Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. What about Covid? I repeat, Ukraine. And inflation? Ukraine. Fuel rises? Ukraine. The coming food shortages? Ukraine. Would sir care for an hors d'oeuvre? We have some fresh Ukraine this evening. And a medium rare Ukraine for main course, all rounded off with a Ukraine sorbet.
Covid has all gone a bit quiet, hasn't it? Or rather, a desperate attempt to conjure up World War III has taken its place. But there are still matters of import being revealed, even if the cast of technocratic sociopaths wants us to gaze elsewhere. Especially so. A change is as good as a rest and I was getting a bit tired of the 'anti-vaxxer' label, so a swap to 'Putin apologist' is most welcome.
When one is running a scam, one which relies upon inducing panic mode so that critical faculties might be mothballed, it is important to maintain the tempo. Any slackening off and the rubes might realize that they have been had and that might lead to a desire for retribution – which is one thing the elites will never countenance. So, it's time for Plan B, which is to provoke the 'enemy' whilst simultaneously projecting weakness and then milk the resultant conflict for as long as possible, ensuring that domestic friend and foe alike are obliged to spend the bulk of their time commenting on foreign affairs rather than drawing attention to things like Pfizer disclosures. So far, that plan is going rather well, mostly because the legacy media had no intention of covering any news that undermines the narrative that they themselves have been pushing for the past two years and were grateful to be given the opportunity to focus elsewhere.
As things stand, despite Biden's clear intention to keep the Ukrainian pot boiling for as long as possible, it appears that President Puppet Zelensky (one of Blofeld's acolytes at the WEF) may actually have to agree some sort of peace deal, the better to avoid a humiliating capitulation. By the way, any media outlet that tries to persuade you that the Ukrainians are winning when Russia enjoys total air superiority over the battlefield is merely a Western version of Pravda.
Pfizer Disclosure
So what has been going on in Covid World while the media has been trying to find Ukraine on the map? Plenty. The FDA attempted to delay publication of the material supplied to it by Pfizer, which formed the basis of the decision to approve an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA). The court decided that the FDA had no grounds for drip feeding information to the public. The first 10,000 pages came at the beginning of March, which will be followed by another 10,000 in April. The whole process will take 8 months and we can be sure that the most damning documentation will be in the last batch, if we ever get that far. I don't wish to sound defeatist, but the expectation that we will finally uncover the scam and then hold the scammers accountable as a result of a court order (when the system has so far ridden roughshod over every safeguard, both medical and legal, and gotten away with it) is fanciful. The smoking gun either won't be revealed or, more likely, it will be disclosed but the media won't cover it and nobody in power will suffer any consequences. Besides, by the end of September, who knows what will have come to pass in the US.
That said, the first tranche of documents included some pearlers. It appears that animals, which were tested in the same time-frame as early human trials (rather than prior), all suffered side effects at higher doses.(1) Indeed, the entire concept of various dosing schedules (with different amounts of active ingredients) seems to have elicited surprise in some who have analysed the documents, although I'm not sure why. The clinical trial design, which purported to be applicable to Phase III testing, included different doses and end dates that stretched into 2023. Given that there are no known ongoing clinical trials, it is not unreasonable to assume that the grand experiment is taking place on the wider population, instead. This is what I wrote at the beginning of August, last year:
So, where exactly are we now? What phase of trials? And whose definition are we going to go by? The time honored one or a new one, re-imagined by the drug companies? We must still be in trials; the documents lodged by Pfizer, for instance, give a start date of 29th April 2020, a primary completion date of 2nd November 2021 and a study completion date of 2nd May, 2023. They also list at least 18 different treatment protocols, some of them labelled 'boosters'. Bear in mind that this document has been amended several times since, including an amendment to include boosters for the 'South African variant'. If the original clinical trials were, in fact, completed, there has been plenty of opportunity to amend the dates. The NIH issued a press release on 27th July 2020, stating that the Moderna Phase III clinical trials were about to begin.
