain sight. The technology is longstanding, à la HAARP, and widely documented in patents, White House reports and the like, but if the authorities decide to stay shtum and the Fourth Estate sits on its hands, it is largely unknown to us greenhorns in the general population:
“The microwave radiation is used not only as a tool for monitoring precipitation, but it’s also used to activate and manipulate aerosols to move weather systems. Aerosols absorb radiation and depending on the application may activate, increase, or decrease energy within a weather system.”(66)
At this point, a reaffirmation of the usefulness of 'chemtrails' whilst they are still airborne may be prudent. HAARP and NEXRAD are programmes than require an ionised atmosphere. Ordinarily, while the ionosphere is an electrically active region of the upper atmosphere, the atmosphere around us is not, but “chemtrail particulates are designed to amplify HAARP’s electromagnetic frequencies”.(67) Aluminium, barium and strontium increase the atmosphere's conductivity and therefore enhance weather modification via microwave. It would seem that the US, at least, has all bases covered vis-a-vis weather control, mostly under the guise of research or weather forecasting.
There are three other, seemingly disparate elements that may also form a part of the whole. The first of these is a piece of technology that is becoming increasingly ubiquitous without a conversation ever being had about its safety or, indeed, why we even need it – 5G. It may be said that we didn't exactly have a national debate over previous upgrades, either, and perhaps we should have done. EMF radiation is not harmless – it's still radiation and we are not built for a world full of it. But 5G isn't just another upgrade; it's a far bigger deal than that.
The first generation of mobile 'phones was simply call only. It wasn't until 2G, launched in 1991 in Finland, that digital 'phone calls and texts arrived on the scene. 3G was launched in 1998 and was, essentially, a faster version of 2G; it provided the first high speed mobile internet. As each generation succeeded the other, speed was enhanced and latency (lag time) reduced. 4G, released in 2008, further addressed the issues of reliability and congestion with a technology known as multi-pathing, whereby multiple antennae and receivers created several paths for a single transmission. There's also a 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) which is akin to a 4.5G. The advance in speed is dramatic; perhaps 5 to 7 times faster than 3G.
But that's still not enough for the technocrats, who are determined to put a microsensor into every possible nook and cranny. The Internet of Things (IoT)– think SMART cities, delivery drones, driverless cars, all-digital lifestyles – is to be meshed with the Internet of Bodies (IoB) - SMART watches, fitness trackers, insulin delivery systems and digestible sensors – and that is going to require colossal and continuous bandwidth which cannot be provided by existing tech. Hence, 5G.
We are told the following, although verification is a little hard to come by. There are three main frequency ranges within the 5G spectrum. The range between 600 MHz and 2.4 GHz is very similar to 4G's operational range, but will achieve slightly better speeds (allegedly) and more density, thus catering for many more users. These frequencies are good for a wide coverage and outside to inside buildings functionality.(68) The medium range, between 3 GHz and 6 GHz, will offer moderate coverage and a range of around two miles.
But it's the third band (the C band) that is the most problematic. This spectrum is currently between 24 GHz and 52 GHz; upwards of 30 GHz, the radio waves are in the millimetre range; in other words, they're coming thick and fast. At 1 GHz, radio waves are 300mm apart; at 10 GHz the distance is down to 30mm and at 30 GHz, the gap is 10mm. The more frequent the waves, the more data that can be carried, which is a necessity if the IoT is to reach its full potential and licensing bodies have announced that frequencies up to 300 GHz will be available.(69) There is, however, a trade off. While the lower frequencies have the ability to penetrate solid structures, the higher frequencies often don't. Thick dense surfaces like concrete and wood are a problem and so the infrastructure has to be much closer together.
I don't propose to get into the weeds with regard to the endemic dangers to human health which ENF radiation inevitably represents (see Radiation Nation for that). Instead, I'll focus on the possible role that 5G may have in the fires and 'weather events'. In the US, the rollout of the infrastructure has been extensive, gathering pace during the lockdowns and benefitting from 'co-location', where the new technology is grafted onto an existing site which is already connected to power and fibre.(70) Lahaina and LA were both the lucky recipients of 5G coverage and, by the end of 2020, so were most of the big cities.(71)(72) AT&T had 281 million people in nearly 22,000 cities hooked up on low band 5G (850MHz) by October 2022.(73)
Figure 53
5G had arrived. Panels proliferated, although quite who owns all of them is not a matter of public record – only a small proportion of them can be accounted for. The rest have no listed owners.(74) There is also a nationwide network of GWEN towers (Ground Wave Emergency Network) allegedly designed as a back-up comms system in the event of a nuclear strike. There may be as many as 800 of them and they, too, are now festooned with mysterious panels.(75)
Figure 54
Figure 55
I'm curious about a possible role for 5G (or these panels, at any rate) because of the fact that, like HAARP and NEXRAD, the technology utilises microwave radiation. And because most of these arrays are unregistered, when they shouldn't be. And because government cannot be trusted in any and all circumstances. Much of the 5G story is not documented, because the mainstream media has evinced little to no interest in the subject. The whole project has been rolled out without any public involvement or oversight, which is why the fact that the most common WiFi frequency of 2.4GHz is also the frequency at which a microwave oven cooks food is not common knowledge.(76) Of course, there should be two significant differences; focus and power.
“A Wi-Fi router sends its signal out omnidirectionally. That is, it sends it in every direction in a rough circle as far as it can. Your microwave, on the other hand, sends its signal in a single direction, roughly towards the center of the oven. That signal continues until it hits a wall, bounces and comes back (at a slightly different angle). It isn't a perfect system, due to the nature of radio waves, and so every microwave has hot and cold spots. Microwaves also use more power than a Wi-Fi router; typically they generate 1000 watts of power. Conversely, a standard Wi-Fi router generates about 100 milliwatts (or 0.1 watts) of power. You'd have to increase the Wi-Fi router's power output about 10,000 times and confine the beam to have a chance at cooking anything.”(77)
However, there are other frequencies at which human life can be made uncomfortable. Militaries are aware of them and have incorporated a particular frequency into an Active Denial System, akin to a targeted microwave oven that can burn skin a kilometre away. (78) Allegedly, they cause no permanent damage, due to the fact that they are non-ionizing – they don't have enough energy to cause disruptions at the cellular level.(79) The interesting part is that they operate at 95 GHz, which is in the millimetre range; just like 38 GHz, which will be used fairly widely for 5G. The 60 GHz range has already been sold and other higher ranges are going to become available. Why would these ranges be viable for 5G, given the effect of ADS?
Figure 56
But the bottom line is that we don't know what is true and what isn't. We don't know whether there are other frequencies in use. Neither do we know whether any of what we are told is true; we don't know who owns what panels; we don't what frequencies those panels operate at; we know the square root of bugger all, but we think we know that three technologies – HAARP, NEXRAD and 5G – all utilise microwave radiation and microwave radiation can be used to make and control weather and cook certain compounds from the inside out. We know that “trees near 5G towers show rapid deterioration, with foliage dying on the side nearest the tower”(80) and we know that birds and other wildlife avoid them like the plague. We know that even water is damaged by exposure to 15 minutes of 5G radiation.(81) And we definitely know that we are being lied to and there is always a reason for that.
The second problematic element that seems to have a role in these conflagrations is the humble SMART meter, another technology foisted upon us in an unseemly fashion. Once again, we find that the case for them has never been properly made, nor has safety ever been properly considered. SMART meters operate in the 900 MHz to 2.8 GHz range – the lower end of that frequency can penetrate deep into the body, especially so when pulsed as with the meters. Add this radiation to that given out by a router, by a cellphone, by a microwave oven (there is no such thing as a perfect seal) and any other SMART devices and we find ourselves enveloped in an electrosmog.
But it is the incendiary tendencies of SMART meters that concern us here. You'll note that governments have been most insistent that we swap out the analogue meters – in the UK, the gloves are effectively off, as the 2023 Energy Bill authorised “someone from your power supplier will have the right to enter your home to replace your current meter with a smart meter. If you refuse him entry or try to refuse having a smart meter installed, he can legally return with police back-up, force entry into your home and use what is called “reasonable force” to restrain you while he rips out your old-fashioned meter and replaces it with a smart meter.”(82) And that was the Conservatives' project; the current mob of Leftists that the intellectually challenged electorate voted into power six months ago are even worse.