Some questions naturally present themselves:
Is it the case that we are all Phase III participants, subject to these protocols of different doses, placebos etc without our knowledge? Even those of us who won't have the jab?
Is that why some people suffer adverse events and some don't?
Is there a placebo control group?
Are they tracking everything, doses, injuries, deaths? Surely, they must be if we are still in trials?
Whilst never acknowledged and never notified, we have been experimented on for over a year. There have been different doses, some more lethal than others. There has been almost certainly been a control group, who have probably been injected with saline. And, additionally, there are the 'hesitant' who have sworn off needles for now, because we were too selfish and cynical to believe what the pathological liars in Big Pharma and the captured regulatory bodies were telling us. The disclosures have also revealed that we were potentially at risk from around 1,000 side effects.(2) This data should not be a surprise and the fact that it is tells its own story. There will be a lot more information to come, but please don't expect the system to do anything about the malfeasance that will inevitably be revealed; it won't.
One hand gives, while the other takes
But while we're on the subject of data, let's have a quick gander at the Scots and the good old CDC. Both Public Health Scotland and the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (a title that is an oxymoronic masterpiece) have decided that the public need to be protected from themselves, as regards data.(3)(4) You see, giving the general population data on public health, particularly about Covid, can encourage 'hesitancy' and 'misinformation', so the public bodies that are paid for out of our tax dollars have decided that the work they do (and the data that reflects that work) should be kept from us because...well, because we're not capable of understanding it properly and we're likely to think that the guidance they have given and the 'vaccines' they have foisted upon us either don't work or are actively dangerous. And we can't have that.
This is where we are now; in a place where publicly funded bodies can spout patently ridiculous nonsense with impunity. The truth of the matter is as you would expect. The reason they don't want to publish is because the data will undermine their policies, because their policies don't work, have never worked and will never work. They are simply lying, but they are so arrogant and so accustomed to getting away with it, that they can say whatever they like and the establishment will find it acceptable. As for the rest of us? They don't care. So the CDC is doing its level best to hide even more data – this is on top of the vast amount of information that they have been refusing to divulge for two years. They have stopped mandatory hospital reporting of Covid deaths and they are also hiding data on the effectiveness of the booster shots for ages 18-64.(5)(6)
Ultimately, the result of these shenanigans is simply more confusion and distrust of official sources, but for the likes of us this is not news. The realization may have dawned slowly, but we have become accustomed to ignoring pretty much every piece of data provided by officialdom. The only information worth having now is overall mortality. Any other wisdom comes from trusted sources outside government or via analysis of curated data. Public authorities forfeited their credibility long ago. As yet one more example of how they've done this, I give you the following.
Figure 1
Figure 2
The amazing disappearing flu, largely as a result of a PCR test that can't tell flu from corona; and when I say corona, I don't just mean Covid. I mean any coronavirus. You will need to read between the lines, but this circumstance has been admitted by the CDC themselves, when they gave nearly six months notice of the intention to withdraw the PCR test from use.(7) The result is that you could equally well call the PCR test a flu virus assay and get the same results. These people couldn't lie straight in bed.
Codon optimization
As we continue on our journey through the 'pandemic', some genuinely new information comes to light. I'm not referring to the recently red-pilled, like poor old John Campbell PhD, who has been spouting government approved propaganda on his YouTube channel for two years, only to suddenly discover what was under his nose all along, thus inducing in him a sense of profound disappointment with the authorities. An automatic trust in government is, and has always been, extremely naïve. More on that later. But for now, something called codon optimization:
“Trying to tell your body to generate proteins is hard for many reasons. One of them is the fact that when you try to run the protein information via ribosomes which process that code and generate the protein, it can be very slow or can get stuck during the process.
Luckily, scientists found a way to overcome this problem, by doing code substitution: instead of using the original genetic code to generate the protein,they changed the letters in the code so the code would be optimized. This is known as Codon Optimization.”(8)
I think the use of the word 'luckily' may be ironic because, once again, it transpires that messing about with natural processes has consequences beyond what was intended - if, of course, we hold that any of the downsides of the 'vaccines' are indeed unintended, which I don't. In any event, it turns out that this method of speeding up the production of spike protein engendered by the mRNA 'vaccines' is deeply flawed, and was known to be so prior to the development of the Covid 'vaccines'. This is because the optimization process is prone to producing misfolded proteins and misfolded proteins are known to produce completely unforeseen consequences. When I say unforeseen, what I really mean is that the specific consequence is unforeseen, not the range of possible outcomes. They are largely known and none of them are good; Alzheimers, Parkinsons, heart disease as well as a number of other possible conditions. This was known as long ago as 2011.(9)
Pfizer has admitted that the optimization process results in elevated levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which in turn is an early marker for heart failure. So, why optimize codons? Because unless they do, the 'vaccines' won't produce enough protein to be 'effective'. Can you sense the circular logic? They have to make the jab dangerous or it won't be able to protect against something that's dangerous. A sensible person, or one not in thrall to the potential for easy profits at the expense of millions of people's health, might think that the technology is not up to the job. But this is Big Pharma we are talking about; the most criminally culpable sector of business.
As a side note, it's worth mentioning once again that, if the plan involved producing a 'vaccine' that targeted part of the viral genome, it wouldn't make sense to choose the area that was most susceptible to mutation – the spike protein. Or rather, it would if you wanted to set yourself up for life by hard-wiring in repeat boosters every few months. And you would if the plan also involved the ability to inject a pathogen every time, because that is what the spike protein is. Clotting and hemorrhaging comes about, at least in part, because the body attacks and destroys the cells in the vascular system that are producing the spike protein. It is notable that even articles that are critical of faults in the 'vaccines' tend to view them as design flaws and bemoan the rushed development process. Very few people ever have the cojones necessary to point to the fact that the large number of 'flaws', all of which cause harm, could equally well be present because that was the intent.
DNA Reverse Transcription
Because here we are with yet one more of those hasty mistakes. Remember all the furore over whether the 'vaccines' could alter our DNA and the endless 'fact-checker' articles assuring us that this was yet more anti-vaxxer misinformation? It will surprise you not to learn that, once again, yesterday's conspiracy theory is today's truth. It turns out that, not only does what is termed reverse transcription occur, it does so rather swiftly:
“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure.”(10)
The long term effects on the body are unknown. The effect on the credibility of the likes of the CDC and Reuters is rather easier to quantify.
Patents
In a further development that should, by now, surprise nobody, it has been further confirmed that Moderna has a patent on a unique sequence of genetic material from the virus' spike protein. Not from 2020 or onward; from 2018. The sequence (CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG) is found in Moderna patent 9587003. There are many other Moderna patents connected to the virus, all from well before its sudden, ‘natural’ emergence.
Figure 3
The chances of this appearing randomly through natural evolution is 3 trillion to 1.(11) This report was published on February 21st 2021. On February 24th, the CEO of Moderna gave an interview where he opined that the virus was the result of a lab leak. Go figure.
The sharp eyed among you may have noticed that this patent is concerned with a cancer gene (oncology). This is in addition to HIV fragments that have also been identified within the virus genome.(12) There is a very good chance that this cancer causing sequence has been added on purpose, especially as it appears in the spike protein and, indeed, near the furin cleavage site (the bit that binds to the human cell). There are already far too many coincidences and anomalies, not the least among them being that Moderna was good to go with a 'vaccine' for trials within two days of being asked.(13) Which is completely credible, right?
Effects of vaccines, again
If a person is injected with 'vaccine' A and then infected with disease B, they would not expect an immune response and it would do no good, anyway. But, in the case of Covid 'vaccines', they do get a response and it still does no good, because they are producing antibodies to a disease that they don't have. Additionally, the spike protein is interfering with their ability to even produce antibodies to disease B, particularly in the case of the N antibody which protects against the shell of the virus. A reduced ability (or complete inability) to destroy this shell makes 'vaccinated' people more vulnerable. That's a lot of the problem for the 'vaccinated', right there.