But it's been the same pretty much everywhere. As long ago as 2012, there were already 4 million installed in Southern California.(83) The Chilean government adopted a different, but equally eye-catching strategy – they offered users a bounty of $10,000 if they agreed to change over to SMART meters.(84) Not in the slightest bit suspicious. It has always been assumed that official enthusiasm for these meters was tied to what has become the Net Zero obsession, as the switch to 'renewable energy' will inevitably lead to energy shortages and the desire to ration supply remotely. I'm sure that is still very much part of the plan.
But they have also been designed to function in ways that are dangerous. SMART meters are not fitted with adequate surge protection. They are frequently sited on an outside wall, a practice that is foolhardy on its face. A plastic device packed with circuit boards, exposed to the elements. They are powered by lithium batteries, which are prone to overheating and react with water. A lithium fire is not favourite, as the batteries are also liable to explode.(85) In addition;
“High frequency wireless radiation from mesh-networked smart meters causes molecules to change polarity 1.8 billion times per second. The polarity change may be even higher for 3G smart meters. This causes vibration at a molecular level to building materials, metal and in the body. Near-field exposure can also cause metal fatigue and rapid non-oxidative corrosion due to electron-stripping.”(86)
When the main power is turned on and off repeatedly, or when there are frequent surges of electricity, problems are going to occur. Powerful surges are capable of passing through the meter and through the purposefully conductive copper wiring installed throughout homes.
“Smart Meters do not have a direct connection to ground, a circuit breaker, or adequate surge protection. Instead, they contain a varistor which wears out over time from repeated surges. When it wears out or if a high voltage event happens, including a surge over its maximum, touching wires, or a lightning strike, it will explode, allowing the overvoltage to flow unabated into the building. This can result in arcing, burned wiring, destroyed appliances and electronics, and fires, and it happens in seconds. It makes a popping sound when it explodes.”(87)
On the morning of the three initial LA fires, the electrical grids were all playing silly buggers. Nonetheless, the lines were not de-energised.
Figure 57
Figure 58
Figure 59
We are told that, in Lahaina, the electricity lines were without power for more than six hours prior to the Afternoon Fire taking hold. Maybe so, maybe not. Who really knows? In any event, SMART meter fires are a well-known phenomenon and have claimed lives.(88)(89) It is remarkable to note that, despite the fact that they emit dangerous levels of both EMF and ELF radiation (Extremely Low Frequency) every few seconds,(90) contain highly flammable lithium, aren't adequately protected from surging currents and are already liable to combust without any fault being registered (high power electromagnetic radiation can cause sparks), there are, nonetheless, hundreds of millions of them in use. So we can add a fourth source of radiation to our list; HAARP, NEXRAD, 5G and SMART meters.
There is one final element that likely has a role to play – air-conditioning units and/or open windows. While most types of air-conditioner don't use outside air, there are some that do.(91)(92) But, in any event, I would expect the household that never opens a window all-year round to be something of a rarity, which would mean that the outside air – leavened with flammable elements – finds it way inside homes. That being the case, one might expect a house fire to burn hotter and with more ferocity.
So, there is a considerable range of vectors which may contribute towards the modern 'wildfire' phenomenon. But how do they fit together and what is fact, as opposed to conjecture? And why would those who rule over us want to harm us in any way?
We know that the weather can be influenced – if not outright controlled – via a judicious mix of cloud seeding and other technologies. We know that we are being sprayed with chemtrails. We know that adding aluminium, barium and strontium to the soil and the atmosphere will poison living matter and will accelerate a conflagration. We know that there are arsonists at large and we know that microwave radiation, however it was delivered, must have been utilised.
I make the latter point because no other explanation fits and Occam's Razor must be acknowledged. If some trees can burn from the inside out, glass melts and plastic doesn't, microwave radiation is the answer. Whether that's from HAARP, NEXRAD, 5G towers with mystery panels, or a combination of all three, I know not. But there are other factors in play. Trees take up whatever elements are in the soil and many are dying – the huge increases in heart wood in young trees is evidence of that. This dead wood will burn, but it's difficult to see how that can happen without there being a mechanism for fire to access the inner wood without burning the bark and the outer wood. Perhaps trees which take up a lot of water are boiling from the inside.
It seems possible that it is the soil itself that burns in many instances, which may explain why some trees don't burn – there may not be sufficient vigour to some fires - but other fires are clearly firenados that move at speed. There doesn't seem to be one set template, but wildfire needs to be a part of whatever it is that is being attempted, so that it may be used as cover. The colours of these wildfires also seem different, more akin to the colour that an aluminium fire (or lithium/barium) would make.
Figure 60
Figure 61
Figure 62
Figure 63
Figure 64
The uneven destruction may be a result of two separate phenomena. Microwave ovens cook food unevenly, which is why the plate rotates. Is it possible that this also happens when microwaves are being deployed in the open? Or perhaps the houses without SMART meters are spared. The Chile fires offer what might be some circumstantial evidence of this possibility. Here, buildings that looked like sheds – which, presumably, would not be equipped with a SMART meter – were left intact, whilst all around went up in smoke.
Figure 65
Figure 66
And, amidst the widespread destruction, one village was entirely unscathed.
Figure 67
Figure 68
Perhaps, this happy outcome was the result of not being part of Chile's SMART grid.
Figure 69
It's even possible for bad actors outside the controlling elite to influence proceedings, although I think it unlikely – unless certain functions have been farmed out to create a degree of plausible deniability.
“One of the types of attacks made possible by the new technologies involves hacking into the advanced metering infrastructure, often abbreviated as AMI, and controlling the smart meter switches to cause load oscillations.”(93)
When a power grid is switched on, it ought to distribute power to all connected homes simultaneously. With old analogue meters, there would have been no other way of doing it. Not so with SMART meters, which can be operated remotely. Presumably, it is possible to turn the power on one home at a time, or to target particular homes and not others. A large surge of power may overwhelm the meter and set off a lithium battery fire which would burn extremely hot, perhaps aided by whatever chemtrail residue had made its way inside. I find it difficult to believe that SMART meters have no part to play, but I can't be sure as to the exact mechanism.
However, the evidence of a microwave effect is more easily confirmed. These are from Lahaina. Note the untouched tennis court, the absence of glass and aluminium and the boats burned offshore. It's difficult to believe that spark would have such an effect fifteen meters from shore.
Figure 70
Figure 71
Figure 72
We also have evidence after-the-fact:
“It is evident that during the “cleanup” of fire damaged areas underground pipes and culverts made of metal have been dug up and replaced by plastic or concrete pipes or culverts. These metal pipes and culverts which have been dug up and replaced and carelessly left at fire sites show evidence of having been severely heat damaged even though they were buried several feet deep. Someone at decision-making levels knew that these buried pipes would have been damaged in this way and ordered that the damaged pipes should be replaced not with metal pipes – NOT with METAL! – but with plastic or concrete which, of course, does not conduct electricity.”(94)
In short, there's nothing accidental about these fires. The Incompetence Defence starts to wear a little thin when you realise that all the ducks were being assiduously lined up beforehand. The LA Fires represent a particularly unsubtle example. Not only does the state restrict water supply, fail to have a cogent fire policy, cut the Fire Department's budget, create rules that force insurance companies to cancel policies and generally do everything that it can to screw things up; the authorities also did their absolute best to ensure that their response would be hamstrung. They stood down firefighters in high risk areas, had over 100 fire trucks in repair lots or off the road for minor regulatory issues and left the power on:
“These choices were not accidents. Whistleblowers within firefighting teams have confirmed that these decisions were made at the highest levels. Maps of high-risk zones were ignored, funding for drills and firebreaks was cut, and water reservoirs were drained months in advance—all before fire season began. And when the fires inevitably started, the response was slow, chaotic, and inadequate.”(95)
In Paradise City, they actually sprayed chemtrails onto the fire while it was burning though the town.(96) In Lahaina, they failed to use their world-famous siren system to warn of the fire and the police blocked the road out, bringing traffic to a standstill, and turned people back into the flames.(97)(98)(99) The authorities weren't simply an impediment – they were actively complicit. Many more died in Maui than has been claimed (mostly children home alone) and, in another example of engineered mayhem in North Carolina (Hurricane Helene), it is thought that over 15,000 have lost their lives.(100) But why? Why would regimes behave in this way? Not just the Americans – they are just the most garishly committed – but others across the NATO countries, too? What is the motivation?