It seems likely (and there is already anecdotal evidence to support the contention) that re-infections will occur frequently; recurring bouts, which may have shorter and shorter interregnums. As an aside, inducing semi-permanent illness in a good proportion of the population would be a pretty good way of increasing dependence on the state, wouldn't it? And as time goes by, the theoretical possibilities become practical realities. Consequently, yet more information on 'vaccine' injuries comes to light and Big Media scrambles to cover some (not all) of the unfolding disaster, presumably in an attempt to mitigate damage.
One of the latest revelations (also as a result of the Pfizer document drop) is that animal experiments demonstrated that the lipid concentration in the ovaries increased exponentially over the first 48 hours. This is in addition to significant concentrations in the spleen, liver and adrenal glands.
Figure 4
We don't know whether there were further increases, as the geniuses at Pfizer didn't check – I mean, why would you? Obviously, a finding such as this lacks a little context, as we don't necessarily know what was expected and what effect these concentrations might have. Suffice to say that the original tall tale from the 'vaccine' manufacturers was that the spike protein stayed near the injection site which, given that it is in the shoulder, is some considerable distance from the ovaries. Add to this the fact that, on the UK Yellow Card system alone, there have been over 40,000 menstrual disorders reported.(14) Plus:
Figure 5
Then we have the recurring theme that is heart problems, particularly (but not exclusively) in men. This signal is a little easier to discern.
Figure 6
Now, you may wish to stick strictly to the letter of scientific probity, ignore the fact that Pfizer has been forced to list myocarditis as an adverse event, blather on about causation and correlation, but nobody is going to listen to you – not now. In the first eight weeks of 2022, the total is already 47% of the entirety of 2021 and we can readily see how that year compared to the decade prior. The condition typically develops after the second dose and affects all age groups, but particularly teenagers and young adults, which is almost certainly due to the strong immune response which is likely to be triggered. It is worth remembering that this is not a mild condition – nor is it merely a passing inconvenience. Myocarditis is dead heart muscle, caused by killer T cells taking out healthy cells which have been forced to produce the spike protein. The survival numbers, after five years, make for grim reading.
Figure 7
“The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic’s observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%. Survival with giant cell myocarditis is substantially lower, with <20% of patients surviving 5 years.”(15)
The lethal effect of the 'vaccines' on the hearts of healthy young men goes a considerable distance in explaining other, otherwise confounding statistics. Such as the fact that deaths among professional footballers in 2021 were four times the average rate recorded between 2009 and 2020.(16) In fact, the number of deaths in December alone equaled the twelve year average.
Figure 8
Obviously, it's not just footballers:
Figure 9
This is only going to get worse. Two doses is worse than one, three doses worse than two. A full dose booster is going to cause havoc, especially in the young. It's worth remembering that we are all pretty much the same machine. Yes, there are differences in immune response, morbidities, medical conditions and so forth. But the 'vaccine' was designed so that it stimulated the same response in all recipients and the only variable would seem to be the dose. Originally, there was a school of thought that believed that if a jabbee made it past the first two weeks, they were home free (apart from whatever may assail them years down the line). But that is not so. Clots can build up over months, recurring illnesses caused by the lack of an operational immune system can deplete resources. There are no guarantees.
Which is not to say that the short term effects are any better:
Figure 10
A little known fact, amongst all the sound and fury of the war, is that nine out of ten alleged deaths from Covid in the UK between weeks 5 and 8, 2022 (almost certainly a composite number, also containing 'vaccine' deaths in large numbers) were 'vaccinated'. That number will almost certainly be higher, due to the inevitable gerrymandering of statistics and the tendency to not count anyone as 'vaccinated' until some time after their second jab. How much longer will the state be able to obfuscate?