In truth, there are a myriad reasons if one takes for granted the absence of a moral compass and not all of them are on the down-low. Agenda 21 will do for starters, the United Nations plan that has spawned 'sustainable' development, 15-minute cities and the entire panoply of all things SMART. The governors of California and Hawaii are two of the most gruesome examples of Leftist pathology. Both are devotees of SMART cities – as is the mayor of LA – and both Lahaina and LA were scheduled to transform, whether the locals liked it or not. This is from the Maui Plan Book of 2012 and all the boxes to the left of the illustration (where Lahaina is situated) were marked urban areas, Agenda-21 speak for SMART cities. The state has been banging on about SMART grids since 2014 at the latest.(101)
Figure 73
And LA was scheduled to become a SMART city by 2028, the year it hosts the Olympic Games.(102)(103) Amazingly, the fires had the good sense to be selective:
“We are left with the astonishing serendipity that a huge swath of the City of Los Angeles has been cleared just in time to be made shovel ready for a newer, better, futuristic version of city neighborhoods to be constructed that will be a showcase for the 2028 Olympics.”(104)
The Livable Communities Initiative (double-speak for a 15-minute city) will now, presumably, be full speed ahead,(105) aided by Newsom's newfound enthusiasm for cutting through the red tape and issuing building permits left, right and centre.(106) I wait with bated breath for multi-story buildings and high rises to replace family homes. The governor had a plan for “reimagining LA” remarkably quickly, possibly even before the fires.(107) And in Maui, in the first days after the fire, Governor Green was busy dreaming up ways that the state could get hold of some prime residential land:
“I’m already thinking about ways for the state to acquire that land so that we can put it into workforce housing, to put it back into families, or to make it open spaces in perpetuity as a memorial to people who were lost.”(108)
His commitment to his people doesn't seem to extend to letting them rebuild themselves. To nobody's surprise, as of January 2025, only two of the 2,000 gutted or destroyed residential properties have been rebuilt – in eighteen months.(109) In a neat trick, Green has tightened the zoning regulations in Lahaina, meaning that many of the destroyed buildings were 'non-conforming' and cannot be recreated.(110) He's slow-walking processes and waiting out the locals. The same play-book had already been implemented by the authorities in Paradise City and, after five years of official inertia, hundreds of homeowners were selling off their land for pennies on the dollar.
Figure 74
But the federal government was already in the business of seizing land, purportedly so that it could be 'conserved'. Biden wanted to place at least 30% of America's land and water under federal control by 2030, because climate change.(111) The strokes that the Feds pull are mind-boggling at times; designing bike paths that go through properties and then seizing those properties; redesignating Hurricane Zones and the like, thus ensuring that home insurance is either prohibitively expensive or unavailable; increasing wetland maps, thereby seizing millions of acres; 'fragmenting habitat', also known as not repairing infrastructure, removing dams, draining lakes, re-routing roads, actions that turn entire communities into ghost towns.(112) All over California, the countryside is being closed – roads are being shrunk, fences constructed and boulders placed in entrances to beauty spots.(113)
All private land is a problem that needs to be solved, according to the UN; a source of inequality and an impediment to 'development':
“Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of the accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.”(114)
So seizing it and burning people off it is, effectively, good policy. The cult of climate change requires it, because if you're saving the planet, everything else is secondary. That includes property rights and, as necessary collateral damage, even life itself for some unfortunates. It also includes making sure that the subject is never far from the front pages and, given that – if anything – the planet is cooling, it requires weather manipulation on a grand scale. Fire is merely another weapon in the arsenal, one that has been an acknowledged weapon of war in the US since 1970.(115)
It's also about the depopulation agenda and control, absolute obsessions of the elites. There's an obvious way to speed the process up, if you can control the weather:
“If people can obtain their own food, you cannot control them. So, how do you take away the food? Answer: Kill the pollinators. Without pollination there is no produce. Make the soil dry and void of nutrients. Kill the microorganisms and worms. Poison the lakes. Boil the oceans. Kill the trees to take away oxygen.”(116)
A small example, by way of illustration; a Michigan beekeeper and aspiring homesteader has documented the yo-yoing temperatures that have decimated his bees over the past couple of years. In early April, 2023 the temperatures were summer-level, the bees hatched and the temperature then plummeted, killing the bees. An unfortunate natural disaster? Well, winter saw more record temperatures and a burst of insects in December, which was unfortunate, as the flowers that they needed to survive had died off months prior. There was then an Arctic freeze and more erratic weather.(117)
Another warm April and sudden drop in temperature put paid to what bees were left and temperatures soared – but not because the days were sunny. The sun was blocked almost every day.
Figure 75
No bees, no insects of any kind. No pollination. A summer temperature of 87 degrees, yet a ground temperature of at least 104° – plants cannot photosynthesise when the ground temperature is 104° or more. And the result of all the mayhem? No harvest. In truth, none of this is new; bees have been dying off for years, as have insects in general. The decline started with the installation of the first internet towers and the first observable chemtrails.(118) Bees are now officially an endangered species in some locales.
Figure 76
In conjunction with most other insects.
Figure 77
There are, of course, many points of attack. Our forensic arborist reports that there is no life of any kind in the vicinity of the 'wildfires', either. Not even fish in the creeks.(119) And the war on food has kicked into high gear on both sides of the pond. The US beef herd is at a 74 year low and regulators have used an alleged bird flu crisis as an excuse to cull chickens (who would otherwise recover), sending egg prices through the roof.(120)(121) Farmers throughout Europe have spent months and many tonnes of silage protesting the EU's green agenda and, in Starmer's UK, more than 10% of farmland will be rewilded so that the climatistas can tell themselves that they are saving the planet.(122) But killing pollinators and insects, on the quiet, is wreaking the most havoc of all.
All in all, then, perhaps more facts and less conjecture than might have been anticipated. Our erstwhile leaders are spraying poisonous chemicals into the sky and what goes up, must come down. Trees are being slowly killed from the inside out. The soil is being made infertile. Weather is being manipulated and at least four sources of microwave radiation – HAARP, NEXRAD (not just a US problem), 5G and SMART meters – are assailing us. The food supply is being compromised and fires and other weather events are conveniently advancing Agenda 21. The guesswork lies in calculating how much each of these elements contributes to the overall effect, whether it's the rogue panels on 5G towers or NEXRAD that is the primary vector, whether SMART meters are a primary or secondary weapon and other matters of degree.
As our Michigan homesteader noted, the pace of these events is quickening. There seems to be some urgency to the project, which is leading to an increasingly apparent forcing of the issue. Aerosol spraying is unsubtle, an absence of insects and wildlife cannot be disguised forever and the plethora of disasters, whilst blamed on 'climate change', do not really fit the bill. The sociopaths in charge have never had a convincing explanation as to the exact mechanism that explains these events and they sound increasingly like the boy who cried wolf.
I appreciate that it seems extraordinary that people would go to the lengths that they have, that they could be so devoid of empathy, so dedicated to harm. But, then again, we've just lived through an engineered 'pandemic', during which the authorities banned cheap and effective medications, did their utmost to kill off as many inpatients and care home dwellers as possible and then convinced a significant proportion of the world's population to take an experimental gene therapy that is designed to maim and kill. So, perhaps, another Big Lie isn't that much of a stretch, after all.