Different strokes
Ordinarily, I have focused on the differing ‘pandemic’ responses evinced by our European and Anglospheric cousins, which has usually said more about them than it has about Covid. Lately, even the Austrians and the Australians (two of the most rabid enforcers of 'measures') have come to the realization that they are still nominally democracies and enforcing arbitrary lock-downs and mandates is not necessarily a vote winner. As predicted, most countries have stepped back from the brink, at least for now. That's not to say that indoor mask mandates and curfews are necessarily past tense everywhere and it is certainly true that a wry acceptance of such remnants will still result in a New Normal by default. However, with the notable exception of the federal government in the US, the country that is anomalous is Germany. This may not be a surprise to some and it seems to stem primarily from the character of the Minister of Health, a certain Klaus Lauterbach.
This is a man who would have done well in a previous regime. Instead of letting the Infection Protection Act expire on March 20th, Klaus has got the bit firmly between his teeth:
“German states must have the capacity to react to future early waves. This includes mask mandates and contact restrictions...we must still have the capacity to implement testing requirements...corona will occupy us for a long time...”(17)
You get the gist. It seems that he's not yet ready to relinquish the limelight and it also seems likely that the legislation will go through on the nod, so that no politician can be singly held accountable for a permanent loss of individual rights. True to form, Lauterbach is currently hyperventilating about an Omicron surge, even though his neighbours aren't and Covid is no respecter of borders, especially not Schengen ones.(18) Besides which, it isn't the variant that is hospitalizing people and it never was. The man is of a type that thrives in Germany. Might be worth giving all those glorious Teutonic tourist destinations a miss this summer.
Deltracron
Of course, if it's not Omicron alone that is giving Klaus sleepless nights, I stand corrected. Certainly, a growing number of countries seem reluctant to give up on the Covid wheeze in its entirety and go back to a more limited style of government. There are two current possible candidates for more panic porn production; whatever has been rattling around China since before Christmas, or the imaginatively labelled Deltacron.
Naturally, the WHO is back in the vanguard, ferreting out cases in France, Netherlands and Denmark. Regrettably, symptoms are no worse than those occasioned by Omicron alone, which must have been a disappointment. Nonetheless, according to yet one more study from the US:
“Our study demonstrates the existence of co-infections, the presence of a recombinant population in at least one of these co-infections, and the existence of two infections consisting almost entirely of multiple copies of a recombinant virus. However, the mechanism by which a recombinant virus comes to dominate an infection remains somewhat of a puzzle.”(19)
I'm going to hazard a guess; the reason the mechanism is a mystery is because it doesn't exist. 'Vaccinating' in a 'pandemic' has never been previously attempted, especially with a 'vaccine' that doesn't actually vaccinate, but allows infection and transmission to occur. Jab recipients, despite recent inoculation, are still prone to additional infection with a variant. It doesn't take a huge conjectural leap to imagine a situation where co-infection is present. It would be instructive to know how many of the alleged 'cases' have been 'vaccinated', but I imagine that data is being redacted in case anti-vaxxers spread misinformation.
As for China; who really knows? Apparently China has once again locked down; this time it's a province and a couple of cities, with approximately 51 million people affected. That's the sort of thing that's necessary when you get a grand total of 1,437 cases via the incredibly reliable PCR test.(20) You know, the one that produces over 90% false positives, the one that the US has ditched. That one. This after the scare over hemorrhagic fever prior to the Winter Olympics in February and their well known lies and propaganda from the very outset of the 'pandemic'. It would be unwise to place any stock in Chinese media stories – they're almost as likely to be fictional as the West's.
The Science hasn't changed
Not that you would necessarily know that from the entirely predictable special pleading from the media and the pharmaceutical mafia. Omicron, 'nature's vaccine', has allowed institutions to claim that now is the time to live with Covid. This from the same people who were advocating that the 'unvaccinated' shouldn't be able to leave their homes, because it was too dangerous for the collective.(21) Well, they did and now everything is apparently okay, despite the selfish individualists.