Citations
(1)
(2)
(3) Ditto
(4)
(5)
(6) https://www.npr.org/2022/05/13/1098547723/fire-crews-new-mexico-wildfire-relentless-wind
(7) Ditto
(9) https://coloradosun.com/2022/01/10/waldo-canyon-fire-recovery-colorado-springs-mountain-shadows/
(10) https://www.opb.org/article/2023/09/08/wildfire-survivors-recovery-southern-oregon/
(11) https://expose-news.com/2023/08/20/are-maui-survivors-right-to-fear-losing-their-properties/
(12)https://x.com/YayAreaNews/status/1879581885048996252?ref_src=twsrc
(15)
(18) https://www.newsweek.com/hawaii-insurance-crisis-premiums-nearly-quadruple-1891744
(20) https://ashland.news/did-we-learn-anything-from-the-almeda-fire-plenty/
(21) https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-camp-fire-tictoc-20181118-story.html
(23) https://expose-news.com/2023/08/17/what-the-media-wont-tell-you-about-the-maui-fires/
(24) https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/thanks-government-mauis-lahaina-fire-became-deadly-conflagration
(25) https://www.wsj.com/us-news/climate-environment/hawaii-maui-fire-risks-plans-government-e883f3a3
(26) https://reason.com/2021/04/06/why-isnt-california-safer-from-wildfires/
(27) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/tomorrow-yikes-gavin-newsom-slashed-state-fire-budget/
(28)
(29)
(31) https://x.com/meantweeting1/status/1666586579983384578?ref_src=twsrc
(32) https://revolver.news/2025/01/just-in-arsonists-caught-on-camera-setting-fires-in-santa-monica/
(33) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/brave-la-residents-take-matters-their-own-hands/
(35) https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/study-shows-84-wildfires-caused-humans-180962315/
(37) https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/2023-year-intense-global-wildfire-activity
(38) Ditto
(39) https://rainforestfoundation.org/amazon-on-fire-2024-sees-highest-number-of-fires-in-20-years/
(40) https://www.voronoiapp.com/climate/Fires-Were-Responsible-for-42-of-Global-Forest-Loss-in-2023-2263
(41) https://www.wri.org/insights/global-trends-forest-fires
(42) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc0020
(43) https://www.fastcompany.com/91260347/california-la-wildfires-human-caused-wildfires-hard-to-contain
(44) https://expose-news.com/2023/11/24/hidden-agenda-behind-uk-gov-chemtrail-operations/
(45) https://www.yourdailyjournal.com/opinion/columns/79582/chemtrails-what-are-they-spraying
(47) https://naturalsociety.com/chemtrails-obvious-overhead-pollutant-ignored-denied/
(48) https://kauaisky.blogspot.com/2012/05/barium-num-soil-l
(49)
(50) https://kauaisky.blogspot.com/2012/05/barium-aluminum-soil-level-letter.html
(51) https://www.howtogeek.com/401215/why-does-wi-fi-use-the-same-frequency-as-microwaves/
(52)
(53) https://vk.com/@secretxgovernment-haarp-secret-weapon-used-for-weather-modification-electromag
(54) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1999-0005_EN.html?redirect
(55) https://vk.com/@secretxgovernment-haarp-secret-weapon-used-for-weather-modification-electromag
(56) Ditto
(57) US4686605.pdf
(58) Ditto
(59) https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015RS005883
(62-63) Ditto
(64) https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030085296A1/en
(65) https://www.chemtrailplanet.com/NEXRAD.html
(66) Ditto
(68) https://www.sqimway.com/lte_band.php
(69) https://www.defendershield.com/5g-vs-4g-wireless-network-protect-from-5g-emf-exposure
(71) https://www.wilsonamplifiers.com/blog/att-5g-network-bands-coverage-5g-vs-5g-plans-and-more/
(72) https://www.whistleout.com/CellPhones/Guides/Best-Coverage-in-Hawaii-USA
(73) https://about.att.com/pages/5g-plus.html
(74)
(75)
(76) https://www.howtogeek.com/401215/why-does-wi-fi-use-the-same-frequency-as-microwaves/
(77) Ditto
(78) https://interestingengineering.com/us-militarys-active-denial-system-is-a-95-ghz-heat-ray
(79) https://www.scienceabc.com/innovation/the-active-denial-system-test-what-is-it-what-does-it-do.html
(80)
(81) Ditto
(82) https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/11/the-coming-eco-totalitarianism/?highlight=smart
(84)
(85) https://expose-news.com/2025/01/28/were-in-a-worldwide-lithium-battery-fire-epidemic/
(87) https://smombiegate.org/california-power-shut-offs-pose-fire-risk-due-to-smart-meters/
(88)
(89) https://spectrum.ieee.org/smart-meter-fire-reports
(90) https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/chile-
smart-wildfires-or-dews-offering?utm_source=publication-search
(91) https://aircomfortlab.com/do-window-air-conditioners-pull-air-from-outside/
(92) https://smartacsolutions.com/do-air-conditioners-take-in-air-from-outside/
(93) https://substack.com/home/post/p-154779726 93
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/report-those-who-disobeyed-road-barricade-survived-maui/
(100)
(101) https://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/Maui-Smart-Grid-Executive-Summary.pdf
(102)
(103) https://ita.lacity.gov/sites/g/files/wph1626/files/2021-05/SmartLA2028 - Smart City Strategy.pdf
(104)
(105) https://www.livablecommunitiesinitiative.com/the-lci-plan
(110) Ditto
(111)https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/02/bidens_30_x_30_land_grab.html
(112)
(113)
(114) https://jbs.org/assets/pdf/Agenda21YouBookletMay2012.pdf
(115) https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/GeoengineeringWatch - Vietnam War Forest Fire As A Military Weapon.pdf
(116)
(117)
(118) Ditto
(119)
(120) https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/us-cattle-herd-set-shrink-1951-lows-beef-crisis-deepens
(122) https://dailysceptic.org/2025/01/31/tenth-of-farmland-to-be-axed-for-net-zero/
Figure 1
Figure 2 Ditto
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6 https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/11/16/18096245/paradise-california-wildfire
Figure 7 https://www.photographer-in-seattle.com/phoenix-oregon-wildfire-damage/
Figure 8 https://www.npr.org/2022/05/13/1098547723/fire-crews-new-mexico-wildfire-relentless-wind
Figure 9 https://abcnews.go.com/US/teen-survivor-tubbs-fire-sounds-alarm-mental-health/story?id=103307734
Figure 10
Figure 11 https://justacarguy.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-fires-in-australia-have-destroyed.html
Figure 12
Figure 13 https://substack.com/home/post/p-154720776
Figure 14 Ditto
Figure 15
Figure 17 https://x.com/DanHellie/status/1876863865612329127/photo/1
Figure 18 https://d1l18ops95qbzp.cloudfront.net/wp-content/2023/08/10154107/230810-kf-Maui-Fire-154.jpg
Figure 19
Figure 21 https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/29/article-2165620-13D6DFAB000005DC-573_964x648.jpg
Figure 22 Ditto
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25 Ditto
Figure 26 Ditto
Figure 27 https://time.com/longform/australia-bushfires-photos/?linkId=80196508
Figure 28
Figure 29 Ditto
Figure 30 By Own work by the original uploader - The original uploader was Bcasterline at Wikipedia.Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by Helt., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1658037
Figure 31 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/lytton-byelection-1.6435103
Figure 32 https://ashland.news/did-we-learn-anything-from-the-almeda-fire-plenty/
Figure 33 https://www.photographer-in-seattle.com/phoenix-oregon-wildfire-damage/
Figure 34
Figure 35 Ditto
Figure 36 https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chart-damage-caused-by-global-forest-fires-2001-2023/
Figure 37
Figure 38 Ditto
Figure 40
Figure 41
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/?s=nexrad
Figures 42-44 Ditto
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figures 47-49 Ditto
Figure 50 https://zerogeoengineering.com/2018/weather-modification-operations-nexrad-level-ii-data-products/
Figure 51 https://www.scivision.dev/nexrad-weather-radar-archive-data/
Figure 52 https://bryanpfeiffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/nexrad-550.jpg
Figure 53 https://www.rvmobileinternet.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/all-carriers-5g-coverage-dec-2020.png
Figure 54
Figure 55
Figure 56 https://www.quantumbooks.com/technology/top-10-most-advanced-weapons/
Figure 57
Figures 58-59 Ditto
Figure 60 https://blog.thepipingmart.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/blog-16.png
Figure 61 https://sciencenotes.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Flame-Test-Colors.png
Figure 62 https://maville.com/photosmvi/2023/06/27/P32875061D5834394G.jpg
Figure 65
Figures 66-69 Ditto
Figure 70
Figure 71 Ditto
Figure 72
Figure 73 https://www.mauicounty.gov/1756/Appendix-B---Maui-Island-Plan-Book
Figure 74
Figure 75
Figures 76-77 Ditto