Figure 11
Call me old fashioned, but that doesn't look much like a 'pandemic' that's over – if, of course, we are inclined to give any credence at all to the official figures, which would be spectacularly unwise given the long and storied history of institutional Covid lies. And the measures that were necessary to protect us from the deadly pathogen?
Figure 12
Apparently we can dispense with those too. Any attempt by the authorities to convince you that any of the measures that they imposed upon can be ameliorated because of the science is bunkum, largely because there was never any science behind them in the first place but they really, really, really don't want to admit that, as there might be a reckoning if they do. So, instead of coming clean about the tyranny of lock-downs, the flagrant nonsense of masking, social distancing and asymptomatic spread, they would rather try and lie to you again about recent studies that have added to the sum total of knowledge and altered public health advice.
This will only go so far; I can't see them ever acknowledging that the logic behind the passports was fatally flawed from the outset (what's the point of them if the 'vaccinated' also spread disease). Nor will there ever be a full mea culpe about the 'vaccines' that aren't vaccines. We would also be well advised to focus on the reasons given for the relaxation of mandates. What they won't include is any acceptance that the state didn't have the right to infringe basic rights in the way that they have. It will, instead, be all about how a milder disease removes the necessity of those measures. In this way, they will leave the path open to a re-imposition of emergency measures in the future, at a time of their choosing. Yet another New Normal.
There is also a clear element of psychic distancing by our betters; a tendency to reference real situations in abstract terms and to refer to policies that they have dreamed up and implemented in ways that are both flippant and semi-detached; it's almost as if these missives were created by somebody else or came into being of their own accord and scientific truths that were widely known prior to January 2020 have actually only been recently discovered.
Additionally, the likes of Walensky at the CDC can somehow get away with declaring that she really hoped that the Pfizer data that showed 95% effectiveness was true and that “no one could have known” that the 'vaccine' wouldn't, in fact, prevent transmission.(22) This is a peculiar statement, given that hundreds of thousands of amateur medical sleuths (some with no scientific training whatsoever) did know facts like these, merely because the data that proved them was in the public record in very early 2021. So, whichever way one looks at it, she should be on her way out the door because she is either comically incompetent or because she is an outright liar. But, whilst those conclusions are obvious, nothing will happen; the standard required of medical professionals has plummeted lately.
What's coming
Two things in particular, with the WHO to the fore. In fact, the WHO seem bent on a power grab, which will inevitably be encouraged because anything that reeks of globalism and simultaneously undermines the nation state is obviously good. So, what better opening gambit than an international Pandemic Treaty? This would entitle the WHO to replace the constitutions of sovereign nations with its own version, all in the interests of preventing harm in the event of yet another global pandemic. I'm not making this up; the European Council are on board with it already and a working group is drawing up a draft.(23)
While addressing the WHO Executive Committee on January 24, 2022, Director-General Tedros spelled out his global health plan, including his final priority for his enormous scheme: 'The fifth priority is to urgently strengthen WHO as the leading and directing authority on global health, at the center of the global health architecture.'(24)
The fact that these sorts of statements get made and yet the wider world is almost universally unaware is a constant surprise. In any event, the proposal would allow the WHO to mandate health passports and vaccinations and any country signed up to the treaty would be obliged to comply. You may not see the harm in this – apart from the fact that you would be surrendering the sovereignty of your body to an unelected, supranational entity – but the WHO's definition of a pandemic would include obesity, as an example. This is because, for some bizarre reason, they have designated being fat a disease (in 2013) and also changed the definition of a pandemic, so that it no longer has to be a disease with a serious risk of morbidity.
If such a treaty is ratified globally, we will become two legged lab rats and you can bet your bottom dollar that they are going to try and push it through; quietly, of course. And your complaint (and mine) will be worthless; as we've seen repeatedly, the aim is to produce an authority, no matter how ill formed, that the medical establishment, insurance companies, media companies – you name it – can defer to and which serves their purposes. It doesn't matter if it's bogus, just that it exists.
Also on the way is a veritable feast of mRNA 'vaccines', the better to cripple as many people as possible. Moderna is expanding its vaccine programmes, hoping to have up to 15 treatments ready for clinical trials by 2025.(25) These include a raft of exotic diseases, prominent among them a series of hemorrhagic diseases such as Ebola and Marburg. Now, what’s one of the things that we know about mRNA 'vaccines' so far? That part about not stopping transmission, due to the way that a 'vaccine' injected into the blood stream will inevitably work. How do you fancy trying the Ebola one?
If that's not your cup of tea, never fear. The head of the international criminal organisation known as Pfizer (among the most fined companies in history) is very keen for us to take a fourth injection, because the best thing to do if three injections of the spike protein - that was dominant two years ago but which has been superseded by many variants since then – aren't cutting it, the best solution would be to take another on top.(26) How these people still get uncritical air time should be a mystery, but sadly isn't. He's an expert, you see. So we should listen to him, just like we should listen to computer programmer Bill Gates when he's giving us the benefit of his opinion on vaccines or climate change.
And finally, two more tidbits. Now that the war in Ukraine looks like it may deflate rather more rapidly than Biden and NATO had hoped, the poisonous octogenarian dwarf aka Lord Fauci is being wheeled out again, this time to warn us that we're not out of the woods yet:
“We have to be careful that if we do see a surge…that we are flexible enough to reinstitute the kinds of interventions that could be necessary to stop an additional surge.”(27)
I know. Masks and mandates are so yesterday, but Fauci wants to remind us that they could be in our tomorrows too. All he has to do is give the word and it will be so. And all we need for another 'surge' is a bout of heavy testing; it's that simple and always has been. So, while we may think we've had our fill, our betters are keeping the pot simmering on the back burner.
But the piece of news that you are definitely not going to see plastered across the front page of any rag you care to mention truly takes the biscuit. If we weren't all so exhausted by the constant stream of lies and misinformation, it would be possible to summon some outrage. Antibodies to SARS COV-2 have been found in stored blood from September 2019 – in Europe, months prior to the supposed outbreak in Wuhan.(28)(29) Covid was running wild months before the Holy Grail that was lock-downs (six months, in fact), thus rendering that measure and all the others completely worthless, even for a true believer. Who'd have thunk it?
Citations
(1)
(2) https://pastebin.com/rjRv8jai
(4) https://amac.us/the-cdc-hides-covid-data-but-says-americans-are-the-problem/
(5) https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html
(6) https://nypost.com/2022/02/27/the-cdc-has-a-hidden-agenda-when-it-comes-to-covid-vaccines/
(8)
(9) https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1211-1536
(10) https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
(11) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
(12)
(14) https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/11/pfizer-docs-vaccine-accumulates-ovaries-cancer/
(15) https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532
(16) https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/18/covid-jab-causes-300-percent-increase-football-deaths/
(18) https://www.dw.com/en/covid-digest-germanys-situation-critical-lauterbach-says/a-61094888
(19) https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/growing-number-countries-identify-cases-deltacron-variant
(20) https://abcnews.go.com/International/china-orders-51-million-lockdown-covid-surges/story?id=83431247
(21)
(22) https://brownstone.org/articles/drs-walensky-and-offit-its-all-in-good-fun/
(24) https://www.americaoutloud.com/tedros-introduces-globalist-plan-to-take-over-worlds-health-systems/
(26)
(28) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-020-00716-2
(29) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0300891620974755
Figure 1 https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/
Figure 2 https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/
Figure 3 https://amgreatness.com/2022/03/04/covid-vaccine-bombshells-you-probably-didnt-hear-about/
Figure 4 https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/11/pfizer-docs-vaccine-accumulates-ovaries-cancer/
Figure 5 https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/11/pfizer-docs-vaccine-accumulates-ovaries-cancer/
Figure 8 https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/18/covid-jab-causes-300-percent-increase-football-deaths/
Figure 9
Figure 11
Figure 12 Ditto